Effect of Organic Fertilizers in Combination with Chemical Fertilizer on Tuber Yield and Some Qualitative Characteristics of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)

بوم شناسی کشاورزی

Article 5, Volume 9, Issue 3 - Serial Number 33, September 2016, Pages 734-748   

Document Type: Scientific - Research

DOI: 10.22067/jag.v9i3.47608

Authors

Rouhollah Amini^* ; Adel Dabbagh Mohammadi Nasab; Shahram Mahdavi

Department of Plant Ecophysiology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz,, Tabriz, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is one of the staple foods for human, with a very high yield. In Iran, the ever-increasing average consumption of potato is over 35 kg while increasing population and high cost of other food sources inevitably leads to need for higher crop production. Generally, humic acid products are available as inexpensive salt solutions such as potassium humate. Humic acid is used to decrease the negative impacts of chemical fertilizers and some other chemicals present in the soil. Impact of humic acid on plant growth has long been established. Ghosh et al. (2004) discussed humic substances as the natural technological products with their miraculous effects on crops and concluded that a scientific and practical program is needed to use this technology in the world, particularly in the developing countries. Therefore, the aim of this study was to study the effects of different fertilizer treatments on yield components, tuber yield and nitrate concentration of potato tuber to identify the best fertilizer treatment for potato production.
Material and Methods
In order to evaluate the effect of organic and chemical fertilizers on yield and some qualitative characteristics of potato, an experiment was conducted based on randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications during 2013 in Ardebil region, Iran. This experiment was conducted based on randomized complete block design with eight treatments and three replications. The fertilizer treatments were including control (without fertilizer), farm manure +50% urea, Pars Humic +50% urea, Bird Hume organic fertilizer, 100% chemical fertilizer (urea), Pars Humic Plus organic fertilizer, Bird Hume + 50% urea and farm manure.Pars Humic Plus organic fertilizer was applied at the rate of 4 kg.ha-1 as mixed with water during 6-8 leaf stage, flowering stage, and tubers expansion stage. Pars Humic Plus organic and biological fertilizer contained 60% humic acid, 15% fulvic acid and NPK of 10:0:10 and all of micronutrients. Bird Hume fertilizer contained 38% humic and fulvic acids, 60% poultry manure and 2% micronutrients and based on its contents it was applied in the basis of 300 kg.ha-1 to soil during plantation. Manure was added and mixed with soil in the basis of 30 ton/ha before planting. 300 kg.ha-1 urea fertilizer was applied to the soil during 6-8 leaf stage, flowering stage, and tuber expansion stage. Final harvest was done during 50% drying of the above ground organs and after removing the above ground parts of the plant (10 days before harvesting). The data subjected to analysis of variance after testing for normality and homogeneity of variance, using MSTATC and SAS. The means were compared using Duncan's multiple range test at p≤0.05.
Results and Discussion
Results indicated that the effect of fertilizer treatment was significant on plant height, lateral stem number, yield components, tuber yield and nitrate concentration of potato. All the fertilizer treatments except the Bird Hume +50% urea increased the tuber diameter in comparison with control treatment. The tuber number per plant in farm manure +50% urea treatment was the highest and had significant difference with control, Bird Hume and Pars Humic Plus treatments. The highest tuber yield was obtained in farm manure +50% urea treatment that was not significantly different from 100% urea treatment. The Pars Humic Plus and Bird Hume treatments had the lowest nitrate concentration in tuber and 100% urea treatment had the highest nitrate concentration.
Conclusion
In general it can be concluded that the integrated application of farm manure +50% urea not only resulted in yield as high as 100% urea treatment, but also reduced nitrate concentration significantly.

Keywords

Bird Hume; Farm Manure; Nitrate Concentration; Pars Humic Plus; Urea

References

Abou-Hussein, S.D., Shoragy, T.E. and Abou-hadid, A.F. 2003. Effect of cattle and chicken manure with or without mineral fertilizers on tuber quality and yield of potato crop. Isha Acta Hortticulturae 60: 95-100.

Afshar, A., Neshat, A., and Afsharmanesh, G.R. 2011. The effect of irrigation regime and manure on water use efficiency and yield of potato in Jiroft. Journal of Water and Resources Conservation 1(1): 63-75. (In Persian with English Summary)

Allahghani, B., Koocheki, A., and Nassiri-Mahallati, M. 2006. Effect of manure fertilizers and planting depth on physiological stages and potato tuber yield. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 4(2): 355-374. (In Persian with English Summary)

Asghari, J., Panahi Kordlaghari, K., and Miri, Z. 2008. Effect of irrigation regimes and fertilizer combinations on yield of two potato cultivars in Fereidon. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources Sciences 46(4): 177-186. (In Persian with English Summary)

Azizi-Aghgale, B.E. 2000. Effect of different sources and levels of fertilizer on quantity and quality of potato yield. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources Sciences 27(3): 13-23. (In Persian with English Summary)

Brussard, L., and Ferrera-Cenato, R. 1997. Soil Ecology in Sustainable Agricultural System. New York: Lewis publishers, USA.

Dabbagh Mohammadi Nassab, A., Amini, R., and Tamari, E. 2015. Evaluation of maize (Zea mays L.) and three cultivars of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) intercropping with application of bio-fertilizers and chemical fertilizers. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Production Science 25(1): 99-113. (In Persian with English Summary)

Daii, M.E., and Sardari, M. 2009. What is the humic acid? Agriculture and Industry. 121:24-30. (In Persian with English Summary)

Emani, E. 1996. The methods of plant analysis. First edition. Technical issue No. 982. Institute of Soil and Water Researches. The Organisation of Agricultural Researches, Education and Extension. (In Persian)

Fernandez, R., Scull, R., Gonzales, J.L., Crespo, M., Sanchez E., and Carballo, C. 1993. Effect of fertilization on yield and quality of Matricaria recutita L. (Chamomile). Aspects of mineral nutrition of the crop. Memorias 11th congreso latinoamericano de la ciencia del suelo. 2ed congresso cubcno de la Ciencia del Suelo. Berlin, Germany p. 891-894.

Fernie, A.R., and Willmitzer, L. 2001. Molecular and biochemical triggers of tuber development. Plant Physiology 127:1459-1465.

Fong, S.S., Seng, L., and Mat, H.B. 2007. Reuse of nitric acid in the oxidative pretreatment step for preparation of Humic acids from low rank coal of Mukah, Sarawak. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society 18 (1): 41-46.

Ghobady, M., Jahanbin, S., Parvizi, K., and Motalebifard, R. 2012. Effect of phosphorus biofertilizers on yield and yield components of potato. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Production Science 21(2): 117-130. (In Persian with English Summary)

Ghosh, P.K., Ramesh, P., Bandyopadhay, K.K., Tripathi, A.K., Hati, K.M., and Misra, A.K. 2004. Comparative effectiveness of cattle manure, poultry manure, phosphocompost and fertilizer-NPK on three cropping systems in vertisoils of semi-arid tropics. I. Crop yields and systems in performance. Bioresource Technology 95: 77-83.

Grewal, H.S., and Kolor, J.S. 1994. On farm studies to evaluate the response of potato to K in relation to farmyard manure. Potato Abstracts 19 (2): 536.

Hassandokht, M.R. 1996. Evaluating the effect of organic and chemical fertilizers on quantitative and qualitative traits of potato. MSc. Thesis. Department of Horticulture. Faculty of Agriculture. University of Tehran. (In Persian with English Summary)

Hassandokht, M.R., Kashi, E.K., Hamedi, M., and Ghaffari, H. 1998. Evaluating the effect of manure and nitrogen on quantitative and qualitative traits of potato. The Proceeding of 5th Congress of Agronomy and Plant Breeding of Iran. Karaj p. 502. (In Persian with English Summary)

Havlin J.L., Beaton J.D., Tisdale S.L., and Nelson W.L. 1999. Soil Fertility and Fertilizers: An Introduction to Nutrient Management. Sixth Ed. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA.

Joern, B.C., and Vitosh, M.L. 1995 .Influence of applied nitrogen on potato. Part I: yield, quality and nitrogen uptake. American Potato Journal 72: 51–63.

Khalghani, J., Rahimzade-Khoi, G., Moghaddam, M., and Rahimian Mashhadi, H.1997. Growth analysis of potato at different levels of nitrogen and plant density. Agricultural Science 7(1): 33-57. (In Persian with English Summary)

Khazai, H.R., and Arshadi, M.J. 2008. Evaluating the effect of N fertilizer management using chlorophyll meter on yield and qualitative characteristics of potato cv. Agria in climate conditions of Mashhad. Journal of Horticultural Sciences (Agricultural Sciences and Industries) 22: 49-63. (In Persian with English Summary)

Kuepper, G. 2000. Manures for organic crop production. ATTRA Fayetteville AR 72702. Available online at: http:// www.attar.org/atrra.job/monuers.Html

Leszczyski, W., and Lisinska G. 1988. Influence of nitrogen fertilization on chemical composition of potato tubers. Food Chemistry 28: 45-52.

Mahmoodabadi, M.R., Ronaghi, A.M., Karimian, N., and Emam, Y. 2008. Greenhouse assessment of organic manure leaching on soil salinity level and seed properties of soybean plant. Environmental Stresses in Agricultural Sciences 1(1): 47-56.

Malakoti, M.J., and Houshmand, S. 1995. How use chemical and organic fertilizers for increasing the potato production in Iran. Technical issue No. 1. Education and Tooling of Manpower for Oil Organization. (In Persian)

Oliveira, C.A.D. 2000. Potato crop growth as affected by nitrogen and plant density. Pesquisa Agropencuaria Brasileira 34: 939-950.

Opena, G.B., and Portner, G.A. 1999. Soil management and supplement irrigation effects on potato: II. Root growth. Agronomy Journal 91: 426-431.

Osaki, M., Sagara, K., and Tanaka, A. 1992. Effect of nitrogen application on growth of various organs of potato plant. Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 63: 46-52.

Prosba, B.U. 1993. The influence of planting date and the level of nitrogen fertilizer application on the accumulation and structure of potato yield. Biuletyn – Instytutu – Ziemniaka 43: 65-73.

Reda, S., Lojkowska, E., and Jastrzebska, Z. 1993. The influence of nitrogen fertilizer application on nitrate content in potato tubers. Biuletyn – Instytutu – Ziemniaka 42: 29-37.

Rezai, E.M., and Soltani, A. 2001. Agronomy of Potato. Jihad Daneshghahi Mashhad Press. Iran. (In Persian)

Roberts, S., Weaver, W.H., and Phelps, J.P. 1982. Effect of rate and time of fertilization on nitrogen and yield of Russet Burbank potatoes under center pivot irrigation. American Potato Journal 59: 77-86.

Sharma, A.K. 2002. A Handbook of Organic Farming. Agrobios, India.

Soleymani, F., Ahmadvand, G., and Safari Sanjani, A.A. 2016. The effect of chemical, biological and organic nutritional treatments on sunflowers yield and yield components under the influence of water deficit stress. Journal of Agroecology 8: 107-119. (In Persian with English Summary)

Tabatabaii, J. 1996. Effect of different levels of urea and its interaction effect with phosphorus and potassium on yield and nitrate accumulation in potato tubers in Ajabshir. MSc. Thesis. Department of Horticulture. Faculty of Agriculture. University of Tarbiat-Modarres, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian with English Summary)

Yarmohammadi, V., Sajedi, N.A., and Mirzakhani, M. 2015. Effect of irrigation intervals, manure and zeolite on agronomical traits and yield of potato variety Agria. New Finding in Agriculture 9(2): 149-158. (In Persian with English Summary)

Zelalem A., Tekalign, T., and Nigussie, D. 2009. Response of potato (Solanum

tuberosum L.) to different rates of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on

vertisols at Debre Berhan, in the central highlands of Ethiopia. African Journal of Plant Science 3: 16-24.