بررسی تأثیر پر مرغ، ورمی کمپوست و هومات پتاسیم بر روی خصوصیات فیزیکی خاک

آب و خاک

مقاله 4، دوره 33، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 65، شهریور 1398، صفحه 417-430   

نوع مقاله: مقالات پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jsw.v0i0.72579

نویسندگان

محمدرضا دلالیان^* ؛ فاطمه ذبیحی؛ انورالسادات پاک نژاد؛ مینا خوشخوان

دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی- واحد تبریز

چکیده

یکی از راهکارهای اصلی بهبود شرایط فیزیکی خاک­های تحت کشت، اضافه کردن اصلاح­کننده­های آلی و معدنی به خاک می­باشد. این تحقیق با هدف بررسی تأثیر سه نوع ماده اصلاحی شامل هومات­پتاسیم، پرمرغ و ورمی­کمپوست با درصدهای وزنی متفاوت بر روی خصوصیات فیزیکی خاک و در سطوح مختلف رطوبتی در شرایط مزرعه (تحت کشت گندم) اجراء گردید. طرح به صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح پایه بلوک­های کامل تصادفی در سه تکرار انجام شد. مواد اصلاح­کننده به طور یکنواخت تا عمق 10 سانتی­متری با خاک مخلوط و تیمارهای رطوبتی اعمال شد. قبل و بعد از آزمایش از کرت­ها نمونه­برداری به عمل آمد. پارامترهای فیزیکی شامل: جرم مخصوص ظاهری (Bd)، رطوبت­های ظرفیت مزرعه­ای (FC) و نقطه پژمردگی دائم (PWP)، پایداری خاکدانه­های مرطوب (WAS)، هدایت هیدرولیکی اشباع (KS)، مقاومت فروروی (PR)، شیب منحنی رطوبتی در نقطه عطف (Si)، میانگین وزنی قطر خاکدانه­ها (MWD) و بعد فراکتالی جرمی خاکدانه­ها (Dm) محاسبه گردید. نتایج نشان داد مصرف مواد­آلی موجب کاهش Bd (89%) و افزایش FC ،PWP (87% و 91% ) Ks و WAS (7/3 و 5/2 برابر) می­گردد. با افزایش سطوح رطوبتی و مقدار ماده­آلی بخصوص هومات­پتاسیم، میزان Si کاهش یافت (101%). PR با افزایش سطوح رطوبتی کاهش یافت. بر خلاف انتظار با افزایش میزان ماده­آلی،Dm  و MWD کاهش یافت. مواد آلی در زمان­های طولانی­تر و در رطوبت­های بالا موجب بهبود پایداری خاکدانه­ها می­گردد. با توجه به تأثیر مثبت مواد آلی بر بسیاری از پارامترهای فیزیکی خاک، این مواد بخصوص پرمرغ بعلت ارزان‌تر و دردسترس بودن، برای اصلاح خاک­ها پیشنهاد می­گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

پرمرغ؛ خصوصیات فیزیکی؛ گندم، مواد اصلاح کننده؛ ورمی کمپوست؛ هومات پتاسیم

مراجع

1- Aggelides S.M., and Londra P.A. 2000. Effects of compost produced from town wasted and sewage sludge on the physical properties of a loamy and clay soil. Bioresource Technology 71: 253-259.

2- Ajwa H.A., and Trout T.J. 2006. Polyacrylamid and water quality effects on infiltration in sandy loam soils. Soil Science Society. American Journal 70:643-650.

3- Allison F.E. 1973. Soil organic matter and its role in crop production. Elsevir. Newyork.

4- Arriaga F.J., and Lowery B. 2003. Soil physical properties and crop productivity of an eroded soil amended with cattle manure. Soil Science. Copyright @ by Lippincott Williams. Inc.0038-075X/03/16812:888-898.

5- ASAE standard S 313.2.1995. Soil cone penetrometer Agricultural Engineering Year Book. P 683.

6- Atiyeh R.M., Lee S., Edwards C.A., Aroncon N.Q., and Metzger J.D. 2002. The influence of humic acids derived from earth worm processed organic wastes on plant growth. Bioresour. Technol. 84: 7-14.

7- Azarmi R., Torabi M., and Didar R. 2008. Influence of vermicompost on soil chemical and physical properties in tomato field. African Journal of Biothecnology 7: 2397-2401.

8- Bagarllo V., and Sgroi A. 2007. Using the simplified falling head technique to detect temporal changes in field- saturated hydrolic conductivity at the surface of a sandy loam soil. Soil Tillage Research 44: 283-294.

9- Bauer A., and Bluck A.L. 1992. Organic carbon effects on available water capacity of three soil textural groups. Soil Science. American Journal 56: 248-254

10- Bird N.R.A., Perrier E., and Rieu M. 2000. The water retention function for a model of soil structure with pore and solid fractal distribution. Europ J Siol Sci. 51: 55-63.

11- Bouyoucos G.J. 1993. Effected of organic matter on waterholding capacity and the wilting point of mineral soils. Soil Science 47: 377-383.

12- Chaney K., and Swift R.S. 1986. Studies on aggregate stability: II. The effect on Humic substances on the stability of re-formed soil aggregates. Soil Science Journal 37: 337-343.

13- Dexter A.R. 2004. Soil physical quality. Part III. Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity and general conclusions about S-theory, Geoderma, 120:227-239.

14- Emami H. 2009. Determination of some hydraulic and mechanical properties using Soil Physical Quality Index (Si), Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Soil Science, Agricultural Faculty, Tehran University, Iran. (In Persian)

15- Emerson W.W. 1995. Water retention, organic carbon and soil texture. Australian Journal of soil Research 17: 45-56.

16- Grandy A.S., Porter G., and Erich M.S. 2002. Organic amendment and rotation crop effects on three covery of soil organic matter and aggregation in potato cropping systems. Soil Science Society of American Journal 66: 1311-1314.

17- Hajabbasi M.A., and Hemmet A. 2000. Tillage impact on aggregate stability and crop productivity in a clay loam soil in central Iran. Soil and Tillage Research 56: 205-212.

18- Imbufe A.U., Patti A.F., Surapaneni A., and. Jackson W.R. 2004. Effects of brown coal derived materials on pH and electrical conductivity of an acidic vineyard soil. http:// www. Regional. Org. au.

19- Imbufe A.U., Patti A.F., Burrow D., Jackson W.R., and Milner A.D. 2005. Effects of potassium Humate on aggregate stability of two soils from Victoria. Australian Journal. Geoderma 125: 321-330.

20- Kay B.D., and Van Den Baygaurt A.J. 2002. Conservation tillage and depth stratification of porosity and soil organic matter. Soil Tillage Research 66: 107-118.

21- Kemper W. D., and Chepil W.S. 1965. Size distribution of aggregates. Pp: 499-510. In Black CA (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part1, Physical and Mineralogical Properties. 1 st edition. ASA, Madison. WI.

22- Kemper W.D., and Rosenau R.C. 1986. Size distribution of aggregates. In: Klute, A. Ed, Method of soil Analysis. Part 1, (2 ed.). Agron. Monogr. Vol 9. ASA-SSSA. Madison. WI.PP: 425-442.

23- Krishnamoorthy R.V., and Vajranabhaiah S.N. 1986. Biological activity of earthworm casts: an assessment of plant growth promotor leves in the casts. Proceeding of the India Acrlemy of Sciences (Animal Science) 95: 341-351.

24- Li Y.Y., and Shao M.A. 2006. Change of soil physical properties under long-term natural vegetation restoration in the loess plateau of china. Arid Environments 64: 77-96.

25- Mamedov A.I., Beckmann S., Huang C., and Levy G.J. 2007. Aggregate stability as affected by polyacrylamid molecular weight, soil textureand water quality. SSSA J. 71(6): 1909-1918.

26- Mirzaee Talarposhti R., Kambodia J., Sabahi H., and Mahdavi Damgani A. 2009. Effect of organic fertilizers on physicochemical properties of soil and production of tomato dry matter. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Research 7(1): 257-267. (In Persian with English abstract)

27- Nyamangara J., Gotosa J., and Mpofu S.E. 2001. Cattle manure effects on structural stability and water retention capacity of a granitic sandy soil in Zimbabwe. Soil Tillage Research 62: 157-162.

28- Neyshabouri M.R., Mirzajani M., and Oustan Sh. 2013. The effect of polyacrylamide and organic matter on three structural stability indexes in fine and medium soil texture with different wet and dry cycles, Journal of Water and Soil Science 22(4): 161-172. (In Persian with English abstract)

29- Ohu J.O., Ekwue E.I., and Folorunso D.A. 1994. The effect of addition of organic matter on the compaction of a vertisol from northern Nigeria. Soil Technolgy 7: 155-162.

30- Reynolds W.D., Elrick D.E. 1990. Ponded infiltration from a single ring. I. Analysis of steady flow. Soil Science Society American Journal 54: 1233-1241.

31- Safadoost A., Mosaddeghi M.R., Mahboobi A.A., Nouroozi A., and Asadian G. 2007. Effect of short-term tillage and manure on structural properties of soil. J.sci.and Tech. Agriculture and Natural Resource41: 91-100 (In Persian).

32- Sarbazrashid S., Dalalian M.R., and Darbandi S. 2014. Effect of potassium humate and feather with leaching on physical and chemical specifications of saline-sodic soils, M.Sc. Thesis. Department of Soil Science, Agriculture College of Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran. (In Persian)

33- Sadegi S., Eslahi N., and Dadashian F. 2015. Recycling chicken feather fibers for the production of absorbent porous keratin foam. The 10th National Conference on Textile Industry of Iran, Isfahan, Faculty of Textile Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology (In Persian).

34- Schoenau J.J. 2006. Benefits of long-term application of manure. Advance in Pork Production 17: 153-158.

35- Sebahattin A., and Necdet C. 2005. Effects of different levels and application times of humic asid on root and leaf yield and yield components of forage Turnip (Brassica rapa L.) Agronomy Journal 4: 130-133.

36- Shirani H., Hajabbasi M.A., Afyuni M., and Hemmat A. 2002. Effect of farmyard and tillage systems on soil physical properties and corn yield in central Iran. Soil Tillage Research. 68:101-108.

37- Sloan D.R., Kidder G., and Jacobs R.D. 2003. Poultry manure as a fertilizer. University of Floria Journal. Htt://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.

38- Tajik F., Rahimi H., and Pazira E. 2003. Effect of electrical conductivity and sodium adsorption ratio of water on aggregate stability in soils with different organic matter content. Journal Agriculture Science Technology 5: 67-75.

39- Tejada M., and Gonzalez J.L. 2006. Crushed cotton gincompost on soil biological properties and rice yield. Europ. Journal Agronomy 25: 22-29.

40- Tejada M., and Gonzalez J.L. 2007. Influence of organic amendments on soil structure and soil loss under simulated rain. Soil and Tillage Research 93: 197-205

41- Vance W.H., Tisdell J.M., and Mckenzie B.M. 1998. Residual effects of surface application of organic matter and calcium salts on the sub-soil of a red-brown earth. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 38: 595-600.

42- Van Genuchten M.Th. 1980. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44: 892-898.

43- Walker D.J., and Bernal M.P. 2008. The effects of olive mill waste compost and poultry manure on the availability and plant uptake of nutrients in a highly saline soil. Biores. Thechnol. 99: 396-403.