تبیین رفتار ارائه ی ایده در نظام پیشنهادهای سازمانی

پژوهش نامه مدیریت تحول

مقاله 8، دوره 5، پائیز و زمستان1392 - شماره پیاپی 10، آذر 1392، صفحه 169-191   

نوع مقاله: مقالات

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/pmt.v5i10.34897

نویسندگان

غلامحسین عبدالله‌زاده^* ؛ ابوالقاسم عربیون؛ ابوالقاسم شریف‌زاده؛ بهرام‌رضا امیری

چکیده

تحقیق حاضر با هدف تبیین رفتار ارائه ی ایده در نظام پیشنهادهای سازمانی به صورت مطالعه ی موردی، در شرکت مخابرات استان خراسان رضوی، انجام شد. نظریه ی شناخت اجتماعی، برای طراحی چارچوب مفهومی تحقیق، مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. بر این اساس، یک مدل نظری، برای بررسی و تبیین روابط بین عوامل زمینه‌ای و ادراک‌های فردی ارائه ی ایده و رفتار ارائه ی ایده ی کارکنان، به نظام پیشنهادهای سازمانی، طراحی و تدوین شد. داده‌های تجربی، با استفاده از پرسشنامه از 147 کاربر باتجربه ی ارائه ی ایده، به نظام پیشنهادهای شرکت مخابرات استان خراسان رضوی، که به صورت تصادفی انتخاب شدند، گردآوری شد. داده‌ها، با استفاده از مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری، جهت بررسی فرضیه‌های نظری، مورد آزمون قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که اعتماد، تأثیر معنی‌دار مثبتی بر رفتار ارائه ی ایده دارد. به علاوه، این مطالعه نشان داد که هنجار عمل متقابل، تأثیر معنی‌داری بر رفتار ارائه ی ایده ندارد. همچنین، تأثیر معنی‌دار و مثبت عوامل مربوط به ادراک‌های فردی، خودکارآمدی ارائه ی ایده، ادراک از مزیت نسبی و ادراک از سازگاری بر رفتار ارائه ی ایده، به نظام پیشنهادهای سازمانی مشخص شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مدیریت دانش؛ نظام پیشنهادهای سازمانی؛ تسهیم ایده؛ رفتار ارائه ی ایده؛ بانک ایده

مراجع

- Abrams, L. C.; Cross, R.; Lesser, E., & Levin, D. Z. (2003). Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Academy of Management Executive, 17(4), 64–77.
- Acs, Z. J.; Carlsson, B., & Karlsson, C. (1999). The Linkages among entrepreneurship, SMEs and the Macro-economy. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
- Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: on doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39-58.
- Amiri, B. R. (2010). Identifying factors affecting on the creation of Idea virtual bank. M.s thesis, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran. (in Persian).
- Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice. a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.
- Andrews, D. (2002). Audience-specific online community design. Communications of the ACM, 45(4), 64–68.
- Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W. H. freeman and company.
- Bentler, P. M. (1992). EQS structural equations program manual. Los Angeles: statistical software, Inc.
- Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
- Bock, G. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2002). Breaking the myths of rewards: an exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Information Resource Management Journal, 15(2), 14–21.
- Butler, B.; Sproull, L.; Kiesler, S., & Kraut, R. (2002). Community effort in online groups: Who does the work and why. In S. Weisband & L. Atwater (Eds.), Leadership at a distance. Mahwah, NJ: lawrence erlbaum publishers.
- Chen, C. J., & Hung, S. W. (2010). To give or to receive? factors influencing members’ knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities. Information & Management, 47, 226–236.
- Cheung, C. K., & Chan, C. M. (2000). Social-cognitive factors of donating money to charity, with special attention to an international relief organization. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23(2), 241–253.
- Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (295–366). Mahwah, NJ: lawrence erlbaum.
- Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy development of a measure and initial test. MIS quarterly, 19(2), 189–211.

- Constant, D.; Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1994). What’s mine is ours, or is it? a study of attitudes about information sharing. Information Systems Research, 5(4), 400–421.
- Constant, D.; Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The kindness of strangers: the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. organization science, 7(2), 119–135.
- Corritore, C. L.; Kracher, B., & Wiedenbeck, S. (2003). On-line trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 58(6): 737-758.
- Corowther, J. (1995). Oxford advanced Learner’s. Oxford university press. Oxford.
- Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Boston: harvard business school press.
- Deichmann, D., & van den Ende, J. (2009). Boomerang effect of network idea. Conference on CBS - Copenhagen Business School, Solbjerg plads 3 DK, frederiksberg, Denmark.
- Ekeh, P. P. (1974). Social exchange theory: the two traditions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university press.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
- Gold, A. H.; Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: an organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214.
- Hair, J. F.; Anderson, R. L., & Tatham, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with reading. Upper saddle river, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Hall, H. (2001). Social exchanges for knowledge exchange. paper presented at managing knowledge: conversations and critiques. university of leicester management centre, 10–11.
- Halliday, L. (2001). An unprecedented opportunity. Information World Review, 167, 18-19.
- Hislop, D. (2003). Linking human resource management and knowledge management via commitment. Employee Relations, 25(2), 182–202.
- Hsu, M. H. ; Ju, T. L. ; Yen, C. H., & Chang, C. M. (2007). Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: the relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations. International Journal of Human–Computer
Studies, 65, 153–169.
- Igbaria, M., & Iivari, J. (1995). The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage.
Omega, 23(6), 587–605.
- Jarvenpaa, S. (1998). Is anybody out there? antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4), 29–65.

- Jashapara, A., & Tai, W. C. (2006). Understanding the complexity of human characteristics on e-learning systems: an integrated study of dynamic individual differences on user perceptions of ease of use. Knowledge Management Research
& Practice, 4, 227–239.
- Kalman, M. E. (1999). The effects of organizational commitment and expected outcomes on the motivation to share discretionary information in a collaborative database: communication dilemmas and other serious games. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, university of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
- Kankanhalli, A.; Tan, B. C. Y., & Wei, K. K. (2005). Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 113–143.
- KRTC (Khorasan Razavi Telecommunication Company). (2008). Regulation of suggestions system for Khorasan Razavi telecommunication company. KRTC publication. Mashhad. 3-11. (in Persian)
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge university press.
- Lin, M. J. J.; Hung, S. W., & Chen, C. J. (2009). Fostering the determinants of knowledge sharing in professional virtual communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 929–939.
- Lindskold, S. (1978). Trust development, the GRIT proposal and the effects of conciliatory acts on conflict and cooperation. Psychological Bulletin, 85(4), 772–793.
- Lucas, L. M. (2005). The impact of trust and reputation on the transfer of best practices. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(4), 87–101.
- Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173–191.
- Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
- Newton, K. (1997). Social capital and democracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(5), 575–589.
- Palvia, P. (2009). The role of trust in e-commerce relational exchange: a unified model. Information & Management, 46(4), 213–220.
- Pavlou, P. A., & Fygenson, M. (2006). Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: an extension of the theory of planned behavior. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 115–143.
- Perez, E. (1999). Knowledge management in the library. Database Magazine, 22, 2-75.
Persaud, A. (2001). The knowledge gap. Foreign affairs, 80(2), 107-117.
- Putnam, R. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: the strange disappearance of social capital in America. Political Science and Politics, 66, 4–683.

- Ridings, C. M.; Gefen, D., & Arinze, B. (2002). Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11, 271–295.
- Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: free press.
- Sandstorm, C., & Bjork, J. (2008). Idea management system for a changing innovation landscape. center for business innovation, working paper series, 9, Chalmers university of technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
- Shumaker, S., & Brownell, A. (1984). Toward a theory of social support: closing conceptual gaps. Journal of Social Issues, 40(4), 11–36.
- Sia, C. L.; Teo, H. H.; Tan, B. C. Y., & Wei, K. K. (2004). Effects of environmental uncertainty on organizational intention to adopt distributed work arrangements. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, 51(3), 253–267.
- Smolensky, E., & Kleiner, B. (1995). How to train people to think more creatively. Management Development Review, 8(6), 28-33.
- Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: John Wiley.
- Tiwana, A., & Bush, A. (2001). A social exchange architecture for distributed web communities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(3), 242–248.
- Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 464–478.
- Usoro, A.; Sharratt, M. W.; Tsui, E., & Shekhar, S. (2007). Trust as an antecedent to knowledge sharing in virtual communities of practice. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 5(3), 199-212.
- Verhoef, P. C., & Langerak, F. (2001). Possible determinants of consumers’ adoption of electronic grocery shopping in the Netherlands. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 8(5), 275–285.
- Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2000). It is what one does: why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2–3), 155–173.
- Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35–58.
- Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of management Review, 14(3), 361–384.
- Zhang, Y., & Hiltz, S. R. (2003). Factors that influence online relationship development in a knowledge sharing community. In Proceedings of the ninth American conference on information systems, 410–417.