Tracing Resistance of Weeds to Aryloxyphenoxypropionate (ACCase), Acetolactate Synthase (ALS) and Synthetic Auxcins Herbicides in Shoushtar Wheat Fields

پژوهش های حفاظت گیاهان ایران

Article 8, Volume 31, Issue 2 - Serial Number 36, June 2017, Pages 284-295   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jpp.v0i0.56555

Authors

E. Elahifard^{* 1}; A. Derakhshan²; Heshmatollah Zarinjoub

¹Faculty Member of Agronomy and Plant Breeding Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Khouzestan

²Faculty of Agriculture, Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Khouzestan

Abstract

Introduction: Since the first compilation of herbicide-resistant weeds in 1982, the number of reported herbicide-resistant species has increased significantly. Iudosulfuron-methyl-sodium + mesosulfuron-methyl+ mefenpyr diethyl, sulfosulfuron and tribenuron-methyl, acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibiting herbicides, clodinafoppropargyl, aryloxyphenoxypropionate (ACCase) inhibiting herbicides and 2,4-D+MCPA, synthetic auxcins herbicides are registered in Iran for post emergence control of broadleaf and some grass weeds in wheat (Triticumaestivum L.). In southwest Iran, Khouzestan province, the appearance of wild oat (AvenaludovicianaDurieu), littleseedcanarygrass (Phalaris minor Retz) and wild mustard (SinapisarvensisL.) populations with different degrees of resistance to mentioned herbicides has been reported previously in last decade. A reliable seedling bioassay was developed and tested for the rapid screening for resistance to aryloxyphenoxypropionic (APP) herbicides in some.populationsspecialy grass weed. This paper describes a rapid and reliable seedling test to detect APP-resistant A. ludoviciana,Phalaris minor and Sinapisarvensisbiotypes in order to determine their frequency within a population. This test has also been developed in order to discriminate between APP, ALS and synthetic auxcin -resistant biotypes.
Materials and Methods: Suspected resistant and susceptible seeds of wild oat, littleseedcanarygrass and wild mustard to iodosulfuron-methyl -sodium+ mesosulfuron-methyl+ mefenpyr diethyl, sulfosulfuron and tribenuron-methyl, clodinafoppropargyl and 2,4-D+MCPA were collected from wheat fields, Shoushtar, southwestern of Iran in 2014 – 2015 growing season. The wild oat and littleseedcanarygrass seedspregerminated in petri dishes. Single doses of clodinafop (1.25 and 0.080 mg ai L-1) were used for the R- and S- populations of wild oat and littleseedcanarygrass, respectively. These experiments were carried out by placing 5 pre-germinated seeds in a 7-cm-diam petri dish containing one piece of filter paper and 5 ml of distilled water or solutions having concentration of clodinafop. The petri dishes were placed in the germinator. The coleoptiles length of seedlings was measured 7 days after treatment (DAT). The pregerminated seeds of wild mustard were sown in pots and irrigated regularly to avoid any moisture stress. Ten days after planting (DAP), they were thinned to two seedlings per pot. Twenty days after weed emergence, seedlings of the pots were subjected to iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium + mesosulfuron-methyl+ mefenpyr diethyl (18 g ai ha-1), sulfosulfuron (19.95 g ai ha-1) and tribenuron-methyl (15 g ai ha-1) and 2,4-D+MCPA (200 g ai ha-1) application. The sprayer was calibrated to deliver 338 L ha-1 at pressure of 2 atm. The aboveground biomass was harvested 28 days after treatment (DAT) and weighed. Then, distribution map of resistant and susceptible populations in fields was drawn using GIS 9.3 software.
Results and Discussion: The results showed that eleven, eight, two and one wild mustard populations were confirmed resistant (RRR), probably resistant (RR), possibly resistant (R?) and susceptible (S) to sulfosulfuron based on “R” ratings system. In addition, three, twelve, three and four wild mustard populations were confirmed resistant, probably resistant, possibly resistant and susceptible to iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium + mesosulfuron-methyl+ mefenpyr diethyl. For tribenuron-methyl, seven, twele and three populations were confirmed resistant, probably resistant, possibly resistant and other populations were susceptible. Meanwhile, whole populations were susceptible to 2,4-D+ MCPA. Seven days after clodinafop treatment, a clear difference in symptoms was observed between the R- and S- populations. Clodinafop affected the cleoptile length of S- and R-populations of wild oat and littleseedcanarygrass differentially. As, thirty three, fifteen and one wild oat populations were confirmed resistant, probably resistant, possibly resistant and other populations were susceptible. Finally, eight, five and three littleseedcanarygrass populations were confirmed resistant, probably resistant, possibly resistant and other populations were susceptible. Distibution map of populations showed that confirmed, probably, possibly resistant populations were dispersed as uniformaly in the region. As shown in the map, distribution of populations was in the center of region.
Conclusions: The results obviously demonstrated that R- and S-populations could be discriminated by the pregerminated seed, whole plant assays. It could be concluded that 2,4-D+MCPA, iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium + mesosulfuron-methyl+ mefenpyr diethyl were more potent than other AlS herbicide group for wild mustard control. Moreover, awareness of distribution map of resistant and susceptible populations could help for better management and prevention the further spread of the populations. We believe that more populations must be studied to determine exact distribution of resistant and susceptible populations in southwest Iran. Finally, extensionists based on distibution maps of resistant populations could recommend herbicides that prevent or delay herbicide resistance development.

Keywords

Discriminating and recommended dose; Global positioning system; Screening

References

1- Aghajani Z., Zand E., Baghestani M.A. and Mirhadi M.J. 2009. Resistance of wild oat (Avena ludoviciana Durieu) populations to iodosulfuron + mesosulfuron herbicide. Iranian Journal of Weed Science, 6(1):79-93. (In Persian with English abstract)

2- Beckie H.J. 2007. Beneficial management practices to combat herbicide-resistant grass weeds in the Northern Great Plains. Weed Technology, 21(2): 290-299.

3- Bena Kashani F., Zand E., Mohammad Alizadeh H. and Fereidoonpoor M. 2006. Investigation on herbicide resistance of wild oat (Avena ludoviciana) biotypes in Fars. p. 490–494. Proceeding of the 1th Iranain Weed Science Congress, 25-26 Jan. 2006. Plant Pest and Disease Research, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian with English abstract)

4- Derakhshan A., Najari Kalantari N., Gherekhloo J. and Kamkar B. 2015. Wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis) and annual bastardcabbage (Rapistrum rugosum) resistance to tribenuron-methyl in Agh Ghala. Journal of Plant Protection, 29(2):199-205. (In Persian with English abstract)

5- Derakhshan A. and Gherekhloo J. 2012. Tribenuron-methyl resistant turnipweed (Rapistrum rugosum) from Iran. p.72. Proceeding of the 6th International Weed Science Congress. 17-22 Jun. 2012. Hangzhou, China.

6- Elahifard E., Rashed Mohassel M.H., Zand E., and Nassiri Mahallati M. 2008. The investigation of the resistance against fenoxaprop – P – ethyl herbicide in little seed canarygrass (Phalaris minor). Agriculture and Natural Resources Science of Gorgan, 14(6): 53-61. (In Persian with English abstract)

7- Forouzesh A., Zand E., Soufizadeh S. and Samadi Foroushani S. 2015. Classification of herbicides according to chemical family for weed resistance management strategies- An update. Weed Research, 55(4):334-358.

8- Gherekhloo J., Oveisi M., Zand E. and De Prado R. 2015. A review of herbicide resistance in Iran. Weed Science, 64(4):551-561.

9- Gherekhloo J. and Derakhshan A. 2012. Investigating cross resistance of resistant-Phalaris minor to ACCase herbicides. Weed Research Journal, 4(1):15-25. (In Persian with English abstract)

10- Gherekhloo J., Rashed Mohassel M.H., Nassiri Mahallati M., Zand E., Ghanbari A., Osuna M.D. and De Prado R. 2011. Confirmed resistance to aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicides in Phalaris minor populations in Iran. Weed Biology and Management, 11 (1): 29-37.

11- Gherekhloo J. 2008. Tracing resistant Phalaris minor populations and studying their resistance mechanisms to aryloxyphenoxy propionate herbicides in Fars and Golestan wheat fields. PhD Thesis. Ferdwosi University of Mashhad.

12- Gherekhloo J., Reshed Mohassel M.H., Nassiri Mahallati M., Zand E., Ghanbari A. and De Prado R. 2008. Greenhouse assay for detecting littleseed canarygrass to aryloxyphenoxypropionate. Field Crop Research, 6(2):353-361. (in Persian with English abstract)

13-Heap I.M. 2016. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. Available at http://www.weedscience.org/summary/MOASummary.asp. (visited 24 December 2016).

14- Hull R. and Moss S.R. 1999. The Rothamsted rapid resistance test for detecting herbicide-resistance in black-grass, wild-oats and Italian rye-grass. Available at http://www.rothamsted.ac.uk/black-grass-and-herbicide-resistance/rothamsted-rapid-resistance-test-detecting-herbicide-resistance. (visited 26 December 2016).

15- Lotfifar O., Allahdadi I., Zand E., Akbari G.A. 2013. Investigating resistance of wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis) populations to acetolactate synthase inhibiting herbicides in wheat fields of Khoozestan, Gorgan and Kermanshah provinces. Iranian Journal of Weed Science, 9(2):141-157. (in Persian with English abstract)

16- Mallory-Smith C.A., Thill D.C. and Dial M.J. 1990. Identification of sulfonylurea herbicide-resistant prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola).Weed Technology, 4 (1):163–168.

17-Moss S.R., Perryman S.A.M. and Tatnell L.V. 2007. Managing Herbicide –resistance blackgrass (Alopecurus myosuroides) theory and practice. Weed Technology, 21(2):300-309.

18-Primiani M., Cotterman M.J.C. and Saari L.L. 1990. Resistance of kochia (Kochia scoparia) to sulfonylurea and imidazolinone herbicides. Weed Technology, 4(1):169–172.

19- Rastgoo M. 2007. Detecting of Avena ludoviciana resistant to aryloxyphenoxy propionate herbicides in wheat fields of Khuzestan province. PhD Thesis. Ferdwosi University of Mashhad.

20- Rastgoo M., Rashed Mohassel M.H., Kavoosi H., Mirshamsi Kakhki A. and Zand E. 2012. Molecular investigation of resistance to aryloxyphenoxy propionate in wild oat (Avena ludoviciana Durieu) populations of Khuzestan wheat fields. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 10(2):270-276. (In Persian with English abstract)

21- Ritz C. and Streibig J.C. 2005. Bioassay analysis using R. Journal of Statistical Software, 12 (5): 1-22.

Tharayil – Santhakumar N. 2003. Mechanism of Herbicide Resistance on Weeds. Plant and Soil Science University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA. http:// www.weedresearch. com /paper/Mechanism %20 of %20 Herbicide %20 resistance. PDF. Visited: 2012/09/22.

22- Topuz M., Nemli Y., Fatima T., and Mattoo A.K. 2015. Seed dormancy is modulated in recently evolved chlorsulfuron-resistant Turkish biotypes of wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis). Frontiers in Chemistry, 3:46.

23- Zand E., Baghestani M.A., Nezam Abadi N. and Shimi P. 2011. Herbicides and important Weeds of Iran. Markaze Nashre daneshgahi Press, Tehran.

24- Zand E., Baghestani M.A., Bena Kashani F. and Dastaran F. 2010. Investigating efficiency of some herbicides in control of resistant and susceptible wild oat (Avena ludoviciana Durieu) biotypes to acetyl -CoA carboxylase. Journal of Plant Protection, 24(3):242-251. (in Persian with English abstract)

25- Zand E., Bena Kashani F., Soufizadeh S., Ebrahimi M., Minbashi, M., Dastaran F., Poorbayge M., Jamali M., Maknali, A., Younesabadi, M., Diehimfard R., Forouzesh, S. 2009. Study on the resistance of problematic grass weed species to clodinafop propargyl in wheat in Iran. Environmental Sciences, 6(4):145-160.

26- Wrzesinska B., Kierzek R. and Obrepalska-steplowska A. 2016. Evaluation of six commonly used reference genes for gene expression studies in herbicide resistant Avena fatua biotypes. Weed Research, 56(1):1-9.