The Effect of Combined Application of PGPR and Mycorrhizal Fungi in Intercropping of Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) and Faba bean (Vicia faba L.) on Growth Characteristics and Seed Yield

پژوهشهای زراعی ایران

Article 9, Volume 17, Issue 1 - Serial Number 53, April 2019, Pages 123-140   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/gsc.v17i1.71955

Authors

Kh Alizadeh; E Rezaei-Chiyaneh^* ; R Amirnia; M Barin

Urmia University

Abstract

Introduction: Intercropping is defined as the growing of two or more crops at the same time in the same piece of land. Intercropping of legume with non-legume compared with monoculture has many advantages such as reducing the risk of crop failure, making efficient use of available land, improving productivity and income, more efficient use of resources (water, nitrogen, and radiation) and increasing food security in vulnerable production systems. Biofertilizers are important not only for the reduction of quality of chemical fertilizers but also for getting better yield in sustainable agriculture. Application of biofertilizers and no use of chemical fertilizers are rapidly gaining favor. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) has been well documented to be a bio-fertilizers that have a symbiotic relationship with many crops and by increasing the uptake of nutrients mainly phosphorus, and enhancing the water absorption and resistance to pathogens, improves growth and yield of host plants in sustainable agricultural systems. The main objective of the present study was to determine the effect of biofertilizers (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulfur solubilizing bacteria+ Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi) and intercropping on seed yield and yield components of linseed and faba bean.
Materials and Methods: This experiment was conducted as factorial layout based on randomized complete block design with three replications at the Research Farm of the Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University, Iran, during growing season of 2017. The first factor was five intercropping patterns including 1 row linseed + 1 row faba bean, 2 row linseed + 2 row faba bean, 3 row linseed + 3 row faba bean, and monocropping of each crop and the second factor was included control (no fertilizer), and biofertilizers (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulfur supplier bacteria+ arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi). Before the sowing, the related biofertilizers were shaked completely to cover the whole seeds surface after which the seeds were shadow-dried and planted, irrigation was done immediately after seed sowing. No fertilizer was used during the growing season. In addition, the land equivalent ratio (LER) was calculated to determine the advantages of intercropping. The Analysis of variance was performed using SAS 9.4 software; means were compared by using Duncan's multiple test at 0.05 probability level.
Results and Discussion: The results showed that the effect of cropping pattern on all measured traits was significant on height, number of lateral branch, number of capsule per plant, number of seed per capsule, 1000-seed weight, biological yield, seed yield, oil percentage of linseed and on height, number of lateral branch, number of pod per plant, number of seed per pod, 1000-seed weight, biological yield, seed yield of faba bean. The highest seed yield of faba bean (4.280 t ha-1) and linseed (2.230 t ha-1) were obtained in monocropping treatments, respectively. The higher production in linseed and faba bean monocropping may be due to the less disturbance in the habitat in homogeneous environment under monocropping systems. The results showed that biofertilizer had a significant effect on all traits, in linseed and faba bean. The highest yield and yield componenet of both plants were achieved in use of biofertilizers. In linseed, the highest oil percentage of all treatments was higher than solecropping. Also, total LER was more than 1 and the highest values were observed in all treatments. The maximum LER values (1.50) were obtained for intercropping 2 row of linseed + 2 row of fababean with using biofertilizers. It seems that better utilize of the growth resource in the intercropping led to reach this result.
Conclusions: In general, the results of this experiment showed that the faba bean and linseed yield were influenced by different intercropping patterns and biofertilizer. The highest seed yield for both plants (faba bean and linseed) were achieved in monocropping. In the present study, application of biofertilizers could improve the yield and some characteristics of faba bean and linseed. In addition, with application of biofertilizer the seed yield of linseed and faba bean about 38% and 31% compared with control (non-consumption), respectively. It seems that the use of biofertilizers in intercropping is one of the suitable strategies for achieving optimal yields with minimum inputs, which in the long run can reduce the need of crop systems to chemical inputs.

Keywords

: Azotobacter; Land equivalent ratio; Oil; Planting pattern; Pseudomonas

References

1. Abou- Hussein, S. D., Salman, S. R., Adel-Mawgoud, A. M. R., and Ghoname, A. A. 2005. Produtivity, quality and profit of sole or intercropping green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) crop. Journal of Agronomy 2: 151-155.

2. Ahmadvand, G., and Hajinia, S. 2016. Ecological aspects study of replacement intercropping patterns of soybean (Glycine max L.) and millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Journal of Agroecology 7 (4): 485-498. (in Persian with English abstract).

3. Ali, Z., Asghar-Malik, M., and Akhtar-Cheema, M. 2000. Studies on determining a suitable canola-wheat intercropping pattern. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 2: 42-44.

4. Amani Machiani, M., Javanmard, A., and Shekari, F. 2017. The effect of intercropping patterns on Peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) dry biomass yield and essential oil content and Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) seed yield. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 27 (3): 45-62. (in Persian with English abstract).

5. Aminifar, J., Ramroudi, M., Galavi, M., and Mohsenabadi, Gh. R. 2017. Advantage of Sesame and Cowpea Intercrops in Different Fertilizer Application Systems. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology 10 (4): 1039-1054.

6. Bijani, M., Yadollahi, P., Asgharipour, M. R., Oleimani, S., and Latifi, M. 2015. Effects of nitrogen and biological fertilizer on yield, oil and protein content of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Journal of Oil Plants Production 1 (2): 67-78.

7. Boomsma, C. R. and Vyn, T. J. 2008. Maize drought tolerance: Potential improvements through arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Iranian Journal Field Crops Research 108: 14-31.

8. Dabbagh Mohammadi Nassab, A., Amini, R., and Tamar, E. 2015. Evaluation of maize (Zea mays L.) and three cultivars of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) intercropping with application of biofertilizers and chemical fertilizers. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 25 (1): 99-112. (in Persian with English abstract).

9. FAOSTS. 2016. World Agriculture Datam, http://www.fao.org/

10. Franco, J. G., King, S. R., Masabni, J. G., and Volder, A. 2015. Plant functional diversity improves short-term yields in a low-input intercropping system. Journal of Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 203: 1-10.

11. Ghale Noyee, Sh., Koocheki, A., Naseri Poor Yazdi, M. T., and Jahan, M. 2017. Effect of different treatments of mixed and row intercropping on yield and yield components of sesame and bean. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 15 (3): 588-602. (in Persian with English abstract).

12. Gharineh, M. H., and Enayat GHolizadeh, M. R. 2009. Crop Ecology. Islamic azad university Shoushtar branch. Pp 303.

13. Gliessman, S. R. 1998. Agroecology: Ecological Processes in sustainable Agriculture. CRC press.

14. Hamzei, J., and Ghamari Rahim, N. 2014. Evaluation of corn-s--oybean intercropping advantages usinga gronomic and weed control efficiency indices. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 24 (3): 61-73. (in Persian with English abstract).

15. Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., Gooding, M., Dibet, P., Von Fragstein, A., Pristeri, M., Monti, E., and Jensen, A. 2009. Pea–barley intercropping for efficient symbiotic N2-fixation, soil N acquisition and use of other nutrients in European organic cropping systems. Journal of Field Crops Research 113: 64-71.

16. Hirpa, T. 2014. Effect of intercrop row arrangement on maize and haricot bean productivity and the residual soil. World journal of Agricultural Sciences 4:69-077.

17. Hodiani mehr, A., Dahmardeh, M., Khammari, I., and Asgharipoor, M. 2016. Effects of Tillage Systems on Changes of Soil Nutrients, Yield and Land Equivalent Ratio in Roselle – Green Gram Intercropping. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 15 (2): 311-322.

18. Jahan, M., and Nassiri Mahallati, M. 2012. Soil fertility and biofertilizers: an agroecological approach. Ferdowsi University Press. 250 pp. (in Persian).

19. Jahan, M., Aryaee, M., Amiri, M. B., and Ehyaee, H. R. 2013. The effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of (Sesamum indicum L.) with application of cover crops of Lathyrus sp. and Persian clover (Trifolium resopinatum L.). Journal of Agroecology 5 (1): 1-15. (in Persian).

20. Jannoura, R., Joergensena, R. G., and Bruns, C. H. 2014. Organic fertilizer effects on growth, crop yield, and soil microbial biomass indices in sole and intercropped peas and oats under organic farming conditions. European Journal of Agronomy 52: 259-270.

21. Jensen, E. S., Peoples, M., and Hauggaard-Nielsen, H. 2010. Faba bean in cropping systems. Journal of Field Crop Research 115: 203-216.

22. Karimi, K., Bolandnazar, S. A., and Ashoori, S. 2013. Effect of bio-fertilizer and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on yield, growth characteristics and quality of green bean (Phaseolous vulgaris L.). Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 23(3): 157-167. (in Persian with English abstract).

23. Khaki Najafabadi, A., Jahan, M., Koocheki, A., and Nassiri Mahalat, M. 2017. Effects of intercropping of common millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) and biological fertilizer inoculation on water and nitrogen use efficiencies. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 15 (3): 691-708. (in Persian with English abstract).

24. Khorramdel, S., Koocheki, A., Nassiri Mahallati, M. and Ghorbani, R. 2010. Effect of biofertilizers on the yield and yield components of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 8(5): 758-766. (in Persian).

25. Koocheki, A., Fallahpour, F., Khorramdel, S., and Jafari, L. 2014. Intercropping wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with canola (Brassica napus L.) and their effects on yield, yield components, weed density and diversity. Journal of Agroecology 6 (1): 11-20. (in Persian).

26. Koocheki, A., Lalegani, B., and Najib Nia, S. 2009. Evaluation of intercropping beans and corn production. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 7 (2): 20-30. (in Persian).

27. Koocheki, A., Rezvani Moghaddam, P., and Fallahi, H. R. 2016. Effects of planning dates, irrigation management and cover crops on growth and yield of saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Journal of Agroecology 8(3): 435-451.

28. Koocheki, A., Zarghani, H., and Norooziyan, A. 2016. Comparison of yield and yield components of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) and Red Bean (Phaseolus calcaratus) under different intercropping arrangements. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 14 (2): 226-243. (in Persian with English abstract).

29. Leithy, S., El-Meseiry, T. A., and Abdallah, E. F. 2006. Effect of biofertilizer, cell stabilizer and irrigation regime on rosemary herbage oil quality. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 2: 773-779.

30. Mardani, F., Balouchi, H., Yadavi, A., and Salehi, A. 2015. Effect of row intercropping patterns on yield, yield components, and weed control of fenugreek (Trigonellafoenumgreacum L.) and anise (Pimpinellaanisum L.). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 13 (3): 623-636. (in Persian with English abstract).

31. Moradi Telavat, M. R., and Ataollah Siadat, S. 2012. Introduction and production of oil seed crops. Education and agricultural promotion Press, Pp 374. (in Persian).

32. Naghizade, M., Ramroodi, M., Galavi, M., Siahsar, B., Heydari, M., and Maghsoodi, A. A. 2013. The effects of various phosphorus fertilizers on yield and yield components of maize and grass pea intercropping. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science 43 (2): 203-215. (in Persian with English abstract).

33. Pooramir, F., Nassiri Mahallati, M., Koocheki, A., and Ghorbani, R. 2010. Effect of different planting combinations on yield and yield components of sesame and peas intercropping in additive series. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 8 (3): 393-402. (in Persian).

34. Rezaei- Chiyaneh, E. 2016. Intercropping of flax seed (Linum usitatissimum L.) and pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under foliar application of iron nano chelated and zinc. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 29 (1): 39-56. (in Persian with English abstract).

35. Rezaei- Chiyaneh, E., Tajbakhsh, M., and Fotohi Chiyaneh, S. 2015. Yield and yield components of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) in strip intercropping with ajowan (Carum copticum L.) influenced by bio and chemical fertilizer. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 24 (4): 1-15. (in Persian with English Summary).

36. Rezaei-Chiyaneh, E., and Gholinezhad, E. 2015. Study of agronomic characteristics and advantage indices in intercropping of additive series of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and black cumin (Nigella sativa L.). Journal of Agroecology 7 (3): 381-396. (in Persian).

37. Rezaei-Chiyaneh, E., Khorramdel, S., and Garachali, P. 2015. Evaluation of relay intercropping of sunflower and faba bean on their yield and land use efficiency. Journal of Crops Improvement 17 (1): 183-196. (in Persian).

38. Rezvani Moghadam, P., and Moradi, R. 2012. Assessment of planting date, biological fertilizer and intercropping on yield and essential oil of cumin and fenugreek. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science 43 (2): 217-230. (in Persian with English abstract).

39. Rezvani Moghaddam, P., Amiri, M. B., and Seyyedi, S. M. 2014. Effect of organic and bio-fertilizers application on yield, oil content and fatty acids composition of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences 16 (3): 209-221. (in Persian with English abstract).

40. Rudresh, D. L., Shivaprakash, M. K., and Prasad, R. D. 2005. Effect of combined application of rhizobium, phosphate solubilizing bacterium and trichoderma spp. on growth, nutrient uptake and yield of Chickpea (Cicer aritenium L.). Journal of Applied Soil Ecology 28: 139-146.

41. Seyed Sharifi, R., and Khoramdel, S. 2016. Effects of Nano-Zinc oxide and seed inoculation by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on yield, yield components and grain filling period of soybean (Glycine max L.). Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 13 (4): 738-753. (in Persian).

42. Seyed sharifi, R., and Namvar, A. 2015. Bio fertilizers in agronomy. University of Mohaghegh Ardabili. 280. (in Persian).

43. Strichland, M. S., Leggett, Z. H., and Bradford, M. A. 2015. Biofuel intercropping effects on soil carbon and microbial activity. Ecological Applications 25: 140-150.

44. Tang, X., Bernard, L., Brauman, A., Daufresne, T., Deleporte, P., Desclaux, D., Souche, G., Placella, S. A., and Hinsinger, P. 2014. Increase in microbial biomass and Phosphorus availability in the rhizosphere of intercropped cereal and legumes under field conditions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 75: 86-93.

45. Tavassoli, A., Ghanbari, A., Ahmadi, M. M., and Heydari, M. 2010. The effect of fertilizer and manure on forage and grain yield of and bean in intercropping. Iranian Journal of Agronomy Research 8 (2): 96-114. (in Persian with English abstract).

46. Tong-jian, X., Qing-song, Y., Wei, R., Guo-hua, X. U., and Qi-rong, S. H. 2010. Effect of inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus on nitrogen and phosphorus utilization in upland rice-mungbean intercropping system. Journal of Agricultural Sciences in China 9: 528 -535.

47. Toosi, P., Esfahani, M., Rabiei, M., and Rabiei, B. 2011. Effect of concentration and time of supplementary nitrogen fertilizer application on yield and NUE of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) as a second crop in paddy field. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science 42 (2): 387-396. (in Persian).

48. Weisanny, W., Raei, Y., Zehtab-Salmasi, S., and Sohrabi, Y. 2016. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi on yield and yield components of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and dill (Anethum graveolens L.) in mono and Intercropping System. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production 26 (3): 1-19. (in Persian with English abstract).

49. Zarifpour, N., Naseri Poor Yazdi, M. T., and Nassiri Mahallati, M. 2014. Effect of different intercropping arrangements of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) on quantity and quality characteristic of species. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research 12(1): 34-43. (in Persian).