Effects of Intercropping of Common Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) – Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) and Biological Fertilizer inoculation on Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies

پژوهشهای زراعی ایران

Article 10, Volume 15, Issue 3 - Serial Number 47, October 2017, Pages 691-708   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/gsc.v15i3.52944

Authors

A Khaki Najafabadi; M Jahan^* ; A Koocheki; M Nasiri mahalati

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

Introduction
Nowadays, increasing world population, destruction of natural resources followed by the confirmed need to increase food production are the basic challenges of the world. The appropriate solution for this challenge is sustainable agriculture based on consuming different kinds of biological and organic fertilizers, with the purpose of elimination and considerable decrease of agrochemicals. Phosphorus biological fertilizer consisted of two genus of bacteria, Bacillus spp. and Pseudomonas spp., helps plants to absorb phosphorus dissolved in soil by two mechanisms, excreting organic acids and phosphate enzyme.
Improving nitrogen use efficiency is a principle strategy to increase sustainability in agricultural systems. Some of management options which are effective on increasing nutrients efficiency in agro–systems are intercropping, rotation and green manure application. Utilizing fixed nitrogen of legumes by cereals is the advantage of intercropping legumes and cereals. Intercropping systems are practical and suitable samples for increasing water use efficiency in agriculture. Francis (9) believes that in case of water limitation, the best way to improve water use efficiency is intercropping.
The purpose of the present study was evaluating sole cropping system, intercropping common millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) and the role of biological fertilizer to achieve the most suitable combination of growing these two species crops and fertilizing recommendations with the purpose of suitable yield and resources use efficiency.
Materials and Methods
This experiment was conducted at a farm in Najafabad-Isfahan, during growing season of year 2013-2014. The experimental treatments were arranged in split plots based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. Two levels of phosphorus biofertilizer a1 (seed inoculation with Bacillus spp. and Pseudomonas spp. rhizobacteria as Barvar 2 biofertilizer®) and a2 (control=no inoculation) were assigned to main plots. The sub-plots including b1 (sole cropping of millet), b2 (millet100%+ cowpea25%), b3 (millet100%+ cowpea50%), b4 (millet100%+ cowpea75%), b5 (millet100%+ cowpea100%) and b6 (sole cropping of cowpea). The distances between the rows in all treatments were 50 centimeters and the distance between two plants on each row of the sole millet was 8.6, for sole cowpea was 10.7 centimeters (with density of 200 and 160 thousand plants per hectare). In additive ratios the distances between the plants on all rows were 4.3 centimeters for millet as the fixed plant and 21.4, 10, 7, 7.1 and 5.4 cm for cowpea (with density of 4, 8, 12 and 16 plants per m2) which were on the parallel rows with millet.
Water use efficiency for grain yield was calculated from equation 1(8) and nitrogen efficiencies (including: recovery, Physiological and use) also were calculated by using the equation 2, 3 and 4 respectively.
Results and Discussion
The results of this experiment showed that the effect of Barvar 2 biofertilizer® on WUE, NRE, NPE and NUE was significant (P≤0.05). In addition, the effect of cropping ratios on all measured traits was significant so that the most (0.704, 0.473 and 0.784 kg.m-3) water use efficiency, nitrogen recovery efficiency (77.7, 101.7 and 120.6%), nitrogen physiological efficiency (55.3, 37 and 66.8 kg.kg-1) and nitrogen use efficiency (43.2, 37.7 and 48.7 kg.kg-1) observed respectively for millet in ratio of millet 100%+ cowpea25%, for cowpea in sole cropping and for total two species also in ratio of millet100%+ cowpea25% was obtained.
Conclusions
The results of this experiment showed that the management based on true understanding of ecological basis and principles of intercropping systems and application of biofertilizers could be an ecological approach for increasing productivity and best usage of resources (water and nitrogen) in order to achieve suitable production, decrease expenses and dependence to expensive foreign inputs, eliminate pollution and bioenvironmental pressures on sustainable agricultural systems.
Acknowledgements The authors are sincerely grateful to all the respectable anonymous persons that supported this research.

Keywords

Additional of series; grain yield; Nitrogen use efficiency; Phosphorus biological fertilizer

References

1. Aggawell, P. K., Garrity, D. P., Liboon, S. P., and Morris, R. A. 1992. Resource use and interaction in a rice mungbean intercrop. Agronomy Journal 84: 71-78.

2. Ameri, A., Nasiri Mahallati, M., and Rezvani Moghadam, P. 2007. Effects of different nitrogen levels and plant density on flower, essential oils and extract production and nitrogen use efficiency of Marigold (Calendula officinalis). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 5 (2): 315- 325. (in Persian with English abstract).

3. Biari, A., Gholami, A., and Asadi Rahmani, A. 2007. Sustainable production and improving uptake of nutrients of corn in response, to seed fecundation through instigator growth bacteria. 2th National Conference of Agriculture and Ecology of Iran, Gorgan.

4. Chabot, R., and Antoun, H. 1996. Growth promotion of maize and lectuce by phosphate- solubilizing Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar phaseoli. Plant and Soil 184: 311-321.

5. Dahmardeh, M., Ghanbari, A., Siahsar, B. A., and Ramroudi, M. 2011. Evaluation of forge yield and protein content of maize and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) in intercropping. Iranian Journal of Crop Science 13 (4): 658-670.

6. Daneshmand, A., Shirani-rad, A. H., Noormohammadi, Gh., Zarei, Gh., and Daneshian, J. 2006. Effect of water stress and different levels of nitrogen fertilizer on seed yield and its components, nitrogen uptake and water use and nitrogen utility efficiency in two rapeseeds (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. Iranian Journal of Crop Science 8 (4): 323- 342. (in Persian with English abstract).

7. Dileep-Kumar, S. B., Berggren, I., and Martensson, A. M. 2007. Potential for improving pea production by coinculation with Fluorescent Pseudomonas and Rhizobium. Plant and Soil 229: 25-34.

8. Francis, C. A. 1986. Multiple Cropping system. Macmillan publishing company.

9. Francis, C. A. 1996. Biological efficiencies in multiple-cropping systems Advances in Agronomy. 42: 21-42.

10. Gao, Y. A., Duan, J., Sun, F., Li, Z., and Liu, H. 2009. Crop coefficient and water use efficiency of winter wheat/ spring maize strip intercropping. Field Crops Research 111: 65-73.

11. Ghazi, N., and Al- karaki, G. N. 1998. Benefit, cost and water use efficiency of arbuscular mycorrhiza of durum wheat grown under drought stress. Mycorrhiza 8: 41-45.

12. Ghosh, P. K. 2004. Growth, yield, competition and economics of groundnut cereal fodder intercropping system in the semi-arid tropics of India. Field Crop Research 88: 227-237.

13. Gliessman, S. R. 1997. Agroecology: Ecological processes in sustainable Agriculture. Arbor press.

14. Gliessman, S. R. 1998. Agroecology: Ecological Processes in sustainable Agriculture. CRC press. ISBN: 1-575.

4-043-3.

15. Guehl, I. M., and Garbaye, J. 1991. The effects of ectomycorrhizal status on carbon dioxide assimilation capacity, water use efficiency and response to transplanting in seedlings of Pseudotsuge menziesii (mirb) franco. American Journal of Science 21: 551-563.

16. Hosseinzadeh, H. 2005. Report of effect Barvar 2 biofertilizer on yield grain legume. Tehran Daneshgahi Jehad and fannavari Sabz publication, Tehran.

17. Huggins, D. R., and Pan, W. L. 1993. Nitrogen efficiency component analysis: an evaluation of cropping system differences in productivity. Agronomy Journal 85: 898-905.

18. Hulugulle, N., and Lal, R. 1986. Soil water balance of intrtcropped maize and cowpea grown in tropical hydromorphic soil Western Nigeria. Agronomy Journal 75: 86-90.

19. Jahan, M., and Nasiri Mahallati, M. 2012. Soil Fertility and Biofertilizers (An Agroecological Approach). Ferdowsi University of Mashhad press publication.

20. Javanshir, A., Dabbagh, A., Hamidi, A., and Gholipour, M. 2000. The Ecology of Intercropping, Jahad-e Daneshgahi of Mashhad Press publication.

21. Koocheki, A., Nasiri- Mahallati, M., Borumand-Rezazadeh, Z., and Khorramdel, S. 2010. Effect of delayed, intercropping wheat and corn on nitrogen use and utility efficiency. 1th Iranian Conference of sustainable agricultural and healthy crop production. Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, Isfahan, Iran.

22. Koocheki, A. Sustainable agriculture. 2001. Jahad-e Daneshgahi of Mashhad Press. (in Persian).

23. Li, L., Sun, J., Zhang, F., Li, X., Yang, S., and Rengel, Z. 2009. Wheat/maize or wheat/ soybean strip intercropping yield advantage and interspecific interactions on nutrient. Field Crops Research 71 (2): 123-137.

24. Madani, H., Melbobi, M. A., and Omidi, M. 2006. Applying of phosphorus biofertilizer on cultivation of bean. 1th Iranian Creals Congress, Mashhad, Iran.

25. Mahdavi- Damghani, A., Deihimfard, R., and Mirzaei- Talarposhti, R. 2007. Sustainable Soils; The placement of organic matter in sustaining soils and their productivity. Shahid Beheshti University press publication.

26. Mahdavipur, A., Rezaei, M., Asgharzadeh, A., and Cherati, A. 2001. Effect of different substances of Barady- rhizobiom Japonicum bacteria on uptake of micronutrients in forage and grain yield on soybeen plant. Iranian Journal of plant Sciences Research 16 (4): 218-232.

27. Marulanda, A., Barea, J. M., and Azcon, R. 2006. An indigenous drought- tolerant strain of Glomus intraradices associated with a native bacterium improves water transport and root development in Retama Spaero carpa. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 52: 670-678.

28. Mazaheri, D. 1994. Intercropping. Tehran University.

29. Mirzaei, A., and Jokar, M. 2014. Water use efficiency in plants crop and its ecological approaches. National Conference on energy consumption optimization in Science and Engineering. Kome Elmavaran danesh. R. S. Institute.

30. Mutungamiri, A, Margia, I. K., and Chivinge, O. A. 2001. Evaluation of maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars and density for dryland maize-bean intercropping. Tropical Agriculture 78 (1) 8-12.

31. Nachigera, G. M., Ledent, J. F., and Draye, X. 2008. Shoot and root competition in potato/maize intercropping: effects on growth and yield. Environmental and Experimental Botany.

32. Najafi, N., Mostafaii, M., Ousting, Sh., and Dabagh-e- mohamadi Nasb, A. 2015. Effect of manure application and intercropping of corn, bean, and biter vetch on macronutrients content in maize shoot. 12th Iranian Crop Sciences Congress. Karaj Brach, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran.

33. Najibnia, S., Koocheki, A., Nasiri Mahallati, M., and Porsa, H. 2014. Comparision of water uptake, use and productivity efficiency in sole and multiple cropping systems of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.), bean and corn. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 12 (2): 153-163.

34. Nasiri Mahallati, M., Koocheki, A., Rezvani- Moghadam, P., and Beheshti, A. 2001. Agroecology. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Publication.

35. Papendick, R. I., Sanchez, D. A., and Triplet, G. B. 1983. Multiple cropping. American Society of Agronomy (ASA).

36. Parsa, S., Kafi, M., and Nasiri Mahallati, M. 2009. Effects of salinity and nitrogen Levels on nitrogen content of wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 7 (2): 327-355. (in Persian with English abstract).

37. Payne, W. A. 1997. Managing yield and water use of pearl millet in the Sahel. Agronomy Journal 89: 481-490.

38. Richards, R. A., Rebetzke, G. J., Condon, A. G., and Vanher- warden, A. F. 2002. Breeding opportunities for increasing the efficiency of water use and crop yield in temperate cereals. Crop Science 42: 111-121.

39. Roy, R. K., and Tripathi, R. S. 2005. Effect of irrigation and fertlizer on yield water use efficiency and nutrient concentration in winter maize. Indian Journal of Agronomy 32: 314-318.

40. Saleh Rastin, N. 2001. Biofertilizers and their role in achiving sustainable agriculture. Collection of articles about the necessity of industrial production of biofertilizers in contry 1-54.

41. Salemzade, A., Siyadat, S. A., and Nouriyani, H. 2014. Evaluation of agronomic efficiency, physiological efficiency and utilization of nitrogen in the canopy additive intercropping Corn-bean in Dezful region. 1st International and 13th Iranian Crop Science Congress, 3th Iranian Seed Science and Technology Conference. Seed and Plant Improvement Institute Karaj, Iran. (in Persian with English abstract).

42. Sani, B., Rajabzadeh, F., Liaghati, H., Ghushchi, F., and Karvar, M. 2008. Effect of biofertilizers on quality and quantily indexes of maize at agroecosystem, 2th Iranian Agroecological conferences, Gorgan, Iran.

43. Sharpe, R., Harper, L. A., Giddens, J. E., and Langdale, G. W. 2001. Nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen budget for conservation tilled wheat. Soil Science Society of America Journal 52: 1349-1398.

44. Singh, A., Turkhade, B. B., Prasad, R., Singh. R. K., and Bhargava, S. C. 1992. Effect of wheat +Linseed intercropping on moisture use. Indian Journal of Agronomy 37: 142-143.

45. Sirousmehr, A., Javanshir, A., Rahimzadeh Khoyei, F., and Moghaddam, M. 2003. Pearl millet and common vetch intercropping. Iranian Journal of Beiabane 5 (2). (in Persian with English abstract).

46. Taei, J., Ghanbari, A., and Jokar, M. 2008. Intercropping an approache for increasing water use efficiency. The 1th International Conference of water Crisis, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran.

47. Tanwar, S. P .S., Rao, S. S., Regar, P. L., Datt, Sh., Kumar, P., Jodha, B. S., Santra, P., Kumar, R., and Ram, R. 2014. Improving water and Land use efficiency of fallow- wheat system in shallow lithic calciorthid soils of arid region: Introduction of bed planting and rainy season sorghum legume intercropping. Soil &Tillage Research 138: 44-55.

48. Tavassoly, A., Ghanbari, A., and Amiri, A. 2010. Calculation of water use efficiency on sole cropping and intercropping systems of millet and pea in Sistan area. 1th Iranian Conference of sustainable agriculture and healthy crop production. Isfahan Agriculture and Natural Resources Research Center, Isfahan, Iran.

49. Tavassoli, A., Ghanbari, A., Ahmadi, M. M., and Heydari, M. 2010. The effect of fertilizer and manure on forage and grain yield of millte (panicum miliaceum) and bean (phaseolus vulgaris) in intercropping- Iranian Journal of Agronomy Research 8 (2): 1-11. (in Persian with English abstract).

50. Touzi, I. S., Tourdonnet, De., Launay, M., and Dore, T. 2010. Does intercropping winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) with red fescue (Festuca rubra) as a cover crop improve agronomic and environmental performance? A modeling approach. Field Crops Research 116: 218- 229.

51. Tsubo, M., Walker, S., and Mukhala, E. 2001. Comparisons of radiation use efficiency of mono / intercropping system with different row orientation. Field Crop Research 71: 17-29.

52. Tsubo, M., Walker, S., and Ogindo, H. 2005. A simulation model of cereal- legume intercropping systems for semi-arid regionsI. model development. Field Crop Research 93: 10-22.

53. Vessey, J. K. 2003. Plant growth promoting rizobacteria as biofertilizer. Plant and Soil 255: 571-586.

54. Wahuma, T. A. T., and Miller, D. A. 1987. Effects of intercropping on soybean N2 fixation composition on associated sorghum and soybean. Agronomy Journal 70: 292- 295.

55. Wallace, J. 2001. Organic Field Crop Handbook. Pub. Canadian Organic Growers. Ottanan, Onta.