Studying SNPs in SUN and OVATE Genes Responsible for Fruit Shape in Tomato

علوم باغبانی

Article 1, Volume 35, Issue 2 - Serial Number 50, April 2021, Pages 169-182   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jhs.2021.61531.0

Authors

Sanaz Khezerloo; Babak Abdollahi Mandoulakani^*

Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Urmia University, Urmia

Abstract

Introduction: Commercial tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), one of the most widely grown vegetable crops worldwide, belongs to the Solanaceae family. The marketability of the commercial tomato mostly depends on the fruit quality. Tomato fruit quality is determined mainly by color, texture, shape and flavor. Fruit shape, one of the important traits affecting the quality of tomato fruit, is controlled by multiple minor genes and quantitatively inherited. Two important genes, involved in fruit shape, are SUN and OVATE genes. The SUN gene, which is a member of the IQD (IQ-domain) gene family and the Calmodulin binding protein, controls fruit length. The more expression of both SUN and OVATE genes leads to increased fruit length. Moreover, the increased expression of OVATE gene reduces the size of flower and leaf components. Due to the important role of these genes in tomato fruit shape, identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as a new generation of robust, frequent and reliable bi-allelic markers, in the coding regions of these genes might be necessary for generating functional markers associated with fruit shape.
Materials and Methods: Seeds of 96 tomato genotypes from 12 populations were grown in the research greenhouse of Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources of Urmia University. The genotypes had been collected from different regions of West Azerbaijan of Iran and Turkey (Iğdır). The young and green plant leaves were used for genomic DNA extraction. The quality and quantity of the extracted DNA was assessed using spectrophotometry and agarose gel electrophoresis. To identify SNPs in SUN and OVATE genes, specific primers were designed by using FastPCR and Gene Runner software for amplifying fragments from coding regions of these genes in 96 tomato genotypes. Then, the amplified fragments of both genes were digested by using restriction enzymes TruI and PstI. Due to the lack of polymorphism in the digested patterns obtained by the used enzymes, four individuals from populations with close geographical distance were selected and amplified. The amplified bands were then purified by a purification kit (Kiagen, USA) and sequenced (Bioneer, South Korea). Sequencing was performed from both ends of the PCR fragments using both the forward and reverse primers used in the PCR reactions. The exon and intron regions of the sequenced fragments were identified by Softberry software. Following the retrieval of the sequenced fragments of each gene using FastPCR and Softberry software, multiple sequence alignment using Clustal Omega was used to identify SNPs in the exon and intron of the genes.
Results and Discussion: Digestion of the amplified fragments of the genes using TruI and PstI restriction enzymes produced no polymorphism in the studied genotypes. Thus, four individuals were selected from geographically different populations and gene fragments were amplified, purified and sequenced in these genotypes. Sequencing of the amplified fragment of SUN gene revealed an intron region with a size of 369 bp. Out of the 10 SNPs detected in the SUN gene, four was found in the exon region, while the number of SNPs in intron was six. Of the total SNPs found in the SUN gene, the percentage of transition and transversion substitutions was 80 (50% T/C and 30% A/G) and 20 (T/G), respectively. In the OVATE gene, five SNPs were identified. The percentage of transition (40% G/A and 40% C/T) and transversion (20% G/T) substitutions in this genes were the same as SUN. The ratio of transition to transversion substitutions was 1:4 for both genes. The average number of SNPs in a 100 bp fragment in exonic and itronic region of SUN was 0.9 and 1.62, respectively, while it was 0.5 for exonic region of OVATE gene.
Conclusion: The results of the current study revealed low polymorphisms and point mutations in the exon regions of SUN and OVATE genes, suggesting that the coding regions of these genes were conserved during the tomato evolution. Also, the number of SNPs in intron was more than those of exon. Considering the important role of fruit quality, especially fruit shape, in tomato market, the SNPs found in the current study may be used in genetic diversity studies, genetic map preparation, and saturation and identification of the functional markers associated with tomato fruit shape. These markers could accelerate tomato breeding programs aimed fruit shape improvement.

Keywords

Fruit shape; Single nucleotide polymorphism; Tomato; Transition substitution

References

1-       Aizi M., and Abdollahi Mandolkani B. 2017. Identification of SNPs in exonic regions of eugenol O-methyl transferase and chavicol O-methyl transferase genes in basil. Agricultural Biotechnology Journal 10(1): 117-105. (In Persian with English abstract)

2-       Bai Y., and Lindhout P. 2000. Domestication and breeding of tomatoes: what have we gained and what can we gain in the future? Annals of Botany 100: 1085-1094.

3-       Ching A., Caldwell K., Jung M., Dolan M., Smith O., and Tingey S. 2002. SNP frequency, haplotype structure and linkage disequilibrium in elite maize inbred lines. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Genetics 3(19): 1-14.       

4-       De Masi L., Castaldo D., Galano G., Minasi P., and Laratta B. 2006. Genotyping of fig (Ficus carica L.) via RAPD markers. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 85: 22-35.

5-       Frary A., Nesbitt TC., Frary A., Grandillo S., Van Der Knaap E., Cong B., Liu J., Meller J., Elber R., and Alpert KB. 2000. fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science 289: 85-88.

6-       Gaderi R., and Rezaei R. 2009. Common Guide and Tomato Cultivation. Tehran University, Press, 395p. (In Persian)

7-       Gupta PK. 2008. Single-molecule DNA sequencing technologies for future genomics research. Trends in Biotechnology 26: 602-11.

8-       Hackbusch J., Richter K., Muller J., Salamini F., and Uhrig JF. 2005 A. Central role of Arabidopsis thaliana ovate family proteins in networking and subcellular localization of 3-aa loop extension homeodomain proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 4908-4912.

9-       Huang X., Wei X., Sang T., Zhao Q., Feng Q., Zhao Y., Li C., Zhu C., Lu T., and Zhang Z. 2010. Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces. Nature Genetics 42: 961-967.

10-   Jiang N., Gao D., Xiao H., Francis D., and Van der Knaap E. 2009.Genome organization of the tomato sun locus and characterization of the unusual retrotransposon Rider. Plant Journal 60: 181-193.

11-   Joanne AL., and Angela MB. 2005. Tomato SNP discovery by EST mining and resequencing. Molecular Breeding 16: 343-349.

12-   Kalloo G., and Bergh BO. 1993 Genetic improvement of vegetable crops. Pergamon Press, Oxford and New York, 833 p.

13-   Klee HJ., and Giovannoni JJ. 2011.Genetics and control of tomato fruit ripening and quality attributes. Annual Review of Genetics 45: 41-59.

14-   Liu J., Van Eck J., Cong B., and Tanksley SD. 2002.A new class of regulatory genes underlying the cause of pear-shaped tomato fruit. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99: 13302-13306.

15-   Mammadov J., Chen W., Mingus J., Thompson S., and Kumptla S. 2012. Development of versatile gene-based SNP assasy in maize (Zea mays L.). Molecular Breeding 29: 77-790.

16-   Paduchuri P., Gohokar S., Thamke B., and Subhas M. 2010. Transgenic tomatoes. Advanced Biotechnology and Research 2: 69-72.

17-   Rodriguez GR., Munos S., Anderson C., Sim SC., Michel A., Causse M., McSpadden Gardener B B., Francis D., and van der Knaap E. 2011. Distribution of SUN, OVATE, LC, and FAS in the tomato germplasm and the relationship to fruit shape diversity. Plant Physiology 156: 275-285.

18-   Rodriguez GR., Pratta M., and Zorzoli R. 2006. Evaluation of plant and fruit traits in recombinant inbred lines of tomato obtained from a cross between Lycopersicon esculentum and L. pimpinellifolium. Cienciae Investigation Agraria 33(2): 111-118.

19-   Stommel JR., and Haynes KG. 1994. Inheritance of beta-carotene content in the wild tomato species Lycopersicon cheesmani. Journal of Heredity 85(5): 401-404.

20-   The Tomato Genome Consortium.2012. The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 485: 635-641.

21-   Wu S., Xiao H., Cabrera A., Meulia T., and Knaap E. 2011.SUN regulates vegetative and reproductive organ shape by changing cell division pattern. Plant Physiology 157(3): 1175-1186.

22-   Xiao Z., Kapteyn J., and Gang D.R. 2008. A systems biology investigation of the MEP/terpenoid and shikimate/phenylpropanoid pathways points to multiple levels of metabolic control in sweet basil glandular trichomes. The Plant Journal 54(3): 349-361.

23-   Yang W., Bai X., Eaton C., and Kamoun E. 2004.Discovery of single nucleotide polymorphisms in (Lycopersicon esculentum) by computer aided analysis of expressed sequenced tags. Molecular Breeding 14: 21-34.