Substitution of Short Vowels in English and Arabic Words borrowed by Persian: A Comparative Study

زبانشناسی و گویش های خراسان

Article 5, Volume 16, Issue 2 - Serial Number 35, November 2024, Pages 127-107   

Document Type: Original Article

DOI: 10.22067/jlkd.2024.88896.1253

Author

Bashir Jam^*

Associate Professor of Linguistics, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran

Abstract

Sound substitution is a process whereby a phoneme in a loanword is replaced by its closest phone in the borrowing language. English and Arabic share short vowels /I/ and /U/ which are absent in Persian. This comparative study aimed at explaining how these vowels are substituted in Persian within the framework of optimality theory (Prince & Smolensky, 1993/2004). The findings indicated that the short vowels /I/ and /U/ in English loanwords are replaced by the long vowels [i] and [u], respectively, because they are the closest vowels to /I/ and /U/. However, they change to mid, short vowels [e] and [o], respectively, in Arabic loanwords due to Persian orthography. Therefore, this process could not be explained using an analysis that is solely phonological. Accordingly, the substitution of /I/ and /U/ in Arabic loanwords was analysed using orthographic constraints which have access to graphematical information. This comparative study presented arguments in favor of different constraint rankings which cause the occurrences of these processes.

Keywords

Sound Substitution; Pronunciation of English Loan Words; Pronunciation of Arabic Loanwords; Short Vowels; Orthographic Constraints; Optimality Theory

References

انطاکی، محمد. (1372). آواشناسی. ترجمه قاسم بستانی. تهران: جهاد دانشگاهی.

جم، بشیر. (1388). نظریه بهینگی و کاربرد آن در تبیین فرایندهای واجی زبان فارسی. رسالۀ دکتری زبان‌شناسی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.

جم، بشیر. (1394). فرهنگ توصیفی فرایندهای واجی. تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.

جم، بشیر؛ رزمدیده، پریا. (1397). بررسی تطبیقی جایگزینی واج‌های ملازیِ وام‌واژهای عربی در فارسی معیار و گویش رودباری (کرمان) در چارچوب نظریه بهینگی. زبان‌پژوهی. دوره 10، شماره 26، بهار. صص 66- 45.

رزم‌دیده، پریا؛ ناصری، زهره‌سادات. (1398). خطاهای تلفظی برخی همخوان‌ها در زبان‌آموزان ایرانیِ زبان انگلیسی: رویکرد بهینگی. مطالعات زبان و ترجمه. دوره 52، شماره 4، زمستان. صص 160- 133.

صرامی، ولی‌اله. (1401). تحلیل بومی‌سازی آوایی ‌واژه‌های‌ انگلیسی در زبان فارسی بر اساس نظریه بهینگی. رسالۀ دکتری زبان‌شناسی، دانشگاه اصفهان.

کامبوزیا، عالیه. ک. ز؛ هاشمی، افتخارسادات. (1394). انطباق واجی واکه‌های وام‌واژه‌های زبان عربی در فارسی؛ رویکرد بهینگی. جستارهای زبانی. دوره 6. ش 7. پیاپی 28. صص 257- 229.

مشیری، مهشید. (1371). فرهنگ واژه‌های اروپائی در فارسی. تهران: البرز.

Akidah, M. A. (2013). Phonological and semantic change in language borrowing: The case of Arabic words borrowed into Kiswahili. International Journal of Education and Research,1(4), 1-20.

Arolotto, A. (2005).Introduction to Historical Linguistics(2nd ed.) (Y. Modarresi, Trans.).Tehran: Institute of Humanities & Cultural Studies [In Persian].

Baroni, A. (2013). Eye dialect and casual speech spelling: orthographic variation in OT, Writing Systems Research 5.1, 24-53.

Baroni, A. (2016). Constraint interaction and writing systems typology. Dossiers d’HEL, SHESL, Écriture(s) et représentations du langage et des langues, 9, pp.290-303.

Campbell, L. (1998). Historical Linguistics: an Introduction, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Davis, S. & Kang, H. (2006). English loanwords and the word-final [t]problem in Korean. Language Research. 42 (2): 31-70.

Dong, X. (2012). What Borrowing Buys Us: A Study of Chinese Loanword Phonology. PhD dissertation, Universiteit Utrecht.

Gusdian, R. I. & Lestiono, R. (2021). English and Arabic Vowels: Ferreting Out the Similarity for Bridging Pronunciation Accuracy. JELTL (Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics). Vol. 6(2).

Hall, T. 2004. Assibilation in Modern German. Lingua 114, 1035–1062.

Hamann, Silke & Ilaria E. Colombo. (2017). A formal account of the interaction of orthography and perception: English intervocalic consonants borrowed into Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 35:683–714.

Holden, K. T. (1972). Loanwords and phonological systems. The University of Texas at Austin, Doctoral dissertation.

Jam, B. (2020). Vowel harmony in Persian. Lingua. Volume 246, pp.1-25.

Kirchner, R. (2001). An Effort Based Approach to Consonant Lenition. New York. Routledge.

McCarthy, J. (2002). A thematic guide to optimality theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McMahon, A. (2002). An Introduction to English Phonology. Edinburgh University Press

Miao, R. (2005).Loanword adaptation in Mandarin Chinese: Perceptual, phonological and sociolinguistic factors. Doctoral dissertation. Department of Linguistics, Stony Brook University.

Ozaki, S. (2014).Notes on English loanwords in Japanese: major sound transformations. Kiyo 15, Nagayo Bunri University, 29-40.

Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (1993/2004).Optimality theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Rutgers University & University of Colorado at Boulder, Published 2004, Oxford: Blackwell.

Satoer, D. (2009). Having FAITH in reading and spelling. An Optimality Theoretic study of Dutch children with poor reading skills. Master thesis. Utrecht University.

Silverstein, B. (1996). Perfecting the sounds of American English. McGRAW-Hill.

Song, H. J. & Wiese, R. (2010). Resistance to complexity interacting with visual shape–German and Korean orthography, Writing Systems Research 2.2, 87-103.

Wiese, R. 2004. How to optimize orthography. Written Language & Literacy, 7(2), 305–331.