Genetic analysis of production and reproduction traits of Isfahan Holstein dairy cows under heat stress conditions

پژوهشهای علوم دامی ایران

Article 9, Volume 14, Issue 2 - Serial Number 50, June 2022, Pages 267-281   

Document Type: Research Articles

DOI: 10.22067/ijasr.2021.38245.0

Authors

Saeed Ansari Mahyari^{* 1}; Seyed Hadi Hosseini²; Mahmoud Mahin²; Amir Hossein Mahdavi²; Abolfazl Mahnani²

¹Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran.

²Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran..

Abstract

Introduction One of the most important environmental factors affecting the dairy industry is the temperature changes that showed a negative impact on the industry over the past few years. Increasing temperatures have declined the production and reproductive performance of herds in the tropics. Huge losses are caused annually due to heat stress. Heat stress in dairy cows is caused by a combination of environmental factors (temperature, relative humidity, solar radiation and air movement). Continual genetic selection for greater performance results to increased sensitivity to heat stress. It was one of the reasons why lactation curve during summer has decreasing trend compared to spring in which lactation curve maintained within high levels. Dairy cows at the beginning of lactation have small chances to fight off a thermal stress, and thus it has the strongest effect on the production of milk in the first 60 days of lactation. A negative balance of energy in dairy cows at the beginning of lactation is even more increased by creating and emitting of higher quantity of thermal energy in the period when animals consume less food. For this reason, a high-yielding dairy cows are more sensitive to heat stress than cows having a lower genetic potential for milk production. Impacts of heat stress on reproductive efficiency have been well documented and reviewed. Heat stress has been shown to alter the duration of estrus, colostrum quality, conception rate, uterine function, endocrine status, follicular growth and development, luteolytic mechanisms, early embryonic development and fetal growth. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of heat stress on yield of dairy cattle in different months of production and also to estimate genetic parameters of production and reproductive traits under heat stress.
Material and Methods In this study, 169655 records of 60322 dairy cows in different parity in Isfahan province of Iran were used. The studied traits included productive and reproductive traits. Milk test day and fat percent as productive traits and open days and days to first service were considered as reproductive traits. Climatic records of herds were collected from 7 stations less than 70 km away from herds and temperature-humidity index (THI) was calculated for each month in each herd. Dairy milk production records ranged from 5 kg to 60 kg for milk and milk fat percentage from 1 to 7%. Genetic and phenotypic trends were considered by regression of the estimated breeding values on year of the birth. The model used included the effect of herd-year of calving, calving month, parity and temperature-humidity index. An animal model was used to estimate genetic parameters of reproductive traits and random regression was used for production traits. SAS software was used to investigate the significance level of independent factors and DMU software was used to estimate genetic parameters.
Results and Discussion The results showed that the threshold of temperature-humidity index is 72 and more than it has adverse effects on performance. Average days open and difference to first service in different Parity 112 and 60 days respectively and was estimated the average heritability of days open and difference to first service 0.02 and 0.06, respectively. With increase in temperature- humidity index, mean of production traits decreased and this decrease for milk and fat yield traits occurred at temperature-humidity threshold of 72 and 65, respectively. The average of heritability was calculated as 0.32 for milk yield and 0.24 for milk fat percentage. The results indicated that with increasing temperature humidity index in 72 the genetic variance for both traits was increased. In on other words, the cows after heat stress (THI=72). Genetic differences were significantly increased. The results of this study indicate that the additive genetic variances were higher in early lactation (5 to 100 days of lactation), for both milk yield and fat percentage.
Conclusion Genetic variance increased with increasing temperature-humidity index (THI = 72) for the two traits of milk and fat production. Also breeding value of open day correction and difference to first calving under heat stress decreased. In other words, there is a significant genetic difference between animals exposed to heat stress after temperature-humidity index 72. Therefore, it may be possible to genetically identify animals more resistant to heat stress as parents of the next generation.
 
 

Keywords

Days to first service; Genetic and Phenotypic Trends; Heat stress; Milk test day; Open days

References

1. Abe, J. M., and B. T. McDaniel. 2000. Genetic parameters and trends of milk, fat, days open, and body weight after calving in North Carolina experimental herds. Journal of Dairy Science, 83: 1364-1370.
2. Aguilar, I., T. I. Misztal, and S. Tsuruta. 2010. Short communication: Genetic trends of milk yield under heat stress for US Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science, 93: 1754-1758.
3. Ahangaran, H., Gh. R. Ghorbani, M. Khorvash, and A. Sadeghi-sefidmazgi. 2013. Study of temperature-humidity index (THI) and its effect on milk yield of dairy cows in Isfahan province. Ms.c thesis. Isfahan university of technology (In Persian).
4. Ansari-Mahyari, S., M. R. Ojali, M. Forutan, A. Riasi, and L. F. Brito. 2019. Investigating the genetic architecture of conception and non-return rates in Holstein cattle under heat stress conditions. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 51(7): 1847–1853.
5. BakhtiariZadeh, , M. Moradi ShahreBabak, A. Pakdel, and A. Moghimi. 2009. Genetic Relationships between Linear Type Traits, Milk Yield and Open Day in Holstein Cows of Iran. Iranian Journal of Animal Science, 40(4): 13-19. (In Persian).
6. Barash, H., N. Silanikove, A. Shamay, and E. Ezra. 2001. Interrelationships among ambient temperature, day Length, and milk yield in dairy cows under a Mediterranean climate. Journal of Dairy Science, 84: 2314-2320.
7. Bignardi, A. B., F. Cardoso, and L. Albuquerque. 2009. Random regression models to estimate test-day milk yield genetic parameters Holstein cows in Southeastern Brazil. Livestock Science, 123: 1-7.
8. Bitaraf Sani, M., A. A. Aslaminejad, and A. Seyeddokht. 2013. Genetic Evaluation of Age at First Calving, Open Days and Milk Production of Holstein Cattle in Iran. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research, 5(1): 62-68. (In Persian).
9. Bohmanova, J., I. Misztal, and J. B. Cole. 2007. Temperature-humidity indices as indicators of milk production losses due to heat stress. Journal of Dairy Science, 90:1947-1956.
10. Boonkum, W., I. M. Duangjinda, V. Pattarajinda, S. Tumwasorn, and Buaban, S. 2011. Short communication: Genetic effects of heat stress on days open for Thai Holstein crossbreds. Journal of Dairy Science, 94: 1592-1596.
11. Bouraoui, R., M. Lahmr, M. Misdoubt, and R. Belyea. 2002. The relationship of temperature-humidity index with milk production of dairy cow in a Mediterranean climate. Animal Research, 51:479-492.
12. Brugemann, K. and S. König. 2012. Defining and evaluating heat stress thresholds in different dairy cow production systems. Journal of Dairy Science, 55: 13-25.
13. Carabaño, M. J., K. Bachagha, M. Ramón, and C. Díaz. 2014. Modeling heat stress effect on Holstein cows under hot and dry conditions: Selection tools. Journal of Dairy Science, 97: 1 -16.
14. Collier, R., C. Tiening, J. H. Hoying, and M. Abdallah. 2006. Direct effects of thermal stress on gene expression in growing bovine mammary epithelial cells in collagen gel culture. Journal of Animal Science, 43:114-131.
15. Dechow, C. D., G. Rogers, W. Klei, L. Lawlor, and P. M. Vanraden. 2004. Body condition scores and dairy form evaluations as indicators of days open in US Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science, 87: 3534-3541.
16. Dikmen, S. 2009. Is the temperature-humidity index the best indicator of heat stress in lactating dairy cows in a subtropical environment? Journal of Dairy Science, 92: 109-116.
17. Dikmen, S., L. Martins, E. Pontes, and P. J. Hansen. 2009. Genotype effects on body temperature in dairy cows under grazing conditions in a hot climate including evidence for heterosis. International Journal of Biometeorology, 53: 327 – 331.
18. Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh, N., Mohit, and N. Azad. 2013. Effect of temperature-humidity index on productive and reproductive performances of Iranian Holstein cows. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Research, 14(2): 106-112. (In Persian).
19. Gonzalez-Recio, O. A. R. 2005. Genetic parameters for female fertility traits and a fertility index in Spanish dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 88: 3282–3289.
20. Hammami, H., J. Bormann, N. M Hamid, H. H. Montaldo, and N. Gengler. 2013. Evaluation of heat stress effects on productiontraits and somatic cell score of Holsteins in a temperate environment. Journal of Dairy Science, 96:1844-1855.
21. Hansen, P. J. 2007. Exploitation of genetic and physiological determinants of embryonic resistance to elevated temperature to improve embryonic survival in dairy cattle during heat stress. Theriogenology, 68: 242-249.
22. Heravi Moussavi, A. R., M. Danesh Mesgaran, and T. Vafa. 2013. Factors affecting reproductive performance of Holstein Dairy Cows. Journal of Ruminant Research, 1 (2): 75-92. (In Persian).
23. Jamrozik, J., L. R. Schaeffer, and F. Canavesci. 2007. Estimates of genetic parameters for a test-day model with random regressions for yield traits of first lactation Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science, 80:762-770.
24. Jordan, E. R. 2003. Effects of heat stress on reproduction. Journal of Dairy Science, 86: 104-114.
25. Nienaber, J. A, and G. L. Hahn. 2007. Livestock production system management responses to thermal challenges. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 52: 149-157.
26. Oseni, S., S. Tsunta, I. Misztal, and R. Rekaya. 2004. Genetic Parameters for Days Open and Pregnancy Rates in US Holsteins Using Different Editing Criteria. Journal of Dairy Science, 87: 4327-4333.
27. Peana, I., G. Fois, and A. Cannas. 2007. Effects of heat stress and diet on milk production and feed and energy intake of Sarda ewes. Journal of Animal Science, 6:577-579.
28. Ravagnolo, O., I. Misztal, and G. Hoogenboom. 2000. Genetic component of heat stress in dairy cattle, development of heat index function. Journal of Dairy Science, 83: 2120- 2125.
29. Sanchez, J. P., I. Misztal, I. Aguilar, B. Zumbach, and R. Rekaya. 2009. Genetic determination of the onset of heat stress on daily milk production in the US Holstein cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 92:4035-4045.
30. St-Pierre, N.R., B. Cobanov, and G. Schnitkey. 2003. Economic losses from heat stress by US livestock industries. Journal of Dairy Science, 86: 52–77.
31. Toghiani Pozveh, S., A. A. Shadparvar, M. Moradi Shahrbabak, and M. Dadpasand Taromsari. 2009. Genetic analysis of reproduction traits and their relationship with conformation traits in Holstein cows. Livestock Production Science, 125: 84–87.
32. Van Raden, P. M., A. H. Sanders, M. E. Tooker, and R. H. Miller. 2004. Development of a national genetic evaluation for cow fertility. Journal of Dairy Science, 87: 2285-2292.
33. West, J., B. Mulinix, and J. Bernard. 2003. Effect of hot humid weather on milk temperature, dray matter intake, and milk yield of lactation in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 86: 232-242.
34. Wheelock, J., S. Sanders, C. Moore, H. Green, and L. Baumgard. 2009. Effect of heat stress and Monessen on production and metabolism in lactation Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 92: 333-334.