| The sustainable form of cities has been considered since the formation of first cities, but with the increasing exposure of cities to uncertainties such as natural disasters, climate change, drought crises, and energy crises, this stability is disrupted. The resilient and stable form of cities has achieved a special importance and this concept has been considered by many researchers. Urban resilience is a multidimensional concept that is measured using both objective and subjective approaches. This study calculates Texas urban resilience using both objective and subjective approaches during Hurricane Harvey 2017 to provide an overview of the actual situation and public perception, respectively, and to examine the relationship between the two approaches. In the objective approach of the research, by integrating social, economic, infrastructural, organizational indicators with a certain weight, it was extracted by DANP method and cities were ranked by TOPSIS method. The DANP method used the opinions of experts, which had a high reliability. In the subjective approach, the Twitter data were used and the ratio index was used. The results of the objective approach indicated that the most resilient cities were Harris, Austin, Fort Bend, Galveston, Brazoria, Chambers, Rockwall and the least resilient cities were Moore, Presidio, Dimmit, Starr, Jasper, Camron, and Kennedy. A total of 24 cities were selected to compare resilience changes in the two approaches, as these cities had more than 50 Twitter messages and were facing direct threats from Hurricane Harvey. The results showed that the correlation coefficient between the two approaches in these cities was 0.708. There was a strong positive relationship between the two approaches, which means that cities that in terms of resilience were at a higher level, shared more Twitter messages when faced with a crisis. The knowledge gained from this study can provide valuable insights into strategies for using social media data to increase resilience to natural disasters. |
رضویان، م؛ توکلی نیا، ج؛ فرزادبهتاش، م؛ خزایی، م؛ 1396. تحلیل و ارزیابی تاب آوری اجتماعی بافت فرسوده منطقه 12 شهر تهران در مواجهه با سوانح طبیعی. مدیریت سرمایه اجتماعی. 4(4 ), 595-612. https://sid.ir/paper/266926/fa
قنبری، ا؛ سالکی ملکی، م؛ قاسمی، م؛ 1395. ارزیابی میزان آسیب پذیری شبکه معابر شهری در برابر زمین لرزه (نمونه موردی: شهرک باغمیشه تبریز). جغرافیا و مخاطرات محیطی. 5(18). 1-15.
Birgani, Y. T., & Yazdandoost, F., 2018. An integrated framework to evaluate resilient-sustainable urban drainage management plans using a combined-adaptive MCDM technique. Water Resources Management, 32(8), 2817-2835. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11269-018-1960-2
Cai, H., Lam, N. S., Qiang, Y., Zou, L., Correll, R. M., & Mihunov, V., 2018. A synthesis of disaster resilience measurement methods and indices. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 31, 844-855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.015
Karami, A., Shah, V., Vaezi, R., & Bansal, A., 2020. Twitter speaks: A case of national disaster situational awareness. Journal of Information Science, 46(3), 313-324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551519828620
Kontokosta, C. E., & Malik, A., 2018. The Resilience to Emergencies and Disasters Index: Applying big data to benchmark and validate neighborhood resilience capacity. Sustainable cities and society, 36, 272-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.025
Martinez-Rojas, M., del Carmen Pardo-Ferreira, M., & Rubio-Romero, J. C., 2018. Twitter as a tool for the management and analysis of emergency situations: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 196-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.008
Renschler, C. S., Frazier, A. E., Arendt, L., Cimellaro, G. P., Reinhorn, A. M., & Bruneau, M., 2010, July. Developing the ‘PEOPLES’resilience framework for defining and measuring disaster resilience at the community scale. In 9th US and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering Toronto, Canada. https://doi.org/ 10.13140/RG.2.1.1563.4323
Rizza, C., & Pereira, Â. G., 2014. Building a resilient community through social network: Ethical considerations about the 2011 Genoa floods. In ISCRAM.
Ragini, J. R., Anand, P. R., & Bhaskar, V., 2018. Big data analytics for disaster response and recovery through sentiment analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 42, 13-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.05.004
Tabibian, M., & Rezapour, M., 2016. Assessment of urban resilience; a case study of Region 8 of Tehran city, Iran. Scientia Iranica, 23(4), 1699-1707. https://doi.org/ 10.24200/SCI.2016.2240
Wang, Z., & Ye, X., 2019. Space, time, and situational awareness in natural hazards: A case study of Hurricane Sandy with social media data. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 46(4), 334-346. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/152304062018.1483740
Wang, K., Lam, N. S., Zou, L., & Mihunov, V., 2021. Twitter Use in Hurricane Isaac and Its Implications for Disaster Resilience. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(3), 116. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ijgi10030116
Zou, L., Lam, N. S., Cai, H., & Qiang, Y., 2018. Mining Twitter data for improved understanding of disaster resilience. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108(5), 1422-1441. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2017.1421897
Zou, L., Lam, N. S., Shams, S., Cai, H., Meyer, M. A., Yang, S., ... & Reams, M. A., 2019. Social and geographical disparities in Twitter use during Hurricane Harvey. International Journal of Digital Earth, 12(11), 1300-1318. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2018.1545878
|
