Investigation on the Tolerance Level of Wild Barley (Hordeum spontaneum) Populations to Clodinafop Propargyl under Greenhouse Condition

پژوهش های حفاظت گیاهان ایران

Article 5, Volume 28, Issue 4 - Serial Number 29, December 2015, Pages 467-473   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jpp.v28i4.45303

Authors

ahmad hosseini^* ; Mohammad hasan rashed; Ebrahim Kazerooni monfared; K Hajmohammadnia Ghalibaf

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

In order to study the tolerance level of different wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) populations to Clodinafop propargyl (Topic®), a pot dose response experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design with three replications at Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Greenhouse in 2009. Cultivared barley (Hordeum vulgare) and three wild barley populations (Shiraz, Boshroyeh, and Torogh) were studied in this experiment. Also, wild oat (Avena ludoviciana) was included as a susceptible species. Clodinafop propargyl was applied postemergence at 2-3 leaf stage of plant species at different rates. Dry weight of each plant was determined three weeks after herbicide application, and then ED50, ED25, and level of tolerance index were determined for each wild barley population. Results showed that all wild barley populations were highly tolerant to herbicide even at higher doses, while wild oat was completely controlled at lower than recommended dose. ED50, and ED25 doses for wild oat was 16.3 and 5.6 g a.i ha-1, respectively, while no ED50 doses could be estimated for barley species. Based on ED25 doses, common barley showed highest tolerance to the herbicide. Tolerance level of wild barley population calculated based on ED25 of each wild barley relative to wild oat, was 29.2, 29.3, and 43.7 for Shiraz, Boshroyeh, and Torogh, respectively. It seems that all wild barley populations are highly tolerant to this herbicide, and Clodinafop propargyl can not be a solution for wild barley in wheat, while it has high efficacy on wild oat.

Keywords

Cultivated barley; Dose response; Herbicide tolerance; wild barley

References

1- باغستانی م.ع. 1379. بررسی کارآیی چند علف‌کش‌ جدید در مزارع گندم. گزارش نهایی طرح تحقیقاتی بخش تحقیقات علف‌های‌هرز، موسسه تحقیقات آفات و بیماری‌های گیاهی.

2- باغستانی م. ع.، زند ا. و مین‌باشی‌معینی م. 1386. مروری بر تحقیقات انجام شده روی کنترل جوهای وحشی در مزارع گندم کشور. دومین همایش علوم علف‌های هرز ایران. مشهد.

3- حمیدی ر. 1386. آثار افشره‎های برگ و ساقه جو وحشی روی جوانه‎زنی و رشد گیاهچه گندم زمستانه. دومین همایش علوم علف‌های هرز ایران. مشهد

4- زند ا.، باغستانی م.ع.، بیطرفان م. و شیمی. پ. 1386. راهنمای علف‌کش‌های ثبت شده در ایران با رویکرد مدیریت مقاومت علف‌های هرز به علف‌کش‌ها. انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی مشهد.

5- مین‌باشی م. 1383. تهیه نقشه پراکنش علف‌های هرز مزارع گندم آبی کشور. گزارش سالیانه طرح. بخش تحقیقات علف‌های هرز، مؤسسه تحقیقات آفات و بیماری‌های گیاهی.

6- ویسی م. 1382. تهیه نقشه پراکنش علف‌های هرز مزارع گندم آبی استان کرمانشاه. گزارش سالیانه طرح. مرکز تحقیقات کشاورزی کرمانشاه.

7- Ball D.A., Frost S.M., and Bennett L.H. 2007. ACCase-inhibitor herbicide resistance in downy brome (Bromus tectorum) in Oregon. Weed Science, 55: 91-94.

8- Baghestani M.A., Zand E., Mesgaran M.B., Veysi M., PourAzar R., and Mohammadipour M. 2008. Control of weed barley species in winter wheat with sulfosulfuron at different rates and times of application. Weed Biology and Management, 8: 181-190.

9- Harlan J.R. 1992. Crops and man. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.

10- Sensmen S.A. 2007. Herbicide Handbook. (9th ed). Weed Science Society of America, U.S.A.

11- Yu Q., Friesen S., Zhang X., and Powles S.B., 2004. Tolerance to acetolactate synthase and acetyl-coenzyme a carboxylase inhibiting herbicides in Vulpia bromoides is conferred by two co-existing resistance mechanisms. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 78: 21-30.

12- Zand E., Baghestani M.A., Soufizadeh S., Eskandari A., PourAzar R., Veysi M., Mousavi K., and Barjasteh A. 2007. Evaluation of some newly registered herbicides for weed control in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Iran. Crop Protection, 26: 1349-1358.