Studying Growth Pattern and Body Weight Gain of Isfahan Native Chickens

پژوهشهای علوم دامی ایران

Article 8, Volume 11, Issue 1 - Serial Number 37, March 2019, Pages 97-110   

Document Type: Genetics & breeding

DOI: 10.22067/ijasr.v1397i1.67920

Authors

Samira Abbaszadeh¹; Nasroliah Pirany^{* 2}; Behnam Ahmadipour¹

¹Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran.

²Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrekord University, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction[1] Native chickens are playing an important role in rural economy in most of the developing and underdeveloped countries. One of the sources that provides protein in developing countries, is native chicken. So, they should be taken in to consideration in poultry improvement programs. Mathematical functions called ‘growth functions’ have been used to relate body weight to age or cumulative feed intake. Growth models summarize information needed to understand the biological phenomenon of growth; an important component in livestock production systems. They are used to determine the age-live weight relationship of animals and each its own characteristics and mathematical limitation.
Little is known about the productive performance of native chickens, so the objective of the present study was to characterize growth performance and growth curve of Isfahan native chickens under a confined system.
Materials and Methods The chickens of this study included 230 of Isfahan native chickens which were reared for 12 weeks. The birds were raised under the same condition in the rearing period. Feed and water were provided ad libitum. Temperature and air humidity in the hall were measured and controlled automatically day and night. The average temperature was 25°C (max 32°, min 18°) and air humidity was 60-65%. During raising period, chickens were vaccinated and dewormed following the sanitary program of the region. The lighting program consisted of 24 h from 1 day to 12 weeks of age. At 1-day of age, each chick was weighed and marked with color plastic tags attached on the on the right leg. The chickens were individually weighed weekly until the end of the experiment. Some morphometric traits were measured at weeks 3, 6, 9 and 12. Morphometric traits were included breast width, breast length, thigh diameter, thigh length, shank diameter and shank length. Those measurements were done on day 84 with the help of a field assistant, so the birds each time were held in comfortable position and measurements taken in particular order for above mentioned times for accuracy. The chickens were slaughtered and after determining their sex, divided into economics parts. The carcass traits evaluated included live-weight at 12 weeks of age, carcass weight, carcass yield, and primal cuts (breast, thighs, wings and back and neck) weight. Flexible growth and fixed point of inflection functions were evaluated for their ability to describe the relationship between live-weight and age. For Three non-linear growth functions (Gompertz, Logestic and Richard), were used for this purpose. The accuracy of the used functions was determined by determination coefficient (R2), root mean square error (RMSE) and Akaike’s information criterion (AIC). Statistical analysis of data collected in this study was performed using the SAS statistical program v9.1.
Results and Discussion Based on goodness of fit criteria and statistical analysis, the flexible growth functions fit the data better than the functions with a fixed point of inflection. Richard’s function gave the best fit to the data with r2adj= 0.96 for both sexes.  The results indicated that male broilers had a higher final body weight than the female broilers. Sex had significant influence on live weight from the second week until the last week and no significant influence on live weight of first week. Chicken sex had significant influence on carcass and abdominal fat weight, yields of thighs, breast and wings and no significant influence on carcass yield. Male chickens were found to have higher live body weight, carcass weight, yields of thighs, whereas yields of breast and wings were higher in female chickens. Breast width of males in every week numerically was higher than females, but this difference was statistically significant at weeks of 6 and 9. Length of the breast at weeks 6, 9 and 12 was significantly higher than females. Thigh diameter of males numerically was higher than females but this difference was statistically significant at weeks 6, 9 and 12 only. Length and diameter of the shank in males was significantly higher than females in each week.
Conclusion The male chickens had superior growth performance and higher potential for selection and breeding. Comparison of tree growth functions in terms of goodness of fit criteria revealed that the Richard’s function was the most appropriate function for describing the age-related changes in body weight of native chickens. Special attention should be paid to characterization of the growth pattern of birds under different environmental conditions. The development of growth curves for native chickens may be useful in selecting chickens that have rapid growth at early ages.

Keywords

: Body weight; Carcass Characteristics; Growth function; Native chickens

References

1- Abphanap, H., and I. L. Kosin. 1952. Heritability of body measurements in turkeys. Poultry Science, 31:781-791.

2- Aggrey, S. E. 2009. Logistic nonlinear mixed effects model for estimating growth parameters. Poultry Science, 88: 276-280.

3- Aggrey, S. E., G. A. Ankra-badu, and H. L. Marks. 2003. Effect of long-term divergent selection on growth characteristics in Japanese quail. Poultry Science, 82: 538-542.

4- Akaike, H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19 (6): 716-723.

5- Anthony, N. B., D. A. Emmerson, K. E. Nestor, and Bacon W.L. 1991. Comparison of growth curves of weight selected populations of turkey, quail and chickens. Poultry Science, 70: 13-19.

6- Blyth, J. S. S. 1953. Shank length: segregation in unselected character in inbred lines of fowls. Heredity, 7: 433-434.

7- Dana, N., E. Vander Waaij, and J. Van Arendonk. 2011. Genetic and phenotypic parameter estimates for body weight and egg production in Horro chicken of Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 43: 21-28.

8- Del Castilho, C. C., T. T. Santos, C. A. F Rodrigues and Torres Filho R.A. 2013. Effect of sex and genotype on performance and yield characteristics of free rang broiler chickens. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, 65(5): 1483-1490.

9- Dou, T. C., S. R. Shi, H. J. Sun, and K. H. Wang. 2009. Growth rate, carcass traits and meat quality of slow-growing chicken according to three raising systems. Animal Science Papers and Reports, 27 (4):361-369.

10- Fanatico, A. C., P. B. Pillai, L. C. Cavitt, C. M. Owens, and J. L. Emmaert. 2005. Evaluation of slower-growing broiler genotypes grown with and without outdoor access: meat quality. Poultry Science, 84: 1785-1790.

11- FAO. 2007. The state of the World′s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. FAO Rome. Italy.

12- Fayeye, T. R., J. K. Hagan, and A. R. Obadare. 2013. Morphometric traits and correlation between body weight and body size traits in Isa brown and Ilorin ecotype chickens. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 4 (3): 609-614.

13- Fosta, J. C., X. Rgnon, M. Tixier-Boichard, G. Coquerelle, D. Pone Kamdem, J. D. Ngou Ngoupayou, Y. Manjeli, and A. Bordas. 2010. Phenotypic characterization of local chicken population was under taken in the humid forest zone. Animal Genetic Resources Information, 46: 49-59.

14- Glazener, E. W, and M. A. Jull. 1946. Feed utilization in growing chickens in relation to shank length. Poultry Science, 24: 355-364.

15- Gompertz, B. 1825. On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality and on a new method of determining the value of life contingencies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 115:513-585.

16- Gonzales, E., J. R. Sartori. 2002. Crescimento e metabolism muscular. Pages 279-297 In: Fisiologia Aviaria Aplicada a Frangos de Corte. Macari M., R. L. Furlan, E. Gonzales, eds. Jaboticabal: FUNEP/UNESP.

17- Havenstein, G. B., V. D. Toelle, K. E. Nestor, and W. L. Bacon. 1988. Estimates of genetic parameters in turkeys. II. Body weight and carcass characteristics. Poultry Science, 67: 1388-1399.

18- Kgwatalala, P. M., A. M. Bolowe, K. Thutwa, and J. S. Nsoso. 2013. Carcass traits of the naked-neck, dwarf and normal stains of indigenous Tswana chickens under an intensive management system. Journal of Agriculture and Biology of North, 4(4): 413-418.

19- Knizetova, H., J. Hyanek, B. Knize, and J. Roubicek. 1991. Analysis of growth curves of fowl. I. Chickens. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 32: 1027-1038.

20- Korosi Molnar, A., I. Barta, I. Szalay, B. Podmaniczky, K. Kustos, D. Gerendai, Z. S. Farkas, I. Horvath, and L. Lennert. 2000. Effect of feeding and type of management on the performance and carcass characteristics of Hungarian chicken breeds developed for alternative management. Poultry Science, 67:1708-1716.

21- Marcato, S. M., N. K. Sakomura, D. P. Munari, J. B. K. Fernandes, I. Kawauchi, and M. A. Bonato. 2008. Growth and body nutrient deposition of two broiler commercial genetic lines. Revista Brasileria de ciencia Avicola, 10: 117-123.

22- Masoudi, A., A. Azarfar, and H. Khosravinia. 2016. Comparison of non-linear, spline regression and neural networks models to predict the growth curves of broiler chickens fed different levels of rice hull. Journal of Animal Production, 18(4):877-888. (In Persian).

23- Mirdrikvandi, M., A. Masoudi, A. Azarfar, and A. Kiani. 2015. Comparison of Gompertz and artificial neutral network models of broiler growth received Artichoke extract in their drinking water. Iranian Journal of Animal Science, 46 (1): 9-16. (In Persian).

24- Moazeni, S., M. R. Mohammadabadi, M. Sadeghi, H. Shahrbabak, A. Koshkoieh, F. Bordbar. 2016a. Association between UCP Gene Polymorphisms and Growth, Breeding Value of Growth and Reproductive Traits in Mazandaran Indigenous Chicken. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 6 (1):1-8.

25- Moazeni, S. M., M. R. Mohammadabadi, M. Sadeghi, H. Moradi Shahrbabak, A. K. Esmailizadeh. 2016b. Association of the melanocortin-3 (MC3R) receptor gene with growth and reproductive traits in Mazandaran indigenous chicken. Journal of Livestock Science and Technologies, 4 (2):51-56.

26- Mohammadabadi, M. R., M. Nikbakhti, H. R. Mirzaee, A. A. Shandi, D. A. Saghi, M. N. Romanov, I. G. Moiseyeva. 2010. Genetic variability in three native Iranian chicken populations of the Khorasan province based on microsatellite markers. Russian Journal of Genetics, 46 (4):505-509.

27- Moharrery, A, and M. Mirzaei. 2014. Growth characteristics of commercial broiler and native chickens as predicted by different growth functions. Journal of Animal and Feed Science, 22:82-89.

28- Molenaar, R., I. A. M., Reijrink, R. Meijerhof, and H. Van den Brand. 2007. Relationship between chick length and chick weight at hatch and slaughter weight and breast meat yield in broilers. Page 40 in Biology of Breeding Poultry, Edinburgh, Scotland. UK.

29- Moujahed, A., and Haddad, B. 2013. Performance, livability, carcass yield and meat quality of Tunisian local poultry and fast-growing genotype (Arbor Acres) fed standard diet and raised outdoor access. Journal of Animal Production Advances 3(3):75-85.

30- Nahashon, S. N., S. E. Aggrey, N. A. Adefope, and A. Amenyenu. 2006. Modeling growth characteristics of meat-type guinea fowl. Poultry Science, 85:943-946.

31- Nikkhah, M., M. Motaghitalab, and M. Zavare. 2008. Comparison of hyperbolastic models with classic models for describing broiler chicken growth curves. Iranian Animal Science Journal, 40 (4): 71-78. (In Persian).

32- Osei-Amponsah, R., B. B. Kayang, and A. Naazie. 2011. Age, genotype and sex effects on growth performance of local chickens kept under improved management in Ghana. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 44:29-34.

33- Rezvannejad, E., A. Pakdel, S.R. Miraee Ashtianee, H. Mehrabani Yeganeh, M.M. Yaghoobi. 2011. Estimation of the heterosis effect and comparison of growth curves for body weight trait in crosses between two selected lines in Japanese quail. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research, 3 (2):131-137. (In Persian).

34- Richard, F. J. 1959. A flexible growth function for empirical use. Journal of Experimental Botany, 10: 290-300.

35- Robertson, T. B. 1908. On the normal rate of growth of an individual and its biochemical significance. Archives of Development Genes and Evolution, 25:581-614.

36- Rogers, S. R., G. M. Pesti, and H. L. Marks. 1987. Comparison of three nonlinear regression models for describing broiler growth curves. Growth, 51:229-239.

37- Romanov, M. N., S. Wezyk, K. Cywa-Benko, and N. I. Sakhatsky. 1996. Poultry genetic resources in the countries of eastern Europe history and current state. Poultry Avian Biology Revers, 7: 1-29.

38- Santos, A. L., N. K. Sakomura, and E. R. Freitas. 2005. Comparison of free rang broiler chicken strains raised in confined or semi confined systems. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 7: 85-92.

39- SAS. 2009. SAS/STAT users guide for personal computer. Released, 66.18. SAS Institute, INC. Cary N.C. USA.

40- Sengul, T., and S. kiraz. 2005. Non-linear model parameters of growth curves in large white turkeys. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, 29: 331-337.

41- Sezer, M. and S. Tarhan. 2005. Model parameters of growth curves of three meat-type of lines of Japanese quail. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 50: 22-30.

42- Shahdadnejad, N., M. R. Mohammadabadi, M. Shamsadini. 2016. Typing of clostridium perfringens isolated from broiler chickens using multiplex PCR. Genetics in the 3rd millennium 14 (4).4368-4374.

43- Shariatmadari, F. 2000. Poultry production and the industry in Iran. Journal of World′s Poultry Science, 56: 55-65.

44- Sreten, M., B. B. Snezana, S. Goran, D. Vladan, D. Vladimir, and R. Simeon. 2011. Carcass characteristics of two strains of native broilers (White Naked Neck and Block Svrljig) fattened under a semi- intensive system. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10 (70):15813-15818.

45- Yang, Y., D. M. Mekkil, S. J. Lv., L. Y. Wang, J. H. Yu, and J. Y. Wang. 2006. Analysis of fitting growth models in Jinghai mixed-sex Yellow chicken. Asian Poultry Science, 6: 517-521.

46- Yousefi Zonuz, A., S. Alijani, H. Mohammadi, A. Rafat, and H. Daghigh Kia. 2013. Estimation of genetic parameters for productive and reproductive traits in Esfahan native chickens. Journal of Livestock Science and Technologies, 1 (2):34-38.

47- Zandi, E., M. R. Mohammadabadi, M. Ezzatkhah and A. K. Esmailizadeh. 2014. Typing of Toxigenic Isolates of Clostridium Perfringens by Multiplex PCR in Ostrich. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 4: 509-514.