Persian Clausal Constituent order Based on Functional Discourse Grammar

زبانشناسی و گویش های خراسان

Article 1, Volume 14, Issue 1 - Serial Number 26, April 2022, Pages 1-27   

Document Type: علمی - پژ‍وهشی

DOI: 10.22067/jlkd.2021.39554

Authors

Hamed Mowlaei kuhbanani¹; Ali Alizade^{* 2}; Shahla Sharifi²

¹Ph.D. in Linguistics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

²Associate Professor, Department of Linguistics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

This study wants to present a new approach to clausal constituent ordering of Persian. Functional Discourse Grammar as the latest Functional Grammar (2008) is selected as the framework, for this sake. Unlike Greenberg’s typological view (1963), FDG has a dynamic approach for constituent ordering. In this way, there is not any fixed position in clause for language elements already determined; instead, element’s position is determined by its original layer, pragmatic and semantic functions and its superordinated elements in the hierarchy of Interpersonal and Representational levels. Furthermore, FDG rules in this respect are proper for the ordering of phrase and word elements too. However, this study aims to focus only on clausal constituent ordering of Persian. FDG considers four Absolute positions (PI,P2,PM,PF) and unlimited number of Relative position for clausal elements. In its top-down fashion, whenever one of these four Absolute positions are occupied by an element, its Relative ones will be available. In this case there will be 14 logically possible word order correspondences to any of Greenberg’s word order patterns. In other word, FDG introduces 84 word order patterns for Greenberg’s six word order SOV, SVO, OVS, OSV, VOS, and VSO. The results of study show that FDG’s proposals for word order can be applied on Persian as a fairly free ordered language. Furthermore, it is possible to justify Persian scrambling (as the pragmatic intention of speaker) in a based-generated way because FDG does not consider movement. For this sake, Persian short-distance leftward scrambling as a frequent phenomenon is investigated on the basis of pragmatic (not syntactic) considerations in the last part of study.

Keywords

Persian Clausal; Functional Discourse Grammar; Grammer

References

1. دبیرمقدم، محمد(1390)،معرفی و نقد کتاب مطالعه­ای درساخت گفتمانی زبان فارسی، ویژه­نامه فرهنگستان، شماره 7، صص 223-293.
2. راسخ­مهند، محمد (1385)،ارتباط قلب نحوی و تاکید در زبان فارسی، دستور، شماره 2، صص 20-33.
3. محموداف،ح (1365)، ترتیب توالی کلمات در جملات سادۀ دوترکیبی فارسی، ترجمۀ احمد شفائی، مجلۀ زبان­شناس، (3)، 1: 53-66.
4. Connolly, John H (2012).The constituent ordering process in functional discourse grammar. Language science 34(4):455-467.
5. DabirMoghadam, M. (1982). Syntax and Semantics of Causative Constructions in Persian. D. dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.
6. Frommer,P. (1981( Post-verbal phenomena in Qolloquial Persian syntax. Ph.D Dissertation. University of Southern California.
7. Hajati, Abdol-Khalili (1977). Ke-Construction in Persian: Descriptive and Theoretical Aspects. Unpublished PhD Dissertation; Universityof Illinois. Urbana.
8. Hengeveld, K. and L, Mackenzie. (2008). Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Hengeveld, K (2013). A New approach to clausal constituent order. In “Casebook in Functional Discourse Grammar”. Edited by J. L. Mackenzie Hella Olberts.
10. Karimi, Simin and Michael Brame. 1986. A generalization concerning the EZAFE construction in Persian. Ms., University of Washington and University of Arizona, presented atWestern Conference of Linguistics, Vancouver, Canada.
11. Keizer,Evelien (2015). AFunctional Discourse Grammar for English. First edition. Oxford Press.
12. Kroon, Caroline (1995). Discourse Particles in Latin: A Study of NAM, ENIM, AUTEM, VERO and AT. Amsterdam: J.C. Gieben.
13. Soheili-Isfahani, Abolghasem (1976). Noun Phrase Complementation in Persian. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Illinois. Urbana.