Survey of Persistency of Spinosad, Imidacloprid and Indoxacarb on Trichogramma brassicae and T. evanescens

پژوهش های حفاظت گیاهان ایران

Article 5, Volume 33, Issue 1 - Serial Number 43, March 2019, Pages 27-34   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jpp.v33i1.68965

Author

sedighe ashtari^*

research centre

Abstract

Introduction: Trichogramma wasp is one of the most successful parasitic species in the world and the widespread use of these wasps has taken control of many pests in more than 30 countries. Approximately 32 million hectares of agricultural land and forests have been covered by the Trichogramma every year. This parasitoid is reared on Sitotroga cerealella (Lep.: Gelechiidae) and Ephestia kuehniella (Lep.: Pyralidae). The superiority of these bees is their ability to destroy the egg pest before its damage to the host plant. Nonselective insecticides can reduce the potential of biological control agents. In order to determine the most suitable insecticide for effective pest control of Trichogramma wasps, the present study evaluated the persistence toxicity of spinosad, indoxacarb and imidacloprid after exposing of T. brassicae and T. evanescens, the egg parasitoids of tomato leaf miner, according to IOBC procedure.
Materials and Methods: The experiments were carried out in the Laboratory of Plant Protection at Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center of Markazi Province, Arak, Iran. The egg parasitoids T. brassicae and T. evanescens (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) were provided from Biological Control Department of Plant Protection Research Institute (Tehran, Iran). The parasitoids were reared on the Angoumois grain moth, Sitotroga cerealella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) at the laboratory under the controlled conditions of 25±1°C, 65±10% RH and photoperiod of 16:8 h (L: D).
Insecticides: The recommended doses (RD) of the insecticides of Spinosad (SC 22.8% Spintor, DowAgroscience Co.), Imidacloprid (SC35% Confidor, Bayer) and Indoxacarb (SC15% Avant, Aria Shimi) were tested.
Persistent tests: The insecticides were applied at RD on tomato plants by a hand sprayer to the point of run off. Plants were maintained under a transparent polyethylene rain cover in the field. Leaves of the treated tomato plant were sampled and transferred to the laboratory at different time intervals of 3, 5, 16 and 31 days after insecticide application. These intervals were proposed by the IOBC/WPRS Working Group. The samples were placed in ventilated plastic Petri dishes for exposure to the adult parasitoids. The experiment was repeated six times on 30 adult individuals of each species. Assessment of mortality was made on the basis of 24 h post exposure time. Persistence rate of wasps against each insecticide was evaluated according to IOBC/WPRS Working Group. The categories under laboratory conditions include: A, short lived (<5days); B, slightly persistent (5-15days); C, moderately persistent (16-30days); D, Persistent (>30 days).
Results and Discussion: Persistence tests for 30% mortality at each period of time revealed that imidacloprid with less than five days persistence classified as short lived insecticides (class A) for T. brassicae and T. evanescens wasps, indoxacarb with more than five days and less than 16 days effect was slightly persistent (class B) and spinosad which persisted more than 16 days but less than 30 days was moderately persistent for the parasitoid T. brassicae and T. evanescens (class C) (Table 1, 2). This research clearly showed that imidacloprid which persisted less than five days at field conditions were compatible with both egg parasitoids, T. brassicae and T. evanescence as a part of integrated management program of pests. This study also revealed that both parasitoids responded at the same level of susceptibility after exposure to the insecticide. There is no evidence for effect of imidacloprid on Trichogramma parasitoids, however our finding was the same as the results of Fernández et al. (2017) who reported imidacloprid was safe for predatory mite Amblyseius swirskii adults. Some researchers also emphasized on computability of this insecticide with a large number of natural enemies, including the predatory mites Amblyseius cucumeris and Phytoseiulus persimilis. The insecticide was compatible with all stages of phytoseiid mites, reported by Lefebvre et al. (2011) and Beers and Schmidt (2014) in Galendromus occidentalis. Garzon et al., (2015) also reported this insecticide was nontoxic to last instar larvae and adults of Chrysoperla carnea and Adalia bipunctata so they emphasized that it is a good candidate to be incorporated into IPM programs. On the contrary, Doker et al., (2015) reported a significant reduction in oviposition of Iphiseius degenerans after exposure to imidacloprid.
Conclusion: This research focused on the impact of insecticide exposure on Trichogramma species in Markazi Province. Pesticides that control pests without severe side effects on substantial natural enemies are always a necessity for integrated control programs. The application of the short-lived insecticides can allow a rapid recolonization of the parasitoids. We found imidacloprid is non-harmful for both T. brassicae and T. evanescence wasps. By contrast, spinosad and indoxacarb should be used with care as a part of IPM procedure.

Keywords

Key words: Trichogramma; insecticides; semi field conditions; persistent

References

1- Abbott W.S. 1925. A method for computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology 18: 265-267.

2- Beers E.H., and Schmidt R.A. 2014. Impacts of orchard pesticides on (Galendromus occidentalis), lethal and sub lethal effects. Crop protection 56: 16-24.

3- Costa M.A., Muscardini V.F., Gontijo P.D.C., Carvalho G.A., Oliveira R.L.D., and Oliveira H.N.D. 2014. Sub lethal and transgenerational effects of insecticides in developing (Trichogramma galloi). Ecotoxicology, springer.

4- Doker I., Pappas M.L., Samaras C., Triantfyllou A., Kazak C., and Broufas G.D. 2015. Compatibility of reduced risk insecticides withy the nin target predatory mite (Iphiseius degenerans) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Pest Management Science 71(9): 1267-1273.

5- Fernandez M.M., Medina P., Wanumen A., Estal P.D., Smagghe G., and Vinuela E. 2017. Compatibility of sulfoxaflor and other modern pesticides with adults of the predatory mite (Amblyseius swiriskii). Residual contact and persistence studies. Biocontrol 62: 197-208.

6- Garzon A., Medina P., Amor F., Vinuela E., and Budia F. 2015. Toxicity and sublethal effects of six insecticides to last instar larvae and adults of the biocontrol agent (Chrysoperla carnea) (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) and (Adalia bipunctata) (L.) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Chemosphere 132: 87-93.

7- Hassan S.A. 1998. The initiative of The IOBC/WPRS working group on pesticides and beneficial organisms In: Ecotoxicology, Pesticisdes and beneficial organisms. (Eds: Haskell, P.T. and McEwen,P.) Kluwer Academic Publishing, pp22-56.

8- Hewa-Kapuge S., Dougall S.M., and Hoffmann A. 2003. Effects of methoxyfenozide, indoxacarb, and other insecticides on the beneficial egg parasitoid (Trichogramma brassicae) (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) under laboratory and field conditions. Journal of Economic Entomology 96(4): 1083-1090.

9- Jafari M., Saber M., Gharakhani G., and Bagheri M. 2015. Effects of sub lethal of metoxyfenozide and emamectin benzoate on (Trichogramma brassicae). Agricultural Pest Management 2(1): 12-20.

10- Lefebvre M., Bostanian N.J., Thistlewood H.M.A., Mauffette Y., and Racette G. 2011. A laboratory assessment of the toxic attributes of six reduced risk insecticides on (Galendromus occidentalis) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Chemosphere 84: 25-30.

11- Puza V. 2015. Control of insect pest by entomopathogenic nematodes.pp.175-183.In: Lugtenberg,B.(ed.),principles of plant microbe intraction. Springer International Publishing, BERN.

12- Scholler M., and Fields P. 2002. Screening of North American species of (Trichogramma evanescens) Westwood (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) for control of the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Proceedings of the Eighth International Working Conference of Stored-Product Protection, York, U.K

13- Scholler M., and Hassan S.A. 2001. Comparative biology and life tables of (Trichogramma evanescens) and (T. cacoeciae) with (Ephestia elutella) as host at four constant temperatures. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 98: 35-40.

14- Shamszade M. 2011. Biology of (Trichogramma brassicae) on eggs of (Holcocerus sp.) In laboratory conditions. Master thesis of agricultural entomology, Maraghe University.

15- Sheng Z.J., Li L.M., Jing W., and Shu Q. 2009. Toxicity of emamectin benzoate on different developmental stages of (Trichogramma evanescens) Westwood and effects on its population dynamics. Acta Ecologica Sinica 29(9): 4738-4744.

16- Siqueira H.A.A., Guedes R.N.C., Fragoso D.B., and Magalhaes L.C. 2001. Abamectin resistance and synergism in Brazilian populations of (Tuta absoluta) (Meyrick) (Lep., G elechiidae). International Journal of Pest Management 47: 247-251.

17- Stara J., Ourednickova J., and Kocourek F. 2011. Laboratory evaluation of the side effects of insecticides on (Aphidius colemani) (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae), (Aphidoletes aphidiomyza) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), and (Neoseiulus cucumeris) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Journal of Pest Science 84: 25-30.

18- Sterk G., Hassan S.A., Baillod M., Bakker F., Bigler F., and Blumel S. 1999. Results of the seventh joint pesticide testing program carried out by the IOBC/WPRS-Working Group ‘Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms. Biocontrol 44: 99–117.

19- Tohnishi M., Nakao H., Furuya T., Seo A., and Kodama H. 2005. Indoxacarb, a novel insecticide highly active against Lepidopterous insect pests. Journal of Pesticide Science 30(4): 354-360.

20- Uma S., Jacob S. 2013. Impact of novel insecticides on (Trichogramma chilonis), Thesis of Ms. Student, Kerala Agricultural Thrissur India, 159 pp.

21- Van de Veire M., Klein M., and Tirry L. 2002. Residual activity of abamectin and spinosad against the predatory Bug (Orius laevigatus). Phytoparasitica 30(5): 525-528.