Stability of bean (Phaseoulus vulgaris L.) genotypes in common bacterial blight condition using regression analysis, the additive main effects and multiplicative interactions (AMMI) and Muir methods

پژوهش‌های حبوبات ایران

Article 6, Volume 5, Issue 2, December 2014, Pages 119-130   

Document Type: Original Articles

DOI: 10.22067/ijpr.v1393i2.47083

Authors

Hamidreza Dorri^{* 1}; Mohammadreza Lak²; Behroz Assadi¹

¹Khomein Bean Research Station, Khomein

²Arak

Abstract

Common bacterial blight (CBB) caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli is a serious disease of bean fields in Iran and the world. Chemical control of CBB is inefficient, therefore the use of resistant genotypes with stability production is the most suitable alternative. Stability and adaptability of 26 bean genotypes yield in the presence and absence of CBB were evaluated in Agricultural Research and Natural Resources Center of Markazi Province, in 2007 and 2008 using regression analysis, the additive main effects and multiplicative interactions (AMMI) and muir methods. The best genotype in regression analysis, based on yield, regression coefficient and deviation from regression was 21407. In AMMI analysis, the first two interaction principal component axes (IPCA1 & IPCA12) explained 90% of the genotype×environment interaction. Biplot of yield mean and IPCA1 showed that genotypes 21407 and 21275 were the most stable with high yield. In muir method, 21% and 79% of the genotype×environment interaction belonged to heterogeneous variance (HV) and imperfect correlation (IC), respectively. In this method the genotype 21410 had the least total sum of squares of genotype × environment interaction, so it was the most stable genotype. According to all results, the best genotype was 21407 based on stability, yield and resistant to CBB.

Keywords

AMMI; Bean; Muir; Regression; Stability

References

1. Aggour, A.R., and Goyne, D.P. 1989. Heritability, phenotypic correlations and associations of the common blight disease reactions in beans. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Science 114 (5): 828-833.

2. Chahal, G.S., and Gosal, S.S. 2002. Principles and procedures of plant breeding. Alpha Science. New Dehli. India.

3. Eberhart, S.A., and Russell, W.A. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science 6: 36-40.

4. Finlay, K.W., and Wilkinson, G.N. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14: 742-754.

5. Gauch, H.G., and Zobel, R.W. 1996. AMMI analysis of yield trials. In: M. S. Kang & H. G. Gauch (Eds.). Genotype by Environment Interaction, Boca Raton, FI: CRC Press. p. 85-120.

6. Gilbertson, R.L., and Maxwell, D.P. 1992. Common bacterial blight of bean. In: H. C. Chaub, J.Kumar, & U.S.Singh (Eds.). Plant Diseases of International Importance. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, P. 18-39.

7. Hardwick, R.C., and Wood, J.T. 1972. Regression methods for studying genotype-environment interactions. Heredity 28: 209-222.

8. Khalifa, G.H., Eljack, A.E., Mohammed, M.I., Elamin, O.M., and Mohamed, E.S. 2013. Yield stability in common bean genotypes (Phaseolus vulgaris) in the Sudan. Journal of Plant Breading and Crop Science 5:203-208.

9. Lak, M.R., Shamsbakhsh, M., and Bahar, M. 2000. Occurance of common bacterial blight of bean in Markazi province. Proceeding of the 14th Iranian Plant Protection Congress. Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran. P. 285 (Abst.)

10. Mohamed, M.F., and Coyne, D.P. 1995. Photoperiod sometimes influences common bacterial blight disease of common beans. Hortscience 30 (3): 551-553.

11. Muir, W., Nyquist, W.E., and Xu, S. 1992. Alternative partitioning of the genotype by environment interaction. Theoretical & Applied Genetics 84: 193-200.

12. Mulusew, F., Tadele, T., and Tesfaye, L. 2008. Genotype environment interactions and stability parameters for grain yield of faba bean (Vacia faba L.) genotypes grown in South eastern Ethiopia. International Journal of Sustainable Crop Production 3 (6): 80- 87.

13. Mulusew, F., Tadele, T., Setegn, G., and Bekele, H. 2010. Agronomic performances, disease reaction and yield stability of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes in Bale Highlands, Ethiopia. Australian Journal of Crop Science 4 (4): 238-246.

14. Opio, A.F., Allen, D.J., and Teri, J.M. 1996. Pathogenic variation in Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli, the causal agent of common bacterial blight in Phaseolus beans. Plant Pathology 45: 1126-1133.

15. Pereira, H.S., Melo, L.C., Faria, L.C., Cabrera Diaz, J.L., Peloso, M.J., Costa, J.G. and Wendland, A. 2009. Stability and adaptability of carioca common bean genotypes in states of the central South Region of Brazil. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 9: 181-188.

16. Valladares-Sanchez, N.E., Coyne, D.P. and Mumm, R.F. 1983. Inheritance and associations of leaf, external and internal pod reaction to common blight bacterium in phaseolus vulgaris. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Science 108 (2): 272-278.

17. Webster, D.M., Temple, S.R. and Galvez, G.E. 1983. Expression of resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. phaseoli in phaseolus vulgaris under tropical conditions. Plant Disease 67 (4): 394-396.

18. Yan, W., and Rajcan, I. 2002. Biplots analysis of the test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Science 42: 11-20.

19. Yates, F., and Cochran, W.F. 1938. The analysis of groups of experiments. Journal of Agricultural Science 28: 556-580.

20. Zobel, R.W., Wright, M.S. and Gauch, H.G. 1988. Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agronomy Journal 80: 388-393.