Effect of Sowing Date and Sulfur on Yield, Oil Content and Grain Nitrogen of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in Autumn Cultivation

پژوهشهای زراعی ایران

Article 3, Volume 14, Issue 3 - Serial Number 43, October 2016, Pages 438-448   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/gsc.v14i3.43039

Authors

N Safara^* ; M. R Moradi Telavat; S. A Siadat; A Koochekzadeh; S. H Mousavi

Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan

Abstract

Introduction
Nowadays oilseed crops are considered as the second most important sources of energy in the diet. In this regard, cultivation of oilseed crops such as safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) is important due to quality of oil seed and medicinal properties. Different planting dates leads to adaptation of vegetative and reproductive growth of plant to temperature, day-length and various solar radiations and as a result affects plant’s development phase and yield. With delayed planting date , temperature and day length increases and development phase will accelerate. In this condition the crop yield will reduce due to crop growth and developmental period will shorten.
Sulfur is an essential element for plant nutrition and its role is greater than Phosphorus. Using sulfur increases the heads per plant and grain yield. In order to investigate the effect of sulfur fertilizer under heat stress condition at the terminal growth stages and its role in reducing the negative effects of high temperature stress on safflower, this research was performed.

Materials and Methods
In order to study effect of planting date and sulfur manure on yield components, nitrogen and oil percent in safflower, a field experiment was carried out in a randomized complete blocks design with three replications in as split plot arrangement at Ramin Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan during 2013-2014. The experimental treatments consisted of four planting dates of 30 November, 21 December, 22 January and 1st February were randomly placed in main plots and four levels of sulfur of 0, 200, 400 and 600 kg ha-1 performed randomly in subplots, Sulfur fertilizer was corporated to soil one week before each planting date. Harvest was performed from the mid-May to early-June, during physiological maturity. To measure the yield on maturity time after the removal of margins, Safflower plants were harvested from one m2 unit area. Nitrogen percent was determined by Kjeltec Analyzer Unit device. Grain oil was measured by PORIM procedure and finally the oil yield was calculated by multiplying oil content and the grain yield. Data from the experiment was analyzed using SAS software and mean comparison was carried out using LSD test at the 5% of probability.

Results and Discussion
Planting dates significantly affected grain number per head, biological yield, oil yield, grain yield, heads per plant and grain nitrogen. Sulfur fertilizer had a significant effect on grain number per head, oil yield, grain yield, heads per plant and grain nitrogen. There was a significant interaction between planting date and sulfur on grain yield, number of heads in plant and grain oil percentage. The late planting date resulted in plants exposed to high temperature and resulted in decreased safflower yield and yield components. Based on the results, the highest grain yield 4012.66 kg.ha-1 obtained in planting date 21 December. Late planting dates reduced grain yield to 50.28 percent. It was concluded that 200 kg.ha-1 sulfur increased grain yield through increasing the grain number per head and the number of heads in plant.
Delayed planting decreased growth period length and resulted in reduced yield and its components. But the application of sulfur fertilizer by increasing yield components can compensate the loss of yield. Sulfur is sub-structure of fatty acid metabolism enzymes in fatty acid and bond formation reactions for the production of oil and involved in fat acids. Planting date and sulfur application in appropriate form increased grain and oil yield. Shortening the growing season due to a delay in planting and plant distance from the right conditions for growth reduced the grain yield. These factors limited the plant grow in optimal conditions, disrupted synthesis of primary and secondary metabolites in plants and had a negative effect on seed oil percent.
Conclusions
Delay in planting date reduced, flowering, grain filling period, potential production and economic performance. Delay in planting date reduced yield, dry matter production and harvest index. Sulfur increased photosynthesis and affected the formation of protein and fatty acids, which increased oil and nitrogen percent and grain yield. The study showed that late planting date reduced seed yield and oil performance, but using the 200 kg.ha-1 of sulfur from organic granular sources increased yield and yield components.

Keywords

Head per plant; Heat stress; Nitrogen; Oil

References

1- Anonymous. 1995. PORIM Test Methods. Palm oil Research Institute of Malaysia. p: 72-75.

2- Abadian, H., Lotfi, N., Kamkar, B., and Bagheri, M. 2009. Effect of delayed planting date and density on the quantity and quality of canola in Gorgan. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources 15(5): 20-29. (In Persian with English Abstract)

3- Ahmad, G., Jan, A., Arif, M., Jan, M. T. and Khattak R. A. 2007. Influence of nitrogen and sulfur fertilization on quality of canola (Brassica napus L.) under rainfed conditions. Journal of Zhejiang University Science 8: 731-737.

4- Asghar Milk. M., Aziz, I., Khan, H. Z. and Ashfag Wahid, M. 2004. Growth, seed yield and oil content response of canola (Brassica napus L.) to varying levels of sulfur. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological 6: 1153-1166.

5- Bahmanyar, M. A. and Kazemi, H. 2010. Influence of and sulfur on yield and seed quality of three canola cultivars. Journal of Plant Nutrition 33: 953-965.

6- Bassil, B. S. and Kaffka, S. R. 2002. Response of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) to saline soil and irrigation. Crop response to salinity. Journal Agricultural Water Manage 54: 81-92.

7- Bremner, J. M. 1996. Nitrogen total. Method of Soil Analysis, part 3: Chemical Methods; Spark, D. L. Soil Science Society of America: Madisona, Wisconsin. pp: 1085-1121.

8- Cazzato, E., Ventricelli, O. and Coleto, A. 1997. Effect of date of seeding and supplemental irrigation on hybrid and open-pollinated safflower production in southern Italy. p. 119-124. 4the International Safflower Conference, June 2-7. Italy.

9- Cosge, B. and Kaya, D. 2005. Performance of some safflower varieties sown in Late-autumn and Late-spring. Biology Research 12: 13-18.

10- Dadashi, N. A. and Khajehpour, M. R. 2005. Effect of planting date and cultivar on growth, yield components and yield of safflower in Esfahan. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 8(3): 95-111. (In Persian with English Abstract).

11- Delka, E., Oplinger, S., Eynor, T. M. T., Utnam, D. H. P., Oll, J. D. D., Kling, K. A., Durgan, B. R. and Notzel, D. M. 2005. Safflower. University of Wisconsin-Extension Pub. Cooperative Plant and Animal Products and the Minnessota Extension Service.

12- Farooq, M., Bramley, H., Palta, J. A. and Siddique, K. H. M. 2011. Heat Stress in wheat during Reproductive and grain-Filling Phases. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 30: 491-507.

13- Fazelikakheli, S. F., Sadrabadi, R., Zareh, A. and Ahmadi, M. 2008. Effect of planting date and plant density on yield and yield components in safflower in Spring Planting in Torbat. Iran Journal of Agricultural Research 5 (2): 327-332. (In Persian with English Abstract).

14- Lubes, R. E., Yermanos, D. M., Laag, A. E. and Burge, W. D. 1965. Effect of planting date on seed yield, oil content, and water requirement of safflower. Agronomy Journal 57: 124-162.

15- Mirzakhani, M., Ardakani, M. R., Shiranirad, A. H. and Abbasifar, A. R. 2003. Effects of planting date on yield and yield components of spring safflower cultivars in Central Province. Iran Journal of Crop Sciences, 4 (2): 138-150. (In Persian with English Abstract).

16- Modhej, A. and Fathi, G. L. 2009. Wheat Physiology. Publications Islamic Azad University Shoushtar. (In Persian). Pp: 230-250.

17- Naseri, F. 1997. Oilseeds. Publications Astan Qouds Razavi. Mashhad. Pp: 25-48.

18- Noorullah, K., Amanullah, J., hasanullah, I., Ahmad, K. and Naeem, K. 2002. Response of canola to nitrogen and sulfur nitrogen. Asian Journal Plant Science 1(5): 516-518.

19- Nourmohamadi, G., Siadat, A. and Kashani, A. 2010. Agronomy cereal crops. Publications Shahid Chamran University Ahwaz. (In Persian). Pp: 21-100.

20- Omidi, A. H. and Sharifi Moghaddas, M. R. 2008. Evalution of Iranian safflower cultivars reaction to different sowing dates and plant densities. World Applied Sciences Journal 8: 953-958.

21- Ozer, H. 2003. Sowing date and nitrogen rate effects on growth, yield and yield components of two summer rapeseed cultivars. Eropean. Journal of Agronomy 19: 453-463.

22- Ravi, S., Channal, H. T., Hebsur, N. S., Patil, B. N. and Dharmatti, P. R. 2008. Effect of sulfur, zinc and iron nutrition on growth, yield, nutrient uptake and quality of Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Karnataka Journal Agriculture Science 21: 383-385.

23- Rengel, Z. 2006. Canola cultivars differ in nitrogen utilization efficiency at vegetative stage. Field Crops Research 97: 221-226.

24- Robertson, M. J., Holland, F. and Bambach, R. 2004. Response of canola and India mustard to sowing date in the grain belt of north – eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture44: 43-52.

25- Safari, M., Maddadizade, M. and Shariatnia, F. 2012. Effects of nutrition nitrogen, boron and sulfur on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of grain safflower. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science 42 (1): 133-141. (In Persian with English Abstract).

26- Tandon, H. L. 1995. Sulfur fertilizer for Indian Agriculture. A Quid Book. TSI and Prism sulfur copration, New Dehli India.

27- Wani, M. A., Gha, F. A. A., Milik, M. A. and Rather, Z. A. 2001. Response of sunflower to sulfur application under Kashmir condition. Biology Research 3: 19-22.