Evaluation of Yield and Yield Components of Two Wheat Cultivars in Different Row Cropping Patterns

پژوهشهای زراعی ایران

Article 3, Volume 13, Issue 2 - Serial Number 38, July 2015, Pages 232-238   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/gsc.v13i2.49669

Authors

P Rezvani Moghaddam^* ; H Karimpour; S. M Seyedi

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

Increasing biodiversity in wheat producing systems is a key element for improving sustainable wheat production. In order to find out the best combination of two common used wheat varieties, an experiment was conducted at Research Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran, in 2009-2010 and 2010-2011. The two wheat varieties (Falat and Orom) were sown based on a Randomized Completed Block Design with 12 treatments and three replicates. The treatments included in different row cropping patterns of Falat and Orom (100-0, 75-25, 50-50, 25-75, 0-100, 25-175, 175-25, 50-50, 150-50, 75-125, 125-75 and 100-100). Results of first year experiment showed that the highest grain and biological yield were obtained in sole cropping systems, although there were no significant differences between other cropping systems. The highest grain yield (3136 kg ha-1) was obtained in cropping with the ratio of 75:25 Falat vs. Orom treatment which was 29 and 12.5 percentages more than their sole cropping. Our results revealed that row cropping of different wheat varieties can produce promised grain yield in two years.

Keywords

Flat variety; Sole cropping; Variety diversity; yield

References

1- آمارنامه کشاورزی. 1390. جلد اول محصولات زراعی. وزارت جهاد کشاورزی، معاونت برنامه ریزی و اقتصادی، مرکز فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات.

2- ارزانی، ا. 1383. اصلاح گیاهان زراعی. انتشارات دانشگاه صنعتی اصفهان. اصفهان. 627 صفحه.

3- جوانشیر، ع.، ع. دباغ محمدی نصب، آ. حمیدی و م. قلی پور. 1379. اکولوژی کشت مخلوط (ترجمه). انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی مشهد. 222 صفحه.

4- زارع فیض آبادی، ا. و ا. امام وردیان. 1391. ارزیابی تأثیرکشت مخلوط ارقام برخصوصیات زراعی و عملکرد گندم (Triticum aestivum L.). بوم شناسی کشاورزی 4: 150-144.

5- سید شریفی ر.، ع. جوانشیر، ج. اصغری، ر. سید شریفی و د. حسن پناه. 1385. بررسی اثر تراکم و نسبت‌های مختلف کاشت بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد کشت مخلوط دو رقم گندم. علوم کشاورزی، مجله علوم کشاورزی 12: 107- 97.

6- کوچکی ع.، م. نصیری محلاتی، م. جهان بین. و ا. زارع فیض آبادی. 1383. تنوع واریته های گیاهان زراعی در ایران. بیابان 9 (1): 67-49.

7- کوچکی ع.، م. نصیری محلاتی، ا. زارع فیض آبادی و م. جهان بین. 1383. ارزیابی تنوع نظام‌های زراعی ایران. پژوهش و سازندگی در زراعت و باغبانی 63: 83-70.

8- مظاهری، د. 1373. زراعت مخلوط. انتشارات دانشگاه تهران. 262 صفحه.

9- موسسه تحقیقات اصلاح و تهیه نهال و بذر. http://www.spii.ir/spSPII/default.

10- نگاهی به خصوصیات فیزیولوژیکی و مرفولوژیکی ارقام گندم ایرانی. http://www.bbk-iran.com/article-3338.html.

11- Bowden R., J. Shroyer, K. Roozeboom, M. Claassen, P. Evans, B. Gordon, B. Heer, K. Janssen, J. Long, J. Martin, A. Schlegel, R. Sears, and M. Witt. 2001. Performance of wheat variety blends in Kansas. Kansas State University. Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service.

12- Clarke S. M., H. Jones, Z. Haigh, H. Boyd, and M. S. Wolfe. 2008. Effects of husked oat varieties, variety mixtures and populations on disease levels, crop cover and their resulting yields.16th IFOAM Organic World Congress, Modena, Italy, June 16-20, 2008.

13- Finckh M. R., E. S. Gacek, H. Goyeau, C. Lannou, U. Merz, C. C. Mundt, L. Munk, J. Nadziak, A. C. Newton, and M. S. Wolfe. 2000. Cereal cultivar and species mixtures in practice, with emphasis on disease resistance, Agronomie 20: 813-837.

14- Ghosh, P. K. 2004. Growth, yield, competition and economics of groundnut/cereal fodder intercropping systems in the semi-arid tropics of India. Field Crops Research 88: 227-237.

15- Ghosh, P. K., A. K. Tripathi, K. K. Bandyopadhyay, and M. C. Manna. 2009. Assessment of nutrient competition and nutrient requirement in soybean/sorghum intercropping system. European Journal of Agronomy 31: 43-50.

16- Kiaer, L. P., I. M. Skovgaard, and H. Ostergard. 2009. Grain yield increase in cereal variety mixtures: A meta-analysis of field trials. Field Crops Research 114: 361-373.

17- Kiaer, L., I. Skovgaard, and H. Ostergard. 2006. Meta-analysis is a powerful tool to summarize variety mixture effects- exemplified by grain yield and weed suppression of spring barley. SUSVAR proceedings- Cereal crop diversity: implications for production and products. pp. 49-52.

18- Martin, G. M., and W. L. Alexander. 1986. Intergenotypic competition in biblends of spring wheat. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 66: 871-876.

19- McLaughlin, A., and P. Mineau. 1995. The impact of agricultural practices on biodiversity. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 55: 201-212.

20- Ostergard, H. and J. W. Jensen. 2005. Increased yield and yield stability in variety mixtures of spring barley. Newsletter from Danish Research Centre for Organic Farming. September 2005. No. 3, (http://www.darcof.dk/enews/sep05/mixture.html).

21- Ostergard, H., K. Kristensen, and J. W. Jensen. 2005. Stability of variety mixtures of spring barley. Cost Susvar/Eco-PB Proceedings pp. 28-30.

22- Ottman, M. J. 2006. Variety Mixtures for reduced input barley. Final Report. Arizona Grain Research and Promotion Council.

23- Sarandon, S. J. and R. Sarandon. 1995. Mixed of cultivars: Pilot field trail of an ecological alternative to improve production or quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Journal of Applied Ecology 32: 288-294.

24- Sharma, R. C. and H. J. Dubin. 1996. Effect of wheat cultivar mixtures on spot blotch (Bipolaris sorokiniana) and grain yield. Field Crops Research 48: 95-101.

25- Swanston J. S., A. C. Newton, J. M. Brosnan, A. Fotheringham, and E. Glasgow. 2005. Determining the spirit yield of wheat varieties and variety mixtures. Journal of Cereal Science 42: 127-134.

26- Tosti, G., and M. Guiducci. 2010. Durum wheat–faba bean temporary intercropping: Effects on nitrogen supply and wheat quality. European Journal of Agronomy 33: 157-165.