Effect of Regulated Deficit Irrigation (RDI) and Partial Root zone Drying (PRD) on Quantitative and Qualitative Traits of Strawberry

آب و خاک

Article 3, Volume 29, Issue 4, September 2015, Pages 820-827   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jsw.v0i0.23836

Authors

A. Shahnazari^{* 1}; M. Rezaiyan²

¹Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University

²Tarbiat Modares University

Abstract

Introduction: Deficit irrigation (DI) is a suitable solution to gain acceptable and economic performance by using minimum amount of water. The partial root zone drying (PRD) method introduced in Australia for the first time and its goal was controlling the vine’s excessive growth. This goal gained by alternative drying the rootzone. Basically the theory of PRD method, is expanding the plant’s roots by applying alternative stress on different sides of the roots. So the plants with PRD irrigation method can have different root system in comparison with other irrigation methods. At this method the plant’s condition would be OK by uptaking water from wet side, and the roots at the dry side can release abscisic acid hormone which decrease the stomatal conductance and consequently the water use efficiency would be increase.There had been studies on the effect of water tension on strawberry. The previous studies on strawberry indicated that the water stress can increase the plant’s brix concentration and some of plant acids.The awareness of the impact of water deficit stress on strawberry plant quantity and quality is essential for irrigation and product management, and at the current study, effect of different deficit irrigation methods on quantitative and qualitative traits of strawberry have been evaluated. The focus at the current study was on the qualitative traits.
Materials and Methods: The present study was conducted in one of strawberry farms of Babolsar city in 2012 to evaluate the effects of deficit irrigation and partial root zone drying on quantitative and qualitative traits of strawberry plants. Three Irrigation treatments were studied: Full Irrigation (FI), Regulated Deficit Irrigation (RDI75%) at 75% level of plants water requirementand Partial Root zone Drying (PRD75%) at 75% level of plants water requirement. The study was conducted in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Irrigation was continued until the soil moisture reached to field capacity. The field capacity point’s moisture was measured by using pressure plate equipment. By having the soil moisture curve and measuring the soil suction with tensiometer, the soil moisture situation determined. According to the point that the strawberry’s root is about 25 centimeters (cm), the tensiometers were installed at 2 depths next to the plant. The 1st depth was 8 cm and the 2nd one was 23 cm. The distance between tensiometers and the plant were 4 cm. 2 stochastic replication at the field were considered for the tensiometers positions. In order to deliver precise amount of water to irrigation treatments, the volume counters had been used. The water was applying by using drip tapes. The flow from the emitters on the drip tapes was 2.9 liters per hour. The harvest time was from May 5th to June 20th. To measure the performance, each shrub’s strawberries were weighted separately.Depth of irrigation water during the whole irrigation season for full and deficit irrigation treatments were 341 and 256 mm, respectively. Evaluating the effect of treatments was conducted by measuring the quantitative and qualitative traits of fruits at harvesting time.For analyzing the data, the SAS software and to plot the graphs, the Excel software were used. The SNK test (5% level) was used to comprise the treatments’ traits.
Results and Discussion: Quantitative traits consisted of fresh weight, dry weight, leaf area, leaf area index and yield in FI was higher significantly than deficit irrigation treatments. In comparison with the qualitative traits consisted of titratable acid, acidity and flavor of the fruit there was no significant difference between treatments. The leaf area index (LAI) at RDI and PRD were lower than the FI. Its reason could be the growth’ reducing as a result of abscisic acid (ABA) hormone’s release in the roots which can control the growth. The amount of total sugar (brix) and anthocyanin in RDI were significantly higher than the other two treatments.
Conclusion: The comparison between irrigation treatments indicated that the best quantitative results were at FI treatment. By considering the quantitative and qualitative traits, PRD had the nearest results to FI. At the water stress conditions, applying PRD method at 75% level would be a good management technic to have better performance and increasing the fruit quality. In Mazandaran Province condition, using this method would be a good way to minimize the quantitative losses and increasing the quality of fruits at stress condition.

Keywords

Providence; Water deficit; plant; yield

References

1- Alizadeh A. 2004. Water, soil and plant relation. 3rd edition. Imam Reza University press. 615 pp. (in Persian)

2- Alizade A. and Kamalali Gh.A. 2007. The plants’ water demand at Iran. Imam Reza University press. 228 pp. (in Persian)

3- Cui N., Du T., Kang S., Li F., Zhang J., Wang M. and Li Z. 2008. Regulated deficit irrigation improved fruit quality and water use efficiency of pear-jujube trees, Agricultural water management, 95: 489-497.

4- Davies W.J., Wilkinson S. and Loveys B. 2002. Stomatal control by chemical signalling and the exploitation of this mechanism to increase water use efficiency in agriculture, new phytologist, 153: 449-460.

5- Davies W.J. and Zhang J.H. 1991. Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil, Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular Biology, 42: 55-76.

6- De La Hera M., Romero P., Gomez-Plaza E. and Martinez A. 2007. Is partial root-zone drying an effective irrigation technique to improve water use efficiency and fruit quality in field-grown wine grapes under semiarid conditions? Agricultural water management, 87: 261-274.

7- Dos Santos T.P., Lopes C.M., Rodrigues M.L., De Souza C.R., Maroco J.P., Pereira J.S., Silva J.R. and Chaves M.M. 2003. Partial root zone drying. Effects on fruit growth and quality of field grown grapevines (Vitisvinifera), Functional Plant Biology, 30: 663–671.

8- Dry P. and Loveys B.R. 1998. Factors influencing grapevine and the potential for control with partial root zone drying, Australian Journal of grape and wine research, 4: 140-148.

9- Gine Bordonaba J. and Terry L.A. 2010. Manipulating the taste-related composition of strawberry fruits (Fragaria x ananassa) from different cultivars using deficit irrigation, Food Chemistry, 122: 1020-1026.

10- Kumar S. and Dey P. 2011. Effects of different mulches and irrigation methods on root growth, nutrient uptake, water-use efficiency and yield of strawberry, Scientia horticulturae, 127: 318-324.

11- Liu F., Savić S., Jensen C.R., Shahnazari A., Jacobsen S.E., Stikić R. and Andersen M.N. 2007. Water relations and yield of lysimeter-grown strawberries under limited irrigation, Scientia horticulturae, 111: 128-132.

12- Miller S.A. Smith G.S. Boldingh H.L. and Johansson A. 1998. Effects of water stress on fruit quality attributes of kiwifruit, Annals of botany, 81: 73-81.

13- Rolbiecki S., Rolbiecki R., Rzekanowski C. and Derkacz M. 2001. Effect of different irrigation regimes on growth and yield of'elsanta'strawberries planted on loose sandy soil. International Symposium on Irrigation and Water Relations in Grapevine and Fruit Trees, 646. Pp, 163-166.

14- Schachtman D.P. and Goodger J.Q. 2008. Chemical root to shoot signaling under drought, Trends in plant science, 13: 281-287.

15- Shahnazari A., Liu F., Andersen M.N., Jacobsen S.E. and Jensen C.R. 2007. Effects of partial root-zone drying on yield, tuber size and water use efficiency in potato under field conditions, Field crops research, 100: 117-124.

16- Shao G.C., Zhang Z.Y., Liu N., Yu S.E. and Xing W.G. 2008. Comparative effects of deficit irrigation (DI) and partial rootzone drying (PRD) on soil water distribution, water use, growth and yield in greenhouse grown hot pepper, Scientia horticulturae, 119: 11-16.

17- Taherkhani A. and Golchin A. 2009. Regulated deficit irrigation and partial rootzone drying; technical methods for vineyard’s irrigation management. The 1st national conference of water crisis at agriculture and natural resources. 05th November 2009. Azad University of Shahr e Rey branch, Tehran, Iran. (in Persian)

18- Trout T.J. and Gartung J. 2003. Irrigation water requirements of strawberries. IV International Symposium on Irrigation of Horticultural Crops 664. Pp, 665-671.

19- Wang H., Liu F., Andersen M.N. and Jensen C.R. 2009. Comparative effects of partial root-zone drying and deficit irrigation on nitrogen uptake in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.), Irrigation Science, 27: 443-448.

20- Xu H., Qin F., Wang F., Xu Q., Wang R., Shah S., Zhao A. and Li F. 2009. Applications of xerophytophysiology in plant production-Partial root drying improves tomato crops, Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 7: 981-988.

21- Yazar A., Gökçel F. and Sezen M. 2009. Corn yield response to partial rootzone drying and deficit irrigation strategies applied with drip system, Plant Soil Environment, 55: 494-503.

22- Zegbe J., Behboudian M. and Clothier B. 2004. Partial rootzone drying is a feasible option for irrigating processing tomatoes, Agricultural water management, 68: 195-206.

23- Zegbe J., Behboudian M. and Clothier B. 2006. Responses of ‘Petopride’processing tomato to partial rootzone drying at different phenological stages, Irrigation Science, 24: 203-210.

24- Zegbe Domınguez J., Behboudian M., Lang A. and Clothier B. 2003. Deficit irrigation and partial rootzone drying maintain fruit dry mass and enhance fruit quality in ‘Petopride’processing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum, Mill.), Scientia horticulturae, 98: 505-510.