Designing a Structural-interpretive Model of Information Disclosure Factors related to Sustainable Development Accounting

Iranian Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance

مقاله 2، دوره 5، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 17، اسفند 2021، صفحه 21-38   

نوع مقاله: Original Article

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/ijaaf.2021.40775

نویسندگان

Mohammadreza Abbasi Astamal^{* 1}؛ Mehdi Zeynali²

¹Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Varzeghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Varzeghan, Iran.

²Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.

چکیده

The current study aims to design a structural-interpretive model for disclosing information related to sustainable development accounting in 2020-2021. Qualitative data were obtained through the study of research and credible sources in the field of sustainable development accounting with content analysis approach and in the form of 4 dimensions (environmental, social factors, economic factors and leadership) in the form of 12 variables using fuzzy Delphi method and matrix questionnaire to determine Pairs of variables were compiled and provided to experts. The study's statistical population includes 25 experts in sustainable development accounting. The data obtained from the questionnaire were analysed using a structural interpretive model and drawn at six levels in an interactive network. Also, these variables' influence and degree of dependence on each other in the influence-dependence power matrix were examined. According to the output of the interpretive structural model, the variables of products and services provided and corporate governance are level one or the most basic elements of the model and the variables of strategic approach to the environment and promotion of moral awareness as the level six variable and the most influential model variable. This study indicates that by disclosing information related to sustainable development accounting factors, managers and policymakers can provide more transparent information to stakeholders by formulating appropriate policies and standards in sustainable development accounting, which leads to social welfare and environmental protection. For future generations, capital market growth and increasing the quality of reporting will ultimately lead to the sustainable performance of companies in the long run.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Accounting؛ sustainable development؛ Structural-interpretive Model

مراجع

1. Abbasi Astamal, M., Zeynali, M., Baradaran Hassanzadeh, R. and Badavar Nahandi, Y. (2021). Explain and Prioritise Information Disclosure Factors related to Sustainable Development Accounting with Fuzzy Approach. Advances in Mathematical Finance and Applications, 6(4), pp. 851-868. (in Persian). http://www.iaujournals.ir/article_678864.html
2. Akhtarshenas, D., Khodamipour, A. and Pourheidari, O. (2020). Developing a model of factors affecting corporate sustainability in Iran, Empirical Studies in Financial Accounting, 16(65), pp. 175-201. (in Persian). https://doi.org/10.22054/QJMA.2019.47002.2061
3. Abbasi Astamal, M., Zeinali, M., Baradaran Hassanzadeh, R. and Badavar Nahandi, Y. (2021). Fuzzy Gap Analysis of Sustainable Development Accounting Disclosure Factors with Mixed Approach in Iran. Journal of Governmental Accounting, 8(1), pp. 29-52. (in Persian).
4. http://gaa.journals.pnu.ac.ir/article_7876_d28ad2f2592754c921fe91ae8ded4bec.pdf
5. Afzalianmand, M. and Abdullahzadeh, B. (2016). The role of sustainable development accounting in supporting the sustainable development of the industrial sector, Islamic Humanities Monthly, 1(10). pp. 1-11. (in Persian). https://civilica.com/doc/514321/
6. Abbasi Astamal, M., & Zeynali, M. (2021). Designing a Structural-interpretive Model of Information Disclosure Factors related to Sustainable Development Accounting. Iranian Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance. ahead of print. (in Persian). https://doi.org/10.22067/ijaaf.2021.72909.1046
7. Abdi, M., Kordestani, G. and Rezazade, J. (2019). Designing of Corporates’ Coherent Sustainability Reporting Model. Journal of Financial Accounting Research, 11(4), pp. 23-44. (in Persian). https://doi.org/22108/FAR.2019.118585.1498   
8. Abdi, M., Kordestani, G. and Rezazadeh, J. (2020). Sustainability Reporting: Ranking of Stimuli and Indicators, Empirical Accounting Research, 10(2), pp. 71-114. (in Persian). https://doi.org/10.22051/jera.2019.25698.2404
9. Ahmed, M. (2018). Quality of Sustainable Corporate Reporting: An Evidence from Bangladesh. http://dspace.uiu.ac.bd/handle/52243/212
10. Aktas, R., Kayalidere, K. and Kargin, M. (2013). Corporate sustainability reporting and analysis of sustainability reports in Turkey. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(3), pp. 113-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v5n3p113
11. Akbas, H, E. (2014). Company Characteristics and Environmental Disclosure: An Empirical Investigation on Companies Listed on Borsa Istanbul 100 Index. Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, 62(9), pp.145-164. http://journal.mufad.org.tr/attachments/article/734/9.pdf
12. Bebbington, J. and Unerman, J. (2018). Achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: an enabling role for accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(1), pp. 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-05-2017-2929
13. Braam, G. and Peeters, R. (2018). Corporate sustainability performance and assurance on sustainability reports: Diffusion of accounting practices in the realm of sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(2), pp. 164-181. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1447
14. Bravo, F. and Reguera‐Alvarado, N. (2019). Sustainable development disclosure: Environmental, social, and governance reporting and gender diversity in the audit committee. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), pp. 418-429. https://doi.org/1002/bse.2258
15. Fakhari, H., Malekian, E. and Jafaei, M. (2018). Explaining and ranking the components and indicators of environmental, social and corporate governance reporting by hierarchical analysis in companies listed on the stock exchange. Quarterly Journal of Value and Behavioral Accounting, 2 (4), pp. 153-187. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=464511
16. Giang, N., Binh, T., Thuy, L., Ha, D. and Loan, C. (2020). Environmental accounting for sustainable development: An empirical study in Vietnam. Management Science Letters, 10(7), pp. 1613-1622. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.12.005
17. Huang, L., Wu, J. and Yan, L. (2015) Defining and measuring urban sustainability: a review of indicators. Landscape ecology, 30(7), pp. 1175-1193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-015-0208-2
18. Jizi, M. (2017). The influence of board composition on sustainable development disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(5), pp. 640-655. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1943
19. Jafari Jam, H., Ali Asgari, F. and Zarei, H. (2019). Financial Performance and Value of Companies: The Role of Sustainability Information Disclosure. Financial Accounting Knowledge, 6(3), pp. 215-242. (in Persian). https://doi.org/10.30479/JFAK.2019.9582.2310
20. Kim, K. H., Kim, M. and Qian, C. (2018). Effects of corporate social responsibility on corporate financial performance: A competitive-action perspective. Journal of Management, 44(3), pp. 1097-1118. (in Persian). https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315602530
21. Karami, M. and Salehi, A. (2019). The effects of social change on the development of accounting. Management Accounting, 11(38) pp. 79-92. https://jma.srbiau.ac.ir/article_12902.html
22. Khozin, A., Talibnia, G., Gerks, M. and Bani Mahd, B. (2018). Effect of ownership structure on the development of the level of sustainability reporting. management accounting, 11(36), pp. 1-13. (in Persian). https://jma.srbiau.ac.ir/article_11524.html
23. Khozin, A., Talibnia, G., Gerks, M. and Bani Mahd, B. (2017). Investigating the Level of Environmental Financial Reporting Development in the Companies Listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Health Accounting, 5(2), pp. 28-46. (in Persian). https://doi.org/10.30476/jha.2017.39317
24. Manes-Rossi, F., Tiron-Tudor, A., Nicolò. G. And Zanellato, G. (2018). Ensuring More Sustainable Reporting in Europe Using Non-Financial Disclosure-De Facto and De Jure Evidence. Sustainability, 10(4), pp. 1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041162
25. Masoumi, S., Saleh Nejad, S. and Zabihi, A. (2018). Identifying the variables affecting the amount of sustainability reporting of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Auditing Knowledge, 18(70), pp. 195-220. (in Persian). http://danesh.dmk.ir/article-1-1808-fa.html
26. Naciti, V. (2019). Corporate governance and board of directors: the effect of a board composition on firm sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, (237), pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117727
27. Namazi, M., Rajab Dori, H. and Rousta, A. (2018). Development of a model for sustainable development of professional accounting ethics, ethics in science and technology, 12(4), pp. 70-80. (in Persian). http://ethicsjournal.ir/article-1-881-fa.html
28. Rezapour, N. (2014). Critical Accounting Education in the Service of Sustainable Development, Accounting Knowledge and Research, (38), pp. 4-19. (in Persian). https://www.magiran.com/volume/94173
29. Razini, R., Azar, A. and Mohammadi, M. (2014). Designing a model for measuring the performance of agile organisations: a structural-interpretive modeling approach, Tomorrow management, 36(12), pp. 1-10. (in Persian). http://www.modiriyatfarda.ir/Article/13941228229281478
30. Saunila, M., Nasiri, M., Ukko, J. and Rantala, T. (2019). Smart technologies and corporate sustainability: The mediation effect of corporate sustainability strategy. Computers in industry, (108), pp. 178- 185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.03.003
31. Wu, C. H. and Fang, W. C. (2011). Combining the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and the fuzzy Delphi method for developing critical competences of electronic commerce professional managers. Quality & Quantity, 45(4), pp. 751-768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-010-9425-6
32. Yang, N., Li, Z. And Feng, Y. (2017). Empirical study for influencing factors on environmental accounting information disclosure in chemical industry. Chemical Engineering Transactions (62), pp. 1591-1596. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1762266
33. Yabloi Khumslui, M., Izadi Nia, N. and Arabsalehi, M. (2019). The effect of disclosed stability indicators on earnings quality, Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 9(1), pp. 7-34. (in Persian).                                               https://doi.org/10.22103/JAK.2018.11049.2517
34. Zareian, H., Heyrani, F. and Moeinadin, M. (2020). Presenting an interpretive structural model of the indicators affecting the tax audit risk in the comprehensive tax plan. Journal of Public Accounting, 6(1), pp. 97-114. (in Persian). https://doi.org/30473/GAA.2020.50439.1337