Influence of Vegetation Type and Land Management on Soil Organic Carbon Fractions in Gonbad Watershed, Hamadan

آب و خاک

Article 4, Volume 30, Issue 6 - Serial Number 50, January 2016, Pages 1964-1977   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jsw.v30i6.38407

Authors

Khadije Salarinik¹; Mohsen Nael^{* 1}; Ghasem Asadian²; Ali Akbar Safari Sinegani¹

¹Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan

²Agriculture and Natural Resources Research and Education Center of Hamedan

Abstract

Introduction: Soil organic matter is influenced strongly by vegetation cover and management, therefore it is proposed as the main indicator of soil quality and health. The changes in soil organic matter status occur much more rapidly in the labile pools than in organic C. Thus, labile pools can be used as early indicators of changes in total organic matter that will become more obvious in the longer term here. In addition, the labile fraction has a disproportionately large effect on nutrient-supplying capacity and structural stability of soils. Land management as well as soil and environmental conditions lead to the deployment of different plant communities in rangeland ecosystems, which in turn may have different effects on soil quality indicators. The main objective of this research was to investigate the influence of different vegetation covers on the quantity and quality of soil organic carbon fractions in Gonbad experimental watershed, Hamadan. Moreover, the seasonal changes of selected soil carbon fractions were investigated.
Materials and Methods: Paired Gonbad watershed in Hamedan consists of two sub-basins: in control sub-basin no grazing management is applied, while in protected sub-basin, grazing has been restricted to a very short period in late autumn since 2002. Average annual precipitation and average annual temperature in the area are 304.4 mm and 9.5 °C, respectively (5). The soil cover of the watershed consists of TypicCalcixerepts, TypicHaploxerepts and Lithic Xerorthents (9). Five different vegetation typesof which, grasses (G), Astragalus-Bromus (A-B), Astragalus-Artemisia (A-A), Astragalus-Lactuca (A-L) in protected sub-basin, and Astragalus-Euphorbia (A-E) in control sub-basin, were selected. In addition, a formerly cultivated hilly land outside the watershed, now under rainfed wheat farming (RW) was selected as a non-pasture vegetation type. All of the six vegetation types were similar in terms of soil parent materials and slope aspect.. Soil and plant sampling were conducted in mid-autumn 2012 (a), and late spring 2013 (s). Three plots (1*1 m2) were studied in each vegetation type. Total organic carbon (TOC), carbon stock (CS), carbon stock normalized with sand(CS/Sa), active carbon (AC), normalized active carbon (AC/TOC), soil carbohydrates (Ch), normalized carbohydrates (Ch/TOC), basal respiration (BR) and normalized basal respiration (BR/TOC) were measured in surface soils (0-15 cm). A factorial experimental design with two factors, vegetation type (6 levels) and time (2 levels), was conducted. Prior to statistical analysis, data were normalized, if required.
Results and Discussion: TOC and CS contentswere significantly different between vegetation types. A-B and A-A had highest canopy cover, litter cover and species diversity. Species diversity in the rangeland ecosystems has direct effect on fodder production and soil organic carbon content. A-E site, despite its low TOC content, hadhigher CS/Sa (51.9 Mg/ha) due to higher amount of clay content, compared to A-A (43.1Mg/ha) with higher TOC content. The amount of AC andAC/TOC in different vegetation types is proportional to the amount of TOC, CS, total canopy, and the canopy and production of herbaceous species. AC content was significantly highest in A-B (711.7 mg/kg), and lowest in RW site(262.6 mg/kg). A-B site is rich in grass species with high amounts of readily decomposable root residues and exudates. The variation of carbohydrate contents in different vegetation types wasvery similar to that of total organic carbon, in that A-B and A-A exhibited the highest (5843 and 5258 mg/kg, respectively) and RW showed the lowest (1937 mg/kg) carbohydrate contents. The woody, not easily decomposible litters in A-A explainedthe high content of Ch/TOC (38.12%) in this site; low rate of humification entails increased soil carbohydrates. Ch/TOC was significantly lower in A-E than other covers. The highest BR andBR/TOC, were observed in A-B and A-A sites, mainly due to the high canopy cover, species richness,and soil organic matter. The lowest BR andBR/TOC were observed in A-E.Thesoil texture in this site was clay.The recirculation of organic matter in fine-textured soils is low because of organic materials protection from microbial decomposition. Total organic matter and labile organic carbon inputs werelower in A-L, A-E and G sites; this may explain the reduction of microbial activity in these vegetation types. Except for AC/TOC, Ch, and BR, seasonal changes of all other indicators were significant. Unlike other indicators, the content of Ch/TOC was significantly higher in autumn than spring.
Conclusion: Vegetation types had significant effects on selected soil quality indicators, so that A-A and A-B sites exhibited the highest soil quality, mainly because of higher vegetation cover, litter, and plant diversity. RW, followed by A-E site, demonstrated the lowest soil quality due to the tillage practices and low plant residue inputs in the first case, and overgrazing of vegetation cover and litter in the second. Total soil organic carbon and active carbon were significantly higher in spring compared to autumn. Seasonal changes of basal microbial respiration and carbohydrates were not statistically significant.

Keywords

Active carbon; Basal respiration; Carbohydrate; Soil quality; Vegetation type

References

1- Abdi N. 2005. Estimation of carbon sequestration by Astragalus in the Markazi and Isfahan provinces. PhD thesis of rangeland Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran. (in Persian with English abstract)

2- Alexander M. 1977. Introduction to Soil Microbiology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

3- A´lvaro-Fuentes J., Lo´ pez M.V., Arru´ e J.L., and Cantero-Martı´nez C. 2008. Management effects on soil carbon dioxide fluxes under semiarid Mediterranean conditions. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 72 (1): 194–200.

4- Angers D. A., and Mehuys G. R. 1989. Effects of cropping on carbohydrate content and water-stable aggregation of a clay soil. Canadian Journal Soil Science, 69: 373–380.

5- Anonymous. 2008. Meteorological Information Center of Iran (Hamadan), Statistics and information Meteorological Station of Hamedan. Available at: www.hamedanmet.ir.

6- Aparicio V., and Costa J.L. 2007. Soil quality indicators under continuous cropping systems in the Argentinean pampa. Soil & Tillage Research, 96: 155–165.

7- Augustine D. J., and McNaughton S. J. 1998. Ungulate effects on the functional species com- position of plant communities, herbivore selectivity and plant tolerance. J.Wil Manage, 62: 1165–1183.

8- Aziz I., Mahmood T., Raut Y., Lewis W., Islam R., and Weil R.R. 2009. Active organic matter as a simple measure of field soil quality. In: Acoustical Society of America International Meetings, Pittsburg, PA.

9- Bahrami A. 2012. Modeling soil organic carbon dynamics using APEX Gonbad paired watersheds. Master's thesis. Bu Ali Sina University. Faculty of Agriculture. (in Persian with English abstract)

10- Baldock J. A., and Oades. 1992. Aspects of the chemical structure of soil organic material as revealed by solidstate. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 16: 1-42.

11- Baldock J.A., and Skjemstad J.O. 2000. Role of the soil matrix and minerals in protecting natural organic materials against biological attack. Organic Geochemistry 31: 697-710.

12- Bargdett R. D., Wardle D. A., and Yeates G. 1998. Linking above-ground and below-ground interactions: How plant responses to foliar herbivory infl uence soil organisms. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 14: 1867–1878.

13- Basile-Doelsch I., Amundson R., Stone W.E.E., Borschneck D., Bottero J.Y., Moustier S., Masin F., and Colin F. 2007. Mineral control of carbon pools in a volcanic soil horizon. Geoderma, 137: 477-489.

14- Bilotta G.S., Brazier R. E., and Haygarth P. M. 2007. The impact of grazing animals on the quality of soils, vegetation, and surface waters in intensively managed grasslands. Advances in Agronomy, 94: 273-280.

15- Boone R. D., Nadelhoffer K. J., Canary J. D., and Kaye J. P. 1998. Roots exert a strong influence on the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration. Nature, 396: 570–572.

16- Bruun T. Bech., Elberling B., and Christensen B. T. 2010. Lability of soil organic carbon in tropical soils with different clay minerals. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 42: 888-895.

17- Cardelli R., Marchini F., and Saviozzi A. 2012. Soil organic matter characteristics, biochemical activity and antioxidant capacity in Mediterranean land use systems. Soil & Tillage Research, 120: 8-14.

18- Cheshire M.V. 1979. Nature and Origin of Carbohydrates in Soils. Academic Press, London.

19- Doran J. W., and Jones A.J. 1996. Methods for Assessing Soil Quality. Soil Science Society of America Special Publication, vol. 49. Soil Science Society of America Journal, Madison, WI. 410pp.

20- Dubois M., Gilles K. A., Hamilton J. K., Rebers P. A., and Smith F. 1956. Colorimetric method of determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry, 28: 350–356.

21- Franzluebbers A.J. 2010. Soil organic carbon in managed pastures of the southeastern United States of America. P. 168-175. In: M. Abberton et al. (ed) Grassland Carbon Sequestration: Management, Policy and Economics. Integrated Crop Manage, vol. 11. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, Italy, p. 163-175.

22- Franzluebbers A. J., Haney R. L., Honeycutt C. W., Arshad M. A., Schomberg H. H., and Hons F. M. 2001. Climatic influences on active fractions of soil organic matter. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 33(7–8): 1103–1111.

23- Grandy A. S., Strickland M. S., Lauber C. S., Bradford M. A., and Fierer N. 2009. The influence of microbial communities, management, and soil texture on soil organic matter chemistry. Geology, 150: 278–286.

24- Greenland D. J., and Oades J. M. 1975. Saccharides. P. 213-261. In J. E. Gieseking (ed) Soil Components. Vol. I. Springer-Verlag. New York.

25- Gregorich E.G., Carter M.R., Angers D.A., Monreal C.M., and Ellert B.H. 1994. Towards a minimum data set to assess soil organic matter quality in agricultural soils. Canadian Journal Soil Science, 74: 367–385.

26- Grogan P., and Chapin F. S. 1999. Arctic soil respiration: Effects of climate and vegetation depend on season. Ecosystem, 2(5), 451–459.

27- Hook P.B., Burke I.C., and Lauenroth W.K. 1991. Heterogeneity of soil and plant N and C associated with individual plants and openings in North-American shortgrass steppe. Plant and Soil, 138 (2): 247–256.

28- Isermeyer H. 1952. Eine einfache Methode sur Bestimmung der Bodenatmung and der carbonate in Boden. Z Pflanzanernah Bodenk. 56: 26-38.

29- Islam K. R., and Weil R. R. 2000. Soil quality indicator properties in mid-Atlantic soils as influenced by conservation management. Soil and Water Conservation, 54:69–78.

30- Javaheri khah S. 2014. The effect of vegetation type on some indicators of physical, chemical and biochemical soil quality in Gonbad Watershed, Hamadan. (in Persian with English abstract)

31- Jia B., Zhou G., Wang F., Wang Y., and Weng E. 2007. Effects of grazing on soil respiration of Leymus chinensis steppe. Climatic Change. 82: 211–223.

32- Jonasson S., Castro J., and Michelsen A. 2004. Litter, warming and plant affect respiration and allocation of soil microbial and plant C, N and P in Arctic mesocosms. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 36: 1129–1139.

33- Juma N. G. 1993. Interrelationships between soil structure/texture, soil biota/soil organic matter and crop production. Geoderma. 57:3–30.

34- Kelly R.H., Burke I.C., and Lauenroth W.K. 1996. Soil organic matter and nutrient availability responses to reduced plant inputs in short grass steppe. Ecology, 77 (8): 2516–2527.

35- Klein J., Hart J., and XQ Z. 2007. Experimental warming, not grazing, decreases rangeland quality on the Tibetan Plateau. Ecological Applications, 17 (2): 541-557.

36- Ladd J. N., Foster R. C., and Skjemstad J. O. 1993. Soil structure: carbon and nitrogen metabolism. Geoderma, 56:401–434.

37- Li X.G., Li F.M., Singh B., Rengelc Z., and Zhan Z. Y. 2007. Soil management changes organic carbon pools in alpine pastureland soils. Soil & Tillage Research, 93: 186–196.

38- Manuel P.F., Susanne S., J. Francisco L.C., Isabel M. M., and Raúl O. P. 2013. Soil organic matter of Iberian open woodland rangelands as influenced by vegetation cover and land management. Catena, 109: 13–24.

39- McCulley R.L., Archer S.R., Boutton T.W., Hons F.M., and Zuberer D.A. 2004. Soil respiration and nutrient cycling in wooded communities developing in grassland. Ecology, 85: 2804–2817.

40- Oades J.M. 1967a. Carbohydrates in some Australian soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 5: 103-115.

41- Ohtonen R., and Vare H. 1998. Vegetation composition determines microbial activities in a boreal forest soil. Microbial Ecology, 36(3): 328–335.

42- Raiesi F., and Asadi E. 2006. Soil microbial activity and litter turnover in native grazed and ungrazed rangelands in a semiarid ecosystem. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 43: 76–82.

43- Ramos M.E., Robles A.B., Sanchez-Navarro A., and Gonzalez-Rebollar J.L. 2011. Soil responses to different management practices in rainfed orchards in semiarid environments. Soil and Tillage Research, 112: 85–91.

44- Reeves D.W. 1997. The role of soil organic matter in maintaining soil quality in continuous cropping systems. Soil & Tillage Research, 43 (1–2): 131–167.

45- Saggar S., Parshotam A., Sparling G.P., Feltham C.W., and Hart P.B.S. 1996. 14C-labelled ryegrass turnover and residence times in soils varying in clay content and mineralogy. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 28: 1677-1686

46- Salinas-Garcıa J.R., Velazquez-Garcıa J.D.J., Gallardo-Valdez M., Dıaz-Mederos P., Caballero-Hernandez F., Tapia-Vargas L.M., and Rosales-Robles E. 2002. Tillage effects on microbial biomass and nutrient distribution in soils under rain-fed corn production in central-Western Mexico. Soil & Tillage Research, 66 (2): 143-152.

47- Schuman G.E., Janzen H., and Herrick J.E. 2002. Soil Carbon Information and Potential Carbon Sequestration by Rangelands. Environmental Pollution, 116: 391-396.

48- Sparling G. P. 1992. Ratio of microbial biomass to soil organic carbon as a sensitive indicator of changes in soil organic matter. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 30: 195–207.

49- Spohn M., and Giani L. 2011. Total, hot water extractable and oxidation-resistant carbon in sandy hydromorphic soils-Analysis of a 220-year chronosequence. Plant and Soil. 338: 183e192.

50- Stark S., Tuomi J., Strömmer R., and Helle T. 2003. Non-parallel changes in soil microbial carbon and nitrogen dynamics due to reindeer grazing in northern boreal forests. Ecography, 26: 51–59.

51- Tisdall J. M., and Oades J.M. 1982. Organic matter and water stable aggregates in soils. Journal Soil Science. 33: 141–163.

52- Vagen T.G., Andrianorofanomezana M.A.A., and Andrianorofanomezana S. 2006. Deforestation and cultivation effects on characteristics of Oxisols in the highlands of Madagascar. Geoderma, 131: 190-200.

53- Walkley A., and Black I. A. 1934. An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid in soil analysis. Experimental soil science, 79: 459-465.

54- Weil R.R., Islam K.R., Stine M.A., Gruver J.B., and Samson-Liebig S.E. 2003. Estimating active carbon for soil quality assessment: a simplified method for laboratory and field use. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 18: 3–17.

55- Wander M.M., Walter G.L., Nissen T.M., Billero G.A., Andrews S.S., and Cavanaugh-Grant D.A. 2002. Soil quality: science and process. Agronomy, 94: 23–32.

56- Wilsey B. J., Parent G., Roulet N. T., Moore T. R., and Potvin C. 2002. Tropical pasture carbon cycling, relationships between C source/sink strength, above-ground biomass and grazing. Ecology Letters, 5: 367–376.