Evaluation of Water Uptake Reduction Functions of Lettuce (Red Salad Bowl) under Drought Stress Conditions

آب و خاک

Article 9, Volume 33, Issue 2 - Serial Number 64, May 2019, Pages 317-331   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jsw.v33i2.76461

Authors

Elahe Zorati pour; amir soltani^* ; naser alemzadeh ansari

Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz

Abstract

Introduction: when the loss of water from the leaves by transpiration process exceeds the water in the root zone, water stress occurs. If water uptake reduction functions can predict the flow of water to the roots properly, with no need to field measurements, it is possible to determine the time of irrigation for maximum yield with the help of chemical and physical properties of water and soil and specific plant parameters. From a conceptual point of view, two main approaches of water uptake modeling exist, which differ in the way they predict the volumetric rate of root water uptake. The microscopic models describe the water flow towards the single root. Macroscopic models are based on the principles of energy and mass transfer and described water uptake by the entire root area, regardless of the impact of individual roots. In general, macroscopic models have been considered in plant growth and soil-plant-atmosphere models. The most important models of macroscopic water uptake can be referred to the model of Feddes et al. (1978), the Van-Genuchten model (1987), the Dirksen et al. (1993) and Homaee (1999). Saraei Tabrizi et al. (2015) with an evaluation of the water uptake reduction functions under water stress conditions on basil plant showed that the Homaee (1999) model was more suitable than other models. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the four macroscopic water uptake reduction functions of Feddes et al., (1978), Van Genuchten (1987), Dirksen et al., (1993) and Homaee (1999) in order to predict water uptake by lettuce root and determining the most suitable model to predict the reduction of water uptake of lettuce under water stress conditions. 
Materials and Methods: The experiment was conducted in a completely randomized design with three replications in 2017 in the research greenhouse of Agriculture Faculty, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. The experiment consisted of irrigation water at three levels (I1:100%, I2:80% and I3:60% of crop water requirement). The soil texture was medium. The cultivation was indirect (seedling) in pots of diameter 22 and height 30 cm. For this purpose, 9 pots were used. The plant's growth period was about 70 days. The irrigation was done by the manual method and by the graduated bushel. During the growing season, treatments were irrigated fifteen times. The volume of water used for treatments I3, I2 and I1 were respectively 792, 1055 and 1320 )m3.ha-1(. The weighted method was used to determine the time of irrigation and the soil moisture characteristic curve was used to measure the matric potential. 12 pots were considered as destructive ones for measuring plant weight as it was not possible to measure the weight of plants per day. In order to evaluate the water uptake reduction functions, relative transpiration was plotted against the absolute value of matric potential and the best model was determined by fitting them, to the measured data. For this purpose, the statistical indicators of the Maximum Error (ME), coefficient of determination (R2), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), modeling efficiency (EF) and Coefficient of Residual Mass (CRM) were used.
Results and Discussion: Based on the results, the model of Homaee (1999) and the model of Van Gennuchten (1987) had the best fit on the whole range of measured data, respectively. Then, the model of Dirksen et al. (1993) and, the model of  Feddes et al. (1978) were  ranked. In addition, in models that |h| was smaller than 8000 cm, like Feddes et al. (1978), Van Gennuchten (1987), Dirksen et al. (1993) showed good fit and proximity to each other. Babaazadeh et al. (2017) in studying the effect of salinity and drought stress on the uptake of root water of  basil, concluded that the Homaee (1999) model had the best agreement with experimental data and increasing drought stress reduced the potential of water uptake by roots. Also Saraei Tabrizi et al. (2015) concluded that the Homaee (1999) model had the best fit with the measured data and the results were in accordance with the results of this study. Based on the results of this study, for simulation of water uptake, the models of Feddes et al. (1978) and Dirksen et al. (1993) are slightly overestimated and Van Gennuchten (1987) and Homaee (1999) models have slightly underestimated. Homaee (1999) in his research was conducted that in treatment of 70% water requirement supply for alfalfa, Feddes et al. (1978) model was overestimated and other models were underestimated which are close to the results. Homaee (1999) model was more consistent compared to other water uptake models because of considering two thresholds for the model.
Conclusion: According to the results, Homaee (1999) model was better than other models (RMSE=9.14 and )‎. The results of the models of Feddes et al. (1978) with R2 =0.43 and RMSE = 16.46, Van Gennuchten (1987) with R2 = 0.51 and RMSE = 8.62 and Dirksen et al. (1993) with R2 = 0.48 and RMSE = 12.5 were closely related to each other.

Keywords

Ahvaz; Water stress; Lettuce; Uptake reduction functions

References

1- Azizian A., Sepaskhah A.R., and Zand-Parsa Sh. 2015. Modification of a maize simulation model under different water, nitrogen and salinity levels. International Journal of Plant Production 9(4): 609-632.

2- Babazadeh H., Sarai Tabrizi M., and Homaee M. 2017. Assessing and modifying macroscopic root water extraction basil (Ocimum basilicum) models under simultaneous water and salinity stresses. Soil Physics and Hydrology, Soil Science Society of America Journal, 5585 Guilford Rd, Madison WI 53711 USA.

3- Badavi H., Alemzadeh Ansari N., Mahmudi Servestani M., and Eskandari F. 2015. Effect of drought stress and mycorrhizal fungus on some morpho-physiological characteristics of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Plant Products (Agricultural Science Magazine) 38(3): 27-39. (In Persian)

4- Braud I., Varado N., and Olioso A. 2005. Comparison of root water uptake modules using either the surface energy balance or potential transpiration. Journal of Hydrology 301: 267-286.

5- Couvreur V., Vanderborgh J., and Javaux M. 2012. A simple three-dimensional macroscopic root water uptake model based on the hydraulic architecture approach. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 16: 2957–2971.

6- Dirksen C., Kool J.B., Koorevaar P., and Van Genuchten M.Th. 1993. simulation model of hysteretic water and solute transport in the root zone. Water Flow and Solute Transport in Soils 99-122.

7- Elahi Kia E. 2018. Evaluating water uptake models under water stress conditions for Lettuce plant. M.Sc. Thesis, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz.

8- Feddes R.A., Kowalik P., and Zarandy H. 1978. Simulation of field water use and crop yield. the netherlands saline water in supplemental irrigation of wheat and barley under rainfedagriculture. Agricultural Water Management 78: 122-127.

9- Green S.R., Kirkham M.B., and Clothier B.E. 2006. Root uptake and transpiration from measurements and models to sustainable irrigation. Agricultural Water Management 86: 165-176.

10- Homaee M. 1999. Root water uptake under non-uniform transient salinity and water stress. Ph.D. Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University.

11- Homaee M., Dirksen C., and Feddes R.A. 2002a. Simulation of root water uptake I. Non-uniform transient salinity using different macroscopic reduction functions. Agricultural Water Management 57: 89–109.

12- Homaee M., Feddes R.A., and Dirksen C. 2002b. Simulation of root water uptake II. Non-uniform transient water stress using different reduction functions. Agricultural Water Management 57: 111–126.

13- Homaee M., Feddes R.A., and Dirksen C. 2002c. A macroscopic water extraction model for nonuniform transient salinity and water stress. Published in Soil Sciences 66: 1764–1772.

14- Hoseini Y., Babazadeh H., and khakpour Arablo B. 2015. Evaluation of water uptake reduction functions of pepper plant under simultaneous stress conditions of drought and salinity stress. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture 29(4): 509-523. (In Persian)

15- Li K.Y., De Jong R., and Boisvert J.B. 2001. An exponential root water uptake model with water stress compensation. Journal of Hydrology 252: 189-204.

16- Peters A., Durner W., and Iden S. 2017. Modified feddes type stress function reduction for modeling root water uptake, Accounting for limited aeration and low water potential. Agricultural Water Management 185: 126-136.

17- Richards L.A. 1931. Capillary conduction of liquids in porous mediums. Physics 1: 318–333.

18- Sarai Tabrizi M., Homaee M., Babazadeh H., Kaveh F., and Parsinejad M. 2015. Modeling basil response to water stress under different soil water levels. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research 46(2): 163–171. (In Persian)

19- van Genuchten M.Th. 1987. A numerical model for water and solute movement in and below the root zone. Research Report, US Salinity Laboratory, Riverside, CA.