Water Use Efficiency and Water Deficit Tolerance Indices in Terminal Growth Stages in Promising Bread Wheat genotypes

پژوهشهای زراعی ایران

Article 4, Volume 13, Issue 4 - Serial Number 40, January 2016, Pages 715-727   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/gsc.v13i4.32336

Author

M Nazeri^*

Khorasan Razavi Agricultural and Natural Resourc

Abstract

Introduction
During growth stages of wheat, anthesis and grain filling periods are the most susceptible to drought. Wheat cultivars that are more tolerant to terminal drought are more suitable to Mediterranean conditions. To increase water use efficiency, the target environment should be taken into account, because one trait might be effective in an environment but ineffective in another environment. In general, some traits like early vigour and root absorbtion capacity are so important in water deficient conditions. In recent years, increasing grain yield was due to increasing grain numbers. Although both the source and sink is considered as the limitation factors in increasing grain yield in old cultivars, even in the new cultivars sink seems to be more important. In fact, phenological adjustment adapted with seasonal precipitation pattern can improve water use efficiency in drought conditions. Suitable flowering time is the most important trait that is correlated with increasing water use efficiency in drought conditions.
Materials and Methods
In order to evaluate the level of drought tolerance in promising bread wheat lines, a split plot arrangements using randomized complete block design with three replications was carried out in 2008-09 and 2009-10 growing seasons at Torogh Agricultural Research Field Station, Mashhad. in. water limited conditions at three levels Optimum moisture conditions (L1), removal irrigation and using rain shelter from milky grain stage to maturity (L2), removal irrigation and using rainshelter from anthesis to maturity (L3) were assigned to main plots. Ten bread wheat lines include suitable for cold and dry regions (V1: (Toos), V2: (C-81-10), V3: (pishgam), V4: (C-84-4), V5: (C-84-8), V6: (C-D-85-15), V7: (C-D-85-9), V8: (C-D-84-5502), V9: (C-D-85-5502) and V10: (C-85-6) were randomized in sub-plots. Stress susceptibility index (SSI), stress tolerance index (STI) and tolerance (TOL) were calculated using following equations:
D = 1- (Yd/Yp), SSI = (1-(Ydi/Ypi)) / D, STI = (Ypi×Ysi)/ (Yp) 2, TOL= Ypi – Ysi
In which D is environment stress intensity; Yp, average of grain yield for all genotypes in optimum; Ys, in water limited conditions; Ypi, grain yield of one genotype in optimum; and Ysi, grain yield of one genotype in water limited conditions.
Anthesis and physiological maturity were determined by observing of anthers in %50 spikes and changing color of %50 pedancles to yellow, respectively.

Results and Discussions
The results revealed that water stress (L2 and L3 treatments) reduced grain yield (18.6% and 45.3%, respectively). Genotypes V5, V4 and V10 showed maximum water use efficiency (WUE) (1.885, 1.756 and 1.833 kg.m-3 respectively). A highly significant relationship was found between grain yield under moisture limited conditions and STI (r = 0.93**) and TOL (r = 0.85**). Grain yield under optimum irrigation condition was significantly (r = 0.50**) correlated with STI.
Therefore, stress tolerance index (STI) was more efficient index for estimation the grain yield under either conditions as well as grouping the genotypes with higher grain yield and tolerant to water limited condition. So, stress tolerance index (STI) was suitable for classifying the higher yielding genotypes adapted to drought prone environment. Since stress tolerance index (STI) was highly and significantly associated with grain yield in both optimum (r = 0.50**) and limited moisture (r = 0.93**) conditions, it can be used an efficient index for evaluation in the field.
Conclusions
Our results indicated that genotypes V5, V4 and V10 with high stress tolerance index (STI) values and the greatest WUE, had the best performance among the other genotypes, respectively. These cultivars had higher grain yield in both optimum and stress conditions than other genotypes So, these cultivars could be recommended to cultivate for similar conditions.

Keywords

Anthesis; Developmental stages; Drought stress

References

1. Angus, J. F., and Van Herwarden, A. F. 2001. Increasing water use and water use efficiency in dryland wheat. Agronomy Journal 93: 290-298.

2. Araus, J. L., Bort J., Steduto, P., Villegas, D., and Royo, C. 2003. Breeding cereals for Mediterranean conditions: ecophysiological clues for biotechnology application. Annals of Applied Biology 142: 129-141.

3. Araus, J. L., Salfer, G. A., Reynolds, M. P., and Royo, C. 2002. Plant breeding and drought in C3 cereals: What Should we breed for? Annals of Botany 89: 925-240.

4. Calderini, D. F., Abeledo, L. G., Savin L., and Slafer, G. A. 1999. Effect of temperature and carpel size during pre- anthesis on potential grain weight in wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science 132: 453-459.

5. Carmer, S. G., Nyqist, W. E., and Walker, W. M. 1989. Least significant differences for combined analysis of experiments with two or three factor treatment design. Agronomy Journal 81: 665-672.

6. Dastfall, M., and Ramazanpoor, M. 2000. Evaluation for drought tolerance in wheat under weather Darab conditions. p. 250-250. 6th Iranian Crop Science, Babolsar, Iran.

7. Ehdaee, B. 1993. Sellection for drought tolerance in wheat. p. 43-62. 1st Iranian Crop Science, Karaj, Iran.

8. Fernandez, G. C. 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. Proceeding of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetable and other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress. Taiwan. pp: 257-270.

9. Fischer, R. A. 2001. Selection traits for improving yield potential. In: Reynolds M. P., Ortiz- Monasterio J. I., and McNab A.(eds). Application physiology in wheat breeding. Mexico, D. F, CIMMYT, pp: 148-159.

10. Ghodsi, M. 2004. Ecophysiological aspects of water deficit on growth and development of wheat cultivars, Ph. D Thesis. Tehran University.

11. Hobbs, P. R., and Sayre, K. D. 2001. Managing experimental breeding trials. In: Reynoldss, M.P., Oritz-Monascrio, J.I., and McNab, A.(eds). Application of physiology in wheat breeding. Mexico, D.F. CIMMYT: 48-58.

12. Khazaee, H. R. 2002. Effect of drought stress on physiological traits of wheat resistant and suceptible cultivars and identification of the best suitable drought tolerance Indices, Ph. D Thesis. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.

13. Kringwi, F. M., Van Ginkel, M., Terthowan, R., Sears, R. G., Rajaram, S., and Paulsen, G. M. 2004. Evaluation of selection strategies for wheat adaptation across water regimes. Euphytica 135: 361-371.

14. Martyniak, L. 2002. Grain yield and yield component of spring triticale as affected by simulated drought stress applied in different growth stages. Proceeding of the 5th International Triticale Symposium, Jun 30 – July 5, 2002, Radzikow, Poland. pp: 143-147.

15. Naderi, A., Hashemi Dezfooli, A., Majidi Heravan, E., Rezaee, A., and Noormohammadi, G. H. 1990. Study on corrolation of characteristics effect on grain weight and determination of some physiological traits on grain yield in some spring wheat genotypes in optimum and drought stress conditions. Seed and Plant 16 (2): 374-386.

16. Nasseri, A., and Fallahi, H. A. 2007. Water use efficiency of winter wheat under deficit irrigation. J. Biol. Sci. 7 (1): 19-26.

17. Reynolds, M. P., Skovmand, B., Trethowan, R. M., Singh, R. P., and Van Ginkel, M. 2000. Applying physiological strategies to wheat breeding. Anonymous: Research Highlights of the CIMMYT Wheat Program. 1999-2000. pp: 49-56. International Wheat Improvement Center.

18. Richards, R. A., Condon, A. G., and Robetzke, G. J. 2001. Trait to improve yield in dry environments. In: Reynolds M. P., Ortiz- Monasterio J. I., and McNab A. (eds). Application physiology in wheat breeding. Mexico, D. F, CIMMYT. pp: 88-100.

19. Richards, R. A., Robetzke, G. J., Condon, A. G., and Van Herwarden, A. F. 2002. Breeding opportunities for increasing the efficiency of water use and crop yield in temperate cereals. Crop Science 42: 111-121.

20. Rosielle, A. A., and Hamblin, J. 1981. Theoretical aspect of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment. Crop Science 21: 943-946.

21. Shahryari, R., Gurbanov, E., Gadimov, A., and Hassanpanah, D. 2008. Tolerance of 42 bread wheat genotypes to drought stress after anthesis. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 11 (10): 1330-1335.

22. Siddique, M. R. B., Hamid, A., and Islam, M. S. 2000. Drought stress effects on water relations of wheat. Butanical Bullecin of Academia Sinica 41: 35-38.

23. Slafer, G. A., and Whitechurch, E. M. 2001. Manipulation wheat development to improve adaptation. In: Reynolds M. P., Ortiz- Monasterio J. I., and McNab A.(eds). Application physiology in wheat breeding. Mexico, D. F, CIMMYT. pp: 160-170.

24. Yazdi samadi, B., Rezaee, A., and Valizade, M. 1998. Statistical Designs in Agricultural Research. Tehran University Publication. (in Persian).

25. Zarea Faiz abadi, A., and Ghodsi, M. 2002. Study on drought tolerance of wheat lines and cultivares in cold regions. Agricultural Sciences and Technology Journal 16 (2): 181-189. (in Persian with English abstract).