مقایسه روش‎های ارزیابی پایداری خاکدانه به‎عنوان یکی از شاخص‎های کیفیت فیزیکی خاک

آب و خاک

مقاله 7، دوره 33، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 64، تابستان 1398، صفحه 289-303  

نوع مقاله: مقالات پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jsw.v33i2.73916

نویسندگان

سعید سعادت¹؛ لیلا اسمعیل نژاد ²؛ حامد رضایی¹؛ رسول میرخانی¹؛ جواد سیدمحمدی ³

¹موسسه تحقیقات خاک

²دانشگاه تهران

³تبریز

چکیده

پایداری خاکدانه، توانایی خاک در نگهداری و حفظ ترتیب فاز جامد و فضای خلل و فرج بعد از اعمال تنش‎های مکانیکی است. گرچه تاکنون یک روش رضایت‎بخش جامع برای تعیین کیفیت فیزیکی خاک ارائه نشده است ولی پایداری خاکدانه می‎تواند به‎عنوان یکی از مهم‎ترین شاخص‎های کیفیت فیزیکی خاک قلمداد شود. هدف از این مطالعه، ارزیابی روش‎های مناسب و استاندارد تعیین پایداری خاکدانه است که قادر به تشخیص شرایط کیفی فیزیکی خاک‎های دارای بافت متوسط در هر دو منطقه خشک و مرطوب باشد. تعداد 120 نمونه خاک که شصت نمونه مربوط به منطقه مرطوب گیلان و شصت نمونه دیگر از استان فارس با اقلیم خشک انتخاب شدند. هر 10 نمونه خاک با بافت مشابه مخلوط شده و در نهایت یک نمونه خاک تعیین شد. بعد از هوا خشک‎شدن و الک‎کردن نمونه‎ها، تعیین بافت به‎روش پیپت و کربن‎آلی خاک به‎روش اکسیداسیون انجام گرفت. همچنین نمونه‎های دست‎نخورده با استفاده از استوانه‎های فلزی جهت تعیین ضریب آبگذری اشباع، منحنی رطوبتی و جرم مخصوص ظاهری خاک برداشته شد. تعیین هدایت هیدرولیکی اشباع به‎روش بار ثابت صورت گرفت. برای اندازه‎گیری پایداری خاکدانه، از روش‎های کمپر- رزنا، لابیزسونایس، و دی‎لینهیر-دی‎بودت استفاده شد. براساس نتایج حاصل از این تحقیق، مقادیر میانگین وزنی قطر خاکدانه‎ها در روش‎های کمپر–رزنا و لابیزسونایس برای مطالعه پایداری ساختمان در هر دو اقلیم مناسب هستند. اگر یک روش بررسی سریع و ساده از وضعیت ساختمان خاک مورد نیاز باشد، تست‎های ساده مثل کمپر-رزنا با اشباع سریع و همچنین لابیزسونایس در حالت مرطوب شدن سریع می‎توانند مورد استفاده واقع شوند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

دی‎لینهیر- دی‎بودت؛ لابیوسونایس؛ ساختمان خاک؛ کمپر- رزنا؛ شاخص‎های کیفیت فیزیکی خاک

مراجع

1. Amezketa, E., 1999. Soil aggregate stability: a review. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 14, 83–151.
2. An, S., Mentler, A., Mayer, H., Blum, W. 2010. Soil aggregation, aggregate stability, organic carbon and nitrogen in different soil aggregate fractions under forest and shrub vegetation on the Loess Plateau, China. Catena 81, 226–233.
3. Arshad, M.A., Coen, G.M., 1992. Characterization of soil quality: physical and chemical criteria. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 7, 25–32.
4. Bartlova J., Badalikova B., Pospisilova L. 2015. Water stability of soil aggregates in different systems of tillage. Soil and water res. 10: 147-154.
5. Beare, M.H., Bruce, R.R., 1993. A comparison of methods for measuring water-stable aggregates: implications for determining environmental effects on soil structure. Geoderma 56, 87–104.
6. Bruce-Okine, E., Lal, R., 1975. Soil erodibility as determined by the raindrop technique. Soil Science, 119, 149–157.
7. Cerdà, A. 2000. Aggregate stability against water forces under different climates on agriculture land and scrubland in southern Bolivia. Soil and Tillage Research 57, 159–166.
8. Cornelis, W.M., Khlosi, M., Hartmann, R., Van Meirvenne, M., De Vos, B. 2005. Comparison of unimodal analytical expressions for the soil–water retention curve. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69, 1902–1911.
9. D’Haene, K., Vermang, J., Cornelis, W.M., Leroy, B.L.M., Schiettecatte, W., De Neve, S., Gabriels, D., Hofman, G., 2008. Reduced tillage effects on physical properties of silt loam soils growing root crops. Soil and Tillage Research 99, 279–290.
10. de Leenheer, L., de Boodt, M., 1959. Determination of aggregate stability by the change in mean weight diameter. Mededelingen van landbouwhoge school en de opzoeking stations van de staat te Gent 24, 290–300.
11. Deviren Saygin, S., Cornelis, W.M., Erpul, G., Gabriels, D., 2012. Comparison of different aggregate stability approaches for loamy sand soils. Applied Soil Ecology 54, 1–6.
12. Dexter, A.R., 2004a. Soil physical quality: part I. Theory, effects of soil texture, density, and organic matter, and effects on root growth. Geoderma 120, 201–214.
13. Dexter, A.R., 2004b. Soil physical quality: part II. Friability, tillage, tilth and hard-setting. Geoderma 120, 215–225.
14. Dexter, A.R., 2004c. Soil physical quality: part III: unsaturated hydraulic conductivity and general conclusions about S-theory. Geoderma 120, 227–239.
15. Diaz-Zorita, M., Perfect, E., Grove, J.H., 2002. Disruptive methods for assessing soil structure. Soil and Tillage Research 64, 3–22.
16. Emerson, W.W., 1967. A classification of soil aggregates based on their coherence in water. Australian Journal of Soil Research 5, 47–57.
17. Gee, G.W., Or, D., 2002. Particle-size analysis. In: Dane, J.H., Hopmans, J.W.(Eds.) Methods of Soil Analysis Part 4 Physical Methods. SSSA BookSeries 5’. Soil Science Society of America, Madison.
18. Gijsman, A.J., 1996. Soil aggregate stability and soil organic matter fractions under agropastoral systems established in native savanna. Australian Journal of Soil Research 34, 891–907.
19. Greenland, D.J., 1981. Soil management and soil degradation. Journal of Soil Science 32, 301–322.
20. Henin, S., Monnier, G., Combeau, A., 1958. Methode pour l’etude de la stabilite structural des sols. Ann. Agron. 9, 73–92.
21. Hofman, G., 1973. Kritische Studie van de Instabiliteit van Bodemaggregaten en de Invloed op Fysische Bodemparameters. Dissertation. Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Ghent, Belgium.
22. Horn, R., Taubner H, Wuttke M, Baumgartl T., 1994. Soil physical properties related to soil structure. Soil and Tillage Research 30, 187–216.
23. Kemper, W.D., Rosenau, R.C., 1986. Aggregate stability and size distribution, In: Klute, A. (Ed), Methods of Soil Analysis Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Agronomy Monograph N؛ 9 (2nd Edition), American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Madison, WI.
24. Lal, R., Shukla, M.K., 2004. Principles of Soil Physics. Marcel Dekker, New York. ISBN 0-8247-5324-0.
25. Le Bissonnais, Y., 1996. Aggregate stability and assessment of soil crustability and erodibility: I. Theory and methodology. European Journal of Soil Science 47, 425–437.
26. Leroy, B.L.M, Herath, H.M.S.K., De Neve, S., Gabriels, D., Bommele, L., Reheul, D., Moens, M., 2008. The application of vegetable, fruit and garden waste (VFG) compost in addition to cattle slurry in a silage maize monoculture.
27. Mueller L, Shepherd G, Schindler U, Ball BC, Munkholm LJ, Hennings V, Smolentseva E, Rukhovic O, Lukin S, Hu C., 2013. Evaluation of soil structure in the framework of an overall soil quality rating. Soil and Tillage Research 127:74–84
28. Mueller, L., Kay, B.D., Hu, C., Li, Y., Schindler, U., Behrendt, A., Shepherd, T.G., Ball, B.C., 2009. Visual assessment of soil structure: evaluation of methodologies on sites in Canada, China and Germany part I: comparing visual methods and linking them with soil physical data and grain yield of cereals. Soil and Tillage Research 103, 178–187.
29. Naseri. M, Alimohammadi and., S Jafari., A.A N. 2007. Soil compaction due to sugarcane mechanical harvesting and the effects of physical soil of improvement the on subsoiling. Journal of Applied sciences, vol 7, pp: 3638 -3639.
30. Nelissen V, Ruysschaert G, Abusi DM, DˈHose T, De Beuf K, Al-Barri B, Cornelis W, Boeckx P, 2015. Impact of a woody biochar on properties of a sandy loam soil and spring barley during a two-year field experiment. Eur J Agron 62: 65-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. eja.2014.09.006.
31. Niewczas, J., Witkowska-Walczak, B., 2003. Index of aggregates stability as linear function value of transition value of transition matrix elements. Soil and Tillage Research 70, 121–130.
32. Nimmo, J.R., Perkins, K.S., 2002. Aggregate stability and size distribution. In: Dane, J.H., Topp, G.C. (Eds.) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 4 Physical Methods. Madison, Wisconsin, Soil Science Society of America 317–328.
33. Pierce F.J., Larson, W.E., Dowdy, R.H., Graham, W.A.P., 1983. Productivity of soils: assessing long-term changes due to erosion. Journal of Soil Water Conservation 38, 39–44. http://www.fao.org/docrep/V9926E/v9926e04.
34. Pieri, C.J.M.G., 1992. Fertility of Soils: A Future for Farming in the West African Savannah. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
35. Pulido Moncada, M., Lobo, L.D., Lozano, P.Z., 2009. Association between soil structure stability indicators and organic matter in Venezuelan agricultural soils. Agrociencia 43, 221–230.
36. Rawlins, B.G., Wragg, J., Lark, R.M., 2013. Application of a novel method for soil aggregate stability measurement by laser granulometry with sonication. European Journal of Soil Science 64, 92–103.
37. Reynolds, W.D., Drury, C.F., Tan, C.S., Fox, C.A., Yang, X.M., 2009. Use of indicators of pore volume-function characteristics to quantify soil physical quality. Geoderma 152, 252–263.
38. Reynolds, W.D., Drury, C.F., Yang, X.M., Fox, C.A., Tan, C.S., Zhang, T.Q., 2007. Land management effects on the near-surface physical quality of a clay loam soil. Soil and Tillage Research 96, 316–330.
39. Rohoskova M, Valla, M., 2004. Comparison of two methods for aggregate stability measurement – areview. Plant Soil and Environment 50, 379–382.
40. Seybold, C.A., Herrick, J.E., 2001. Aggregate stability kit for soil quality assessments. Catena 44, 37–45.
41. Shukla, M.K., Lal, R., Ebinger, M., 2006. Determining soil quality indicators by factor analysis. Soil and Tillage Research 87, 194–204.
42. Soil Survey Staff. 2014. Soil survey laboratory methods manual. Soil survey investigations report No. 42, Version 5. USDA, NRCS, National Soil Survey Center.
43. van Genuchten, M.T., 1980. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44, 892–898.
44. Vermang, J., Cornelis, W.M., Demeyer, V., Gabriels, D., 2009. Aggregate stability and erosion response to antecedent water content of a loess soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 73, 718–726.
45. Walkley, A., Black, I.A., 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining organic carbon in soils: effect of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil constituents. Soil Science 6, 251–263.
46. Yoder, R.E., 1936. A direct method of aggregate analysis and a study of the physical nature of erosion losses. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy 28, 337–351.