Evaluation of Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Maize and Cotton Intercropping under Different Nitrogen Levels

پژوهشهای زراعی ایران

Article 1, Volume 13, Issue 1 - Serial Number 34, April 2015, Pages 1-13   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/gsc.v13i1.48310

Authors

A Koocheki^{* 1}; M Nasiri mahalati¹; R Moradi²; Y Alizade

¹Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

²Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman

Abstract

In order to evaluate the yield and nitrogen use efficiency of corn and cotton intercropping under different levels of nitrogen, an experiment was conducted as a factorial arrangement based on completely randomized block design with three replications. The experimental treatments were nitrogen fertilizers in four levels (0, 50, 100 and 150 kg ha-1) and planting pattern in three levels (maize sole cropping, cotton sole cropping and maize/cotton intercropping). Results showed that fertilizer levels and cropping patterns had significant effect on economical and biological yield, nitrogen uptake and nitrogen use efficiency indices in maize and cotton. During growth season nitrogen concentration decreased in maize and cotton. Nitrogen uptake and concentration and biomass were enhanced with increased levels of nitrogen in both plants. The highest economical and biological yield of maize and cotton were observed on highest fertilizer level and sole cropping. The LER was up to 1 in all nitrogen levels and with a positive effect of intercropping on plant yield was observed. Agronomic nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen uptake efficiency were significantly reduced with increased nitrogen levels on both plants. Nitrogen efficiency was also higher in maize compared with cotton in all of the treatments. LER evaluation for all nitrogen efficiencies showed that nitrogen use and uptake were more efficient in intercropping compared with sole cropping. Nitrogen competitive ratio showed that nitrogen uptake ratio was higher with 0, 50 and 100 Kg nitrogen ha-1 for maize, while it was higher for cotton with 150 kg ha-1 level.

Keywords

cropping pattern; LER; NUE; Nitrogen competitive ratio; Uptake

References

1- سازمان جهاد کشاورزی ایران. آمارنامه تولید محصولات زراعی. www.maj.ir/portal/Home/Default.aspx.

2- عامری، ع. ا.، م. نصیری محلاتی و پ. رضوانی مقدم. 1386. اثر مقادیر مختلف نیتروژن و تراکم بر کارایی مصرف نیتروژن، عملکرد گل و مواد موثره همیشه بهار (Calendula officinalis L.). مجله پژوهشهای زراعی ایران. 5: 325-315.

3- کاظم پور، س. و م. تاجبخش. 1381. اثر برخی مواد ضد تعرق بر خصوصیات رویشی، عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد ذرت تحت آبیاری محدود. مجله علوم کشاورزی ایران. 33: 211-205.

4- مجیدیان، م.، ا. قلاوند، ع. ا. کامکار حقیقی و ن. کریمیان. 1387. اثر تنش خشکی، کود شیمیایی نیتروژن و کود آلی بر قرائت کلروفیل متر، عملکرد دانه و اجزای عملکرد ذرت دانه ای. مجله علوم زراعی ایران. 3- 330-302.

5- نصیری محلاتی، م. و ع. ر. کوچکی. 1388. پهنه بندی اگرواکولوژیکی گندم در استان خراسان: برآورد پتانسیل و خلاء عملکرد. پژوهش های زراعی ایران. 7: 710-695.

6- Alfred, E. H., M. Johnston, J. N. O’Sullivanc, and S. Polomad. 2000. Nitrogen use efficiency of taro and sweet potato in the humid lowlands of Papua New Guinea. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 79: 271– 280.

7- Benites, J. R., R. E. McCollum, and C. C. Naderman, 1993. Production efficiency of intercrops relative to sequentially planted sole crops in a humid tropical environment, Field Crops Research, 31: 1-18.

8- Boswell, F. C., J. J. Meisinger, and W. L. Case. 1985. Production, marketing and use of nitrogen fertilizers. In Fertilizer Technology and Use. European Journal of Agronomy. 25: 229-292.

9- Casper, B. B. and R. B. Jackson. 1997. Plant competition underground. Annual Review of Ecological Systems. 28: 561-573.

10- Cassman, K. G., A. Dobermann., D. T. Walters and H. Yang. 2003. Meeting cereal demand while protecting natural resources and improving environmental quality. Annual Review of Environmental Resources. 28: 315–358.

11- Chikowo, R., P. Mapfumob, P. Nyamugafata, and K. E. Giller. 2004. Maize productivity and mineral N dynamics following different soil fertility management practices on a depleted sandy soil in Zimbabwe. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 102: 119–131.

12- Connolly, J., H.C., Goma, and K. Rahim. 2001. The information content of indicators in intercropping research. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 87: 191–207.

13- Coque, M. and A. Gallais. 2007. Genetic variation among European maize varieties for nitrogen use efficiency under low and high nitrogen fertilization. Maydica. 52: 383–397.

14- Gallais, A., M. Coque, I. Quillere, J. L. Prioul, and B. Hirel. 2006. Modelling post-silking N-fluxes in maize using 15N-labeling-field experiments. New Phytology. 172: 696-607.

15- Guarda, G., S. Padovan and G. Delogu. 2004. Grain yield, nitrogen use efficiency and baking quality of old and modern Italian bred-wheat cultivars grown at different nitrogen levels. European Journal of Agronomy. 21: 181-192.

16- Hirel, B., A. Martin, T. Terce-Laforque, M. B. Gonzalez-Moro, and J. M. Estavillo. 2005. Physiology of maize I: a comprehensive and integrated view of nitrogen metabolism in a C4 plant. Physiology of Plant. 124: 167–177.

17- Jahansooz, M. R., I. A. M. Yunusa, D. R. Coventry, A. R. Palmer, and D. Eamus. 2007. Radiation- and water-use associated with growth and yields of wheat and chickpea in sole and mixed crops. European Journal of Agronomy. 26: 275–282.

18- Kumbhar, A. M., U. A. Buriro, S. Junejo, F. C. Oad, G. H. Jamro, B. A. Kumbhar, and S. A. Kumbhar. 2008. Impact of different nitrogen levels on cotton growth, yield and N-uptake planted in legume rotation. Pak. J. Bot. 40: 767-778.

19- Li, L., J. H. Sun, F. S. Zhang, X. L. Li, S. C. Yang, and Z. Rengel. 2001. Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping I. Yield advantage and interspecific interactions on nutrients. Field Crops Research. 71: 123–137.

20- Ma, B. L., L. M. Dwyer, and E. G. Gregorich. 1999. Soil nitrogen amendment effects on nitrogen uptake and grain yield of maize. Agronomy Journal. 91: 650–656.

21- Moll, R. H., E. J. Kamprath, and W. A. Jackson. 1982. Analysis and interpretation of factors which contribute to efficiency of nitrogen utilization. Agronomy Journal. 74: 562–564.

22- Nelson, D. W. and L. E. Somers. 1973. Determination of total nitrogen in plant material. Agron. J. 65: 109–112.

23- Oswald, A., J. K. Ransom, J. Kroschel, and J. Sauerborn. 2002. Intercropping controls Striga in maize based farming systems. Crop Protection. 21: 367-374.

24- Pandey, R. K., J. W. Maranville, and A. Admou. 2000. Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effects on maize in a Sahelian environment. I. Grain yield and yield components. Agricultural Water Management. 46: 1–13.

25- Peng, Y., J. Niu, Z. Peng, F. Zhang, and C. Li. 2010. Shoot growth potential drives N uptake in maize plants and correlates with root growth in the soil. Field Crops Research. 115: 85–93.

26- Plenet, D. and G. Lemaire. 2000. Relationships between dynamics of nitrogen uptake and dry matter accumulation in maize crops. Determination of critical N con- centration. Plant Soil. 216: 65–82.

27- Presterl, T., G. Seitz, M. Landbeck, E. M. Thiemt, W. Schmidt and H. H. Geiger. 2003. Improving nitrogen-use efficiency in european maize: estimation of quantitative genetic parameters. Crop Science. 43: 1259–1265.

28- Rameshwar, S. C. M. 2001. Crop yields and soil fertility under different combinations of fertilizers and FYM in maize-wheat sequence under rainfed conditions. Journal of Hill Research: 14: 26-31.

29- Raun, W. R. and G. V. Johnson. 1999. Improving nitrogen use efficiency for cereal production. Agronomy Journal. 91: 357-363.

30- Rochester, I. J., M. B. Peoples, G. A. Constable. 2001. Estimation of the N fertiliser requirement of cotton grown after legume crops. Field Crops Research. 70: 43-53.

31- Sage, R. F. and R. W. Pearcy. 1987. The Nitrogen Use Efficiency of C3 and C4 Plants II. Leaf Nitrogen Effects on the Gas Exchange Characteristics of Chenopodium album (L.) and Amaranthus retroflexus (L.). Plant Physiol. 85: 355-359.

32- Shafi, M., J. Bakht, M. T. Jan, and Z. Shah. 2007. Soil C and N dynamics and maize (Zea may L.) yield as affected by cropping systems and residue management in North-western Pakistan. Soil & Tillage Research. 94: 520–529.

33- Sinclair, T. R. 1995. Effect of nitrogen supply on maize yield. I. Modeling physiological responses. Agronomy Journal. 87: 632–641.

34- Singh, U., J. K. Ladha, E. G. Castillo, G. Punzalan, A. Tirol-Padre, and M. Duqueza. 1998. Genotypic variation in nitrogen use efficiency in medium- and long-duration rice. Field Crops Research. 58:35–53.

35- Smiciklas, K. D. and F. E. Below. 1990. Influence of heterotic pattern on nitrogen use and yield of maize. Maydica. 35: 209–213.

36- Tsubo, M., S. Walker, and E. Mukhala. 2001. Comparisons of radiation use efficiency of mono-/inter-cropping systems with different row orientations. Field Crops Research. 71: 17–29.

37- Uribelarrea, M., S. P. Moose, and F. E. Below. 2007. Divergent selection for grain protein affects nitrogen use in maize hybrids. Field Crops Research. 100: 82–90.

38- Wahua, T. A. T., O. Babaloia, and M. E. Akenova. 1981. Intercropping morphologically different type of maize with cowpea: LER and growth attributes of associated cowpea. Explants Agriculture. 17: 407-413.

39- Willey, R. W. and M. R. Rao. 1980 A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Explants Agriculture. 16: 117–125.

40- Yildirim, E. and I. Guvenc. 2005. Intercropping based on cauliflower: more productive, profitable and highly sustainable. European Journal of Agronomy. 22: 11–18.

41- Ying, J., S. Peng, G. Yang, N. Zhou, R. M. Visperas, and K. G. Cassman. 1998. Comparison of high-yield rice in tropical and subtropical environments: II. Nitrogen accumulation and utilization efficiency. Field Crops Research. 57:85–93.