Study and analysis of Iran-Turkey foreign policy approach in the South Caucasus

پژوهش ‎های جغرافیای سیاسی

Article 8, Volume 9, Issue 4 - Serial Number 36, February 2025, Pages 163-191   

Document Type: مقالات علمی -پژوهشی

DOI: 10.22067/pg.2025.27286.0

Author

hamid dorj^*

PhD student in International Relations, University of Guilan

Abstract

Iran and Turkey have special sensitivities to this region due to the multidimensional importance of the South Caucasus. Iran considers this region as an arena for the development of its power and influence, and on the other hand, Turkey sees it as a bridge for mapping and promoting its position in Eurasia. The research question is, considering the position of the South Caucasus in the foreign policy of Iran and Turkey, what policy do these two countries pursue in this region? The research hypothesis is that due to the power vacuum created in the post-Cold War era, the South Caucasus has presented opportunities for Iran and Turkey to advance in this regard; The two countries are seeking to achieve goals such as exploiting the region's economic and energy potential, establishing regional peace and stability, and expanding cooperation. In the meantime, Ankara is pursuing a policy of containment of Iran by establishing close relations with regional and trans-regional actors such as Azerbaijan, Israel and the United States; Tehran, meanwhile, has sought to reduce Ankara's influence in the South Caucasus and its isolation in the South Caucasus by creating the Tehran-Moscow-Yerevan axis. Qualitative analysis method was used to analyze the data.

Keywords

Iran; Turkey; South Caucasus; Geoeconomics; Geopolitics

References

1. Akbarzadeh, S.(2016). Iran in the World: President Rouhani's Foreign Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1- 212
2. Avdaliani, E. (2022). New World Order And Small Regions: The Case of South Caucasus. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1-248
3. Aybet, G.(2020). Turkey, NATO, And the future of the transatlantic relationship in a declining liberal order. Turkish Policy, pp. 1-22
4. Bilban, C.(2021). Perspectives on Conflict Management in the South Caucasus. Schriftenreihe der Landesverteidigungsakademie, pp. 1-89
5. Borzel, T. A. & Soyaltin, D. (2012). Europeanization in Turkey - Stretching a Concept to its Limits?. KFG Working Paper Series, 36, Kolleg-Forschergruppe(KFG), The Transformative Power of Europe, Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin, pp. 1- 25.
6. Bozorgmehri, Majid & Tabatabai, S. M. (2017). A Comparative Study of Iran-Turkey Foreign Policy in the South Caucasus since the Collapse of the Soviet Union by 2015. Foreign Policy Quarterly, 31(2), pp. 109-150. [In Persian]
7. Chiragov, F. & others (2015). The South Caucasus: Between Integration and Fragmentation. university of pittsburgh, pp. 1- 110
8. Faizollahi, M. & Pourahmadi Meibdi, H.(2023). Zero-sum game in the South Caucasus (with an emphasis on the 2020 Karabakh war). Central Asia and Caucasus Studies Quarterly, Volume 29, Number 123, pp. 67-92. [In Persian]
9. Falahat Pishe, H. & Sharbati, V. & Mozafari, M. M. (2015). Turkey’s Foreign Policy in South Caucasus and Interests of Iran and Russia. Quarterly of Strategic Policy Research, 3(42), 37-60. [In Persian]
10. Falahat Pisheh, H.u., & Sharbati, V. & Mozafari, M. M.(2014). Turkey's foreign policy in the South Caucasus and the interests of Iran and Russia. Strategic Policy Research Quarterly, Vol. 3, No. 24, pp. 37-60. [In Persian]
11. Fallahi, E. And Omidi, A. (2019). Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the South Caucasus, Offensive or Defensive?. Quarterly of Central Eurasian Studies, Volume 11, Number 2, pp. 417-433. [In Persian]
12. Fallahi, Ehsan & Votoghi, S. (2020). Turkey's new position in the geopolitics of energy pipelines in the South Caucasus and the consequences of logics for Iran. Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies of Public Policy, Vol. 10, No. 35, pp. 60-86. [In Persian]
13. Fida, Z. (2018). Central Asia's Place in Turkey's Foreign Policy. Journal Of Policy Perspectives, 15(1), pp. 113-125
14. Ersen, E. & Kostem, S. (2019). Turkey's Pivot to Eurasia: Geopolitics and Foreign Policy in A Changing World Order. Routledge, pp. 1-200
15. Hazinia, N. (2014). Equations of Power in the Security Environment of the South Caucasus. Foreign Policy Quarterly, Year 28, No. 1, pp. 149-172. [In Persian]
16. Hosseinzadeh, S. & Asgarkhani, A. M. & Mirabbasi, S. B.(2019). Russia and Turkey's Approach to Security Arrangements in the South Caucasus. Iranian Political Sociology Quarterly, Year 1, Number 4, pp. 209-237. [In Persian]
17. Hunter, S. T. (2010). Iran's Foreign Policy in the Post-Soviet Era: Resisting the New International Order. Praeger; Illustrated edition, pp. 1-316
18. Jafari Nia, A. & Kazempour, Z. & Madadi, S. (2023). Security Arrangements Overlooking the South Caucasus (Future Opportunities and Challenges). Defense Research Quarterly, Year 8, Number 28, pp. 57-89. [In Persian]
19. Javadi Arjamand, M. J. & Fallahi, E. (2015). Comparative study of foreign policy of Iran and Turkey in the South Caucasus (with emphasis on Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan). Central Eurasian Studies Quarterly, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 211-228. [In Persian]
20. Javadi Arjomand, M. J. And Karimi Ghahroudi, M. and Akhbari, M. (2015). The Evolution of US Foreign Policy Towards Afghanistan Based on Geopolitical Theories. Quarterly of Political Science, Volume 11, Number 32, pp. 33-52. [In Persian]
21. Jodicke, A. (2017). Religion and Soft Power in the South Caucasus. London, pp. 1- 259
22. Kakai, S. & Dehghani Firouzabadi, S. J. (2021). Turkey's policy in the Karabakh conflict. Central Asia and Caucasus Studies Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 115, pp. 122-97-122. [In Persian]
23. Kamrava, M. (2017). The Great Game in West Asia: Iran, Turkey and the South Caucasus. Oxford University Press; 1 edition, pp. 1- 368
24. Karimi Fard, H. (2018). Trump's foreign policy and the realities of the international system. Quarterly of Strategic Studies of Public Policy, Vol. 8, No. 28, pp. 285-302. [In Persian]
25. Kaya, Sezgin & Şartepe, Z. (2016). Contentious Politics in Iran: Factions, Foreign Policy and the Nuclear Deal. Turkish Journal of International Relations, 14(3), pp. 1-12
26. Mahmoud Oghli, R. & Ebrahimi, M. & Fatahi Ardakani, H. (2022). The Second Karabakh War (2020): Causes, Contexts and Consequences. Defense Policy Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 119, pp. 69-103. [In Persian]
27. Moshirzadeh, H. (2022). evolution in the theories of international relations. Samt Publications, 16th edition, pp. 1-392. [In Persian]
28. Mottaghi Dastnaei, A. (2015). Analysis of the Geopolitical Formation of Convergence in the Central Asia and Caucasia. Central Ursia Studies Quarterly, 8(1), pp. 63-84. [In Persian]
29. Nazemroaya, M. D. & Halliday, D. J. (2012). The Globalization of NATO. Clarity Press, INC, September 15, pp. 1- 414
30. Oztig, L. I.(2023). A Comparative Analysis of Turkish Foreign Policy on the Azerbaijan-Armenia Conflicts (2020-1988). Journal Of Insight Turkey, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 139-162
31. Paul, A. (2015). Iran's policy in the South Caucacus Between pragmatism and realpolitik, in The South Caucasus: Between integration and fragmentation. Connections: The Quarterly Journal, vol. 1, no. 3 (2002): 49-57.
32. Rezaei, Q. & Sanaianzadeh, K.(2022). Investigating the interaction between NATO and Turkey in the Caucasus region (Karabakh crisis). Contemporary Political Essays Quarterly, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 53-74. [In Persian]
33. Sabadus, A. (May 18, 2015). Turkey: Dispelling Unhelpful Myths. available at: http://www.naturalgaseurope.com/turkey-dispelling-unhelpful-myths-2375
34. Simao, L. (2018).The EU’s Neighbourhood Policy towards the South Caucasus. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG, pp. 1- 256
35. Shahram Nia, S. A. M. & Vaisi, S. (2015). Study on the regional confrontations between the Islamic Republic of Iran and Saudi Arabia in Syria; In the framework of the integrated approach of constructivism-realism. Political Studies Quarterly, Vol. 8, No. 29, pp. 27-52. [In Persian]
36. Tagliapietra, S. (2014). Turkey as a Regional Natural Gas Hub: Myth or Reality? An Analysis of the Regional Gas Market Outlook, beyond the Mainstream Rhetoric. Giuseppe Sammarco, pp. 1- 36
37. Taheri, A. & Farahmand, B. (2015). The role of interaction and confrontation of American and Russian foreign policy in the development of the South Caucasus region: a case study of energy. Political Science Quarterly, Volume 10, Number 29, pp. 139-181. [In Persian]
38. Tajik, H. & Mohammadi Mani, E.(2020). Comparative study of sustainable peace from the perspective of realism and Islam. Islamic Peace Research Quarterly, first year, first issue, pp. 127-168. [In Persian]
39. Tishehyar, M. & Bahrami, S. (2018). Iran's pragmatic foreign policy in the South Caucasus in the post-conflict period. Central Eurasian Studies Quarterly, Volume 11, Number 1, pp. 23-38. [In Persian]
40. Tsereteli, M. (February 17, 2017).Weaker Turkey leaves the South Caucasus without Strategic Anchor. The central Asia- Caucasus Analyst, from: https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/13428-weaker-turkey-leaves-the-south-caucasus-without-strategic-anchor.html
41. Tufekci, O.(2017). Turkish Eurasianism: Roots and Discourses. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 1-36
42. Valigholizadeh, A. (2015). Expounding South Caucasus Geo-economic Importance in the Economic Promotion of Aras Free Zone. International Geopolitical Quarterly, 11(37), pp. 135-156. [In Persian]
43. Vazirov, N. (2022). The development of Azerbaijani Oil & Gas industry from the origins to recent FDIs, The Case of British Petroleum. Final Thesis, pp.1-114
44. Yazdani, E. a. and Kheiri, M. (2017). Turkey's Foreign Policy Approach in the Caucasus Region with Emphasis on the Republic of Azerbaijan. Quarterly of Central Asia and the Caucasus, Volume 23, Number 98, pp. 127-152. [In Persian]
45. Yousefi Rad, E. & Darvishi Se Telani, F. (2019). Comparative analysis of realist foundations in the US government's foreign policy macro strategy (2000-2020). Foreign Relations Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 43, pp. 161-195. [In Persian]