Designing a Model of Intangible Causes of Bankruptcy by TISM

Iranian Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance

مقاله 2، دوره 7، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 24، آبان 2023، صفحه 17-37   

نوع مقاله: Original Article

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/ijaaf.2023.42640.1138

نویسندگان

Marzieh Mazaheri؛ leyla Safdarian^* ؛ Mahnam Molaei

Department of Accounting, Mobarakeh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

چکیده

One of the competitive conflicts of the capital market is the structural disruption of companies in terms of company capacity with market changes that can lead to the bankruptcy of companies. Bankruptcy will usually have detrimental social effects and loss of stakeholder rights due to individual negligence and lack of strategic structural insights at the market level, that knowing that can prevent financial helplessness and bankruptcy and maintain the ground for growth or maintaining the competitive position of the company in the markets as well as the capital market. This study aims to design a model of intangible causes of bankruptcy of capital market companies based on modeling a Total Interpretive Structural Modelling. This research is methodologically based on the result, developmental, and data type is a mixed method. In the qualitative part of the research, through Meta-synthesis and Delphi analysis, an attempt was made to screen the themes of companies' bankruptcy in the capital market and then determine their theoretical adequacy based on Delphi analysis. In the quantitative part of the research, an attempt was made to prioritize the approved themes of the qualitative part while analyzing the total interpretive structural model to determine the most influential theme of the bankruptcy of capital market companies. The target population in this research in the qualitative part included 12 accounting and financial management specialists at the university level and in the quantitative part were 25 managers of the top 50 companies of the stock exchange. The results showed that the lack of strategies to reduce the size of the company based on the product life cycle of products is the most intangible factor in the bankruptcy of capital market companies. This research is limited because it focuses on companies' content and structural dimensions in creating bankruptcy risk. Based on a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis, he sought to explain the dimensions identified in prioritizing the themes of bankruptcy of capital market companies, an area that, despite its strategic importance and institutional governance in protecting the interests of shareholders, has received less attention. This research can be used to develop theoretical foundations on the one hand and the structural and content relevance of companies on the other to surround the stimulus considered the risks of bankruptcy. The paper shapes the relationship between a firm's situation, its symptoms, the bankruptcy syndrome and the causes of a particular situation. Using one of the newest developed theories, total interpretive structural modelling (TISM) used in firms' diagnosis – the bankruptcy syndrome – the paper extends the characteristics of this term and uses it in determining the causes that generate anomalies at the firm level.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Content Causes of Corporate Bankruptcy؛ Structural Causes of Corporate Bankruptcy؛ Total Interpretive Structural Modelling

مراجع

1. Aktan, S. (2012). Early Warning System for Bankruptcy: Bankruptcy Prediction, Institut für Wirtschaftstheorie und Statistik (ETS), 12(1), pp. 322-348. https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000025642
2. Antill, S. (2022). Do the right firms survive bankruptcy?, Journal of Financial Economics, 144(2), pp. 523-546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.07.006
3. Attri, R., Dev, N., and Sharma, V. (2013). Interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach: an overview. Research journal of management sciences, 2319(2), A. 1171.
4. Bărbuță-Mișu, N., and Madaleno, M. (2020). Assessment of bankruptcy risk of large companies: European countries evolution analysis. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(3), pp. 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13030058
5. Bateni, L., and Asghari, F. (2020). Bankruptcy Prediction Using Logit and Genetic Algorithm Models: A Comparative Analysis. Computational Economics, 55(2), pp. 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-016-9590-3
6. Berkovitch, E., Israel, R., and Zenderm J, F. (1998). The Design of Bankruptcy Law: A Case for Management Bias in Bankruptcy Reorganizations, the Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 33(4), pp. 441-464. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331127
7. Cooper, E and Uzun, H. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and bankruptcy, Studies in Economics and Finance, 36(2), pp. 130-153. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-01-2018-0013
8. Dabagh, R., and Sheikhbeiglou, S. (2020). Bankruptcy Prediction of Companies Listed on Tehran Stock Exchange by Artificial Neural Network Methods and Fulmer Model, Journal of Development and Capital, 5(2), pp. 153-168 (In Persian).
9. Fakhrehosseini, S., and Aghaei Meybodi, O. (2019). Prediction and Identification of Companies with High Bankruptcy Probability in Tehran Stock Exchange (Different analysis of models). Journal of Decisions and Operations Research, 4(2), pp. 100-111 (In Persian).
10. Farooq, U and Jibran, A.Q. (2018). Scope, measurement, impact size and determinants of indirect cost of financial distress: A systematic literature review, Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 10(1), pp. 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-08-2017-0080
11. Ghaderi, K., and Ghaderi, S. (2018). Bankruptcy Risk and Corporate Diversification Strategy. Financial Accounting Knowledge, 4(4), pp. 119-137 (In Persian).
12. Ghosh, S. (2019). Corporate distress, troubled debt restructurings and equity stripping: Analyzing corporate debt restructurings in India, South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 8(1), pp. 105-126. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-05-2018-0059
13. Hashemi, S. J., and Heidarpoor, F. (2021). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Bankruptcy Risk. Accounting and Auditing Studies, 10(37): pp. 25-40 (In Persian).
14. He, D., Yu, K., and Wu, J. (2020). Industry characteristics, court location, and bankruptcy resolution, Journal of Management Analytics, 7(3), pp. 389-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/23270012.2020.1715272
15. Heidari, M., Ziari, Sh., Shayannia, S, A., and Rashidi Kamijan, A. (2021). Predicting the Financial Bankruptcy of Stock Exchange Companies Using Artificial Neural Network and Lightning Worm Algorithm, Financial Engineering and Securities Management, 12(46), pp. 691-716 (In Persian).
16. Hosseini, S., and Morshedi, F. (2020). Bankruptcy Risk of Companies; a Comparative Study. Accounting and Auditing Research, 12(47), pp. 55-72. 10.22034/IAAR.2020.119058 (In Persian).
17. Hu, Y. C., Jiang, P., Jiang, H., and Tsai, J. F. (2021). Bankruptcy prediction using multivariate grey prediction models. Grey Systems: Theory and Application, 11(1), pp. 46-62. https://doi.org/10.1108/GS-12-2019-0067
18. Inam, F., Inam, A., Mian, M. A., Sheikh, A. A., and Awan, H. M. (2019). Forecasting bankruptcy for organizational sustainability in Pakistan: Using artificial neural networks, logit regression, and discriminant analysis. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 35(3), pp. 183-201. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-05-2018-0063
19. Jace, K., Koumanakos, D., and Tsagkanos, A. (2022). Bankruptcy prediction in social enterprises. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 13(2), pp. 205-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2020.1763438
20. Jandaghi, G., Saranj, A., Rajaei, R., Ghasemi, A., and Tehrani, R. (2021). Identification of the Most Critical Factors in Bankruptcy Prediction and Credit Classification of Companies. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 14(4), pp. 817-834. 10.22059/IJMS.2021.285398.673712. (In Persian).
21. Jia, Z., Shi, Y., Yan, C., and Duygun, M. (2020). Bankruptcy prediction with financial systemic risk. The European Journal of Finance, 26(7-8), pp. 666-690. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2019.1656095
22. Karels, G. V., and Prakash, A. J. (1987). Multivariate normality and forecasting of business bankruptcy. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 14(4), pp. 573-593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.1987.tb00113.x
23. Kuttner, M., Mayr, S., Mitter, C. and Duller, C. (2023), Impact of accounting on reorganization success: empirical evidence from bankrupt SMEs, Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 19(6), pp. 24-45. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-06-2021-0080
24. Laitinen, E.K. (2021). Analyzing business-failure-process risk: evidence from Finland, Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 19(4), pp. 571-595. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-06-2020-0164
25. Li, H., Chen, Q, X., Hong, L, Y., and Zhou, Q. (2019). Asset restructuring performance prediction for failure firms, Journal Corporate Accounting & Finance, 30(4), pp. 25-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22409
26. Lohmann, Ch., and Ohliger, Th. (2019). Using accounting-based information on young firms to predict bankruptcy, Journal of Forecasting, 38(8), pp. 803-819. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2586
27. Malone, D. W (2014). An introduction to the application of interpretive structural modeling, Proceedings of the IEEE, 63(3), pp. 397-404.
28. Nagel, R and Aviles, C. (2021). The impact of corporate bankruptcy on strategic management: using a textual analysis approach to analyze executives’ opinions, Journal of Indian Business Research, 13(3), pp. 382-394. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-07-2020-0245
29. Nguyen, B. H., and Huynh, V. N. (2022). Textual analysis and corporate bankruptcy: A financial dictionary-based sentiment approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(1), pp. 102-121, https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1784049
30. Nishi, H and Peabody, S.D. (2019). The information content of stock prices after bankruptcy: Does volatility affect the probability of successful emergence?, Managerial Finance, 45(9), pp. 1166-1182. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-01-2019-0005
31. Olsen, B.C., Tamm, C. (2017). Corporate governance changes around bankruptcy, Managerial Finance, 43(10), pp. 1152-1169. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-09-2015-0257
32. Oware, K. M., and Appiah, K. (2022). CSR assurance practice and financial distress likelihood: evidence from India. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(6), pp. 1470-1492, https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-10-2020-1055
33. Pour Tabarestani, A., Dadashi, I., and Zare Bahnamiri, M. (2019). Information Content of Audit Report in Predicting Bankruptcy. Accounting and Auditing Research, 11(44), pp. 175-194. 10.22034/IAAR.2019.102299 (In Persian).
34. Ptak-Chmielewska, A. (2019). Predicting Micro-Enterprise Failures Using Data Mining Techniques, Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12(1), pp. 30-49. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12010030
35. Qu, Y., Quan, P., Lei, M., and Shi, Y. (2019). Review of bankruptcy prediction using machine learning and deep learning techniques, Procedia Computer Science, 162(2), pp. 895-899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.12.065
36. Ramesh, A., Banwet, D.K., and Shankar, R (2010). Modeling the Barriers of Supply Chain Collaboration, Journal of Modelling in Management, 5(2): pp. 176–193.
37. Setayesh, M., and Aznab, M. (2019). Providing Optimal Model to Predict Bankruptcy Using Invasive Weed Algorithm and Evaluating it's Efficiency Compared to Altmen's Model. Accounting and Auditing Research, 11(43): 41-54. 10.22034/IAAR.2019.96979 (In Persian).
38. Singh, M. D., and Kant, R (2011). Knowledge management barriers: An interpretive structural modeling approach, International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 3(2), pp. 10.
39. Vaghfi, S. (2019). Using artificial intelligence algorithm in Financial Bankruptcy by Macro-economic and Accounting variables in listed companies for stock exchange in Tehran. Journal of Decisions and Operations Research, 4(2), pp. 158-173. https://doi.org/10.22105/dmor.2019.174674.1106
40. Veganzones, D and Severin, E. (2021). Corporate failure prediction models in the twenty-first century: a review, European Business Review, 33(2), pp. 204-226. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-12-2018-0209