Effects of Humic Acid as Fertigation on Phosphate and Iron Fertilizers Efficiency and Some of Mineral Nutrients Concentration in Corn (Zea mays L.)

آب و خاک

Article 5, Volume 37, Issue 6 - Serial Number 92, January and February 2024, Pages 891-906   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jsw.2023.83587.1315

Authors

M. Amarloo; M. Heshmati Rafsanjani^* ; M. Hamidpour

Soil Science Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan, Rafsanjan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Application of natural organic matter derived components, i.e. humic acid, as fertilizer is a suitable way to improve soil fertility and increase yield and quality of agricultural products. Many researchers reported positive effects of humic acid on water holding capacity, soil aeration, root formation and development, microorganism activities, and availability of mineral nutrients in soil. Antagonistic interaction between soil phosphorus and some micronutrients, especially in calcareous soils, can cause micronutrients deficiency in plants. With regard to positive effects of organic compounds on bioavailability of mineral nutrients, it seems that humic acid can positively affect the phosphorus interaction with micronutrients. Therefore, investigation of the effects of humic acid incorporated into irrigation water, phosphate and iron fertilizers application, on nutrients concentration in plants and their interactions is considerable.
Materials and Methods
This study was carried out to investigate the effects of application of humic acid in irrigation water, and phosphate and iron fertilizers in soil, on corn growth and concentration of P, Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu in corn tissues. To this aim, a factorial experiment was conducted based on completely randomized design, with three replications in greenhouse. The factors included humic acid in 0, 70, and 140 mg kg^-1 levels, (7 times as fertigation during growth season; total use equal to 0, 490, and 980 mg kg^-1 of soil, respectively), phosphorus (P, as monocalcium phosphate monohydrate) in 0 and 50 mg kg^-1 levels, and Fe (as ferrous sulfate heptahydrate) in 0, 10, and 20 mg kg^-1 levels. P and Fe treatments were mixed with 4 kg of air-dried soil (<2 mm in diameter) and filled to the pots. Six seeds of maize (Zea maye L. cv. Single cross 704) were seeded per pot, and three seedlings were finally kept and grown for two months. After harvest, fresh and dried weight of shoots were measured. The roots were accurately extracted from the soil, washed, dried at 65^◦C, and weighed. Sample digestion and measuring concentration of P, Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu were done according to conventional methods (P by a UV-Visible Spectrophotometer and metal elements by the GBS Savant Atomic Absorption Spectrometer). Statistical analyses were done by the IBM SPSS Statistics version 26 software.
Results and Discussion
According to this study results, the main effect of humic acid, on P concentration and dry matter of shoots and roots, was statistically significant. In presence of P (2nd P level), 490 and 980 mg kg^-1 humic acid levels significantly increased the mean of dry matter compared to blank while humic acid had no significant effect on means of shoots and roots dry matter in 1st level of P (no P application). Increasing humic acid level from 490 to 980 mg kg^-1, significantly decreased mean of shoots dry matter. The interaction effect between humic acid and the other two factors exhibited statistical significance concerning root dry matter. The treatment combination of 50 mg kg^-1 of P, 490 mg kg^-1 of humic acid, and 20 mg kg^-1 of Fe yielded the highest mean root dry matter, which was 97% greater than that of the control. The 2nd level of P significantly increased the means of shoots P concentration in all levels of humic acid and Fe factors, compared to those of the 1st P factor level. There was no significant difference between means of shoots P concentration in different levels of humic acid and Fe factors, at the 1st level of P factor, separately. On the other hand, at the 2nd level of P factor, significant differences were observed between the means of P concentration for both other factors (significant interaction between P and humic acid, and between P and Fe Factors). Applying humic acid could significantly increase the means of shoots P concentration at the 2nd level of P factor, but there was no significant difference between those of 490 and 980 mg kg^-1 levels. About the effect of Fe factor on shoots P concentration, only 10 mg kg^-1 level of Fe significantly increased it. The main effect of the P and humic acid factors and interaction of the P and Fe factor on roots P concentration, were statistically significant. Roots P concentration increased significantly by 490 and 980 mg kg^-1 humic acid levels. A significant increase of roots P concentration was observed in the 1st P factor level and 10 mg kg^-1 level of Fe compared to the blank, and in 50 mg kg^-1 level of P, Fe factor had no significant effect on it. The results showed that humic acid could not improve P uptake by corn from the soil with low available phosphorus (Olsen extractable P lower than 4 mg kg^-1). The humic acid factor had no significant effect on Fe concentration of corn shoots, but its main effect and its triple interaction, with two other factors, on Fe concentration of the roots were statistically significant. There was no significant difference between the means of roots Fe concentration at the 1st level of P factor (9 treatments, various levels of humic acid and Fe factors). The highest mean of root's Fe concentration was found in treatment of the highest level of each factor, significantly more than those of the most of other treatments. About the Mn concentration in corn tissues, the Mn concentration in shoots was significantly increased by P fertilizer application, and Mn concentration in roots was significantly affected and increased by 490 and 980 mg kg^-1 humic acid levels. The means of Mn concentration of roots in 490 and 980 mg kg^-1 humic acid were not significantly different. The Zn concentration of corn shoots was significantly affected by interaction of the P and humic acid factors as the highest mean of it was in 0 mg kg^-1 of P and 980 mg kg^-1 humic acid levels, and there was no significant difference between those of other levels. The Zn concentration of corn roots was significantly increased by P applying and affected by the interaction of humic acid and Fe factors. When humic acid was at zero concentration level, Fe application of 20 mg kg^-1 significantly decreased the Zn concentration of corn shoots while with humic acid application (490 and 980 mg kg^-1) no significant difference was observed between the means. This result showed that humic acid can decrease the antagonistic effects of Fe and Zn in soil. The Cu concentration in shoots was significantly affected by the P and Fe factors. Usage of P fertilizer significantly increased the Cu concentration of corn shoots; on the contrary, the 2nd and 3rd levels of Fe factor (Fe applications) significantly decreased Cu concentration in shoots of corn. Moreover, using humic acid could significantly increase Cu concentration of corn roots without any significant interaction with the other two factors.
Conclusion
The findings suggest that in soils with very low available P, humic acid alone does not enhance the growth and dry matter yield of corn. However, the efficiency of phosphate fertilizer can be enhanced by applying humic acid fertilizer through irrigation water. Additionally, humic acid has been observed to mitigate antagonistic effects between P and certain micronutrients, as well as reduce antagonistic interactions among metal micronutrients. For the positive effect of humc acid on growth and adequate chemical composition of corn, concentration of 490 mg kg^-1 humic acid is recommended.

Keywords

Chemical composition; Dry matter; Fertilizer; Micronutrients; Organic acids

References

1. Arjumend, T., Abbasi, M. K., & Rafique, E. (2015). Effects of lignite-derived humic acid on some selected soil properties, growth and nutrient uptake of wheat (tritcum aestium) grown under greenhouse conditions. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 47(6), 2231-2238.
2. Aylaj, M., Sisouane, M., Tahiri, S., Mouchrif, Y., & El Krati, M. (2023). Effects of humic acid extracted from organic waste composts on Turnip culture (Brassica rapa subsp. rapa) in a sandy soil. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 24(7), 345-359. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/163510
3. Cavani, L., Ciavatta, C., & Gessa, C. (2003). Identification of organic matter from peat, leonardite and lignite fertilizers using humification parameters and electrofocusing. Bioresource Technology, 86, 45-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00107-4
4. Chaji, N., Khorassani, R., Astaraei, A., & Lakzian, A. (2013). Effect of phosphorous and nitrogen on vegetative growth and production of daughter corms of saffron. Journal of Saffron Research, 1(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.22077/jsr.2013.352
5. Chakerol-hosseini, M. (1999). Effect of phosphorus and iron on growth and chemical composition of corn and soybean. M.Sc. Thesis, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Iran. (In Persian with English abstract) 
6. Ertani, A., Pizzeghello, D., Francioso, O., Muscolo, A., & Nardi, S. (2013). Isopentenyladenosine and cytokininlike activity of different humic substances. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 129, 70-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2012.10.007
7. Fageria N.K., Baligar, V.C., & Jones, C.A. (2011). Growth and mineral nutrition of field crops (3rd Ed.).  CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, New York.
8. FAO, IFAD, & WFP. (2015). The state of food Insecurity in the world 2015. Meeting the 2015 international hunger targets: taking stock of uneven progress. Rome, FAO. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.115.009936
9. Fixen, P.E., Ludwick, A.E., & Olsen, S.R. (1983). Phosphorus and potassium fertilization of irrigated alfalfa on calcareous soils: Soil phosphorus solubility relationships. Soil Science Society of Amerrican Journal, 47, 112–117. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1983.03615995004700010023x
10. Gerke, J. (2021). The effect of humic substances on phosphate and iron acquisition by higher plants: Qualitative and quantitative aspects. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 184(3), 329-338. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.202000525
11. Ghorbani, S.H., Khazaee, R., Kaafi, M., & Banayan, A. (2010). Effect of humic acid application in irrigation water on yield and yield components of maize (Zea mays). Journal of Agricultural Ecology, 2, 123-131. (In Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v2i1.7608
12. Harper, S.M., Kerven, G.L., Edwards, D.G., & Ostatek-Boczynski, Z. (2000). Characterisation of fulvic and humic acids from leaves of Eucalyptus camaldulensis and from decomposed Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32(10), 1331-1336. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00021-3
13. Hoffland, E., Wei, C., & Wissuwa, M. (2006). Organic anion exudation by lowland rice (Oryza sativa) at zinc and phosphorus deficiency. Plant and Soil, 283, 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-3937-1
14. Holford, I.C.R. (1997). Soil phosphorus: its measurement, and its uptake by plants. Soil Australian Journal of Soil Research, 35(2), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1071/S96047
15. Hosseini, S., & Abedi, S. (2007). Assess the role of markets and government policies in determining the price of corn. Agricultural Economics, 1, 21-34. (In Persian)
16. Hua, Q.X., Li, J.Y., Zhou, J.M., Wang, H.Y., Du, C.W., & Chen, X.Q. (2008). Enhancement of phosphorus solubility by humic substances in Ferrosols. Pedosphere, 18, 533–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(08)60044-2
17. Jindo, K., Martim, S.A., Navarro, E.C., Pérez-Alfocea, F., Hernandez, T., Garcia, C., Aguiar, N.O., & Canellas, P. (2012). Root growth promotion by humic acids from composted and non-composted urban organic wastes. Plant and Soil, 353, 209-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-1024-3
18. Jing, J., Zhang, S., Yuan, L., Li, Y., Lin, Z., Xiong, Q., & Zhao, B. (2020). Combining humic acid with phosphate fertilizer affects humic acid structure and its stimulating efficacy on the growth and nutrient uptake of maize seedlings. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 17502. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74349-6
19. Keating, B.A., & Carberry, P.S. (2010). Sustainable production, food security and supply chain implications. Aspects of Applied Biology,102, 7–20.
20. Keating, B.A., Herrero, M., Carberry, P.S., Gardner, J., & Cole, M.B. (2014). Food wedges: Framing the global food demand and supply challenge towards 2050. Global Food Security, 3(3-4), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2014.08.004
21. Li, Q., Wu, L., Chen, J., Khan, M. A., Luo, X., & Lin, W. (2016). Biochemical and microbial properties of rhizospheres under maize/peanut intercropping. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 15(1), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61089-9
22. Li, X., Geng, H., Zhang, L., Peng, S., Xin, Q., Huang, J., & Wang, Y. (2022). Improving maize yield prediction at the county level from 2002 to 2015 in China using a novel deep learning approach. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 202, 107356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.107356
23. Lindsay, W.L. (1979). Chemical Equilibria in Soils. Wiley-Interscience, New York.
24. Masood, T., Gul, R., Munsif, F., Jalal, F., Hussain, Z., Noreen, N., & Khan, H. (2021). Effect of different phosphorus levels on the yield and yield components of maize. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 27(2), 167-170.
25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268011160
26. Michaeal, H.B., & Lua, H. (2001). Influence of humic acid on the growth of tomato in hydroponic systems. Acta Horticulturae, 548, 451-458. https://doi.org/17660/ActaHortic.2001.548.53
27. Nezami, S., & Malakouti, M.J. (2016). The role of organic acids on the release of phosphorus and zinc in a calcareous soil. Journal of Water and Soil, 30(3), 805-816. https://doi.org/22067/jsw.v30i3.40469
28. Oktem, A.G., & Oktem, A. (2020). Effect of Humic acid application methods on yield and some yield characteristics of corn plant (Zea mays indentata). Journal of Applied Life Sciences International, 23(11), 31-37. https://doi.org/10.9734/jalsi/2020/v23i1130196
29. Ouzounidou, G., Čiamporová, M., Moustakas, M., & Karataglis, S. (1995). Responses of maize (Zea mays) plants to copper stress—I. Growth, mineral content and ultrastructure of roots. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 35(2), 167-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0098-8472(94)00049-B
30. Ronaghi, A., Chakrol-hosseini, M., & Karimian, N. (2002). Growth and chemical composition of corn as affected by phosphorus and iron. Journal of Science and Technology of Agricultural and Natural Resources, 6, 91-102. (In Persian). https://doi.org/1001.1.22518517.1381.6.2.8.2
31. Sarhadi-Sardoui, J., Ronagashi, A., Maftoun, M., & Karimian, N. (2003). Growth and chemical composition of corn in three calcareous sandy soil of Iran as affected by applied phosphorus and manure. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 5, 77-84. https://doi.org/1001.1.16807073.2003.5.1.4.1
32. Sekhon, G.S. (1994). Management of nutrient interactions in agriculture. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 42(1), 167-167.
33. Subhash, C., Malik A., Zargar, M.Y., & Bhat, M.A. (2011). Nitrate pollution: a menace to human, soil, water and plant. Universal Journal of Environmental Research and Technology, 1, 22-32.
34. Sumner, M.E., & Farina, M.P. (1986). Phosphorus Interactions with Other Nutrients and Lime in Field Cropping Systems. In: Stewart, B. A., Ed., Advances in Soil Science, Springer, New York, 201-236.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8660-5_5
35. Yuan, Y., Gai, S., Tang, C., Jin, Y., Cheng, K., Antonietti, M., & Yang, F. (2022). Artificial humic acid improves maize growth and soil phosphorus utilization efficiency. Applied Soil Ecology, 179, 104587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2022.104587