Selectivity of Cold Tolerant Chickpea Genotypes under Controlled Condition (Cold room)

پژوهشهای زراعی ایران

Article 5, Volume 17, Issue 1 - Serial Number 53, April 2019, Pages 75-82   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/gsc.v17i1.66071

Author

D Sadeghzadeh-Ahari^*

Dryland Agricultural Research Institute

Abstract

Introduction: Chickpea is the most important field crop among food legumes in Iran. According to the published statistic by agricultural ministry of Iran, cultivation area of chickpea varies between 550– 900 thousand hectares that more than of 90% them cultivated under dryland condition. More than 63% of country has cold and higher cold climates and more than 60% of drylands in Iran located in cold and highlands where temperature declines to -25°C in some years, with continues cold duration (more than 100 days per year). Reports show that the yield of chickpea is low in cold areas (about 500 kg.ha-1) because of the spring planting and lack cold tolerant cultivars suitable for autumn planting. In cold regions that absolute minimum temperature in winter reaches under -6°C till -12°C, studies showed that it may be complete damage occurrence if chickpea planted in autumn. Studies showed that planting of cold tolerance varieties increased the yield of chickpea almost twice. Hence, screening chickpea germplasms for cold tolerance will help to release new cold tolerant cultivars. The literature review suggests that most studies related to the evaluation and screening of chickpea cold tolerance were done under natural conditions (field), but the spatial and temporal variation in the weather under such circumstances may lead to different results. Researchers reported that using from controlled condition for screening cold tolerance genotypes in chickpea germplasm would prevent seasonal restrictions, saving time and increasing the accuracy of studies while eliminating unwanted factors.
Materials and Methods: In order to study on cold tolerance of 33 Kabuli chickpea genotypes along with three controls (Saral, ILC 533 and Jam), this study carried out in square lattice design (6×6) with two replications under controlled condition (cold room) at Maragheh Dryland Agricultural Research Station, during growing season 2014-2015 . Ten seeds of each genotype after surface sterilized with fungicide (Benomile with 0.015%) planted in five cm depth in planting boxes (100×80×25 cm) at early autumn (29 September). In order to simulation of natural growth condition in autumn and acclimation of seedlings, planted boxes incubated outside of green house. Number of germinated seeds was recorded and seedling of genotypes at six-week stage, incubated in cold room. The temperature of cold room decreased two degrees in each hour up to minus 15°C and seedlings remained for one hour at this temperature. A thin layer of ice nucleation active bacteria sprayed on the surface of seedlings at -2°C in order to establish ice nucleation and prevent ultra-freezing of seedlings. Then temperature increased up to 4°C for three days and boxes transferred to green house for two weeks under 20±3°C. Frost resistance ratios (FRR) of genotypes calculated and analyzed. According to other studies and reports the genotypes with 0.91-1 and 0.81-0.90 FRR classified in highly resistance and resistance groups, respectively. 
Results and Discussion: Results showed that there was significant (p ≤ 0.01) differences in frost resistance ratio (FRR) among the investigated genotypes. Lines 14 (Flip98-138C* SEL99TER85074)*Sel.99th.15039, 28 (FLIP 00-84 C) and Saral cultivar had the highest FRR (100, 98 and 89 survived percentage, respectively) among the genotypes. Also Kaka cultivar and line 12 (Flip 98-28C*Flip 98-22C)* ICCV2 had the lowest frost tolerance among the studied genotypes. About 30% of genotypes could tolerate the frost damage, for example, genotypes 14 and 28 had between 0.9-1.0 ratio, whereas, the FRR of susceptible check (ILC533) was 0.13. 
Conclusions: The existence of wide range of diversity for frost resistance among the studied germplasm would be useful to introduce new tolerant chickpea cultivars with autumn-sown potential. Moreover, the tolerance of Saral cultivar to frost stress, its cultivation under cold dryland regions could be recommended as the first frost tolerant variety in the country.

Keywords

Chickpea; Dryland; frost resistance ratio; Line; seedling; Selection

References

1. Anonymous. 2015 a. Statistical information of agricultural crops production in Iran. Department of Statistics. Ministry of Jihad-e-Keshavarzi 1: 1-44. (in Persian).

2. Anonymous. 2015 b. Survey of harvest area and crop production during 36 years (1977-2013). Department of Statistics. Ministry of Jihad-e-Keshavarzi 112-118. (in Persian).

3. Croser, J. S., Clarke, H. J., Siddique, K. H. M., and Khan, T. N. 2003. Low-temperature stress: implications for chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) improvement. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 22 (2): 185-219.

4. Eradatmand-Asli, D., and Mehrpanah, H. 2009. Pulse Crops Production and Nitrogen Fixation. Islamic Azad University of Saveh. (in Persian).

5. Farayedi, Y. 2007. Study on agronomic characteristics and cold hardiness in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes in autumn rainfed sowing condition. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal 23 (4): 489-503. (in Persian with English abstract).

6. Fathi, E., Tahmasebi, I., and Teimoori, N. 2016. Electrolyte leakage and catalase and peroxidase activity in chickpea genotypes seedling responding to low temperatures. Agro Ecology Journal 12 (2): 25-34. (in Persian with English abstract).

7. Heidarvand, L., Maali Amiri, R., Naghavi, M. R., Farayedi, Y., Sadeghzadeh, B., and Alizadeh, Kh. 2011. Phisiological and morphological characteristics of chickpea accessions under low temperature stress. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 58 (1): 157-163.

8. Izadi-Darbandi, E., Nezami A., Hassanbeigy, R., and Janalizadeh Ghazvini, M. 2016. The effect of freezing stress on percentage of electrolytes leakage and survival of flixweed (Descurainia sophia L.) seedlings. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 14 (2): 369-379. (in Persian with English abstract).

9. Kanouni, H., Khalily, M., and Malhotra, R. S. 2009. Assessment of cold tolerance of chickpea at rainfed highlands of Iran. American-Eurasian Journal of Agriculture and Environment Sciences 5 (2): 250-254.

10. Kanouni, H. 2004. Study of cold tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes in fall sown nurseries. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal 20 (1): 89-99. (in Persian with English abstract).

11. Kanouni, H., Farayedi, Y., Sabaghpour, S. H., Sadeghzadeh- Ahari, D., Shahab, M. R., Kamel, M., Saeid, A., Mahmoodi, A. A., Pezeshkpour, P., Norollahi, Kh., Hasanpour- Hosni, M., Mahdie, M., Bahrami Kamangir, S., Mahmoodi, F., Nemati-Fard, M., and Ghasemi, M. 2013. Saral, new chickpea variety to expand autumn sowing in highland cold areas of Iran. Research Achievements for Field and Horticulture Crops 2 (4): 265-276. (in Persian with English abstract).

12. Keykha Akhar, F., Bagheri, A., Moshtaghi, N., and Nezami, A. 2012. Selection for freezing tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) by in vitro culture. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 10 (2): 292-298. (in Persian with English abstract).

13. Khalili, A., Hojam, S., and Irannejhad, P.1991. Extensive project of country water. Vol.4. Recognization of Iranian climatology, weather divisions. Ministry of Power publications. 274 pp. (in Persian).

14. Naderi, H., Shokrpoor, M., Asghari, A., Kanooni, H., and Esfandiari, A. 2013. Evaluation of cold tolerance in winter sowing of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) using morphological and phenological traits in Kurdistan. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 4 (1):69-80. (in Persian with English abstract).

15. Nezami, A., Bagheri, A., Rahimian, H., Kafi, M., Nasiri Mahalati, M. 2007. Evaluation of freezing tolerance of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes under controlled conditions. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 10 (4): 257-269.

16. Nezami, A., and Bagheri, A. 2006. Preliminary evaluation of phenology, yield components and yield of fall chickpea genotypes in the Mashhad conditions. Agricultural Sciences and Technology Journal 20 (3): 71-80. (in Persian with English abstract).

17. Nezami, A., Sedaghatkhahi, H., Porsa, H., Parsa, M., and Bagheri, A. R. 2010. Evaluation of autumn sowing chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes of cold tolerant under supplemental irrigation. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 8: 415-423. (in Persian with English abstract).

18. Ozdemir, S., and Karadavut, U. 2003. Comparison of the performance of autumn and spring sowing of chickpeas in a temperate region. Turk Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 27: 345-352.

19. Parsa, M., and Bagheri, A. R. 2008. Pulses. Mashhad Jihad-e- Daneshghahi Publ. (in Persian).

20. Porsa, H., Nezami, A., Bagheri, A. and Najibnia, S. 2016. Agronomic assessment of cold tolerant chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes in fall sowing at Mashhad conditions. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 7 (1): 37-53. (in Persian with English abstract).

21. Saeed, A., Darvishzadeh, R., Hovsepyan, H., and Asatryan, A. 2010. Tolerance to freezing stress in Cicer accessions under controlled and field conditions. African Journal of Biotechnology 9 (18): 2618-2626.

22. Saghfi, S., Eivazi, A. R., and Qasimov, N. 2013. Assessing of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes to cold stress with different planting dates. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production 4 (8):1903-1909.

23. Sadeghzadeh-Ahari, D. 2011. Improving researches results of dryland pulses. Dryland Agricultural Research Institute publications. (in Persian).

24. Sadeghzadeh-Ahari, D. 2012. Improving researches results of dryland pulses. Dryland Agricultural Research Institute publications. (in Persian).

25. Sadeghzadeh-Ahari, D. 2015. Effect of freezing temperatures on different seedling ages of chickpea genotypes under controlled conditions. Seed and Plant Production Journal 31 (2): 161-172. (in Persian with English abstract).

26. Sadeghzadeh-Ahari, D., and Farayedi, Y. 2013. Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) advanced lines to no snow cover cold in fall planting. Seed and Plant Improvement Journal 29 (4): 711-727. (in Persian with English abstract).

27. Sedaghat Khahi, H., Parsa, M., Nezami, A., Bagheri, A., and Porsa, H. 2011. Evaluating of the morphological and phenological characteristics of cold tolerant chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes at Entezary sowing in Mashhad conditions. Iranian Journal of Pulses Research 3 (1): 41-52. (in Persian with English abstract).

28. Singh, K. B.1990. Winter chickpea: problems and potential in the Mediterranean region. Options Mediteraneees 9: 25-34.

29. Zare-Mehrjerdi, M., Bagheri, A. R., and Vesal, S. R. 2005. Screening approach for cold tolerance screening in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Proceedings of the first national pulse crops symposium of Iran. 441-444. (in Persian).

30. Yazdi Samadi, B., Majnoun Hosseini, N., and Peighambari, S. 2004. Evaluation of cold hardiness in lentil genotypes (Lens culinaris medik.) Seed and plant Improvement Journal 20 (1): 23-37. (in Persian with English abstract).

31. Wery, J .1990. Adaptation to frost and drought stress in chickpea and implications in plant breeding.pages:77-85. In: M.C. Saxena, J. I. Cubero, J. Wery (Eds.). Present status and future prospects of chickpea crop production and improvement in the Mediterranean countries. Options Mediterraneenes Serie Seminaries. No. 9. CHEAM. France.