An Inquiry into Social and Communicative Aspects of Metaphor in Election Debates: A Complex Dynamic Systems Approach to Metaphor Analysis

زبانشناسی و گویش های خراسان

Article 1, Volume 16, Issue 4 - Serial Number 37, January 2025, Pages 24-1   

Document Type: Original Article

DOI: 10.22067/jlkd.2024.89453.1267

Author

Mahmood Naghizadeh^*

Assistant Professor in Linguistics, Payame-Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Dynamical systems approach provides a theoretical framework for describing metaphor in face-to-face conversation and relies on the idea that metaphor is not static mapping between domains, but it is considered as a temporary stability that emerges from the interaction of interconnected systems of social use and cognitive activities in language. Drawing on dynamical systems approach, this study tried to study creating and understanding systematic metaphors in election debates in Persian. The data of this descriptive-analytical study were collected through observing debates for Iran parliament election in 2023. The results indicated that in creating metaphor as a self-organized process, embodied aspects of repeated biological experience such as far-near (getting away from the issue) and primary metaphors like مقاومت، ایستادن به‌صورت عمودی است (persistence is standing upright) are considered as points of equilibrium and basins for the emergence of metaphorical utterances. Furthermore, different vehicle terms (gambling, right) were used to conceptualize the same topic (election). This variety in conceptualization might lead to different understanding and reasoning of the world and various unpredictable metaphorical expressions (phase change). Finally, creating such conceptual metaphors (سیستان جسد نیمه‌جان یک انسان است personalizing Sistan province as a dying human being), force schema (to overload a parliament bill) and novel metaphorical expressions (تقدیم کادو به مخالفین شرکت در انتخابات یا رقیب انتخاباتی meaning “giving gifts to the opposition or rival candidates”) together with cultural components and contextual-cognitive elements may be considered as the ground for creating metaphors that are activated in nonlinear patterns and in different temporal and social scales.

Keywords

Dynamical System Approach; Election Debates; Metaphor; Social and Commutative Aspects

References

دهخدا، ع. (1310). فرهنگ دهخدا. انتشارات دانشگاه تهران. برگرفته از https://abadis.ir/dehkhoda

رضاپور، ا. (1396). نقش ایدئولوژی در ساخت و گزینش استعارۀ مفهومی مرگ در اشعار شاملو و فریدون توللی از منظر نظریۀ گفتمانی استعاره. زبان‌شناسی و گویش‌های خراسان، 17(9)، 81-120.

لعل عارفی، ح.، شریعتی‌فر، ع.، و عشقی سردهی، ع. (۱۴۰۰). نقش استعارۀ مفهومی در ساخت و گزینش استعاره در اشعار احمد شاملو و نادر نادرپور براساس نظریۀ لیکاف و جانسون. زبان‌شناسی و گویش‌های خراسان، 24(1)، 169-190. https://doi.org/10.22067/jlkd.2021.69343.1016

معین، م. (1382). فرهنگ لغت فارسی. انتشارات زرین. برگرفته از  https://abadis.ir/moeen/

Cameron, L. (1994). Organizing the world: children's concepts and categories, and implications for the teaching of English. ELT, 48(1), 28–39.

Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. Advances in applied linguistics. Continuum.

Cameron, L. (2007a). Confrontation or complementarity? Metaphor in language use and cognitive metaphor theory. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 5, 107–135.

https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.5.06cam

Cameron, L. (2007b). Patterns of metaphor use in reconciliation talk. Discourse and Society, 18(2), 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/095792650707337

Cameron, L. (2010). The discourse dynamics framework for metaphor. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp. 77–96). Equinox.

Cameron, L., & Deignan, A. (2006). The emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 671–690. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml032

Cameron, L., Maslen, R., Todd, Z., Maule, J., Stratton, P., & Stanley, N. (2009). The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 24(2), 63–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480902830821

Charteris-Black, J. (2006). Politicians and rhetoric: The power of metaphor. Palgrave Macmillan.

Cienki, A. (1997). Some properties and groupings of image schemas. In M. Verspoor, K. D. Lee, & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Lexical and syntactic constructions and the construction of meaning (pp. 3−15). John Benjamins.

Deignan, A. (1999). Linguistic metaphors and collocation in nonliterary corpus data. Metaphor and Symbol, 14(1), 19–36.

Fauconnier, G., &Turner, M. (2002). The way we think. Basic Books.

Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain's concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3-4), 455-479.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000310

Gibbs, W. R. (2005). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge University Press.

Gibbs, W. R. (2012). Metaphors, snowflakes, and termite nests: How nature creates such beautiful things. In F. MacArthur, J. L. Oncins-Martinez, A. Piquer-Piriz, & M. Sancez-Garcia (Eds.), Metaphor in use: Culture, context, and communication (pp. 347–372). Benjamins.

Gibbs, W. R. (2013). Metaphoric cognition as social activity: Dissolving the divide between metaphor in thought and communication. Metaphor and the Social World, 3(1), 54–76. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.3.1.03gib

Gibbs, W. R. (2016). Metaphor, language, and dynamical systems. In V. Koller, E. Semino, & Z. Damjen (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 56-70). Routledge

Gibbs, W. R. (2017). Embodiment. In B. Dancygier (Ed.). The Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 449–462). Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000310

Gibbs, W. R. (2019). Metaphor as dynamical–ecological performance. Metaphor and Symbol, 34(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2019.1591713

Gibbs, W. R., & Cameron, L. (2008). The social-cognitive dynamics of metaphor performance. Cognitive Systems Research, 9(1–2), 64-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2007.06.008

Gibbs, W. R., & Colston, H. (2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge University Press.

Goatly, A. (2007). Washing the brain: Metaphor and hidden ideology. John Benjamins.

Grady, J. (1999). Metaphors in cognitive linguistics. John Benjamins.

Hampe, B. (2005). When down is not bad, and up not good enough: A corpus-based assessment of the plus-minus parameter in image schema theory. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(1), 81−112. http://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2005.16.1.81 

Huang, C. (2022). Metaphor analysis in political discourse based on discourse dynamics framework for metaphor: A case study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(1), 96‑102.

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1201.11   

Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture, universality and variation. Cambridge University Press.

Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where metaphors come from. Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford University Press.

Kripke, S. (1980). Naming and necessity. Oxford University Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.

Li, H., Bisiada, M., & Xu, Y. (2024). Applying the discourse dynamics approach to metaphors for women in the Spanish translation of the Chinese novel Wei Cheng. Perspectives, 32(2), 330‑344. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2022.2164735

Nassaji, Hossein. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research. 19(2), 129-132. http://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747 

Saddock, J. M. (1993). Figurative speech and linguistics. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 42-58). Cambridge University Press.