News

 Statistics

Number of Journals56
Number of Issues2,150
Number of Articles22,204
Article View97,880,049
PDF Download35,445,764
Tahmasebi, M., Gohari, M., Sharifi, A., Hedayatipour, A. (2023). Development and Field Evaluation of a Variable-Depth Tillage Tool Based on a Horizontal Pneumatic Sensor Measurement. , 13(1), 85-99. doi: 10.22067/jam.2023.79231.1128
M. Tahmasebi; M. Gohari; A. Sharifi; A. Hedayatipour. "Development and Field Evaluation of a Variable-Depth Tillage Tool Based on a Horizontal Pneumatic Sensor Measurement". , 13, 1, 2023, 85-99. doi: 10.22067/jam.2023.79231.1128
Tahmasebi, M., Gohari, M., Sharifi, A., Hedayatipour, A. (2023). 'Development and Field Evaluation of a Variable-Depth Tillage Tool Based on a Horizontal Pneumatic Sensor Measurement', , 13(1), pp. 85-99. doi: 10.22067/jam.2023.79231.1128
Tahmasebi, M., Gohari, M., Sharifi, A., Hedayatipour, A. Development and Field Evaluation of a Variable-Depth Tillage Tool Based on a Horizontal Pneumatic Sensor Measurement. , 2023; 13(1): 85-99. doi: 10.22067/jam.2023.79231.1128

Development and Field Evaluation of a Variable-Depth Tillage Tool Based on a Horizontal Pneumatic Sensor Measurement

ماشین های کشاورزی
Article 7, Volume 13, Issue 1 - Serial Number 27, March 2023, Pages 85-99    PDF (1.25 M)
Document Type: Research Article-en
DOI: 10.22067/jam.2023.79231.1128
Authors
M. Tahmasebi* 1; M. Gohari2; A. Sharifi3; A. Hedayatipour1
1Agricultural Engineering Research Department, Markazi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Arak, Iran
2Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Arak University of Technology, Arak, Iran
3Agricultural Engineering Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
Abstract
Soil compaction can be naturally occurred or can be machinery-induced. Subsoiling is often applied to loosen soil compaction and decrease soil strength to levels that allow for root development and growth. Variable-depth subsoiling which modifies the physical properties of soil only where the tillage is required for crop growth has the potential to reduce labor, costs and fuel, and energy requirements. Since this study aimed to perform subsoiling operations with variable depth, the variable-depth tillage (VDT) tool was developed. A pneumatic multi-nozzles sensor has been used to simultaneously predict the depth of a soil layer in three depths (15, 30, and 45 cm), and send a signal to control the depth of the VDT tool. Evaluation of the VDT tool system was performed by two methods namely static and dynamic tests. In static evaluation, the system response time was measured to reach 95% of the proposed depths. The dynamic evaluation of the tool was accomplished in two steps in the field. The amount of fuel consumption and the travel distance of the tool tine to reach the desired operation depth were measured and compared with the common subsoiler (when the depth control was OFF). The average fuel consumption by using the variable-depth tillage tool decreased by 17.36% compared to the constant depth. Furthermore, the pneumatic sensor tine penetrated into the soil perfectly and sent the control signal to the control unit of the VDT tool in real-time, and the VDT tool loosened the soil at the exact depths sent by the sensor.
Keywords
Compacted soil layer; Fuel consumption reduction; Pneumatic sensor; Precision tillage; Variable-Depth Tillage (VDT) tool
References
  1. Abbaspour-Gilandeh, Y., Khalilian, A., Reza, A., Alireza, K., & Sadati, S. H. (2005). Energy savings with variable-depth tillage. In Proceedings of the 27th Southern Conservation Tillage Systems Conference, Florence, South Carolina, USA, 27-29 June, 2005(pp. 84-91). North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, North Carolina State University.
  2. Adamchuk, V. I., Skotnikov, A. V., Speichinger, J. D., & Kocher, M. F. (2003). Instrumentation system for variable depth tillage. In 2003 ASAE Annual Meeting(p. 1). Paper No. 03-1078, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.‏ https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.13723
  3. Adamchuk, V. I., Skotnikov, A. V., Speichinger, J. D., & Kocher, M. F. (2004). Development of an instrumented deep-tillage implement for sensing of soil mechanical resistance. Transactions of the ASAE, 47(6), 1913-1919.‏ https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.17798
  4. Alihamsyah, T., Humphries, E. G., & Bowers, C. G. (1990). A technique for horizontal measurement of soil mechanical impedance. Transactions of the ASAE, 33(1), 73-0077.‏ https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.31296
  5. Alimardani, R., Abbaspour-Gilandeh, Y., Khalilian, A., Keyhani, A., & Sadati, S. H. (2007). Energy savings with variable-depth tillage a precision farming practice. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 2(4), 442-447.
  6. ASAE Standards, 49th (2002). S313.2. Soil cone penetrometer. St. Joseph, Michigan: ASAE.
  7. Chung, S. O., Sudduth, K. A., Plouffe, C., & Kitchen, N. R. (2004). Evaluation of an on-the-go soil strength profile sensor using soil bin and field data. In 2004 ASAE Annual Meeting(p. 1). Paper No. 041039, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.‏ https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.16137
  8. Fallahi, I., Aghkhani, M. H., & Bayati, M. R. (2015). Design, construction and evaluation of the automatics position control system of tillage tools. Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 46(2), 117-123 (In Persian). https://doi.org/22059/IJBSE.2022.333190.665451
  9. Fox, J., Khalilian, A., Han, Y., Williams, P., Mirzakhani Nafchi, A., & Maja, J. M. (2018). Real-time, variable-depth tillage for managing soil compaction in cotton production.‏ In 2018 Beltwide Cotton Conferences, San Antonio, TX, January 3-5. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojss.2018.86012
  10. Fulton, J. P., Wells, L. G., Shearer, S. A., & Barnhisel, R. I. (1996). Spatial variation of soil physical properties: a precursor to precision tillage. ASAE Paper, 961002, 1-9.‏ https://doi.org/10.18393/ejss.2016.3.192-200
  11. Gohari, M. (2006). Design, construction and evaluation of a variable depth tillage Faculty of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology. (In Persian)
  12. Gohari, M., Hemmat, A., & Afzal, A. (2010). Design, construction and evaluation of a variable-depth tillage implement equipped with a GPS. Iranian Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 41(1).‏ https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.20084803.1389.41.1.1.0
  13. Gorucu, S., Khalilian, A., Han, Y. J., Dodd, R. B., & Smith, B. R. (2006). An algorithm to determine the optimum tillage depth from soil penetrometer data in coastal plain soils. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 22(5), 625-631.‏ https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.21993
  14. Khalilian, A., Han, Y. J., Marshall, M. W., Gorucu, S., Abbaspour-Gilandeh, Y., & Kirk, K. R. (2014). Evaluation of the Clemson instrumented subsoiler shank in coastal plain soils. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 109, 46-51.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2014.09.002
  15. Khalilian, A., Han, Y. J., Dodd, R. B., Sullivan, M. J., Gorucu, S., & Keskin, M. (2002). A control system for variable depth tillage. ASAE Paper No. 021209. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI.
  16. Koostra, B. K., & Stombaugh, T. S. (2003). Development and evaluation of a sensor to continuously measure air permeability of soil. In 2003 ASAE Annual Meeting(p. 1). American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.‏ https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.14926
  17. Meselhy, A. A. E. (2021). Effect of Variable-Depth Tillage System on Energy Requirements for Tillage Operation and Productivity of Desert Soil. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences, 7(1), 38 ‏ https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20210701.13
  18. Meselhy, A. A. E. (2020). Evaluation of locally made horizontal penetrometer to measure soil compaction under Egyptian conditions. Bioscience Research, 17(3): 2331-2357. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/nvbs/v7/5028F
  19. Raper, R. L. (1999). Site-specific tillage for site-specific compaction: Is there a need. In  International Conference of Dryland Conservation/Zone Tillage, Agriculture University, Beijing, China,(pp. 66-68). ‏
  20. Raper, R. L. (1999). Site-specific tillage for site-specific compaction: is there a need? In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Dryland Conservation/Zone Tillage, China Agriculture University, Beijing, China, pp. 66-68.
  21. Raper, R. L., Reeves, D. W., Shaw, J. N., Van Santen, E., & Mask, P. L. (2007). Benefits of site-specific subsoiling for cotton production in Coastal Plain soils. Soil and Tillage Research, 96(1-2), 174-181. https://doi.org/1016/j.still.2007.05.004
  22. Sharifi, A., & Mohsenimanesh, A. (2012). Soil mechanical resistance measurement by an unique multi-cone tips horizontal sensor. International Agrophysics, 26(1), 61-64.‏ https://doi.org/2478/v10247-012-0009-7
  23. Tahmasebi, M., Hedayatipoor, A., Gohari, M., & Sharifi malverjerdi, A. (2021). Design, Fabrication and Evaluation of Variable Depth Subsoiler Using Pneumatic Sensor. Agricultural Engineering Research Institute. Report No. 59876. (in Persian).
  24. Taylor, H. M., & Gardner, H. R. (1963). Penetration of cotton seedlingn taproots as influenced by bulk density, moisture content, and strength of soil. Soil Science, 96(3), 153-156.‏ https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-196309000-00001
  25. Vernekar, S. R. (2015). Design and Development of Smart Soil Monitoring System Based on Embedded Technology(Doctoral dissertation, Goa University).‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.10.067
Statistics
Article View: 1,826
PDF Download: 1,246


Journal Management System. Powered by Sinaweb