The moderating role of ethical leadership on the relationship between the organization’s external prestige and unethical pro-organizational behavior

پژوهش نامه مدیریت تحول

Article 5, Volume 14, Spring & summer 2022 - Serial Number 27, September 2022, Pages 123-146   

Document Type: Original Article

DOI: 10.22067/tmj.2022.73834.1222

Authors

Reza Sepahvand¹; Meysam Jafari²; Mahdieh Vishlaghi^{* 3}

¹Professor , Public Administration Department, Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences

²Ph.D Candidate, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences

³Ph.D. candidate department of Public Administration, Faculty of Economics, Management and Administrative Sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran

Abstract

 
1- INTRODUCTION
Behaviors can be unethical but in line with the interests of the organization. Unethical pro-organizational behavior is a creative deviant behavior that seeks to maximize the interests of the organization and stakeholders by evading the law and misleading the supervisory and upstream institutions. The external prestige of the organization is an indicator of the organization's quality and directs the behaviors of employees. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of the organization's external prestige on unethical pro-organizational behavior considering the moderation of ethical leadership.
 
2- THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
People tend to join organizations of having valuable social features. Based on this fact, organizations try to improve their external image and prestige with internal and external stakeholders. The image of the organization is mostly influenced by the external stakeholders, so their perceptions and opinion affect the understanding and evaluation of the internal stakeholders of the organization. Organizational prestige describes the employee's perception of how external institutions look at the organization. Organizational image is of great importance for many companies because today, their work and overall existence depend on their credit from the point of view of various shareholders. To maintain the social image and the prestige of the organization, the managers and employees of the organizations may resort to actions that are not appropriate from the point of view of ethics and logic, however, they bring success and pride to the organization. Such behavior is more precisely called positive deviant behavior or unethical behavior of the organization. The positive deviation is used as a practical strategy and is an intelligent search for change and creating solutions. Therefore, with such an approach to maintain a positive and powerful image of the organization, any action that is beneficial in this direction can be used. On the other hand, the atmosphere and leadership of the organization play an important role in using ethical or unethical strategies. Ethical leaders show good values with their words and actions. In such a case, measures are followed with more sensitivity and only technical issues will not be considered. In Iran's business environment, all public and private companies are under the influence of multiple stakeholders and various regulatory organizations, and sometimes they turn to unethical behaviors to maximize their interests.
 
3- METHODOLOGY
The present research is an applied study in terms of purpose, and in terms of data collection, it is a descriptive-correlational study. The statistical population of the study was the managers and supervisors of companies under the Saipa Group. Using Cochran's formula, a sample size of 109 was selected by conducting stratified random sampling. A pre-made questionnaire was used to gather data after reaffirming reliability using Cronbach's alpha. The obtained data was analyzed in SPSS and Amos software.
 
4- RESULTS & DISCUSSION
According to the first hypothesis, the external prestige of the organization significantly affected unethical behaviors (beta = 0.84; t-value = 9.91). Regarding the second hypothesis of the research, the path coefficient was equal to 0.47 at the confidence level of 95 percent. Therefore, the organization's external prestige significantly affected unethical behaviors (t-value = 4.15).
 
5- CONCLUSIONS & SUGGESTIONS
The external prestige of the organization affects the future and the existence of the organization and causes the managers to exert different actions and behaviors to maintain and improve it. In other words, managers and employees work in line with the image of the organization they have created in the eyes of stakeholders and society. This may cause unethical actions and behaviors despite they are very beneficial. On the other hand, the leadership of the organization and its atmosphere can moderate these behaviors. The research results will help managers and employees to understand the importance of the organization's prestige and its leadership style. In this regard, researchers are recommended to investigate the moderating role of the organization's external prestige on the association of ethical leadership with organizational citizenship behavior, commitment, and identity.
 
Keywords: External Prestige, Unethical Pro-organizational Behavior, Ethical Leadership, Saipa Group.
 

Keywords

External Prestige; nethical Pro-organizational Behavior; Ethical Leadership; Saipa Group

References

 

Aryati, A. S.; Sudiro, A., Hadiwidjaja, D., & Noermijati, N. (2018). The influence of ethical leadership to deviant workplace behavior mediated by ethical climate and organizational commitment. International Journal of Law and Management, 60(2), 233-249. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlma-03-2017-0053

Aziz, J. S., & Kim, H. (2019). Ethical leadership and OCB: The mediating role of organizational trust and the moderating role of perceived external prestige. Korean Journal of Resources Development, 22(1), 177-202. https://doi.org/10.24991/kjhrd.2019.03.22.1.177

Carmeli, A., & Freund, A. (2009). Linking perceived external prestige and intentions to leave the organization: The mediating role of job satisfaction and affective commitment. Journal of Social Service Research, 35(3), 236-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488370902900873

Collier, J. E. (2020). Applied structural equation modeling using Amos: Basic to advanced techniques. Routledge.

Daeseok Kang, (2010). Emerging predictors of organizational commitment and turnover intention in the case of Chinese employees: Perceived external prestige, ethical organizational climate and leader-member Exchange (LMX) quality. The Korean Journal of Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(3), 113-139. https://doi.org/10.18211/kjhrdq.2010.12.3.005

Dalton, D. W.; Vinson, J. M., & Widener, S. K. (2019). Is prestige only beneficial? A cost of perceived external prestige among accounting employees. European Accounting Review, 29(4), 753-780. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2019.1682021

Di Stefano, G.; Scrima, F., & Parry, E. (2017). The effect of organizational culture on deviant behaviors in the workplace. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(17), 2482-2503.

  https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1326393

Dustar, M., & Hasani, H. (2016). Investigating the effect of ethical leadership on employees' silent behavior and voice and their performance. Journal of Public Management Perspectives, 7(3), 63-83. (in Persian).

Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393235

Emilisa, N.; Putra, D. P., & Yudhaputri, E. A. (2018). Perceived external prestige, deviant workplace behavior Dan job satisfaction pada karyawan industri otomotif Di Jakarta. Journal Manajemen dan Pemasaran Jasa, 11(2), 247. https://doi.org/10.25105/jmpj.v11i2.2959

Freeman, R. E.; Martin, K.; Parmar, B.; Cording, M., & Werhane, P. H. (2006). Leading through values and ethical principles. In R. J. Burke & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Inspiring Leaders, Routledge Publishing. Oxford, UK.

 

Guerrero, S., & Challiol-Jeanblanc, H. (2017). Ex antei-deals, perceived external prestige and turnover intentions. Personnel Review, 46(6), 1199-1212. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-10-2015-0271

Heckert, D. M. (2016). Positive deviance. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosp060.pub2

Heckert, D. M., & Heckert, D. A. (2015). Positive deviance. The Handbook of Deviance, 80-100. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118701386.ch5

Herington, M. J., & Van de Fliert, E. (2017). Positive deviance in theory and practice: A conceptual review. Deviant Behavior, 39(5), 664-678.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2017.1286194

Herrbach, O., & Mignonac, K. (2004). How organisational image affects employee attitudes. Human Resource Management Journal, 14(4), 76-88.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2004.tb00134.x

Kalshoven, K.; Den Hartog, D. N., & De Hoogh, A. H. (2011). Ethical leadership at work questionnaire (ELW): Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 51-69.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.007

Kang, D.; Stewart, J., & Kim, H. (2011). The effects of perceived external prestige, ethical organizational climate, and leader‐member exchange (LMX) quality on employees' commitments and their subsequent attitudes. Personnel Review, 40(6), 761-784. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483481111169670

Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Perceived Interorganizational competition scale. PsycTESTS Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/t10415-000

Mo, S., & Shi, J. (2015). Linking ethical leadership to employee burnout, workplace deviance and performance: Testing the mediating roles of trust in leader and surface acting. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(2), 293-303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2821-z

Perry, A. (2018). Ethics, leadership, and ethical leadership. Biblical Theology for Ethical Leadership, 23-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75043-9_2

Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal,  38(2), 555-572. https://doi.org/10.2307/256693

Schaubroeck, J.; Woessner, Z. W., & Malonson, B. (2013). Ethical leadership. Management. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199846740-0038  

Tuna, M.; Ghazzawi, I.; Yesiltas, M.; Tuna, A. A., & Arslan, S. (2016). The effects of the perceived external prestige of the organization on employee deviant workplace behavior. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 28(2), 366-396. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-04-2014-0182

Walumbwa, F. O.; Hartnell, C. A., & Misati, E. (2017). Does ethical leadership enhance group learning behavior? Examining the mediating influence of group ethical conduct, justice climate, and peer justice. Journal of Business Research, 72, 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.11.013

Wetzels, Odekerken-Schröder, & Oppen, V. (2009). Using PLS Path Modeling for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177. doi: 10.2307/20650284

Yasir, M., & Rasli, A. (2018). Direct and indirect effects of ethical leadership on workplace deviance in public healthcare sector of Pakistan. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 15(4), 558-574. 

https://doi.org/10.1108/jamr-11-2017-0109

Yıldız, B., & Alpkan, L. (2015). A theoretical model on the proposed predictors of destructive deviant workplace behaviors and the mediator role of alienation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 210, 330-338.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.373