Investigating the Legitimacy of Iran Missile Operation against Ain al-Assad Military Base

پژوهش نامه ایرانی سیاست بین الملل

Article 12, Volume 11, Issue 2 - Serial Number 22, March 2023, Pages 288-305   

Document Type: Original Article

DOI: 10.22067/irlip.2022.72007.1139

Authors

Gholam Ali Ghasemi¹; Mohamad Setayeshpur^{* 2}

¹Associate Prof., Department of International Law, Faculty of Law, University of Qom, Qom

²Assistant Prof., Department of International Law, Faculty of Law, University of Qom, Qom

Abstract

Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) of Islamic Republic of Iran’s(IRI) missile operation against military base of United States of America (USA) called, Ain al-Assad, following the US drone strike and martyrdom of Genaral Haj Qasem Soleimani and some of other islam defendants, has raised various opinions considering the legitimacy of the action in question. Countermeasure, self-defence and consent are three circumstances that have been raised in legal teachings and doctrines regarding the said issue. Pursuant to customary international law and article 20 of International law commission’s draft articles on international responsibility of states for international wrongful act (ARSIWA 2001), Iraq’s consent authorizes that the islamic republic of iran’s operation in iraq’s territory, does not violate territorial integrity of Iraq and does not consider as intervention in its internal affairs. Countermeasures can not affect state obligation not to use of force and demand of Islamic community of IRI for hard revenge, does not mean that the missile action is a reprisal, as in some doctrines has been said. Regarding the seriality of US internationally wrongful acts in this regard and the evidences that show the commitment of more similar wrongs, the Islamic Republic of Iran’s action is the legitimate self-defence as the inherent right has been explicited in article 51 of the UN charter. This should not be regarded as pre-emptive (anticipatory) or preventive defence but as a chain of infringements by the US makes that the IRI act would be considered self-defence which is legitimate and legal in international law.

Keywords

Martyrdom of General Haj Qasem Soleimani; International Obligation; Missile Operation; Ain al-Assad Military Base

References

Abramowitz, M. (2013). Does the United States have a ‘Responsibility to
Protect’ he Syrian People?. Washington Post, September 06.
Azizi, S. (2020). Targeted Killing from the Perspective of International Law
and U.S. Domestic Law: A Case Study of the Assassination of Major General
Soleimani. Journal of Comparative Study of Islamic and Western Law, Vol. 7,
pp. 123-150. (in Persian).
Baqeri, M., Imam Jome Zadeh, S. J. & Mahmoud, J. K. (2017). Role of
Doctrine of Responsibility to Protect in U.S. Foreign Policy (with Emphasis on
New Intervetion Approch in Evoloutions of Arabic States). Pazhouheshha-ye-
Siasi-va-Beinolmelali. Vol. 30, pp. 31-77. (in Persian).
Bazzar, V. & Mafi, H. (2018). Legitimacy of Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons
in Perspective of Advisory Opinion 1996 of International Court of Justice.
Interrnational Studies of Police, Vol. 35, pp. 9-28. (in Persian).
Bellamy, A. (2014). The Responsibility to Protect: A Wide or Narrow
Conception?” in Peter Hilpold (edn.). Responsibility to Protect (R2P): A New
Paradigm of International Law, Brill Nijhoff Publishers.
Brandis, George (2017). The Right of Self-Defence Against Imminent Armed
Attack in International Law. European Journal of International Law, EJIL
Talk, May 25. available at: https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-right-of-self-defence-
against-imminent-armed-attack-in-international-law/
Crawford, J. (2013). State Responsibility: The General Part, translated
by Alireza Ebrahimgol, Siamak Karimi, Hassan Khosroshahi and Parisa
Roshanfekr, 2017, Sangelaj Publications.
Dehnavi, V., Taghizadeh Ansari, M. and Rahimi, F. (2020). USA International
Responsibility for the Assassination of Martyr Qassem Soleimani and
Adjudication by IRI. Afagh-e-Amniat, Vol. 13, pp. 143-167. (in Persian).
Delerue, F. (2020). Circumstances Precluding or Attenuating the Wrongfulness
of Unlawful Cyber Operations. in Cyber Operation and International Law
(Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law). Cambridge
University Press.
Ebrahimgol, A. (2013). Countermeasures and International Responsibility for
Collective Interests. Khorsandy Publications.
Ghasemi, A. & Barin Chaharbakhsh, V. (2012). Threats of Force and
International Law. Journal of Public Law Research, Vol. 14, pp. 133-156. (inPersian).
Ghasemi, Gh. & Setayeshpur, M. (2020). U.S. International Responisbility
for Martyrdom of Major General Soleimani. Journal of Comparative Study of
Islamic and Western Law, Vol. 7, pp. 189-216. (in Persian).
Green, J. (2011). Questioning the Peremptory Status of the Prohibition of the
Use of Force. European Journal of International Law, EJIL Talk, March 17;
available at: https://www.ejiltalk.org/questioning-the-peremptory-status-of-
the-prohibition-of-the-use-of-force.
Helmersen, S. T. (2014). The Prohibition of the Use of Force as Jus Cogens:
Explaining Apparent Derogations. Netherlands International Law Review, Vol
61.
Henderson, Christian (2018). The Use of Force and International Law.
Cambridge University Press.
Ibrahimi, A.R. (2021). Investing the Jurisdiction of Domestic and International
Courts in the Assassination Case of Martyr General Qasem Soleimani and his
Companions. Pazhouheshname-ye-Mazahe-e-Eslami, vol. 8, pp. 413-432. (in
Persian).
ICJ (1986). Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activiies in and against
Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America). Contentious case.
ICJ (1996). Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons. Advisory
Opinion.
ICJ (2005). The Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo case (Democratic
Republic of Congo v. Uganda), Contentious case.
ILC (2001). Yearbook. Vol. II, part. 2, Draft Articles on Responsibility of States
for Internationally Wrongful Acts, (ARSIWA.)
Kadkhodaei, A. A. & Maghami, A. (2016). Analogue Structure of International
Law. Public Law Studies Quarterly, Vol. 46, pp. 465-489. (in Persian).
Karamzadeh, S. & Abedini, A. (2020). Legal Aspects of Martyrdom of Major
General Qassem Soleimani by the United States in Iraq. Vol. 7, pp. 217-244.
(in Persian).
Montazeran, J. & Jafari, S. A. (2020). Assassination of Martyrdom Major General
Soleimani in Perspective of Rules of International Law and Humanitarian Law
(With Emphasis on of Foreign Media). Journal of International Media Research
Letters. Vol. 5, pp. 11-37. (in Persian).
NBC News (2020). Trump Authorized Soleimani’s Killing 7 Months Ago,
with Conditions. January 13; available at: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/
national-security/trump-authorized-soleimani-s-killing-7-months-ago-conditions-n1113271.
New York Times (2020). The Killing of General Qassim
Suleimani: What We Know Since the U.S. Airstrike.
January 03; available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/
03/world/middleeast/iranian-general-qassem-soleimani-killed.html.
O’Connell, M. E. (2021). The Illusory Standard of Imminence in the
International Law of Self-Defense: The Killing of Qassim Soleimani. SSRN.
Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3784820.
Paddeu, F. (2018). Justification and Excuse in International Law: Concept
and Theory of General Defences. Cambridge Studies in International and
Comparative Law. Cambridge University Press.
Pellet, Alain (2004). Between Codification and Progressive Development of
the Law: Some Reflections from the ILC. International Law Forum du droit
international, Vol. 6.
Presstv (2020). US Military Says 11 U.S. Troops Wounded in Iranian Missile
Attack Despite Earlier Denials. January 17. available at https://www.presstv.com/
Detail/2020/01/17/616392/11-troops-wounded-Iranian-missile-attack.
Rashidi, M. (2020). Feasibility of Filling Lawsuits in International and Domestic
Courts over the Assassination of General Soleimani and His Companions.
Judiciary Law Journal, Vol. 48, pp. 107-127. (in Persian).
Salari, A. (2015). International Law: International Responsibility of States and
Individual Criminal Responsibility. Translation of ILC Draft Articles 2001 for
Internationally Wronngful Acts. (in Persian).
Seifi, S. J. and Hasankhani, A. (2017). Countermeasures for Human Rights
Obligations. Journal of Public Law Research, Vol. 19, pp. 33-58. (in Persian).
Shmitt, M. (2012).”Attack” as a Term of Art in International Law: The
Cyber Operations Context. C. Czosseck, R. Ottis, K. Ziolkowski (edn.). 4th
International Conference on Cyber Conflict.
Sputnik News Agency (2020). America Ghasde Terrore Yeki Digar az
Farmandehane Sepah ra Dasht ke Namovafagh Bood [in persian]. 01.11. at
https://sptnkne.ws/AX6F
The Supreme Leader (1397 sh). Bayaniye Game Dovome Enghelab. (In persian).
UN (1945). The Charter.
UNGA (2002). A/RES/57/141.
Vidmar, J. (2016). Some Observations on Wrongfulness, Responsibility and
Defences in International Law. Netherlands International Law Review, Vol. 63.