بررسی ارزش غذایی و خصوصیات تخمیر شکمبه‌ای غلاف کهور

پژوهشهای علوم دامی ایران

مقاله 5، دوره 10، شماره 1، تابستان 1397، صفحه 35-46  

نوع مقاله: علمی پژوهشی - تغذیه نشخوارکنندگان

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/ijasr.v10i1.60772

نویسندگان

حسن علی عربی ¹؛ فرشته علی پور²؛ پویا زمانی²؛ داریوش علی پور²؛ مصطفی ملکی²؛ خلیل زابلی ²

¹دانشگاه بوعلی سینای همدان

²بوعلی سینا

چکیده

کهور پوشش گیاهی غالب مناطق بیابانی جنوب ایران می‌باشد. میوه کهور (غلاف) دارای ارزش غذایی زیادی است و می‌توان آنرا به مصرف دام رساند. این آزمایش جهت بررسی ارزش غذایی و خصوصیات تخمیر شکمبه‌ای غلاف کهور در قالب طرح کاملاً تصادفی انجام شد. غلاف کهور از مناطق مختلف استان هرمزگان تهیه شد. سپس، ترکیب شیمیایی، کینتیک تخمیر شکمبه‌ای در زمان‌های مختلف انکوباسیون (به‌روش آزمون تولید گاز) و قابلیت هضم به‌روش دو مرحله‌ای (برون‌تنی) در اجزای مختلف آن در 3 تیمار (غلاف کامل، پوسته غلاف و دانه) و در 3 تکرار تعیین شد. در نهایت، اجزای مختلف پروتئین در غلاف کامل و پوسته غلاف برآورد گردید. نتایج نشان داد پروتئین خام در غلاف کامل، پوسته غلاف و دانه به ترتیب 15/12، 65/10 و 53/36 درصد بود. حجم گاز تولید شده در طول 120 ساعت انکوباسیون و پتانسیل تولید گاز در پوسته غلاف به‌طور معنی‌داری بیشتر از سایر بخش‌ها بود (05/0P

کلیدواژه‌ها

ارزش غذایی؛ آزمون تولید گاز؛ غلاف کهور؛ قابلیت هضم

مراجع

Abdulrazak, S. A., T. Awano, T. Ichinohel, T. Fujiharal, and J. Nyangagas. 2000. Nutritive evaluation of Prosopis juliflora fruits and leaves from Kenya. Chemical composition and in vitro gas production.Animal Science, P. O. Box 536 Njoro Kenya.

2- Alemzadeh, B., H. Fazaeli, A. Kardooni, and S. Noroozy. 2008. Effect of Prosopis juliflora pods in the diet of fattening Arabic lambs. Pajouhesh & Sazandegi: No 75: 181-188. (In Persian)

3- Andrade-Montemayor, H., F. Alegria-Rios, M. Pacheco-Lopez, H. Aguilar- Borjas, F. L. O. Villegas-Diaz, R. Basurto-Gutierrez, H. Jimenez- Severiano, H. R. Vera-Avila. 2009. Effect of dry roasting on composition, digestibility and degradability of fiber fractions of mesquite pods (Prosopis laevigata) as feed supplement in goats. Trop. Subtrop. Agroecosyst., Pp:1–7.

4- Askari F. 2005. The nutritive value of twigs and fruits (Pods with seeds) Prosopis cineraria and Acacia tortilis. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi, 68: 48-55. (In Persian).

5- Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 2000. Official Methods of Analysis, 16th ed. USDA,

6- Barnett, A. G. and R. L. Reid. 1957. Studies on the production of volatile fatty acid production from fresh grass. Journal of Agriculture Science, 48: 315-321.

7- Batista, A. M., A. F. Mustafa, J. J. Mckinnon, and S. Kermasha. 2002. In situ ruminal and intestinal nutrients digestibilities of mesquite (Prosopic juliflora) pods. Animal feed science and technology, 100: 107-112.

8- Belal, S. O., Y. A. Abdullah, and A. Fatima. 2008. The effect of partial replacement of barley grains by Prosopis juliflora pods on growth performance, nutrient intake, digestibility, and carcass characteristics of Awassi lambs fed finishing diets. Animal Feed Science and Technoligy, 146: 42–54.

9- Blummel, M., K. P. Aiple, H. Steingass, and K. Becker. 1999. A note on the stoichiometrical relationship of short chain fatty acid production and gas formation in vitro in feedstuffs of widely different quality. J. AnimalPhysi. And anim Nutri. 81:157-167.

10- Boubaker, A. G. and C. Kayouli. 2005. In vitro gas production and its relationship to in situ disappearance and chemical composition of some Mediterranean browse species. Journal of Feed Science and Technology, 123: 303-311.

11- Chamberlain, A. T., and J. M. Wilkinson. 2000. Feeding the dairy cow. (2nd ed.). United Kingdom: Chalcombe Publications, Lincoln.

12- Deaville, E. R., and D. I. Givens. 2001. Use of the automated gas production technique to determine the fermentation kinetics of carbohydrate fractions in maize silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 93: 205-215.

13- Fox D. G., L. O. Tedeschi, T. P. Tylutki, J. B. Russell, M. E. Van Amburgh, L. E. Chase, A, N. Pell, and T. R. Overton. 2004. The Cornell net carbohydrate and protein system model for evaluating herd nutrition and nutrient excretion. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 112: 29–78.

14- Getachew, G., E. J. Peters, and P. H. Robinson. 2004. In vitro gas production provides effective method for assessing ruminant feeds. Cal. Agriculture, 58: 1-12.

15- Greenberg, N. A., and W. P. Shipe. 1979. Comparison of the abilities of trichloroacetic, picric, sulfosalicylic and tungstic acid to precipitate protein hydro lysates and proteins. Journal of Food Science, 44: 735-737.

16- Habit, M. A., T. D. Conitreras, and R. H. Gonzalez. 1981. Prosopis tamarugo fodde tree for arid zones. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper, No. 25: 110.

17- Kumar, R., and J. P. F. D’Mello. 1995. Anti-nutritional factors in forage legumes. In: D’Mello J. P. F. and C. Devendra(eds). Tropical legumes in animal nutrition. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK, pp.95 –133.

18- Licitra, G., T. M. Hernandez, and P. J. Van soest. 1996. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 57: 347-358.

19- Mahgoub, O., I. T. Kadim, N. E. Forsberg, D. S. Al-Ajmi, N. M. Al-Saqri, A. S. Al-Abri, and K. B. Annamalai. 2005. Evaluation of meskit (Prosopis juliflora) pods as a feed for goats. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 121: 319-327.

20- Makkar, H. P. S. 2005. In vitro gas methods for evaluation of feeds containing phytochemical. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 123/124: 291-302.

21- Makkar, H. P. S. 2010. In vitro screening of feed resources for efficiency of microbial protein synthesis. In: Vercoe, P. E., Makkar, H. P. S., Schlink, A. C. (Eds.), In vitro Screening of Plant Resources for Extra-nutritional Attributes in Ruminants: Nuclear and Related Methodologies. IAEA, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, pp. 107–144.

22- McDonald, P., A. R. Edwards, J. F. D. Greenhalp, and C. A. Morgan. 2002. Animal nutrition. (6th Ed), Prentice Hall, London.

23- McDougall, E. I. 1948. Studies on ruminant saliva.The composition and output of sheep saliva. Biochemistry Journal, 43: 99-109.

24- Menke, K. H., and H. Steingass. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research Development, 28: 7–55.

25- Menke, K. H., L. Raab, A. Salewski, H. Steingass, D. Fritz, and W. Schneider. 1979. The estimation of digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedstuffs from the gas production when they incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. Journal of Agricultural Science, 92: 217- 222.

26- Meyer, D., R. Becker, M. R. gumbmann, H. Neukom, and R. M. Saunders. 1986. Processing composition, nutritional evaluation and utilization of mesquite (prosopis spp.) pods as raw material for the food industry. Journal Agriculture Food Chem., 34: 914-919.

27- Moslemi, N. M. 2010. Study of nutritive value and phenolic compounds of Prosopis cinararia and Prosopis juliflora in different growth stages. The thesis submitted for the degree of M.SC, Department of animal science, Zabol University. (In Persian)

28- Muthana, K. D., and G. D. Arora. 1983. Prosopis juliflora (Swartz) D.C., a fast growing tree to bloom in the desert. Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur, 342 003, India.21 pp.

29- National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th ed. The National Academies Press,

30- Pena-Avelino, L. Y., J. M. Pinos-Rodriguez, B. I. Juarez-Flores, and L. Yañez-Estrada. 2016. Effects of Prosopis laevigata pods on growth performance, ruminal fermentation and blood metabolites in finishing lambs. South African Journal of Animal Science, 46 (4): 360-365.

31- Pereira T. C. J., M. L.A. Pereira, J. V. Moreira, J. A. G. Azevêdo, R. Batista, V. F. Paula, B. S. Oliveira and E. J. Santos. 2017. Effects of alkaloid extracts of mesquite pod on the products of in vitro rumen fermentation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24:4301–4311.

32- Pereira, T. C. J., M. L. A. Pereira, S. C. A. Oliveira, L. S. Argôlo, H. G. O. Silva, P. M. D. Santos, P. J. P. Almeida, and A. B. D. Santos. 2013. Mesquite pod meal in diets for lactating goats. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 42 (2): 102-108.

33- Riveros, F. 1992. The genus Prosopis and its potential to improve livestock production in arid and semi-arid regions. Animal Production and Health Paper, Rom, Pp: 257-276.

34- Santos, E. T., M. L. A. Pereira , C. F. P.G. Silva, L. C. Souza-Neta, R. Geris, D. Martins, A. E. G. Santana, L. C. A. Barbosa , H. G., O. Silva, G. C. Freitas, M. P. Figueiredo, F. F. Oliveira and R. Batista. 2013. Antibacterial activity of the alkaloid-enriched extract from Prosopis juliflora pods and its influence on in vitro ruminal digestion. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 14: 8496-8516.

35- SAS. 2001. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA

36- Sawal, R. K., R. Ratan, and S. B. S. Yadar. 2004. Mesquite (Prosopis juliflora) pods as a feed resource livestick, A review. Asian Aust. Journal Animal Science, 17 (5): 719-725.

37- Schwab, C. G., T. P. Tylutki, R. S. Ordway, C. Sheaffer, and M. D. Stern. 2003. Characterization of Proteins in Feeds. Journal of Dairy Science, 86:88–103.

38- Sniffen, C. J., J. D. O'Connor, P. J. Van Soest, D. G. Fox, and J. B. Russell. 1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability.Journal of Animal Science, 70 (11):3562-3577.

39- Tilley, J. M. A., and R. A. Terry. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal British Grasland Society, 18: 104-111.

40- Van Soest, P. J. 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. 2nd ed, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

41- Vansoest, P. J., J. B. Robertson, and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74: 3588-3590.