The Effect of Nitroxin Biofertilizer and Foliar Applicatin of Micronutrients Time Consumption on Yield and Yield Components of New Wheat Cultivars under Khorramabad Climatic Conditions

پژوهشهای زراعی ایران

Article 7, Volume 13, Issue 4 - Serial Number 40, January 2016, Pages 797-809   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/gsc.v13i4.35460

Authors

A Vaez^{* 1}; A Khorgamy¹; M Sayyahfar²

¹Islamic Azad University

²Reasearch center of Lorestan

Abstract

Introduction
In order to study the effects of Nitroxin biofertilizer and foliar application of micronutrients time consumption on yield and yield components of new wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum & T. durum) under Khorramabad climatic conditions, an experiment was conducted as factorial based on a randomized complete block design with three replications at the research farm khorramabad during growing season of 2012-2013.
Considering the positive effect of inoculation with bio-fertilizer and foliar Nitroxin micronutrients and reaction of cultivars to this type of fertilizer instead of chemical fertilizers and the importance of wheat as one of the main crops, this study aims to determine the most appropriate time for foliar and Nitroxin application of micronutrients at the different stages of plant growth and bio-fertilizer application on yield and yield components.

Materials and Methods
The first factor was considered in six levels: N0: The lack of the seed insemination with nitroxin biofertilizer and without the foliar application of micronutrients (control), N1: the seed inoculation with the nitroxin biofertilizer, N2: the foliar application of micronutrients at the jointing stage, N3: the foliar application of micronutrients at the heading stage, N4: the seed insemination with nitroxin biofertilizer and foliar application of micronutrients at the jointing stage, N5: the seed insemination with nitroxin biofertilizer and foliar application of micronutrients at the heading stage. The second factor was considered at two levels, consisting: V1: Parsi cultivar and V2: Dena cultivar. MSTATC Software was used for data analysis and means were compared by Duncan's multiple range test at the 5% level.

Results and Discussion
In this experiment the grain yield, biological yield, harvest index, 1000- grain weight, spike number per
m-2, grain number per spike and spikelet number per spike of wheat were studied. The results of the data variance analysis has revealed that there was a significant relationship between foliar application of micronutrients and nitroxin biofertilizer of grain yield, biological yield, harvest index, 1000- grain weight, spike number per m-2, grain number per spike and spikelet number per spike of wheat. The most positive relationship was related to grain and the applying fertilizer treatment of the grain insemination with nitroxin biofertilizer and foliar application of micronutrients at the heading stage. The cultivar factor has also a positive effect on the surveying characteristics such as grain yield, harvest index, 1000-grain weight, spike number per m-2, grain number per spike and spikelet number per spike. The most positive relationship was related to grain and the applying fertilizer treatment of the grain insemination with nitroxin biofertilizer and foliar application of micro-nutrients at the heading stage and the treatment of the Parsi cultivar with an average of 6844/3kg/ha-1. Considering the significant increase in the grain yield, the applying fertilizer treatment of the grain insemination with nitroxin biofertilizer and foliar application of micronutrients at the heading stage and the treatment of the Parsi cultivar were proposed for Khorramabad Situation.

Conclusions
In this study, significant differences between the various levels and stages of foliar fertilizer, bio Nitroxin micronutrients showed that appropriate use of these two factors can result in maximum performance of the wheat. The process of spraying micronutrients had a significant effect on grain yield. The highest yield of seed was obtained in inoculation with the combined application of organic fertilizer and foliar Nitroxin micronutrients in the treatment of stage and heading to the Persian superior varieties of grain yield. The results of this experiment showed that the use of micronutrients can improve agronomic characteristics and increase the grain yield. Micronutrient fertilizers sprayed on soil conservation assistance in achieving the objectives of sustainable agriculture. The application of biological Nitroxin because of beneficial bacteria in the soil can achieve the goals of sustainable agriculture like reducing chemical inputs and thus the protection of soil and water used in agriculture is very helpful. In this study, there were significant differences between different levels of foliar nutrients and Nitroxin the traits under study showed that the use of these two factors had positive impacts on wheat yield and led to maximum performance.

Keywords

Grain insemination; grain yield; Heading stage; wheat

References

1. Abraham, C. P., Viswagith, V., Prabha, S., Sundhar, K., and Malliga, P. 2007. Effect of coir pith based cyanobacterial basal and foliar biofertilizer on Baseellarubra L. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica pp.59-63: Academy of Science 91: 11-170.

2. Amal, G., Ahmed, M. S., and El-Gazzar, M. M. 2006. Growth and yield Response of tow wheat cultivars to complete Foliar Fertilizer compound »Dogoplus« Field Crops Research Department. National Research Centre, Dokki. Cairo. Egypt. Journal of Applied Sciences Researches (1): 20-26.

3. Amirabadi, M., Ardekani, M., Rajali, F., Borji, M., and Khaghani, Sh. 2009. Determination and inoculated mycorrhizal performance under different levels of phosphorus on yield and yield components of maize single cross 704 in Arak. Journal of Crop Science 2: 51-450. (in Persian with English abstract).

4. Agrawal, H. P. 1992. Assessing the micronutrient requirement of winter wheat – soil sci. plant Anal 23: 2555-2568.

5. Ajam, H., Vazin, F., and Salmani Biary, E. 2011. Evaluated the effect of physiological properties wheat cultivar to nitrogen sources. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 58: 170-173.

6. Ardekani, M. 2000. Performance evaluation of biofertilizers in sustainable agriculture wheat. Thesis of Agriculture (Agricultural Ecology) Islamic Azad University, Science and Research. (in Persian with English abstract).

7. Aref, M., and Homaei, M. 2006. The effect of foliar micronutrients zinc and manganese on yield and yield components. First Edition. Tarbiat Modarres University Press, 124 p. (in Persian with English abstract).

8. Arduini, W. K., Masoni, I. A., Ercoli, L., and Mariotti, M. 2006. Grain yield, and dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and remobilization in durum wheat as affected by variety and seedingrate. Europan Journal Agronomy 23: 309-318.

9. Azcon, R., and Parea, M. 1975. Synthesis of auxins, gibberlins, cytokinins, by Azotobacter vinelandii and Azotobacter chroococcum related to effect produced on tomato plants. Journal Plant and Soil 43: 609-619.

10. Bahari, M. R., Pahlavani, N., Akbari, P., and Ehsanzadeh, A. 2005. Effects of low iron and copper fertilizer on growth and yield of chickpea under rainfed conditions Aligudarz-AZNA area. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources 12: 190-200. (in Persian with English abstract).

11. Döbereiner, J. 1997. a importância da fixação biologica de nitrogênio para a agricultura sustentavel. Biotecnologia Ciência and Desenvolvimento - Encarte especial (1): 2-3.

12. Faheed, F. A., and Abad-El Fattah, Z. 2008. Effect of Chlorella vulgaris as bio-fertilizer on growth parameters and metabolic aspects of Lettuce plant. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 4: 165-175.

13. Fallik, E., and Okon, Y. 1996. The response of maize (Zea mays) to Azospirillum inoculation in various types of soils in the field. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 12: 511-515.

14. Gate, P. 1995. Ecophysiologie double. Lavoisier Tec and Doc, Paris.

15. Idris, M. 2003. Effect of integrated use of mineral, organic N and Azotobacter on the yield, yield components and N-nutrition of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences (6): 539-543.

16. Khase sirjani, A. H., Farah bakhsh, S. Z., Davari, N., PasandiPour, E., and Karami, A. 2011. The effect of bio-fertilizer, zinc, and nitrogen fertilizer on wheat yield and quality. Journal of Soil Science (soil and water) 2: 13-125. (in Persian with English abstract).

17. Kloepper, J. W., Zehnder, G. W., Tuzun, S., Murphy, J. F., Wei, G., Yao, C., and Raupach, G. S. 1996. Toward agriculture implementation of PGPR mediated induced systemic resistance against crop pests. Pages 165-174 in: Advances in Biological Control of Plant Diseases. T. Wenhua, R. J., Cook, and Rovira, A. Eds. China Agriculture University Press, Beijing.

18. Malekouti, M. G. 2005. Sustainable agriculture and increase performance by optimizing the use of fertilizers in Iran, dissemination of agricultural education. Karaj. Iran. (in Persian with English abstract).

19. Marius, S., Octavita, S., Eugen, U., and Vlad, A. 2005. Study of a microbial inoculation on several biochemical indices in sunflower (Helianthus anuus L.). Genetic and Molecular Biology 15: 14-18.

20. Midmore, D. J., Cartwright, P. M., and Fischer, R. A. 1984. Wheat in tropical environments. II. Crop growth and grain yield. Field Crops Resaerch 8: 207-227.

21. Moradi, M. 2010. Effect of phosphate solubilizing bacteria on yield and yield components in weather conditions Mehra. master thesis. Azad University of Dezful. (in Persian with English abstract).

22. Nieto, K. F., and Franken berger, W. T. 1990. Influence of adenine, isopenthyle alchole and (Azotobacter chroococcum) on the growth of (Raphanus sativus), Plant and Soil 127: 147-156.

23. Nehra, A. S., and Hooda, I. S. 2002. Influence of integrated use of organic manures and inorganic fertilizers on wheat yields and soil properties. Department of Agronomy CCS Haryana Agricultural University India. Research on crops 3 (1): 11-16.

24. Pandey, A., Sharma, E., and Palni, L. M. S. 1998. Influence of bacterial inoculation on maize in upland farming systems of the Sikkim Himalaya. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 30: 379-384.

25. Rahmati, E. 2005. The effect of the change in density on yield and yield components of hybrid sunflo tank, a Master's thesis of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University of Karaj. (in Persian with English abstract).

26. Rai, S. N., and Gaur, C. 1998. Characterization of Azotobacter.spp, and Effect of Azotobacter and Azospirillum as Inoculation on Yield and N-uptake of Wheat crop. Plant and Soil 109: 131-134.

27. Rajai, S. 2005. Azotobacter chroococcum native strains as biological fertilizer application potential growth in the wheat fields of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari. Agriculture Master's thesis. (in Persian with English abstract).

28. Salardyny, E. 2005. Soil fertility (Compilation), Tehran University Press, 124 p. (in Persian with English abstract).

29. Shariefi, A. E., El-Kalla, A. T., El-Kassaby, M. H., Ghonema, M. H., and Abdo, G. M. Q. 2006. Effect of biofertilization and times of nutrientfoliar application on growth, yield and yield components of rice. Chemical Journal of Agronomy 4 (2): 202-208.

30. Shirani Far, B. 1995. Effect of different densities on the plant, tillering and its relations with the three figure Crop weather in Ahvaz, a Master's thesis. University of Chamran martyr. (in Persian with English abstract).

31. Soleiman Panah, M. M. E., Esmaeili, M., Mirniya, Kh., and Cherati Araei, E. 2000. Effect of zinc and manganese on the qualitative and quantitative properties of beets, 383 P. Proceedings of the Sixth Congress of Crop Iran. (in Persian with English abstract).

32. Soyler, S. B., Seed, A., Topal, N., Akgun, S., and Gezgin, S. 2005. Responses of Irrigated durum and Bread Wheat Cultivars to Boron Application in Low Boron Calcareous Soil Turk. Journal Agricultural 29: 275-286.

33. Subashini, H. D., Malarvannan, S., and Kumaran, P. 2007. Effect of biofertilizers (N-Fixers) on the yield of rice varieties at puducherry, india. Asian Journal of Adricultural Research (3): 036-041.

34. Sumner, M. E. 1990. Crop responses to Azospirillum inoculation. In: Stewat, B. A. (Ed.). Advances in Soil Science. New York: Springer-Verlag (1): 52-123.

35. Yadav, K. S., Singh, D. P., Sunita, N., Neeru, K., Lakshminarayana, S., Suneja, A., and Narula, N. 2000. Effect of Azotobacter chroococcum on yield and nitrogen economy in wheat (Triticum aestivum) under field conditions. Environment and Ecology 18: 109-113.

36. Ziaeian, A. S., and Malekouti, G. 2000. A new method to increase the efficiency of spraying fertilizers and achieve sustainable agriculture. Journal of Extension, Technical Publications Department of Agricultural Extension. (in Persian with English abstract).