The Effects of Partial Root Zone Drying and Growing Bed on Yield and its Components of Quinoa (cv. Titicaca)

آب و خاک

Article 1, Volume 34, Issue 1 - Serial Number 69, March 2020, Pages 1-10   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jsw.v34i1.81937

Authors

S. Jamali; H. Ansari^* ; S.M. Zeynodin

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

Abstract

Introduction: Since the agriculture is the main water consumer, it is necessary to increase water use efficiency. As a management practice, deficit irrigation strategy is applied to cope with water shortages, especially during drought periods. A greenhouse experiment was conducted to investigate the impact of water and salt stress on Quinoa plants (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.), Aly et al (2) showed that quinoa plants can tolerate water stress (50% FC) when irrigated with moderately saline water (T1 and T2, respectively). The results of some studies showed that Amaranth was the most responsive plant to water. Quinoa showed the best performance in the treatment with the upper-middle water level among the other evaluated species. Millet showed thermal sensitivity for cultivation in the winter, making grain production unfeasible; however, it showed exceptional ability to produce biomass even in the treatment with higher water deficit. Water stress can affect plants by reducing the plant height, relative growth rate, cell growth, photosynthetic rate, and the respiration activation. Cultivated plants have several mechanisms of adaptation to water deficit, but the responses are complex and adaptation is attributed to the ability of plants to control water losses by transpiration, which depends on the stomatal sensitivity and greater capacity of water absorption by the root system, among other factors. In PRD method, half of the root zone is watered and the other half is kept dry intermittently. The objective of this research was to study yield and yield components of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Titicaca cultivar, using PRD irrigation method in three growing bed, under greenhouse conditions.
Materials and Methods: This research was conducted to study the effects of water stress on yield and its components of Quinoa under the different growing beds in the experimental research greenhouse of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad during 2018. Titicaca cultivar of Quinoa was planted and experimental design was factorial, based on complete randomized design and three replications, included two irrigation managements (FI, full irrigation and PRD, partial root-zone drying method) and three levels of growing bed (S1, silty clay, S2 clay loam and, S3 sandy loam). Research station is located in north-east Iran at 36° 16' N latitude and 59° 36' E longitude and its height from sea level is 985 meters. The seeds of Quinoa were planted at a depth of 1.5 centimeters in the soil of each pot and were irrigated with tap water. Plants were harvested after 4 months and plant height, branches number, panicle number, thousand kernel weights, grain yield, biomass; steam, leaf, and panicle dry weight panicles were measured. Physical and chemical properties of irrigation water and soil were determined before the beginning of the experiment. The obtained data analyzed using the statistical software of SAS (Ver. 9.4) and the means were compared using LSD test at 5 % percent levels.
Results and Discussion: Results showed that the highest plant height (84.4 cm) was in FI treatment and the shortest plant height (82.5 cm) was in PRD treatment. The highest and the lowest 1000 kernel weights and grain yield were measured in FI (4.0 and 19.7 g per plant) and PRD (3.6 and 17.7 g per plant) treatments, respectively. With a 50 % reduction of water in PRD compared to FI treatment, 1000 kernel weights were decreased by 9.1%. Grain yield was decreased by 10.2% (changing from FI to PRD). The highest and the least grain yield (20.2 and 18.4 g per plant) were obtained in S1 and S2,3 soils, respectively. Silty clay soil with 1000 kernel yield of 4.12 g had higher than clay loam and sandy loam soil, which produced 3.78 g and 3.78 g, respectively.
Conclusion: In general, the effect of the PRD irrigation method on reducing water use in the greenhouse production of Quinoa was positive and recommendable. Silty clay soil with 1000 kernel yield of 4.12 g had higher than clay loam and sandy loam soil, which produced 3.78 g and 3.78 g, respectively.

Keywords

Deficit irrigation; Greenhouse conditions; Panicle and grain yield; PRD method; Quinoa

References

1- Aly A.A., Al-Barakah F.N., and El-Mahrouky M.A. 2018. Salinity Stress Promote Drought Tolerance of Chenopodium Quinoa Willd. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 49(11): 1331-1343.‏

2- Aziz A., Akram N.A., and Ashraf M. 2018. Influence of natural and synthetic vitamin C (ascorbic acid) on primary and secondary metabolites and associated metabolism in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) plants under water deficit regimes. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 123: 192-203.‏

3- Clark J.M., Smith T.F., cage MCt N., and Gerr D. 1983. Growth analysis of spring Wheat Cultivars of Varying drought resistance. Crop Science 24: 537–41.

4- Daneshpazhoh P., Ghasemi A.R., Noori M.R., and Barzegar R. 2018. The Effect of Partial Root-Zone Drying and Zeolite on Water Use Efficiency and Physiological Characteristics of Sweet Pepper. Journal of Water and Soil 32(4): 675-690. (In Persian with English abstract)

5- Emam Y., and Niknejad V. 2011. An Introduction to the Physiology of Crop Performance. 3ed. Shiraz University publication. 571 pp. (In Persian)

6- Emam Y., Ranjbari A., and Bohrani, M.J. 2007. Evaluation of grain yield and its components in wheat genotypes under drought stress condition after anthesis. Journal Agriculture Natural Resource Science Technology 11: 317-327.

7- Fisher R.A., and Maurer R.1988. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars I: grain yield responses. Australian journal of Agriculture Research 29: 897–912.

8- Hamrouni, I., Salah, H. B., and Marzouk B. 2001. Effects of water-deficit on lipids of safflower aerial parts. Phytochemistry 58(2): 277-280.‏

9- Hirich A., El-Omari H., El-Youssfi L., Fahmi H., Rami A., Laajaj K., Jacobsen S.E., and Choukr-Allah R. 2013. Using deficit irrigation with treated wastewater to improve crop water productivity of sweet corn, chickpea, faba bean and quinoa. Revue Marocaine des Sciences Agronomiques et Veterinaires 2(1): 15-22.

10- Jamali S. 2017. Investigation the effects of different levels of salinity and deficit irrigation on yield and yield components of Quinoa. MSc thesis. Gorgan university of Agriculture science and Natural resource. (In Persian with English abstract)

11- Javadi T., Arzani K., and Ebrahimzadeh H. 2008. Study of proline, soluble sugar, andchlorophyll a and b changes in nine Asian and one European pear cultivarunder drought stress. Acta Horticulture 769: 241–246.

12- Khoyerdi F.F., Shamshiri M.H., and Estaji A. 2016. Changes in some physiological and osmotic parameters of several pistachio genotypes under drought stress. Scientia horticulturae 198: 44-51.

13- Kolenc Z., Vodnik D., Mandelc S., Javornik B., Kastelec D., and Čerenak A. 2016. Hop (Humulus lupulus L.) response mechanisms in drought stress: proteomic analysis with physiology. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 105: 67–68.

14- Meidanshahi M., Mousavi S.F., Mostafazadeh-Fard B., and Landi E. 2013a. Effect of PRD deficit-irrigation method and sodium salicylate on yield, yield components and water use efficiency of tomato. Journal of Science and Technology of Greenhouse Culture Soilless Culture Research Center 4(1): 1-14. (In Persian with English abstract)

15- Meidanshahi M., Mousavi S.F., and Mostafazadeh-Fard B. 2013b. Effect of PRD Deficit-irrigation Method and Growth Stabilizer on Yield, Yield Components and Water Use Efficiency of Safflower. Journal of Crop production and processing 3(8): 37-51. (In Persian with English abstract)

16- Molden D., Murry-Rust H., Sakthivandival R., and Makin I. 2001. A water productivity framework for understanding and action. Workshop on Water Productivity, 12 -13 November. 2001. Wadduwe, Sri Lanka.

17- Naderi M.R., Nourmohammadi Gh., Majidi A., Darvish F., Shirani-Rad A.H., and Madani, H., 2005. Evaluation of summer safflower response to different intensities of drought stress in Isfahan region. Agro-Breed Journal 7(3): 212-225. (In Persian with English abstract)

18- Ramzani P.M.A., Shan L., Anjum S., Ronggui H., Iqbal M., Virk Z.A., and Kausar S. 2017. Improved quinoa growth, physiological response, and seed nutritional quality in three soils having different stresses by the application of acidified biochar and compost. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 116: 127-138.‏

19- Razzaghi F., Plauborg F., Jacobsen S.E., Jensen C.R., and Andersen M.N. 2012. Effect of nitrogen and water availability of three soil types on yield, radiation use efficiency and evapotranspiration in field-grown quinoa. Agricultural Water Management 109: 20-29.‏

20- Sadiq M., Akram N.A., Ashraf M., Ali S. 2017. Tocopherol confers water stress tolerance: Sugar and osmoprotectant metabolism in mung bean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Agrochimica 61: 28-42.

21- Sai S.K.P.V., Sandya V., Manjari S., and Ali S. 2016. Enhancement of drought stresstolerance in crops by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Microbiological Research 184: 13–24.

22- Sanchez H.B., Lemeur R., Damme P.V., and Jacobsen S.E. 2003. Ecophysiological analysis of drought and salinity stress of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Food Reviews International 19(1-2): 111-119.

23- Sarmadnia G.H. and Kouchaki A. 2013. Plant Physiology. 17 ed. Jahad-daneshgahi of Mashhad publication. 467 pp. (In Persian)

24- Sharifan H., Mirzaei Sh., and Seilsepourr M. Effect of Different levels of Super Absorbent Polymer and Water Stress on Yield Components of Forage Corn. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage 8(4): 705-712. (In Persian with English abstract)

25- Sharma B.D., Sharma U.C., and Kaul H.N. 1990. Physiological traits for high yield in potato. Indian Journal of Hill Farming 3(1): 41-46.

26- Yasmeen R., and Siddiqui Z.S. 2018. Ameliorative effects of Trichoderma harzianum on monocot crops under hydroponic saline environment. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 40(4): 1-14.

27- Zarinkafsh M. 1993. Applied soil science: soil survey and soil-plant-water analysis. Tehran University publication. 342 pp. (In Persian)