A Review and Investigation on Cappelen and Lepore's Semantic Minimalism using Persian Language Data

زبانشناسی و گویش های خراسان

Article 3, Volume 16, Issue 1 - Serial Number 34, August 2024, Pages 55-73   

Document Type: Original Article

DOI: 10.22067/jlkd.2024.88117.1247

Author

Mohammadreza Pahlavannezhad^*

Associate Professor in Linguistics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

The present study reviewed Herman Cappelen and Ernest Lepore’s theory of Semantic Minimalism. This theory was proposed as a universal semantic theory in linguistics in 2005. In this article, the Semantic Minimalism theory was examined in Persian language and on the data of this language. By examining the criticisms raised by some experts, it can be seen that considering the nature of the theory that follows logical and mathematical languages, it is inefficient and unacceptable in the analysis of meaning in languages that are natural. In this article, the opinions of different experts regarding the Semantic Minimalism theory of Cappelen and Lepore were reviewed. Moreover, this study evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of the viewpoints of experts in this field of study. There are important objections to this theory. Some of the objections context displacement, incompleteness, and unchangeability of truth conditions.

Keywords

Semantic Minimalism; Cappelen and Lepore; Pluralism of Speech Act; Truth Conditions; Proposition

References

Bach, K. (1994). "Conversational Implicature", Mind and Language 9: 124-162.

Bach, K. (2006). "The Excluded Middle: Semantic Minimalism without Minimal Propositions", Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73: 435-442.

Bach, K. (2006). "Minimalism for Dummies: Reply to Cappelen and Lepore".

Cappelen, H. and E. Lepore (2005). "Insensitive semantics. A defence of semantic minimalism and speech act pluralism", Oxford, Blackwell.

Carston,R.(1998). Pragmatics and the Explicit/Implicit Distinction. PhD thesis, University of London.

Corazza, E. (2007). "Contextualism Minimalism and Situationalism PRAGMATICS and COGNITION".

Corazza, E. (2007). "Sense and Insensibility".

Davidson, Donald. (1967). "Truth and meaning", Synthese 17, 304-23.

Glanzberg, Michael. (2001). "Minimalism and Paradoxes".

Grice, P. (1989). "Studies in the Way of Words", Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.

Gross, S. (2006). "Can one sincerely say what one doesn’t believe?", Mind and Language 21(1). 11‑20.

Montminy, M. (2006). "Semantic content, truth conditions and context", Linguistics and Philosophy 29: 1-26.

Pagin, Peter & Pelletier, Jeff. (2006). "Content, Context and Composition".

Perry, J. (1998). "Indexicals, Contexts and Unarticulated Constituents".

Pietroski, Paul. (2005a). "Meaning before truth", in Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peters (eds.). Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth, 253–300. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Recanati, F. (2004). "Literal Meaning", Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Scheffler, Tatjana. (2005). "Ellipsis, Subsentential Speech, and the Contextualism Discussion".

Searle, J. (1978). "Literal Meaning", Erkenntnis, 13: 207–24.

Stanley, J. (2000). "Context and Logical Form", Linguistics and Philosophy 23: 391–434.

Travis, C. (1997). "Pragmatics", in B. Hale and C. Wright (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Language, pp. 87–107, Blackwell, Oxford.