The Effect of Valuing Social Responsibility by Combining the Company's Life Cycle

Iranian Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance

دوره 8، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 27، مرداد 2024، صفحه 85-100   

نوع مقاله: Original Article

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/ijaaf.2024.44212.1380

نویسندگان

Nahid Bigmoradi¹؛ Ahmad Khodamipour^{* 2}؛ Omid pourheidari³

¹Ph.D. student of Accounting, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.

²Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman

³Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

چکیده

This research examines the effect of valuing social responsibility by combining the company's life cycle. In other words, by examining the role of life cycle stages on the relationship between high social responsibility and company value, the related literature on corporate social responsibility will be expanded to the less researched area in Iran. The statistical population of the research is the companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. A sample of 115 companies from 2006 to 2021 is 1725 company-year. Multiple panel regression methods and STATA version 17 statistical software were used to test the hypotheses. The results show that although social responsibility and company value generally have a positive relationship, this relationship is conditional on the company's life cycle stages. The effect of each dimension of social responsibility on the company's value is different in the life cycle stages. Social responsibility's social and governance aspects predict higher firm value in all life cycle periods, but this effect is more significant in the decline period. The environmental aspect of social responsibility generally positively impacts the firm’s value, but this effect is insignificant at different life cycle stages.

کلیدواژه‌ها

Company Value؛ Environment؛ Social Responsibility

مراجع

1. Ahmad, G., Hayat, F., Almaqtari, F. A., Farhan, N. H. and Shahid, M. (2023). Corporate social responsibility spending and earnings management: The moderating effect of ownership structure. Journal of Cleaner Production, 384(21), pp. 135-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135556
2. Alshurafat, H., Ananzeh, H., Al-Hazaima, H. and Al Shbail, M. O. (2023). Do different dimensions of corporate social responsibility disclosure have different economic consequence: multi-approaches for profitability examination. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 33(1), pp. 240-263. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-06-2022-0082
3. Bajic, S. and Yurtoglu, B. (2018). Which aspects of CSR predict firm market value? Journal of Capital Markets Studies, 2(1), pp. 50-69. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCMS-10-2017-0002
4. Bartlett, R. P. and Bubb, R. (2023). Corporate Social Responsibility through Shareholder Governance. NYU Law and Economics Research, 23(21), pp. 60-73. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4354220
5. Caiazza, S., Galloppo, G. and Lattanzio, G. (2023). Industrial accidents: The mediating effect of corporate social responsibility and environmental policy measures. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(3), pp. 1191-1203. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2413
6. Chia, A., Kern, M. L. and Neville, B. A. (2020). CSR for Happiness: Corporate determinants of societal happiness as social responsibility. Business Ethics: A European Review, 29(3), pp. 422-437. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12274
7. Chung, C.Y., Jung, S. and Young, J. (2018). Do CSR activities increase firm value? Evidence from the Korean market. Sustainability, 10(9), pp. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093164
8. Coelho, R., Jayantilal, S. and Ferreira, J. J. (2023). The impact of social responsibility on corporate financial performance: A systematic literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(5), pp. 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2446
9. Curras-Perez, R., Alvarado-Herrera, A. and Vera-Martínez, J. (2023). Comparing the effects of consumers' perceptions of companies' corporate social responsibility initiatives in emerging and developed markets. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 5(2), pp. 138-143. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-09-2022-0761
10. Dickinson, V. (2011). Cash flow patterns as a proxy for firm life cycle. Accounting Review, 86(6), pp. 1969-1994. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10130
11. Fatima, T. and Elbanna, S. (2023). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) implementation: A review and a research agenda towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 183(1), pp. 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05047-8
12. Hendratama, T. D. and Huang, Y. C. (2021). Corporate social responsibility, firm value and life cycle: evidence from Southeast Asian countries. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 22(4), pp. 577-597. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-09-2020-0194
13. Jiang, X., Li, G. and Fan, X. (2023). Environmental Protection Fee-to-Tax and Corporate Environmental Social Responsibility: A Test Based on Corporate Life Cycle Theory. Sustainability, 15(3), pp. 21-28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032128
14. Kasradze, M., Kamali Saraji, M. and Streimikiene, D. (2023). Challenges to corporate social responsibility adoption for sustainability: a picture fuzzy approach. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 13(11), pp. 40-47.
15. Khuong, N. V. and Anh, L. H. T. (2023). The nexus between corporate social responsibility and firm value: the moderating role of life-cycle stages. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(5), pp. 949-96. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2021-0370
16. Liu, S., Lin, Z. and Leng, Z. (2023). Whether tax incentives stimulate corporate innovation: Empirical evidence based on corporate life cycle theory. Econ. Res. J, 55(6), pp. 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.02
17. Long, F., Lin, F. and Ge, C. (2022). Impact of China's environmental protection tax on corporate performance: Empirical data from heavily polluting industries. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 52(3), pp. 85-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106892
18. Nekhili, M., Boukadhaba, A., Nagati, H. and Chtioui, T. (2021). ESG performance and market value: The moderating role of employee board representation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(14), pp. 3061-3087. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09585192. 2019. 1629989
19. Novitasari, M., Wijaya, A. L., Agustin, N. M., Gunardi, A. and Dana, L. P. (2023). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Green supply chain management as a mediating variable. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(1), pp. 267-276. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2353
20. Oh, H. I., Kim, H., Kim, J. B. and Lee, Y. G. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and operating cash flows management: An examination of credit market incentives. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 48(8), pp. 1494-1522. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3805477
21. Osta, S. and Gheitasi, R. (2012). The Effect of Firm Life Cycle on the Discretionary Accruals. Journal of Financial Accounting Research, 4(1), pp. 89-104. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.23223405.1391.4.1.7.3
22. Song, W., Ren, S. and Yu, J. (2019). Bridging the gap between corporate social responsibility and new green product success: The role of green organizational identity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), pp. 88-97. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2205
23. Thu, L. B. and Khuong, N. V. (2023). How does the corporate life cycle influence Vietnamese firms’ corporate social responsibility? Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(1), pp. 123-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 23322039. 2023.2186043
24. Widyawati, L. (2020). A systematic literature review of socially responsible investment and environmental social governance metrics. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), pp. 619-637. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2393
25. Xie, J., Nozawa, W., Yagi, M., Fujii, H. and Managi, S. (2019). Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), pp. 286-300. https://doi.org/10.1002/ bse.2224
26. Yoon, Y., Chastagner, K. and Joo, J. (2020). Inner-self vs. outer-self and socially responsible product consumption. Sustainability, 12(22), pp. 62-93, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229362
27. Zhang, H., Khurshid, A., Xinyu, W. A. N. G. and Băltăţeanu, A. M. (2021). Corporate financial risk assessment and role of big data; New perspective using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Journal for Economic Forecasting, 21(2), pp. 181-199.
28. Zhao, A., Wang, J., Sun, Z. and Guan, H. (2022). Environmental taxes, technology innovation quality and firm performance in China—A test of effects based on the Porter hypothesis. Economic Analysis and Policy, 74(7), pp. 309-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. eap.2022.02.009
29. Zhao, T. and Xiao, X. (2019). The impact of corporate social responsibility on financial constraints: does the life cycle stage of a firm matter? International Review of Economics and Finance, 63(6), pp. 76-93. https://doi.org/0.1016/j.iref.2018.08.010