Evaluation of Cultivated and Wild Tomato Genotypes (Solanum lycopersicum) and (Solanum spp.) for Resistance to Egyptian Broomrape (Orobanche aegyptiaca)

پژوهش های حفاظت گیاهان ایران

Article 14, Volume 28, Issue 4 - Serial Number 29, December 2015, Pages 539-546   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jpp.v28i4.23332

Authors

mansoore kermani^{* 1}; hasan marashi²; Hossein Askari³; Amin Mirshamsi Kakhki

¹Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

²valizadeh

³Shahid Beheshti University

Abstract

Orobanche aegyptiaca, commonly known as Egyptian broomrape, is a holo-parasite that causes high economic damages on tomato production in Iran. Breeding for resistance is the most economic and feasible method to reduce broomrape infestation. 20 tomato cultivars and four wild tomato species were screened for O. aegyptiaca resistance. Tomato yield reduction, dry weight reduction of shoot and root, total number of attached broomrapes, dry weight of broomrapes and tolerance index were widely varied among tomato genotypes. The results showed that LA2530 (Ora mutant) was a very susceptible genotype while it was previously introduced as O. aegyptiaca resistant. According to the reports, the resistance phenotype is controlled by a dominant gene (Ora) and it seems that it is broken by the parasite because the overcoming of monogenic resistances by parasites is more likely than polygenic resistances. High levels of resistance were found in two wild species Solanum chilense TL00798 and S. pimpinellifolium L00134 respectively. The results suggested that wild relative species of tomato are promising diverse genetic resources for developing resistant crops to broomrape.

Keywords

Orobanche aegyptiaca; Tomato genotypes; Screening; Resistance

References

1- Abbes Z., Kharrat M., Delavault P., Simier P., and Chaibi W. 2007. Field evaluation of the resistance of some faba bean (Vicia faba L.) genotypes to the parasitic weed Orobanche foetida Poiret. Crop Protection, 26:1777–1784.

2- Avdeyev Y.I., and Scherbinin B.M. 1977. Tomato resistant to broomrape, Orobanche aegyptiaca. Report of the tomato genetics cooperative, department of vegetative crops, University of California, Davis, Report, 27:7-9.

3- Avdeyev Y.I., Scherbinin B.M., Ivanova L.M., and Avdeyev A.Y. 2003. Studying of tomato resistance to broomrape and breeding varieties for processing. Proceedings of Eighth International ISHS Symposium on the Processing tomato, 613:283-291.

4- Dor E., Alperin B., Wininger S., Ben-Dor B., Somvanshi V.S., Koltai H., Kapulnik Y., and Hershenhorn J. 2009. Characterization of a novel tomato mutant resistant to the weedy parasites Orobanche and Phelipanche spp. Euphytica, 171:371-380.

5- Eizenberg H., Colquhoun J.B., and Mallory-Smith C.A. 2003. Variation in clover response to small broomrape (Orobanche minor). Weed Science, 51:759-763.

6- El-Halmouch Y., Benharrat H., and Thalouarn P. 2006. Effect of root exudates from different tomato genotypes on broomrape (O. aegyptiaca) seed germination and tubercle development. Crop Protection, 25:501-507.

7- El- Maarouf-Bouteau H., Moreau E., Errakhi R., and Salle G. 2008. A diffusible signal from germinating Orobanche ramosa elicits early defense responses in suspension-cultured Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 3:189-193.

8- Fernandez-Aparicio M., Sillero J.C., Perez-De-Luque A., and Rubiales D. 2008. Identification of sources of resistance to crenate broomrape (Orobanche crenata) in Spanish lentil (Lens culinaris) germplasm. Weed Research, 48:85-94.

9- Fernandez-Aparicio M., Sillero J.C., and Rubiales D. 2009. Resistance to broomrape species (Orobanche spp.) in common vetch (Vicia sativa L.). Crop Protection, 28:7–12.

10- Foy C.L., Jacobsohn R., and Jain R. 1987. Evaluation of tomato lines for resistance to glyphosate and/or Orobanche aegyptiaca Pers. In: Weber, H.C., Forstreuter W. (eds), Parasitic flowering plants, Proceeding of the 4th ISPFP. Marburg, Germany, pp 221–230.

11- Foy C.L., Jacobsohn R., and Jain R. 1988. Screening of Lycopersicon spp for glyphosate and/or Orobanche aegyptiaca Pres. resistance. Weed Research, 28:383–391.

12- Gur A., and Zamir D. 2004. Unused natural variation can lift yield barriers in plant breeding. PLOS Biology, 2:1610–1615.

13- Holm L., Pancho J.V., Herberger J.P., and Plucknett D.L. 1979. A geographical atlas of world weeds. Wiley-Interscience. New York. 440 pp.

14- Lozano-Baena M.D., Prats E., Moreno M.T., Rubiales D., and Perez-De-Luque A. 2007. Medicago truncatula as a model host for legumes-parasitic plants interactions: Two phenotypes of resistance for one defensive mechanism. Plant Physiology, 145:437-449.

15- Mariam E.G., and Suwanketnikom R. 2004. Screening of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) varieties for resistance to branched broomrape (Orobanche ramose L.). Kasetsart Journal, 38:434-439.

16- Mighani F., Yazdani M., and Minbashi-Moeinin M. 2009. Study of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) cultivars tolerance to Orobanche aegyptiaca. Applied Enthomology and Phytopathology, 77:93-111.

17- Minbashi-Moeini M. 2007. Orobanche: Botany, Biology, Ecology and Control Methods. Iranian Plant Protection Research Institute Press. 32 p.

18- Parker C., and Riches C.R. 1993. Parasitic Weeds of the World. CAB International,Wallingford, UK. 322 pp.

19- Qasem J.R., and Kasrawi M.A. 1995. Variation of resistance to broomrape (Orobanche ramose) in tomatoes. Euphytica, 81:109-114.

20- Qeshm M.R., and Kafi M. 2009. Industrial Tomato from Cultivation to Harvesting. Mashhad Jahad Daneshgahi Publications. 80 p.

21- Rady A. 2007. Conventional and biotechnological approaches for control of parasitic weeds. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology - Plant, 43:304–317.

22- Rick C., and Chetelat R., 1995. Utilization of related wild species for tomato improvement, First International Symposium on Solanacea for Fresh Market. Acta Horticulturae, 412:21–38.

23- Rispail N., Dita M.A., Gonzalez-Verdejo C., Perez-de-Luque A., Castillejo M.A., Prats E., Roman B., Jorri´n J., and Rubiales D., 2007. Plant resistance to parasitic plants: molecular approaches to an old foe. New Phytologist, 173:703–712.

24- Rubiales D., Alcantara C., and Sillero J.C. 2003. Variation in resistance to Orobanche cranata in species of Cicer. Weed Research, 44:27-32.

25- Rubiales D., Moreno M.T., and Sillero J.C. 2005. Search for resistance to crenate broomrape (Orobanche crenata Forsk.) in pea germplasm. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 52:853–861.

26- Rubiales D., Perez-de-Luque A., Fernandez-Aparico M., Sillero J.C., Roman B., Kharrat M., Khalili S., Joel D.M. and Riches C. 2006. Screening techniques and sources of resistance against parasitic weeds in grain legumes. Euphytica, 147:187-199.

27- Ter Borg S.J., Willemsen A., Khalil S.A., Saber H.A., Verkleij J.A.C., and Pieterse A.H. 1994. Field study of the interaction between Orobanche crenata Forsk. and some lines of Vicia faba. Crop Protection, 13:611–616.