Comparison of Some Rural Wastewater Refining Systems Considering Chemical Properties and Heavy Metals

آب و خاک

Article 3, Volume 29, Issue 2, May 2015, Pages 322-335   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jsw.v0i0.29481

Author

Najme Yazdanpanah^*

Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman

Abstract

Introduction: Water scarcity is an important challenge worldwide, especially in arid and semi-arid regions. In these areas, the excessive exploitation of groundwater for irrigation, inefficient irrigation methods, irrigation with low-quality water and uncontrolled utilization of fertilizers in agricultural lands in addition to contamination of water resources by domestic and industrial wastewater in urban as well as rural regions, have led to water pollution problems. Furthermore, pollution and transportation of pollutants through wastewater have been considered as an environmental issue. Wastewater is a term that is used to describe waste materials that includes liquid waste and sewage waste. Wastewaters from single houses in the countryside that are not connected to sewers are generally treated on-site by septic tank systems or individual domestic wastewater treatment systems. Study on wastewater quality derived from refining systems in rural areas has been rarely taken into account. This study investigates the efficiency of some refining systems in the reduction of wastewater pollution indices and heavy metal concentrations.
Materials and Methods: This study was done in four rural areas including Dehmilan, Hotkan, Sarbagh and Sekukan which are located around the city of Zarand in the Kerman province. Recently, some refining systems have been established in these areas in order to mitigate the environmental issues. An experiment was done to assess the efficiency of these refining systems and to determine the pollution indices for such small communities. Wastewater sampling was done in 10 replicates each at one week interval from four refineries. Different variables including BOD, COD, TOC, EC, TSS, TDS, DO, TKN, TP, pH, temperature, turbidity (Turb), alkanity (Alk) and also the concentrations of Cd, Zn, Pb, Ni and Mo were measured using standard methods. To quantify the performance of each system, the amount of each variable at the outlet was compared to the value of the same variable at the inlet. Also, the percentage change of wastewater properties at the outlet ratio to the inlet values in the refining systems was calculated. Meanwhile, the efficiency was evaluated using permissible values reported by the Environmental Protection Organization of Iran.
Results and Discussion: The results showed that after purification, the amounts of DO, Cd and Mo were not significantly different among the studied systems, while, the other parameters were found to be similar. In almost all the cases, the amounts of pollutants decreased at the outlets, nevertheless considering the permissible standards, just in few cases the pollution was reduced. Moreover, in comparison to the standard values, the amount of TP increased, while Turbidity decreased. Additionally, the amount of DO was higher than the threshold values. As a result of purification in all the studied systems, the concentrations of Cd and Pb were reduced, whereas the concentration of Ni increased. Also, the concentrations of heavy metals, except Mo were less than the standard values.
Conclusion: It was concluded that the selected refining systems had limited performance in the purification of wastewater in the studied rural areas. However, the amounts of pollutants showed some reductions at the outlets, based on the permissible standards reported by the Environmental Protection Organization of Iran. In just a few cases the pollution indices were reduced. In fact, the septic tank systems could not remove the chemical pollutants from wastewaters, although the best performance was observed for TSS and Turbidity, which were reduced with respect to permissible levels. The amounts of BOD and COD were higher than the standard values, indicating low efficiency of the refining systems in removal of chemical and biological agents. Also, the concentration of TP was found to be higher than the permissible level. The entrance of phosphorous into the surface runoff and water bodies may lead to eutrophication. The results of assessment of heavy metals indicated that the refining system could reduce the concentrations of Cd and Pb, whereas, the concentration of Ni increased. Anyway, the concentrations of heavy metals, except Mo were less than the standard values. The source of Mo seems to be within the wastewater generated by the rural communities, which can lead to serious environmental problems. The main concern arises from the high concentration of Mo, which was 4000 percent greater than the permissible level. Therefore, more studies are needed on the possible source of Mo in the rural study region. Also, a modification in the current systems particularly in removal of chemical agents is necessary.

Keywords

Critical level of pollution; Heavy metals; pollutants; Rural wastewater; Zarand

References

1- Ahuja S. 2009. Handbook of Water Purity and Quality. Calabash, NC, USA.

2- Antelo J., Avena M., Fiol S., Lopez R., and Arce F. 2005. Effects of pH and ionic strength on the adsorption of phosphate and arsenate at the goethite water interface. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 285: 476-486.

3- Aviles A., Rodero J., Amores V., de Vicente A., Isabel Rodrıguez M., and Xavier Niell F. 2006. Factors controlling phosphorus speciation in a Mediterranean basin (River Guadalfeo, Spain). Journal of Hydrology, 331: 396- 408.

4- Azimi A.A., and Ameri M. 2002. Determination of discharge and wastewater pollutants in Sahebgharanie- Tehran refining system. Environmental Sciences, 29: 93-100. (in Persian with English abstract).

5- Bitton G. 1999. Wastewater Microbiology. 2nd Edition. Wiley-Liss.

6- Chary N.S., Kamala C.T., and Raj D.S.S. 2008. Assessing risk of heavy metals from consuming food grown on sewage irrigated soils and food chain transfer. Journal of Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 69: 513-524.

7- Chen G.C., He Z.L., Stoella P.J., Yang X.E., Yang Yu. S., and Calvert D. 2006. Use of dolomite phosphate rock (DPR) fertilizers to reduce phosphorus leaching from sandy soil. Environmental Pollution, 139: 176-182.

8- Chitrakar R., Tezuka S., Sonoda A., Sakane K., Ooi K., and Hirotsu T. 2005. Adsorption of phosphate from seawater on calcined Mg-Mn-layered double hydroxides. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 290: 45-51.

9- Environmental Protection Organization of Iran. 2001. Executive Law, C: No. 104, 134. The Third Development Program. Green Circe Press. (in Persian).

10- Fan C., Chang F.C., Ko C.H., Sheu Y.S., Teng C.J., and Chang T.C. 2009. Urban pollutant removal by a constructed riparian wetland before typhoon damage and after reconstruction. Ecological Engineering, 34: 424-243.

11- Hasanoghli A. 2003. Application of domestic and refining systems wastewaters in irrigation of agricultural crops. Final Report of Plan Number 83.806, Agricultural Engineering Research Institute (AERI), Tehran. 231 p. (in Persian with English abstract)

12- Hosseini M.M., Babalu A., and Afshar M.V. 2003. Study on Lagon suitability using mechanical aerobic in reduction of BOD, COD and TSS in wastewater refining system of Khuy. Urmia Medical Journal, 14(3): 158-166. (in Persian with English abstract)

13- Khatami F. 2008. Pollution of heavy metal in Karoun River, Ahvaz. MSc. Thesis, Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch, Tehran. (in Persian with English abstract)

14- Lazarova V., Levine B., Shack J., Cirelli G., Jeffrey P., Muntau H., Salgot M., and Brissaud F. 2001. Role of water reuse for enhancing integrated water management in Europe and Mediterranean countries. Water Science and Technology, 43(10): 23-33.

15- Ligraid B.O.C., and Karstad C.O. 2001. Agricultural Fertilizers and the Environment. CABI pub. New York.

16- Manahan E.S. 2005. Environmental Chemistry. 8th Ed., New York, 783p.

17- Mardani G., Sadeghi M., and Ahankoub M. 2010. Soil pollution due to surface runoff in South of Tehran. Journal of Water and Wastewater, 75: 108-113. (in Persian with English abstract)

18- Michalski R., and Kurzyca I. 2006. Determination of nitrogen species (nitrate, nitrite and ammonia ions) in environmental samples by ion chromatography. Journal of Environmental Studies, 13(1): 5-18.

19- Mireles A., Solis C., Andrade E., Solar M.L., Pina C., and Flocchini R.G. 2004. Heavy metal accumulation in plants and soil irrigated with wastewater from Mexico City. Journal of Environmental Pollution, 219-220: 187-190.

20- Mohammadi M., Fotovat, A., and Haghnia G.H. 2009. Adsorption of wastewater heavy metals by sand, soil and organic matter. Journal of Water and Wastewater, 4: 71-81. (in Persian with English abstract).

21- Mulqueen J., Rodgers M., and Scally P. 2004. Phosphorus transfer from soil to surface waters. Agricultural Water Management, 68 (1): 91-105.

22- Neal C., Jarvie H.P., Williams R., Love A., Neal M., Wickham H., Harman S., and Armstrong L. 2010. Declines in phosphorus concentration in the upper River Thames (UK): Links to sewage effluent cleanup and extended end-member mixing analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 408: 1315-1330.

23- Nordin N.A. 2006. Leachate treatment using constructed wetland with magnetic field. M.Sc. Thesis, Malaysia University. Malaysia.

24- Nowruzi M., and Pourkhabaz A. 2010. Qualitative study on Karoon River water. The 4th Professional Symposium and Exhibition of Environmental Engineering. Tehran, Iran. (in Persian)

25- Pedrero F., Kalavrouziotis I., Jose Alarcon J., Koukoulakis P., and Asano T. 2010. Use of treated municipal wastewater in irrigated agriculture- Review of some practices in Spain and Greece. Agricultural Water Management, 97(9): 1233-1241.

26- Ratan R.K., Data S.P., Chhonkar P.K., Suribabu K., and Singh A.K. 2005. Long-term impact of irrigation with sewage effluents on heavy metal content in soils, crops and groundwater a case study. Journal of Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 109: 310-322.

27- Roeleveld P.J., and Van Loosdrecht M.C. 2002. Experience with guidelines for wastewater characterization in the Netherlands. Water Science and Technology, 45(6): 77-87.

28- Salari H., Hasani, A.H., Borghei M., Yazdanbakhsh A.R., and Rezai H. 2012. Performance of rural refining system using artificial wetland method in removal of N and P from wastewater (case study: Morad Tapeh village). Journal of Water and Wastewater, 3: 40-47. (in Persian with English abstract)

29- Sanchez-Perez J.M., and Tremolieres M. 2003. Change in groundwater chemistry as a consequence of suppression of floods: the case of the Rhine flood plain. Journal of Hydrology, 270: 89-104.

30- Sardashti, A. 2003. Chromium removal from industrial wastewaters. Journal of Water and Wastewater, 45: 18-26. (in Persian with English abstract).

31- Sayadmanesh S.M., Bahmanyar M.A., and Ghajar Sepanlu M. 2014. Application of industrial wastewater in irrigation of fields and the effect on heavy metals accumulation in soil and Rice plant. Journal of Water and Wastewater, 13: 13-20. (in Persian with English abstract).

32- Shokuhian M., and Piyade F. 2010. Industrial wastewater recovery and its role in water crisis reduction. The 4th Professional Symposium and Exhibition of Environmental Engineering. Tehran, Iran. (in Persian).

33- Srinivasan, J., and Reddy V.R. 2009. Impact of irrigation water quality on human health, A case study in India. Ecological Economics, 68: 2800-2807.

34- Torabian A., Ghadimkhani A.A., Rashidi Mehrabadi A., Shokouki M., and Janbeglu R. 2006. Effects of pre-ozonation on organic carbon removal in refining of surface waters. Journal of Water and Wastewater, 58: 2-9. (in Persian with English abstract).

35- Wang S.L., Cheng Y.C., Tzou Y.M., Liaw R.B., Chang T.W., and Chen J.H. 2007. Phosphate removal from water using lithium intercalated gibbsite. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 147: 205-212.

36- Wilsenach J.A., Schuurbiers C.A.H., and van Loosdrecht M.C.M. 2007. Phosphate and potassium recovery from source separated urine through struvite precipitation. Water Research, 41: 458-466.

37- Yazdanpanah N., Pazira E. Neshat A., and Mahmoodabadi M. 2012. Effect of different amendments on some physical and chemical properties of a saline-sodic soil. Arid Biome Scientific and Research Journal, 2(1): 83-97. (in Persian with English abstract).