اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات51
تعداد شماره‌ها2,028
تعداد مقالات21,110
تعداد مشاهده مقاله47,485,443
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله20,369,660
میش مست, اسماعیل, دهمرده, مهدی, گلوی, محمد, خمری, عیسی. (1403). بررسی عملکرد، اجزای عملکرد و کیفیت علوفه در کشت مخلوط کوشیا (Kochia scoparia L.) و لوبیا چشم‌بلبلی (Vigna unguiculata). سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 22(2), 227-242. doi: 10.22067/jcesc.2024.86148.1292
اسماعیل میش مست; مهدی دهمرده; محمد گلوی; عیسی خمری. "بررسی عملکرد، اجزای عملکرد و کیفیت علوفه در کشت مخلوط کوشیا (Kochia scoparia L.) و لوبیا چشم‌بلبلی (Vigna unguiculata)". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 22, 2, 1403, 227-242. doi: 10.22067/jcesc.2024.86148.1292
میش مست, اسماعیل, دهمرده, مهدی, گلوی, محمد, خمری, عیسی. (1403). 'بررسی عملکرد، اجزای عملکرد و کیفیت علوفه در کشت مخلوط کوشیا (Kochia scoparia L.) و لوبیا چشم‌بلبلی (Vigna unguiculata)', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 22(2), pp. 227-242. doi: 10.22067/jcesc.2024.86148.1292
میش مست, اسماعیل, دهمرده, مهدی, گلوی, محمد, خمری, عیسی. بررسی عملکرد، اجزای عملکرد و کیفیت علوفه در کشت مخلوط کوشیا (Kochia scoparia L.) و لوبیا چشم‌بلبلی (Vigna unguiculata). سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1403; 22(2): 227-242. doi: 10.22067/jcesc.2024.86148.1292

بررسی عملکرد، اجزای عملکرد و کیفیت علوفه در کشت مخلوط کوشیا (Kochia scoparia L.) و لوبیا چشم‌بلبلی (Vigna unguiculata)

پژوهشهای زراعی ایران
مقاله 7، دوره 22، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 74، تیر 1403، صفحه 227-242    اصل مقاله (655.75 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jcesc.2024.86148.1292
نویسندگان
اسماعیل میش مست؛ مهدی دهمرده* ؛ محمد گلوی؛ عیسی خمری
گروه زراعت، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زابل، ایران
چکیده
کاهش کمی و کیفی منابع آب همراه با شوری خاک یکی از مهم‌ترین ویژگی‌های مناطق خشک است و تولید گیاهان شورزیست تحت این شرایط جهت تغذیه دام از پایدارترین روش‌های حفاظت از این مناطق محسوب می‌شود. به‌منظور ارزیابی عملکرد و کیفیت علوفه در کشت مخلوط کوشیا و لوبیا چشم‌بلبلی آزمایشی به‌صورت بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در مزرعه آموزشی–پژوهشی دانشگاه زابل اجرا شد. الگوهای جایگزینی و افزایشی کشت مخلوط (100 درصد کوشیا (K100)، 50 درصد کوشیا:50 درصد لوبیا (K50:C50)، 25 درصد کوشیا: 75 درصد لوبیا (K25:C75)، 75 درصد کوشیا: 25 درصد لوبیا (K75: C25)، 100 درصد کوشیا: 100 درصد لوبیا (K100: C100)، 50 درصد کوشیا: 100 درصد لوبیا (K50: C100)، 100 درصد کوشیا:50 درصد لوبیا (K100:C50)، 100 درصد لوبیا (100C)) تیمارهای این آزمایش بودند. نتایج نشان داد که بیشترین عملکرد کوشیا (kg.ha-1 22788) مربوط به تیمار 100C:100K و بیشترین عملکرد اقتصادی لوبیا چشم‌بلبلی (kg.ha-1 3590.3) مربوط به تک‌کشتی لوبیا بود. برای کوشیا بیشترین درصد پروتئین خام (19.90 درصد) و خاکستر (14.83 درصد) از تیمار K100:C100 به‌دست آمد. در رابطه با خصوصیات مورفولوژیکی لوبیا چشم‌بلبلی بیشترین میزان عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد مربوط به تک‌کشتی لوبیا بود. بیشترین نسبت برابری زمین (1.80) از تیمار K50: C50 به‌دست آمد. افزایش عملکرد، پروتئین خام و قابلیت هضم ماده خشک علوفه کوشیا حاکی از برتری الگوهای افزایشی کشت مخلوط در مقایسه با الگوهای جایگزینی و تک‌کشتی کوشیا بود. از این رو می‌توان گفت که کیفیت علوفه کوشیا در کشت مخلوط با لوبیا چشم‌بلبلی بهبود یافته است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
پروتئین خام؛ خاکستر؛ قابلیت هضم ماده خشک؛ نسبت برابری زمین
مراجع
  1. intercropped sorghum bicolor and lablab purpureus forages grown under saline conditions. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 23(1), 271-276.‏ https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR12.007
  2. Akbari, F., Dahmardeh, M., Morshedi, A., Ganbari, A., & Khorramdel, S. (2019). Evaluation of some agroecosystem services in intercropping of corn and bean affected by wheat residues and tillage management systems. Ph.D dissertation of Agroecology, Zabol University, Zabol, Iran. 264 Pp. (in Persian).
  3. Aynehband, A., Hosaini, S., & Farzaneh, M. (2020). Effect of different forage crops and cultivation method on quantity and quality of forage in intercropping. Journal of Crops Improvement, 22(2), 295-305. (in Persian with English abstract).‏ https://doi.org/10.22059/jci.2020.284842.2240
  4. Badakhshan, S., Amiri-Nejad, M., Tohidi-Nejad, E. A., & Parsamotlagh, B. (2021). Evaluation of yield and quality forage in Intercropping Tepary Bean (Phaseolus acutifolus Gray) and Millet Cultivars. Journal of Agroecology, 13(2), 291-305. (in Persian with English abstract).‏ https://doi.org/10.22067/JAG.V13I2.83847
  5. Baghdadi, A., Halim, R. A., Ghasemzadeh, A., Ebrahimi, M., Othman, R., & Yusof, M. M. (2016). Effect of intercropping of corn and soybean on dry matter yield and nutritive value of forage corn. Legume Research-An International Journal, 39(6), 976-981.‏ https://doi.org/10.18805/lr.v39i6.6643
  6. Banik, P., Midya, A., Sarkar, B. K., & Ghose, S. S. (2006). Wheat and chickpea intercropping systems in an additive series experiment: advantages and weed smothering. European Journal of Agronomy, 24(4), 325-332.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2005.10.010
  7. Belel, M. D., Halim, R. A., Rafii, M. Y., & Saud, H. M. (2014). Intercropping of corn with some selected legumes for improved forage production: A review. Journal of Agricultural Science, 6(3), 48.‏ https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v6n3p48
  8. BenYoussef, S., Kachout, S. S., Abidi, S., Saddem, B., Ismail, J., & Salem, B. H. (2019). Effect of different levels of nitrogen fertilization on forage yields and quality of hairy vetch (Vicia villosa, Roth) triticale (X Tritcosecale, Wittmack) mixtures. The Open Agriculture Journal, 13(1).‏ https://doi.org/10.2174/1874331501913010090
  9. Dahmardeh, M., Ghanbari, A., Syahsar, B. A., & Ramroudi, M. (2010). The effect of planting time and the quality of forage maize in intercropping with cowpea. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 41(3): 633-642. (in Persian).
  10. Dusa, E. M., & Stan, V. (2013). The effect of intercropping on crop productivity and yield quality of oat (Avena sativa)/grain leguminous species (pea–Pissum sativum L., lentil–Lens culinaris L.) cultivated in pure stand and mixtures, in the organic agriculture system. European Scientific Journal, 9(21),‏ 69-78.
  11. Egbe, O. M. (2010). Effects of plant density of intercropped soybean with tall sorghum on competitive ability of soybean and economic yield at Otobi, Benue State, Nigeria. Journal of Cereals and Oilseeds, 1(1), 1-10.‏ https://doi.org/10.5897/JCO.9000005
  12. Farajain, M. M., Kafi, M., & Nezami, A. (2013).‏ Intercropping of kochia (Kochia scoparia) with blue panic grass (Panicum antidotale Retz.) under irrigation with saline water. Agroecology, 5, 153-160. (in Persian).
  13. Fazeli Kakhki, S. F., Goldani, M., & Jolaini, M. (2020). Investigation of changes in some morphophysiological traits, yield and quality indices of two Kochia ecotype (Kochia scoparia) in drought stress under field conditions. Iranian Journal of Irrigation & Drainage, 13(6), 1783-1793.‏ (in Persian with English abstract).
  14. Friesen, L. F., Beckie, H. J., Warwick, S. I., & Van Acker, R. C. (2009). The biology of Canadian weeds. 138. Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 89(1), 141-167.‏ https://doi.org/10.4141/CJPS08057
  15. Faramarzi, F., Hosseini, S. M. B., Mansory, H., Fangueiro, D., & Alizadeh, H. (2023). Effect of the Ammonium Nitrate Levels on Intercropped Barley (Hordeum Vulgare ) and Vetch (Vicia Villosa) under Weed Competition Management. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 20(4), 481-500. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jcesc.2022.75859.1154
  16. Ghafarian, M. R., Yadavi, A. R., Dabbagh Mohammadi Nasab, A., Salehi, M., & Movahedi Dehnavi, M. (2021). Advantage of Forage Production in Kochia (Kochia scoparia), Sesbania (Sesbania aculeata) and Guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoliba) intercropping under irrigation water salinity. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 31(1), 71-86.‏
  17. Guerrero-Rodriguez, J. D. D. (2006). Growth and nutritive value of lucerne (Medicago sativa) and Melilotus (Melilotus albus Medik.) under saline conditions.‏ Thesis (Ph.D.). School of Agriculture, Food and Wine.
  18. Gul, B., Ansari, R., Aziz, I. R. F. A. N., & Khan, M. A. (2010). Salt tolerance of Kochia scoparia: A new fodder crop for highly saline arid regions. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42(4), 2479-2487.‏
  19. Hamzei, (2012). Evaluation of Yield, SPAD Index, Landuse Efficiency and System Productivity Index of Barley (Hordeum vulgare) Intercropped with Bitter Vetch (Vicia ervilia). Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 2(4), 79-92. (in Persian with English abstract).
  20. Hamzei, J., & Davoudian, R. (2019). Evaluarion of Agrophysiological Indices and Yield Performance in anola/Chickpea Intercropping. Journal of Agroecology, 11(1), 245-259. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v11i1.65192
  21. Hedayati Firoozabadi, A., Kazemeini, S. A., & Pirasteh Anooshe, H. (2017). Evaluation of different planting ratio of sorghum-kochia intercropping in varied salinity conditions.‏ Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 24(3): 685-698. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22092/ijrdr.2017.114014
  22. Hedayati-Firoozabadi, A., Kazemeini, S. A., Pirasteh-Anosheh, H., Ghadiri, H., & Pessarakli, M. (2020). Forage yield and quality as affected by salt stress in different ratios of Sorghum bicolor-Bassia indica intercropping. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 43(17), 2579-2589.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2020.1783301
  23. Iptas, S., & Yavuz, M. (2008). Effect of pollination levels on yield and quality of maize grown for silage. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 32(1), 41-48.‏
  24. Jami Al-Ahmadi, M. (2005). Study some properties of ecophysiologicy kochia scoparia. Ph.D. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran. (in Persian).
  25. Jami Al Ahmadi, M., & Kafi, M. (2008). Kochia (Kochia scoparia): To be or not to be. Crop and Forage Production Using Saline Waters. M. Kafi and MA Khan, eds. NAM S & T Centre. Daya Publisher, New Delhi.‏
  26. Jamshidi, K., Mazaheri, D., Hosseini, N. M., Mashhadi, H. R., & Peyghambari, S. A. (2011). Investigation of corn/cowpea intercropping effect on suppresing the weeds. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 42(2), 233-241.‏ (in Persian with English abstract).
  27. Javanmard, A., Machiani, M. A., Lithourgidis, A., Morshedloo, M. R., & Ostadi, A. (2020). Intercropping of maize with legumes: A cleaner strategy for improving the quantity and quality of forage. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 1, 100003.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2020.100003
  28. Kafi, M., Asadi, H., & Ganjeali, A. (2010). Possible utilization of high-salinity waters and application of low amounts of water for production of the halophyte Kochia scoparia as alternative fodder in saline agroecosystems. Agricultural Water Management, 97(1), 139-147.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.08.022
  29. Kafi, M., Nabati, J., Khaninejad, S., Masomi, A., & Zare, M. M. (2011). Evaluation of characteristics forage in different Kochia (Kochia scoparia) ecotypes in tow salinity levels irrigation.‏ Electronic Journal of Crop Production, 4, 229-238. (in Persian with English abstract).
  30. Kheradmand, S., Mahmodib, S., & Ahmadi, E. (2014). Quantitative and qualitative performance evaluation of green pea and barley forage intercropping. Applied Field Crops Research, 27(105), 111-118.‏ (in Persian with English abstract).
  31. Klimek-Kopyra, A., Skowera, B., Zając, T., & Kulig, B. (2017). Mixed cropping of linseed and legumes as an ecological way to effectively increase oil quality. Romanian Agricultural Research, 34, 217-224.‏
  32. Koochaki, A., Nasiri Mahalati, M., Khorram Del, S., Anwarkhah, S., Timuri, M., & Sanjani, S. (2010). Evaluation of growth indices of hemp (Cannabis sativa) and sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) in intercropping with replacement and additive series. Journal of Agroecology, 2(1), 27-36. (in Persian).
  33. Koocheki, A., Nassiri Mahallati, M., Hatefi Farajian, M. H., & Hooshmand, M. (2023). Effect of relay triple intercropping arrangements of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris), chickpea (Cicer arietinum), and mung bean (Vigna radiate L.) on yield and yield components. Journal of Agroecology, 15(1), 153-168. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/agry.2022.20158.0
  34. Kurdali, F. (2010). Growth and N2 fixation in mixed cropping of Medicago arborea and Atriplex halimus grown on a salt-affected soil using a 15N tracer technique. Journal of Plant Interactions, 5(1), 37-44.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/17429140903151265
  35. Lewis, D. C., & McFarlane, J. D. (1986). Effect of foliar applied manganese on the growth of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) and the diagnosis of manganese deficiency by plant tissue and seed analysis. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 37(6), 567-572.‏ https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9860567
  36. Lithourgidis, A. S., Vasilakoglou, I. B., Dhima, K. V., Dordas, C. A., & Yiakoulaki, M. D. (2006). Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seeding ratios. Field Crops Research, 99(2-3), 106-113.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.03.008
  37. Masoumi, A., Kafi, M., Nabati, J., & Zare Mehrjerdi, M. (2016). The possibility of forage production in two Kochia (Kochia scoparia) ecotypes by application of low amounts of water in saline conditions. Crop Production Journal, 10(1): 1-19. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22069/EJCP.2017.10053.1791
  38. McDonald, P., Edwards, R. A., Greenhalgh, J. F. D., Morgan, C. A., Sinclair, L. A., & Wilkinson, R. G. (2011). Animal nutrition, 7th (ed.), Longman Group UK, Harlow, UK, 693 pp.
  39. Moosavifar, B. E., Khazaie, H., & Kafi, M. (2019). The determine of nutrition value of Kochia (Kochia Scoparia) forage under salinity and deficit irrigation conditions. Journal of Agroecology, 11(2), 619-634.‏ (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v11i2.75545
  40. Mortada, S., Abou Najm, M., Yassine, A., El Fadel, M., & Alamiddine, I. (2018). Towards sustainable water-food nexus: an optimization approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 408-418.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.020
  41. Nabati, J., Kafi, M., Nezami, A., Rezvani Moghadam, P., Masoumi, A., & Zaremehrjerdi, M. (2012). Effect of salinity stress on yield, component yeild of forage and morphological characteristics of Kochia (Kochia scoparia). Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 42(4): 735-743. (in Persian).
  42. Namdari, M., Abbasi, R., Pirdashti, H., & Zaefarian, F. (2023). Effect of competition on morphological, physiological, and productivity characteristics in soybean (Glycine max (L) Merrill) and millet (Panicum miliaceum) intercropping. Journal of Agroecology, 15(2), 337-357. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/agry.2021.71312.1056
  43. Nazari, S., Zaefrian, F., Farahmandfar, E., Zand, E., & Azimi Sooran, S. (2014). Effect of harvest time on forage yield and quality maize under intercropping with legume plants. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 12(2), 237-245.‏ (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/GSC.V12I2.39155
  44. Oddy, V. H., Robards, G. E., & Low, S. G. (1983). Prediction of in vivo dry matter digestibility from the fibre and nitrogen content of a feed. In Feed information and animal production: proceedings of the second symposium of the International Network of Feed Information Centres/edited by GE Robards and RG Packham. Farnham Royal, Slough [Buckingham]: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, c1983.
  45. Riasi, A., Mesgaran, M. D., Stern, M. D., & Moreno, M. R. (2008). Chemical composition, in situ ruminal degradability and post-ruminal disappearance of dry matter and crude protein from the halophytic plants Kochia scoparia, Atriplex dimorphostegia, Suaeda arcuata and Gamanthus gamacarpus. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 141(3-4), 209-219.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.06.014
  46. Ross, S. M., King, J. R., O'Donovan, J. T., & Spaner, D. (2005). The productivity of oats and berseem clover intercrops. I. Primary growth characteristics and forage quality at four densities of oats. Grass and forage Science, 60(1), 74-86.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2005.00455.x
  47. Sabeghynezhad, F., Dahmardeh, M., Asgharipour, M. R., Khammari, I., & Sori Nezami, Z. (2019). Evaluation of tillage systems on agronomic aspect of soybean (Glycine max) and roselle (Hibiscus subdariffa L.) Relay Intercropping. Journal of Agroecology, 11(3), 1085-1104.‏ (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v11i3.68442
  48. Salehi, Z., Amirnia, R., Rezaeichiyaneh, E., & Khalilvandi Behrozyar, H. (2018). Evaluation of yield and some qualitative traits of forage in intercropping of triticale with annual legumes. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 28(4), 59-76.‏ (in Persian).
  49. Sharafi, S. (2022). Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative yield of forage from additive series of snail medic in intercropping with sorghum under low irrigation condition. Journal of Crops Improvement, 24(1), 15-29.‏ (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22059/jci.2021.312749.2470
  50. Sherrod, L. B. (1971). Nutritive Value of Kochia scoparia I. Yield and Chemical Composition at Three Stages of Maturity 1. Agronomy Journal, 63(2), 343-344.‏ https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1971.00021962006300020049x
  51. Sherrod, L. B. (1973). Nutritive value of Kochia scoparia. III. Digestibility of kochia hay compared with alfalfa hay. Journal of Dairy Science, 56(7), 923-926.‏ https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(73)85278-6
  52. Smith, K. F., Reed, K. F. M., & Foot, J. Z. (2008). An assessment of the relative importance of specific traits for the genetic improvement of nutritive value in dairy pasture. Grass and Forage Science, 52(2), 167-175.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1997.tb02347.x
  53. Soleymani, M. R., Kafi, M., Ziaei, M., & Shabahang, J. (2008). Effect of limited irrigation with saline water on forage of two local populations of Kochia scoparia Schrad. Journal of Soil and Water (Agricultural Science and Technology), 22(2): 307-317. (in Persian with English abstract).‏ https://doi.org/10.22067/JSW.V0I22.1028
  54. Stoltz, E., & Nadeau, E. (2014). Effects of intercropping on yield, weed incidence, forage quality and soil residual N in organically grown forage maize (Zea mays) and faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Field Crops Research, 169, 21-29.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.09.004
  55. Tang, C., Yang, X., Chen, X., Ameen, A., & Xie, G. (2018). Sorghum biomass and quality and soil nitrogen balance response to nitrogen rate on semiarid marginal land. Field Crops Research, 215, 12-22.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.09.031
  56. Tawfik, M. M., Thalooth, A. T., Nabila, M. Z., Hassanein, M. S., Amany, A. B., & Amal, G. A. (2013). Sustainable production of Kochia indica grown in saline habitat. Environment Treat Technology, 1(1), 56-61.‏
  57. Tsubo, M., Mukhala, E., Ogindo, H. O., & Walker, S. (2003). Productivity of maize-bean intercropping in a semi-arid region of South Africa. Water Salinity, 29(4), 381-388.‏ https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v29i4.5038
  58. Tosti, G., Benincasa, P., Farneselli, M., Tei, F., & Guiducci, M. (2014). Barley–hairy vetch mixture as cover crop for green manuring and the mitigation of N leaching risk. European Journal of Agronomy, 54, 34-39.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2013.11.012
  59. Tribouillois, H., Cruz, P., Cohan, J. P., & Justes, É. (2015). Modelling agroecosystem nitrogen functions provided by cover crop species in bispecific mixtures using functional traits and environmental factors. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 207, 218-228.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.04.016
  60. Valizdeh, R., Mahmoudi-Abyane, M., & Ganjavi, R. (2016). Chemical composition, in vitro digestibility and fermentative gas production of Kochia scoparia irrigated by water containing different level of salinity. Iranian Journal of Animal Science Research, 8(2), 238-247.‏ (in Persian with English abstract).‏ https://doi.org/10.22067/IJASR.V8I2.27715
  61. Van Soest, P. J. (1994). Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY. 476 Pp.
  62. Waldron, B. L., ZoBell, D. R., Olson, K. C., Jensen, K. B., & Snyder, D. L. (2006). Stockpiled forage kochia to maintain beef cows during winter. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 59(3), 275-284.‏ https://doi.org/10.2111/05-121R1.1.
  63. Xie, Y., & Kristensen, H. L. (2017). Intercropping leek (Allium porrum) with dyer’s woad (Isatis tinctoria L.) increases rooted zone and agro-ecosystem retention of nitrogen. European Journal of Agronomy, 82, 21-32.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2016.09.017
  64. Yilmaz, Ş., Özel, A., Atak, M., & Erayman, M. (2015). Effects of seeding rates on competition indices of barley and vetch intercropping systems in the Eastern Mediterranean. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 39(1), 135-143.‏ https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1406-155
  65. Yolcu, H., Gunes, A., & Turan, M. (2009). Evaluation of annual legumes and barley as sole crops and intercrop in spring frost conditions for animal feeding II. Mineral Composition. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 7, 1343-1348.‏
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,901
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 502


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب