The Effect of Light Quality and Cultivar on some Physiological and Vegetative Characteristics of Melon (Cucumis melo Gr. Inodorus) Transplant

علوم باغبانی

Article 4, Volume 33, Issue 1, June 2019, Pages 41-51   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jhorts4.v33i1.66168

Authors

Azadeh Rashidi^* ; Seyyed Hossein Nemati; Narges Bozorg

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

Introduction: Transplant production is one of the most important commercial production of melon. Transplanting of seedlings with strong and healthy stems and roots will be successful. Environmental conditions, such as light, affect the proper growth of healthy transplants. The light provides the necessary energy for photosynthesis. Due to the stimulation of the activity of photosynthetic pigments and light receptor pigments, it can be expected that plant performance increase by improving the quality and quantity of light. High pressure sodium and fluorescent lamps are common artificial light sources in greenhouses but because of their high power consumption, heat generation and the light spectrum that the plant does not use, application of LED is taken into consideration. The production of specific spectrum of light and the possibility of spectral composition are advantages of LED lamps. The aim of this experiment was to investigate the effect of light quality and cultivar on some physiological and vegetative characteristics of two melon cultivar seedlings, Ghasri and Khatooni, which are among the most important melon cultivars in Iran.
Materials and Methods: To investigate the effect of light quality and cultivar on vegetative characteristics of melon (Cucumis melo Gr. Inodorus) transplants, a research was conducted from April 4 to May 10, 2016 as split plot experiment in completely randomized design with five replications and the seedlings of Khatoonia and Ghasri cultivars were treated under different light quality include two combinations of blue and red spectrum with ratios of 15%B : 85%R , 30%B : 70%R, fluorescent lamp and HPS lamp. In order to set spectra combinations, LED lamps of Red (R625nm )  and Blue (B476nm)  were used. The 85%R: 15%B ratio was obtained through using of 340 R lamps plus 60 B lamps and the 70%R: 30%B ratio was obtained by the usage of 280 R lamps plus 120 B lamps on separate Plexiglass plate. Closed growth chambers without natural light were used. The size of LED growth chambers were 70×60×60 cm3 and the size of HPS lamp growth chamber was 120×60×60 cm3. The seeds were planted at a depth of 4 cm and were transplanted to growth chamber equipped with the desired light compounds. Light intensity was 65 mmol    and duration of light was 16 hours. Data was collected when transplant had four leaves. Emergence speed index, mean time for emergence of  transplants, fresh and dry weights of foliage and root, root volume, leaf area and thickness, leaf number, height, height to diameter ratio, stem caliper, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, chlorophyll total and carotenoids contents were measured.
Results and Discussion: The result showed that the interaction effect of light quality and cultivar was significant on fresh and dry weights of foliage and root, root volume, leaf area and thickness, height to diameter ratio, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, chlorophyll total and carotenoids contents. The fresh and dry weights of foliage of Ghasri cultivar and fresh weight of root of Khatooni cultivar under 15%B: 85%R ratio, the dry weight and root volume of Ghasri cultivar under, 30%B: 70%R ratio, the chlorophyll a and carotenoids contents of Ghasri cultivar under, 30%B: 70%R ratio, the chlorophyll b and chlorophyll total contents of Khatooni cultivar under, 30%B: 70%R ratio were superior. The results of this study showed that the use of compounds of blue and red lights increased the dry matter and development of roots in studied plants. Proper dry matter and root development are important because they make the plant resistant to environmental stress. However, the effect of light quality was affected by the cultivar. For example, Ghasri cultivar showed the highest fresh and dry weights of foliage under 15%B: 85%R ratio and with the increase of blue light level, these two traits decrease significantly, but this results was not obtained in Khatooni cultivar. The results showed that the light quality affected leaf area and thickness of two cultivars in a different way. In Ghasri cultivar the highest leaf area and thickness were obtained under, 30%B: 70%R ratio. In Khatooni cultivar, under, 30%B: 70%R ratio, the highest leaf area and under fluorescent light, the highest leaf thickness were observed. The effect of blue light on the variation of leaf area among plants has been reported differently. The leaf area plays an important role in photosynthesis in plants and with its increase, photosynthesis and plant growth improved. The result showed that the interaction effect of light quality and cultivar was not significant on emergence speed index, mean time for emergence of transplants, leaf number, stem caliper and height. The highest emergence speed index and mean time for emergence of transplants were obtained under, 30%B: 70%R ratio without significant difference with 15%blue: 85%red ratio. Leaf number was lowest under HPS lamp and there is no significant difference in leaf number among 15%B: 85%R ratio, 30%B: 70%R ratio and fluorescent lamp. The highest stem caliper and lowest height were obtained under, 30%B: 70%R ratio. Interaction of phytochromes and cryptochromes due to different levels of blue and red lights lead to the formation of different concentrations of gibberellins and this affects the height of the plants. In some plants, increasing the amount of blue light leads to a decrease in the secretion of this hormone and as a result, plant heights are reduced. The results showed that the blue light had a positive effect on the increase of stem caliper and increasing transplant diameter has a positive effect on its establishment and development after their transfer  to the main planting site.
 
Conclusions: The result showed that the application of the blue and red spectra compared to fluorescent and HPS lamps improved the quality of transplants growth. Improve or mitigate results and the performance in traits such as fresh and dry weights of foliage and root, root volume, leaf area and thickness, height to diameter ratio, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, chlorophyll total and carotenoids contents depend on  light quality and cultivar.

Keywords

Ghasri; Khatooni; light quality; light spectrum

References

1- Adams S. R., Valdes V. M. and Langton, F. A. 2008. Why does low intensity, long-day lighting promote growth in Petunia, Impatiens, and tomato? Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnolog, 83(5): 609–615.

2- Ahmad M. and Cashmore A. 1997. The blue-light receptor cryptochrome 1 shows functional dependence on phytochrome A or phytochrome B in Arabidopsis thaliana. The plant journal,11(3): 421-427.

3- Ahmad M., Grancher N., Heil M., Black R., Giovani B., Galland P. and Lardemer D. 2002. Action spectrum for cryptochrome-dependent hypocotyl growth inhibition in arabidopsis. Plant Physiology,129(2): 774-785.

4- Blanchard M.G. and Runkle E.S. 2012. Greenhouse energy curtains influence shoot-tip temperature of New Guinea Impatiens. HortScience,47(4): 483-488.

5- Brown C. S. ,Schuerger A. C. and Sager J. C. 1995. Growth and photomorphogenesis of pepper plants under red light-emitting-diodes with supplemental blue or far-red lighting. Journal of American Society for Horticultural Science,120: 808-813.

6- Cope K. R. and Bugbee B. 2013. Spectral effects of three types of white light-emitting diodes on plant growth and development, absolute versus relative amount of blue Light. HortScience, 48(4): 504-509.

7- Dole J. and Wilkins H. F. 2005. Floriculture: principles and species 2nd (2e). Published by Pearson Higher Ed. USA.

8- Fan X., Xu Z., Liu X., Tang C. and Wang L. 2013. Effect of light intensity on the growth and leaf development of young tomato plants grown under a combination of red and blue light. Scientia Horticulturae, 153: 50-55.

9- Folta K.M. and Spalding E.P. 2001. Unexpected roles for cryptochrome 2 and phototropinrevealed by high-resolution analysis of blue light-mediated hypocotyl growth inhibition.Plant Journal, 26: 471-47.

10- Folta K. M., Koss L. L., McMorrow R., Kim H., Kenitz J. D., Wheeler R. and Sager J. 2005. Design and fabrication of adjustable red-green-blue LED light arrays for plant research. BMC Plant Biology, 5: 17-28.

11- Franklin K. A. and Whitelam G.C. 2005. Phytochromes and shade-avoidance responses in plants. Annals of Botany, 96: 169-175.

12- Fukuda N. and Olsen J. E. 2011. Effects of light quality under red and blue light emitting diodes on growth and expression of FBP28 in petunia. Acta Horticulturae, 907: 361–366

13- Fukuda N., Ajima C., Yukawa T., Olsen J. 2016. Antagonistic action of blue and red light on shoot elongation in petunia depends on gibberellin, but the effects on flowering are not generally linked to gibberellin. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 121: 102-111.

14- Gaudreau L., Vezina L. and Gosselin A. 1994. Photoperiod and photosynthetic photon flux influence growth and quality of greenhouse-grown lettuce. HortSicence, 29(11): 1285-1289.

15- Heo J., Lee C., Chakrabarty D. and Paek K. 2002. Growth responses of marigold and salvia bedding plants as affected by monochromic or mixture radiation provided by a Light-Emitting Diode (LED). Plant Growth Regulators, 38:225-230.

16- Hirai T., Amaki W. and Watanabe H.2006. Action of blue or red monochromatic light on stem internodal growth depends on plant species. Acta Horticulture, 711: 345-349,

17- Hopkins W.G. and Huner N. P. A. 2004. Introduction to plant physiology. John Wily and Sons, Inc., New Jersey.

18- Islam M. A., Kuwar G., Clarke J., Blystad D. R., Gislerod H. R., Olsen J.E. and Torre S. 2012. Artificial light from light emitting diodes (LEDs) with a high portion of blue light results in shorter poinsettias compared to high pressure sodium (HPS) lamps. Scientia Horticulturae, 147: 136-143.

19- Jeong S. W., Hogewoning S. H. and Ieperen W.V. 2014. Responses of supplemental blue light on flowering and stem extension growth of cut chrysanthemum. Scientia Horticulturae, 165: 69-74

20- Liu X., Xu Z., Guo S., Chang T., Xu Z., Tezuka T. 2012. Regulation of the growth and photosynthesis of cherry tomato seedlings by different light irradiations of light emitting diodes (LED). African Journal of Biotechnology, 11(22):6169-6177.

21- Marcelis L. F. M., Heuvelink E., Hofman-Eijer B., Bakker J. D. and Xue L. B. 2004. Flower and fruit abortion in sweet pepper in relation to source and sink strength. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55(406): 2261-2268.

22- Masson J., Tremblay N. and Gosselin A. 1991. Nitrogen fertilization and HPS supplementary lighting influence vegetable transplant production. I: Transplant growth. Journal of American Society for Hoeticultural Science. 116(4): 594-598.

23- Moscolo A., Bovalo F., Ginofriddo F. and Nardi F. 1999. Earhworm humic matter produces auxin like effect on Daucus carote cell growth and nitrate metabolism. Soil Biology and biochemistry, 31: 1303-1311.

24- Neff M. M. 2012. Light mediated seed germination: connecting phytochrome B to gibberellic acid. Developmental Cell, 22: 687-688.

25- Nhut D.T., Takamura T., Watanabe H., Okamoto K. and Tanaka M. 2003. Responses of strawberry plantlets cultured in vitro under super bright red and blue light-emitting diodes (LEDs). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 73:43-52.

26- Ohashi-Kaneko K., Takase M., Kon N., Fujiwara K., Kurata K. 2007. Effect of light quality on growth and vegetable quality in leaf lettuce, spinach and komatsuna. Environmental control in Biology, 45 (3): 189-198.

27- Pinho P., Oskari M., Eino T. and Lisa H. 2004. Photobiological aspects of crop plants grown under light emitting diodes. Proc CIE Expert Sym. LED Light Sources. Tokyo, Japan. 7-8 June. pp. 71-74.

28- Randall, W.C. and Lopez, R.G. 2014. Comparison of supplemental lighting from high-pressure sodium lamps and light-emitting diodes during bedding plant seedling production . HortScience, 49(5): 589–595.

29- Rose R., Campbell S. and Landis T. 1990. Target seedling symposium: Proceedings, combined meeting of the Western Forest Nursery Associations, August 13-17, 1990, Roseburg, Oregon. Publisher Fort Collins, Colo.: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, 1990.

30- Sakai T., Kagawa T., Kasahara M., Swartz T. E., Christie J. M., Briggs W. R., Wada M. and Okada K. 2001. Arabidopsis nph1 and npl1: Blue light receptors that mediate both phototropism and chloroplact relocation. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 98 (12): 6969-6974.

31- Senger H. 1982. The effect of blue light on plants and microorganism. Phytochemistry and Photobiology, 35: 911-920.

32- Schuerger A.C., Brown C. S. and Stryjewski E.C. 1997. Anatomical features of pepper plants (Capsicum annuum L) grown under red light-emitting diodes supplemented with blue or far-red light. Annals of Botany, 79:273-282.

33- Shinkle J. R. and Jones R. J. 1988. Inhibition of stem elongation in cucumis seedlings by blue light requires calcium. Plant Physiology, 86:960-966.

34- Sohrabi S., Ghanbari A., Mohassel M. H., Gherekhloo J., Vidal R. A. 2016. Effects of environmental factors on Cucumis melo L. subsp. agrestis var. agrestis (Naudin) Pangalo seed germination and seedling emergence. South African Journal of Botany. 105: 1-8.

35- Stutte G.W. and Edney S. 2009. Photoregulation of bioprotectant content on red Leaf lettuce with light-emitting diodes. HortScience, 44(1):79-82.

36- Terachima I., Hanba Y. T., Tholen D. and Niinemets U. 2011. Leaf functional anatomy in relation to photosynthesis. Plant Physiology. 155: 108-116.

37- Terfa M.T., Solhaug K.A., Gislerod H. R., Olsen J. E. and Torre S. 2013. A high proportion of blue light increases the photosynthesis capacity and leaf formation rate on Rose × hybrida but dose not affect time to flower opening. 2013. Physiologia Plantarum, 148:146-159.

38- Walters K. L. and Currey C. J. 2018. Effects of nutrient solution concentration and daily light integral on growth and nutrient concentration of several basil species in hydroponic production. HortScience. 53(9): 1319-1325.

39- Wheeler R., Mackowiak C. K. and Sager J.C. 1991. Soybean stem growth under high pressure sodium with supplemental blue lighting. Agronomy Journal, 83: 903–906.

40- Wojciechowska R., Kolton A., Grochowska O., Knop E., 2016. Nitrate content in Valerianella locusta L. plants is affected by supplemental LED lighting. Scientia Horticulturae, 211 :179-186.

41- Yorio N. C., Goins G. D., Kagie H. R., Wheeler, R. M. and Sager, J. C. 2001. Improving spinach,radish and lettuce growth under red light-emitting diodes (LEDs) with blue light supplementation. HortScience, 36:380-383.