اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات52
تعداد شماره‌ها2,091
تعداد مقالات21,679
تعداد مشاهده مقاله79,599,600
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله25,513,480
Taghilou, Aliakbar. (1403). A Conceptual Framework for Groundwater System Dynamics Evaluation by Combining Adaptive Cycle Theory and Social-Ecological System. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(2), 33-52. doi: 10.22067/jrrp.v13i2.2310-1090
Aliakbar Taghilou. "A Conceptual Framework for Groundwater System Dynamics Evaluation by Combining Adaptive Cycle Theory and Social-Ecological System". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13, 2, 1403, 33-52. doi: 10.22067/jrrp.v13i2.2310-1090
Taghilou, Aliakbar. (1403). 'A Conceptual Framework for Groundwater System Dynamics Evaluation by Combining Adaptive Cycle Theory and Social-Ecological System', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 13(2), pp. 33-52. doi: 10.22067/jrrp.v13i2.2310-1090
Taghilou, Aliakbar. A Conceptual Framework for Groundwater System Dynamics Evaluation by Combining Adaptive Cycle Theory and Social-Ecological System. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1403; 13(2): 33-52. doi: 10.22067/jrrp.v13i2.2310-1090

A Conceptual Framework for Groundwater System Dynamics Evaluation by Combining Adaptive Cycle Theory and Social-Ecological System

Journal of Research and Rural Planning
دوره 13، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 45، آبان 2024، صفحه 33-52    اصل مقاله (679.29 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jrrp.v13i2.2310-1090
نویسنده
Aliakbar Taghilou*
Urmia University, Iran.
چکیده
Purpose- The groundwater system is subject to drastic changes. Nonlinear changes in the groundwater system and management have made it difficult.  There has been no study on groundwater dynamics assessment and most studies have examined the variables of salinity control, pollution, water volume and water demand. In addition to filling the study gap, the difference of the research is that it has studied the capacity and the elements of the groundwater system as indicators in the groundwater dynamics.
Design/methodology/approach- In this study, using studies and literature on the groundwater Social-Ecological System (SES), a framework for evaluating groundwater SES dynamics by combining the groundwater adaptive cycle is presented. SES Groundwater consists of three subsystems: the aquifer, natural environment, and community. The elements of these three subsystems move in a four-stage adaptive cycle of exploitation, protection, release, and reorganization, in which potential change, connections, and adaptive capacity make the system dynamic.
Findings - In assessing the dynamics of the groundwater system, the threshold of concern is an important concept for indicators for which capacity can­ not be defined or when and where the indicators change.
Originality/value - The groundwater system dynamics assessment framework can be useful for proper management and timely actions to protect water and aquifer services in different areas.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Adaptive Cycle؛ Groundwater؛ System Dynamics؛ Social-Ecological System؛ Evaluation
مراجع
  1. Adobor, H. (2020). Supply chain resilience: an adaptive cycle approach. The International Journal of Logistics Management. DOI:10.1108/IJLM-01-2020-0019.
  2. Ajjur, S. B., & Baalousha, H. M. (2020). Formulation of Indicators for Sustainable Groundwater Development in Qatar. 12th International Exergy, Energy and Environment Symposium (IEEES-12). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349310278_Formulation_of_Indicators_for_Sustainable_Groundwater_Development_in_Qatar
  3. Allen, D. M., Mackie, D. C., & Wei, M. J. H. J. (2004). Groundwater and climate change: a sensitivity analysis for the Grand Forks aquifer, southern British Columbia, Canada.Hydrogeology Journal, 12(3), 270-290. doi:10.1007/s10040-003-0261-9
  4. Behyari, M., Jabari, A., & Alizadeh, A. (2020). Monitoring of buried faults and their role on the groundwater flow in the Urmia plain. Hydrogeology, 5(1), 98-109.  DOI:22034/HYDRO.2020.10456.
  5. Biggs, R., Gordon, L., Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Schlüter, M., & Walker, B. (2015). Principle 3–Manage slow variables and feedbacks. Principles for building resilience: Sustaining ecosystem services in social-ecological systems, 105-141. https://www.stockholmresilience.org/publications/ -manage-slow-variables-and-feedbacks.html.
  6. Bishop, J. M., Glenn, C. R., Amato, D. W., & Dulai, H. (2017). Effect of land use and groundwater flow path on submarine groundwater discharge nutrient flux. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 11, 194-218, doi:10.1016/j.ejrh.2015.10.008.
  7. Blomquist, W. (2020). Beneath the surface: complexities and groundwater policy-making. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36(1), 154-170. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grz033.
  8. Bouchet, L., Thoms, M. C., & Parsons, M. (2019). Groundwater as a social-ecological system: A framework for managing groundwater in Pacific Small Island Developing States. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 8, 579-589. doi 10.1016/j.gsd.2019.02.008.
  9. Boulton, A. J., & Hancock, P. J. (2006). Rivers as groundwater-dependent ecosystems: a review of degrees of dependency, riverine processes and management implications. australian Journal of Botany, 54(2), 133-144. https://www.publish.csiro.au/bt/BT05074.
  10. Bresci, E., & Castelli, G. (2021). Water Harvesting in Farmlands. Handbook of Water Harvesting and Conservation: Basic Concepts and Fundamentals, 87-100. https://10.1002/978 1119478911.ch6.
  11. Daedlow, K., Beckmann, V., & Arlinghaus, R. (2011). Assessing an adaptive cycle in a social system under external pressure to change: the importance of intergroup relations in recreational fisheries governance. Ecology and Society, 16(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26268880.
  12. Dietz, T., E. Ostrom, and P.C. Stern. 2003. The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302, no. 5652: 1907–1912. DOI: 10.1126/science.1091015.
  13. Earman, S., & Dettinger, M. (2011). Potential impacts of climate change on groundwater resources–a global review. Journal of water and climate change, 2(4), 213-229. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2011.034.
  14. Ekeland, I. (2002). Rene Thom (1923-2002) - obituary. Nature, 420 (6917), 758. https://doi.org/10.1038/420758a.
  15. Escamilla Nacher, M., Ferreira, C. S. S., Jones, M., & Kalantari, Z. (2021). Application of the Adaptive Cycle and Panarchy in La Marjaleria Social-Ecological System: Reflections for Operability. Land, 10(9), 980.  https://doi.org/10.3390/land10090980.
  16. Fath, B.D., Dean, C.A., Katzmair, H., )2015(. Navigating the adaptive cycle: an approach to managing the resilience of social systems. Ecol. Soc. 20, 24. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26270208.
  17. Foster, S., & van der Gun, J. (2016). Groundwater governance: key challenges in applying the global framework for action. Hydrogeology Journal, 24(4), 749-752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s 10040-016-1376-0.
  18. Foster, S., Garduno, H., Tuinhof, A., & Tovey, C. (2010). Groundwater governance: conceptual framework for assessment of provisions and needs (No. 57555, pp. 1-16). The World Bank. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1523029/groundwater-governance/2207405/.
  19. Foster, S., Pulido-Bosch, A., Vallejos, Á., Molina, L., Llop, A., & MacDonald, A. M. (2018). Impact of irrigated agriculture on groundwater-recharge salinity: a major sustainability concern in semi-arid regions. Hydrogeology Journal, 26(8), 2781-2791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-018-1830-2.
  20. Gejl, R. N., Bjerg, P. L., Henriksen, H. J., Bitsch, K., Troldborg, L., Schullehner, J., ... & Rygaard, M. (2020). Relating wellfield drawdown and water quality to aquifer sustainability–A method for assessing safe groundwater abstraction. Ecological Indicators, 110, 105782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105782.
  21. Grundmann, P., Ehlers, M. H., & Uckert, G. (2012). Responses of agricultural bioenergy sectors in Brandenburg (Germany) to climate, economic and legal changes: An application of Holling's adaptive cycle. Energy Policy, 48, 118-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.051
  22. Habiba, U., Abedin, M. A., Shaw, R., & Hassan, A. W. R. (2014). Salinity-induced livelihood stress in coastal region of Bangladesh. In Water insecurity: A social dilemma. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S2040-7 262%282013% 290000013013/full/html.
  23. Henriksen, H. J., Troldborg, L., Højberg, A. L., & Refsgaard, J. C. (2008). Assessment of exploitable groundwater resources of Denmark by use of ensemble resource indicators and a numerical groundwater–surface water model. Journal of Hydrology, 348(1-2), 224-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.09.056.
  24. Holling, C. S. )1986(. The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems; local surprise and global change. Pages 292-317 in W. C. Clark and R. E. Munn, editors. Sustainable development of the biosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. https://pure.iiasa.ac.at/13667.
  25. Holling, C. S., & Gunderson. L.H. )2002(. Resilience and adaptive cycles. Pages 25-62 in L. H. Gunderson and C. S. Holling, editors. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/67621
  26. Holling, C.S. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems, 4(5), 390-405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5.
  27. Hund, S. V., Allen, D. M., Morillas, L., & Johnson, M. S. (2018). Groundwater recharge indicator as tool for decision makers to increase socio-hydrological resilience to seasonal drought. Journal of Hydrology, 563, 1119-1134, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.05.069.
  28. Jasechko, S., Birks, S. J., Gleeson, T., Wada, Y., Fawcett, P. J., Sharp, Z. D., ... & Welker, J. M. (2014). The pronounced seasonality of global groundwater recharge. Water Resources Research, 50(11), 8845-8867. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015809
  29. Kernberg, O. F. (1988). Object relations theory in clinical practice. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 57(4), 481-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/21674086.1988.11927218.
  30. Kløve, B., Ala-Aho, P., Bertrand, G., Boukalova, Z., Ertürk, A., Goldscheider, N., ... & Widerlund, A. (2011). Groundwater-dependent ecosystems. Part I: Hydroecological status and trends. Environmental Science & Policy, 14(7), 770-781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci. 2011.04.002.
  31. Konikow, L.F. (2013). Groundwater depletion in the United States (1900-2008). USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2013- 5079. Reston, Virginia: USGS. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20135079
  32. Kopeć, D., Michalska-Hejduk, D., & Krogulec, E. (2013). The relationship between vegetation and groundwater levels as an indicator of spontaneous wetland restoration. Ecological Engineering, 57, 242-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.04.028
  33. Lerner, D. N., & Harris, B. (2009). The relationship between land use and groundwater resources and quality. Land use policy, 26, S265-S273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.005.
  34. Li, Y., Kappas, M., & Li, Y. F. (2017). Exploring the coastal urban resilience and transformation of coupled human-environment systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 1505–1511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.227
  35. Linnenluecke, M.K., & Griffiths, A. (2010). Corporate sustainability and organizational culture. Journal of World Business, 45(4), 357-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.006
  36. Liu, D., Cao, C., Chen, W., Ni, X., Tian, R., & Xing, X. (2017). Monitoring and predicting the degradation of a semi-arid wetland due to climate change and water abstraction in the Ordos Larus relictus National Nature Reserve, China. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 8(2), 367-383. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2016.1220024
  37. López-Gunn, E. (2012). Groundwater governance and social capital. Geoforum, 43(6), 1140-1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.06.013.
  38. Majidipour, F., Najafi, S. M. B., Taheri, K., Fathollahi, J., & Missimer, T. M. (2021). Index-based Groundwater Sustainability Assessment in the Socio-Economic Context: a Case Study in the Western Iran. Environmental Management, 67(4), 648-666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01424-7
  39. Mathias, J. D., Anderies, J. M., Baggio, J., Hodbod, J., Huet, S., Janssen, M. A., & Schoon, M. (2020). Exploring non-linear transition pathways in social-ecological systems. Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59713-w
  40. Molle, F., & Closas, A. (2020). Why is state‐centered groundwater governance largely ineffective? A review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 7(1), e1395.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1395
  41. Petit, O., Kuper, M., López-Gunn, E., Rinaudo, J. D., Daoudi, A., & Lejars, C. (2017). Can agricultural groundwater economies collapse? An inquiry into the pathways of four groundwater economies under threat. Hydrogeology Journal, 25(6), 1549-1564. https://DOI:10.1007/s10040-017-1567-3
  42. Popa, C. L., Bretcan, P., Radulescu, C., Carstea, E. M., Tanislav, D., Dontu, S. I., & Dulama, I. D. (2019). Spatial distribution of groundwater quality in connection with the surrounding land use and anthropogenic activity in rural areas. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 24(2). https://actamont.tuke.sk/pdf/2019/n2/1popa.pdf
  43. Pulido-Bosch, A., Rigol-Sanchez, J. P., Vallejos, A., Andreu, J. M., Ceron, J. C., Molina-Sanchez, L., & Sola, F. (2018). Impacts of agricultural irrigation on groundwater salinity. Environmental earth sciences, 77(5), 197, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7386-6
  44. Randle, J.M., Stroink, M.L., Nelson, C.H. (2014). Addiction and the adaptive cycle: a new focus. Addict. Res. Theory 6359, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2014.942295
  45. Sandwii, W. J. P. (2007). Groundwater potential to supply population demand within the Kompienga dam basin in Burkina Faso. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:hbz:5N-12319
  46. Silberstein, J., & Maser, C. (2013). Land-use planning for sustainable development. CRC Press.
  47. Sundstrom, S. M., & Allen, C. R. (2019). The adaptive cycle: More than a metaphor. Ecological Complexity, 39, https://www.routledge.com/Land-Use-PlanningSilberstein-Maser/p/book/9780367868048.
  48. Thapa, R., Thoms, M., & Parsons, M. (2016). An adaptive cycle hypothesis of semi‐arid floodplain vegetation productivity in dry and wet resource states. Ecohydrology, 9(1), 39-51.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1609
  49. Vrba, J., Girman, J., van der Gun, J., Haie, N., Hirata, R., Lopez-Gunn, E., ... & Wallin, B. (2007). Groundwater resources sustainability indicators (Vol. 14, p. 114). A. Lipponen (Ed.). Paris: Unesco.
  50. Walker, B., Holling, C.S., Carpenter, S.R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability, and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26267673
  51. Williams, A., Whiteman, G., & Kennedy, S. (2019). Cross-scale systemic resilience: implications for organization studies. Business & Society, 1-30. https://doi:10.1177/0007650319825870
  52. Wycisk, C., McKelvey, B., & H€ulsmann, M. (2008). “Smart parts” supply networks as complex adaptive systems: analysis and implications”, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 30(2), 108-125. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810861198.
  53. Xu, Y. S., Shen, S. L., Du, Y. J., Chai, J. C., & Horpibulsuk, S. (2013). Modelling the cutoff behavior of underground structure in multi-aquifer-aquitard groundwater system. Natural hazards, 66(2), 731-748, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0512-y
  54. Zazueta, A. E., & Garcia, J. R. (2021). Multiple actors and confounding factors: Evaluating impact in complex social-ecological systems. In Evaluating Environment in International Development (pp. 93-110). Routledge, https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/46924/9781000363968.pdf?sequence=1#page=114
  55. Zhang, L., Huang, Q., He, C., Yue, H., & Zhao, Q. (2021). Assessing the dynamics of sustainability for social-ecological systems based on the adaptive cycle framework: A case study in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102899
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,587
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 156


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب