Effect of Land-Use Change on some Physical and Chemical Indices of Soil Quality in the Bazoft Region, (Chaharmahal-Va-Bakhtiari Province)

آب و خاک

Article 14, Volume 34, Issue 3 - Serial Number 71, July 2020, Pages 707-720   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jsw.v34i3.84914

Authors

M. Molaei Arpnahi¹; M.H. Salehi^{* 2}; M. Karimian Egbal¹; Z. Mosleh²

¹Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran

²Shahrekord

Abstract

Introduction: The most important factor in environmental degradation and pressure on ecological resources is rapid population growth combined with unsustainable exploitation of resources. Soil is one of the most important and worthful natural resources of environment. Land use change and deforestation decrease soil quality. Land use change also causes destruction of the evolved soils and decrease soil quality which result in permanent destruction of land fertility. Therefore, studying land use management effects on the soil quality has got an attention in recent years. Destroying the vegetation especially in the last 50 years resulted in important problems like soil erosion, land slide as well as increasing flood in the Bazoft area. In this area, degradation of the forests and their convert to other land uses like pasture, agriculture and urban or rural land use, occurs annually at high extent, in which make high damages to natural resources. In this study, the effect of land use change on soil quality indices in this area located at Chaharmahal-Va-Bakhtiari province was investigated.
Materials and Methods: In this research, four different managements with relatively similar conditions in terms of the influence of soil producing processes were chosen. Then, 10 composite samples from 0-30 cm depth of each land use (40 samples in total) were taken and different soil properties including soil texture, mean weight diameter of aggregates (MWD), porosity, bulk density, soil acidity, electrical conductivity and calcium carbonate equivalent were determined. One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the dataset. Tukey HSD test was applied to compare the means at the probability level of 5%. The first land use includes the natural forest with predominant cover of Iranian oak and the highest density and cover with the least human interference. Another land use is the degraded forest, caused by deforestation over the last 50 years. The third land use is the agricultural land which transformed from forest land use by deforestation in the last 50 years. The fourth land use is the walnut garden which established from agricultural land about 20 years ago.
Results and Discussion: The results showed that land use change from natural forest to other uses had a significant effect on most of the studied parameters. The percentage of particle size distribution was affected by different land uses, so that the percentage of clay was significantly higher in the land use of natural forest and walnut orchard than other land uses. The results also showed that the mean weight diameter of aggregates was influenced by the land use change (P <0.001). Factors like soil compaction due to livestock grazing and machinery traffic, agricultural operations and reduced biological activity increased the bulk density in all land uses compared with the forest land use. Deforestation also resulted in 6.92%, 12.05% and 14.16% porosity reduction in walnut orchard, agricultural land and deforestation, respectively. Changing management from farmland to walnut orchards also improved soil porosity by 6 percent. In the study area, the problem of changing vegetation, grazing, planting and other mismanagement increased soil pH in other land uses compared with the forest land use. The comparison of means showed that degraded forest and agriculture land uses had the highest rate of electrical conductivity which showed significant difference with natural forest land use and walnut orchard. Analysis of variance indicated that the land use had a significant effect on calcium carbonate equivalent at the probability level of 0.001. The comparisons also showed that the equivalent calcium carbonate content in agricultural land was higher than the other land uses, and there was no significant difference between walnut orchard and natural forest.
Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that the soil physical and chemical properties were significantly affected by land use change. Overall, it can be stated that the rate of changes in soil quality under human management and different utilization systems indicates failure in sustainable management of soil resources in the study area. Some characteristics such as soil particle size distribution percentage, soil porosity and calcium carbonate equivalent shows that there is no significant difference between walnut orchard and natural forest. However, the walnut orchards can be selected as the best management in areas where it is impossible to restore natural forests. Also, the need for stopping deforestation in Zagros ecosystem is highly recommended.

Keywords

Land use change; Soil quality; Bazoft

References

1- Adeel Z., Safriel, U., Niemeijer D., White R., Kalbermatten G., and Glantz M. 2005. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Huaman Well-bering Desertification Synthesis. Washington DC World Resources Institute, 1(1):623-662. Available at .(http://www.millenniumassessment.org/document.355 ).

2- Barbier E.B., 2000. The economic linkages between rural poverty and land degradation: some evidence from Africa. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 82(1-3): 355-370.

3- Besalatpour A.A., Ayobi S., Hajabbasi M.A., Gharipour A., and Yousefian j.A. 2014. Feature selection using parallel genetic algorithm for the prediction of geometric mean diameter of soil aggegates by machine learning methods. Arid Land Researche and Management 28(4): 383-394.

4- Blake G.R., and Hartge K. 1986. Bulk density1. p. 363–375. A. Klute (ed.) Methods of soil Analysis physical and mineralogical methods (methodsofsoilan1). Part 1. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI.

5- Bolan N., Hedley M., and White R. 1991. Processes of soil acidification during nitrogen cycling with emphasis on legume based pastures. Plant and Soil 134 (1): 53-63.

6- Bouyoucos G.J. 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils 1. Agronomy Journal 54(5): 464-465.

7- Bowman R., Reeder J., and Lober R. 1990. Changes In Soil Properties In A Central Plains Rangeland Soil After 3, 20, And 60 Years Of Cultivation1. Soil Science 150(6): 851-857.

8- Celik I. 2005. Land use effects on organic matter and physical properties of soil in a southern Mediterranean highland of Turkey. Soil and Tillage Research 83(2): 270-277.

9- Chaneton E. J., and Lavado R. S. 1996. Soil nutrients and salinity after long-term grazing exclusion in a flooding pampa grassland. Journal of Rang Management 49(2): 182-187.

10- Famiglietti J.S., Rudnticki J.W., and Rodell M. 1998. Variability in surface moisture content along a hill slope transect Rattlesnake Hill, Texas. Journal of Hydrology 210 (1-4): 259-281.

11- Frac M., Lipiec J., Usowicz B., Oszust K., and Brzezinska M. 2017. Microbial and physical properties as indicators of sandy soil quality under cropland and grassland. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts 19: (95-95).

12- Geissen V., Sanchez H.R., Kampichler C., Ramos R.R., Sepulveda L.A., Ochoa G.S., De J.B., Huerta L. E., and Hernandez D.S. 2009. Effects of land use change on some properties of tropical soils an example from Southeast Mexico. Geoderma 151(3-4): 87-97.

13- Ghorbani H., Kashi H., and Hafezimoghadas N. 2012. The Effect of Rangeland Change to Agriculture on Some Physical and Chemical Properties of Soils in Golestan Province. Soil Management Journal 2(3): 49-58. (In Persian).

14- Gregorich E.G. and Carter M.R., 2007. Soil sampling and methods of analysis. CRC Press is an imprint of Taylor and Francis Group. an Informa business.

15- Guo L.B., and Gifford R.M. 2002. Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis. Global Change Biology 8(4): 345-360.

16- Hobbs P., Woodhead T., and Meisner C. 1994. Soil physical factors limiting the productivity of the rice-wheat rotation and ways to reduce their impact through management. Wheat in Heat-stressed Environments: Irrigated, Dry Areas, and Rice-wheat Farming Systems: Proceedings of the International Conferences, Wheat in Hot, Dry, Irrigated Environments, Wad Medani, Sudan, 1-4 February 1993, Wheat in Warm Area, Rice-wheat Farming Systems, Dinajpur, Bangladesh, 13-15 Feburary [sic] 1993, 1994. CIMMYT, 276.

17- Islam K.R. and Weil R.R. 2000. Land use effects on soil quality in a tropical forest ecosystem of Bangladesh. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 79(1): 9-16.

18- Jafari Z., Niknahad G, Komaki H., and Choogh B.,K. 2014. physical and chemical properties of soil Investigate under two range management scenarios (case study, Chut Rangelands in Gonbade kavoos). Desert Ecosystem Engineering Journal 3(4): 11-20. (In Persian)

19- Jaiyeoba I. 2003. Changes in soil properties due to continuous cultivation in Nigerian semiarid Savannah. Soil and Tillage Research 70(1): 91-98.

20- Kemper, W.D., and Rosenau R.,C. 1986. Aggregate stability and size distribution.p 425-442.

21- Kukal S., and Aggarwal G. 2002. Percolation losses of water in relation to puddling intensity and depth in a sandy loam rice (Oryza sativa) field. Agricultural Water Management 57(1): 49-59.

22- Lambin E.F., and Geist H.J., editors. 2008. Land use and land cover change local processes and global impacts. Springer Science and Business Media.

23- Lambin E.F. 1997. Modelling and monitoring land cover change processes in tropical regions. Progress in physical Geography, 21(3):375-393.

24- Mandal D., Singh R., Dhyani S.K., and Dhyani B.L. 2010. Landscape and Land Use Effects on Soil Resources In A Himalayan Watershed, Catena, 81 (3): 203–208.

25- Martinez M.M., Lopez J., Almagro M., Boix F.C., and Albaladejo J. 2008. Effect of water erosion and cultivation on the soil carbon stock in a semiarid area of South-East Spain. Soil and Tillage Research 99(1): 119-129.

26- McLean E.O. 1982. Soil pH and lime requirement. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological properties, (methodsofsoilan2): 199-224.

27- Mokhtari P., Ayoubi S.h., and Mosaddeghi M.R. 2011. Effects of land use and slope gradient on soil organic carbon pools in particle-size fractions and some soil physico-chemical properties in hilly regions, western Iran. Soil Management and Sustainable Production Journal. 1(1): 23-42. (in Persian)

28- Nekooimehr M., Rafania N., Raisian R., Jahanbazi M., Talebi M., and Abdolahi K.H. 2006. Impact of road construction on forest destruction in Bazoft region. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research 14(3): 228-243. (In Persian with English abstract)

29- Nelson D.W., and Sommers L.E. 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Methods of soil analysis part 3, chemical methods (methodsofsoilan3), p 961-1010.

30- Page D.S., Jurgensen M.F., Tiarks A.E., Ponder J.F., Sanchez F.G., Fleming R.L., Kranabetter J.M., Powers R.F., Stone D.M., Elioff J.D., and Scott D.A. 2006. Soil physical property changes at the North American Long-Term Soil Productivity study sites: 1 and 5 years after compaction. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36(3): 551-564.

31- Rasmussen P.E., and Rohde C.R. 1988. Long term tillage and nitrogen fertilization effects on organic nitrogen and carbon in a semiarid soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 52(4): 1114-1117.

32- Shahui S. 2006. The nature and properties of soils. University of Kurdistan Publications. p 880.

33- Szilassi P., Jordan G., Kovacs F., Van Rompaey A., and Van Dessel W. 2010. Investigating the link between soil quality and agricultural land use change. A case study in the Lake Balaton catchment, Hungary. Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences 5(2): 61-70.

34- Vitousek P.M., Mooney H.A., Lubchenco J., and Melillo J.M. 1997. Human domination of Earth's ecosystems. Science 277(5325): 494-499.

35- Wall D.H., Ritz K., Six J., Strong D.R., and van der Putten W.H. 2012. Soil ecology and ecosystem services. Oxford University Press.

36- Wu R., and Tiessen H. 2002. Effect of land use on soil degradation in alpine grassland soil, China. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66(5): 1648-1655.

37- Yousefifard M., Khademi H., and Jalalian A. 2007. Decline in soil quality as a result of land use change in Cheshmeh Ali region, Chaharmahal Bakhtiari province.Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resoures 14(1): 28-38. (In Persian with English abstract)

38- Zolfaghari A.A., and Hajabassi M.A. 2009. The effects of land use change on physical properties and water repellency of soils in Lordegan forest and Freidunshar pasture. Journal of Water and Soil Agriculture Journal 22(2): 251-262. (In Persian with English abstract.