Study of relationship among seed proteins pattern with quantitative traits in some of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars

پژوهش‌های حبوبات ایران

Article 1, Volume 10, Issue 1, June 2019, Pages 12-27   

Document Type: Original Articles

DOI: 10.22067/ijpr.v10i1.57457

Author

Mehdi Kakaei^*

Department of Agriculture (Plant Breeding and Genetics), Faculty of Sciences, Payame Noor University, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Abiotic stress limits crop productivity, and plays a major role in determining the distribution of plant species across different types of environments. Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is an important legume crop in Iran. Genetic diversity information is crucial for the choice of proper parents to establish new breeding programs. A number of molecular techniques have been developed to unveil the genetic potentials of plant materials. One of the most important methods for studying genetic diversity is using of Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis of seed protein.SDS-PAGE seems to be a reliable molecular marker to investigate the genetic diversity of chickpea genotypes in IRAN. SDS-PAGE is practically a reliable method because seed storage proteins are largely independent of environmental fluctuation. The main objectives of present research was: (1) to investigate the power of SDS-PAGE markers for estimation of genetic diversity among some chickpea genotypes in west of Iran, (2) to investigate the genetic relationships between chickpea genotypes and (3) to determine and studying main drought indexes in chickpea genotypes could be selected main cultivars in drought and non-drought condition. This information will be useful to improve techniques for sampling chickpea genetic variation which might increase efficiency of conservation of germplasm.
 
Materials & Methods
Field experiment was carried out with four chickpea cultivars, based on randomized complete blocks design (RCBD) with three replications at the research farm of the Payame Noor University center of Asadabad in two different conditions (Drought conditions and supplementary irrigation) during 2010 cropping season. The cultivars were taken from Dryland Agricultural Research Institute, Sararood. In this study, seed protein profile of four chickpea cultivars include Arman, Hashem, Azad and ILC-482, were analyzed by Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE using 12/5% polyacrylamide). Protein extraction and gel electrophoresis was done By Laemmle (1970) Method. The seeds were powdered separately by liquid nitrogen. Cultivars seed protein were extracted by extraction buffer. At end of electrophoresis, protein bands were revealed by Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 staining. Biplot, 3D Plot, coefficient jaccard, cluster analysis and other analyses were done using the statistical software MSTAT-C, NTSYS and SPSS. The data for each cultivar was collected on a plot basis.
 
Results & Discussion
SDS-PAGE analysis showed significant differences between four cultivars chickpea at 17 and 25 kilo Dalton (kDa) bands. There are strong and weak proteins bands differences between cultivars. On the basis of SDS-PAGE results, 28.75 protein bands were observed with the Molecular Weight (MW) of 14 to 100 kDa. The presence of protein bands about 17 (kDa) in protein pattern of ILC-482, Hashem and Azad Cultivars and the absence of protein bands with approximate molecular weight 14 (kDa) in protein pattern of Arman cultivar can be used as protein markers for these chickpea cultivars. The specific proteins bands of seed may be used as markers for identification of the genotypes. Correlation between agronomic and molecular traits was assessed using Mantel test and significant positive correlation was observed between them. The results of drought stress indices and Biplot analysis suggested Arman genotype was the most tolerant. Biplot analysis also showed HAM and YI selection indices were the best to identify drought tolerant genotypes.
 
Conclusion
In most cases, an intermediate level of polymorphism have been reported with SDS-PAGE markers, and this study showed a considerable amount of polymorphism. We recommend further studies to be conducted by using number of chickpea genotypes as well as bigger and DNA molecular markers. Results of this study can be used in germplasm management practices, developing plant geneticist and breeders for planning future explorations, and crop improvement purposes.

Keywords

Biplot; Jaccard coefficient; Mantel test; Protein Marker; Supplementary irrigation

References

1. Ahmed, F., Gaur, P.M., and Slinkard, A.E. 1992. Isozyme polymorphism and phylogenetic interpretations in the genus Cicer L. as revealed by polyacryamid gel electrophoresis of seed stronge protein. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 84: 688-692.
2. Abd El-Zaher, M., and Mustafa, A. 2007. Genetic variation among Egyptian cultivars of Vicia faba L. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science 10(23): 4204-4210.
3. Abolhassani, K.H., and Saeidi, G.H. 2006. Evaluation of drought tolerance of safflower lines based on tolerance and sensitivity indices to water stress. Journal of Science and Technological Agricultural and Natural 10: 407-418 (in Persian).
4. Abozaryghazafroodi, A., Valizadeh, M., Honarneghad, R., and fotokeean, M.H. 2006. Comparison of clustering rice varieties the use SDS-PAGE Gel Electrophoresis Seed Proteins and Biometrical Traits data. Journal of Sciences Agricultural 36(5): 1251-1262.
5. Beyranvand, A., Karimzadeh, G., and Sorooshzadeh, A. 2006. Study of a vernalization temperature on quantitative and electrophoretic changes of leaf soluble proteins in winter and spring canola (Brassica napus) cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science NatureResource 12(5): 182-189.
6. Blum, A. 1988. Plant Breeding for Stress Environment. CRC Press. Roca Raton, FL. pp: 38-78.
7. Bouslama, M., and Schapaugh, W.T. 1984. Stress tolerance in soybean. Part 1: evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Science 24: 933-937.
8. Bradford, M.M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochmistry 72: 248-254.
9. Ehsanpor, A.A., Shojaie, B., and Rostami, F. 2009. The use of embryonic markers and seed storage proteins in identification of four pistachio cultivars. Journal Taxonomy and Biosystematics 2(3): 1-10. (In Persian).
10. Elshazly, M.S., and Warboys, I.B. 1989. The use of transparent flexible tubes for studying the root extension and elongation of beans. Journal of Experimental Agriculture 25: 35-37.
11. Razavizadeh, R., and Ehsanpour, A.A. 2013. Application of seed storage protein marker for identification of seven soybean (Glycine max) cultivars. Journal of Cell & Tissue (JCT) 3(4): 319-326.
12. Fareghi, S.H., Farshadfar, M., and Farshadfar, E. 2007. Study of chemical composition and nutrition value of prenniallucerne (Medicago sativa L.) and genetic diversity based on SDS-PAGE markes. Journal of Rangelands and Forests Plant Breeding and Genetic Research 15(3): 196-210. (In Persian).
13. Farshadfar, A., and Farshadfar, M. 2003. Evaluation of the genetic diversity of physiological and molecular markers RAPD chickpea lines in irrigated and rainfed conditions. Research and Builders 2(2): 69-63. (In Persian).
14. Fernandez, G.C.J. 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: C.C. Kuo (Ed.). Proceeding of an International Symposium on Adaptation of Food Crops to Temperature and Water Stress. AVRDC, Shanhua, Taiwan.
15. Fischer, R.A., and Maurer, R. 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 29: 897-917.
16. Farshadfar, E., and Shutka, J. 2003. Multivariate analysis of drought tolerance in wheat substitution lines. Cereal Research Communications 31: 33-40.
17. Ganjeali, A., Bagheri, A.R., and Porsa, H. 2008. Germplasm evaluation chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) for drought resistance. Iran Agricultural Research Magazine 7(1): 183-194. (In Persian).
18. Gupta, P.K., and Agrawal, G.G. 1977. Consumptive use of water by gram and linseed. India Journal Agriculture Science 47: 22-26.
19. Ghafoor, A., Ahmad, Z., Qureshi, A.S., and Bashir, M. 2002. Genetic relationship in Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper and V.radiata(L.) R. Wilczek based on morphological traits and SDS-PAGE. Euphytica 123: 367-378.
20. Gepts, P. 1989. Genetic diversity of seed storage proteins in plants. In: A.H.D. Brown, M.T. Clegg, A.L. Kahler, and B.S. Weir [Eds.]. Plant Population Genetics, Breeding and Genetic Resources 64-82. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.
21. Hameed, A., Mahmud Shah, T., Manzooratta, B., Iqbal, N., AhsanulHaq, M., and Ali, H. 2009. Comparative seed storage protein profiling of Kabuli chickpea genotypes. Pakistan Journal Biotechnology 41(2): 703-710.
22. Iqbal, S.M., Ghafoor, A., and Ayub, N. 2005. Relationship between SDS-PAGE Markers and Ascochyta Blight in chickpea. Pakistan Journal Biological Science 37(1): 87-96.
23. Iran's Agricultural Statistics. 2017. http://amar.maj.ir/Portal/File/ShowFile.aspx.
24. Jinghui, X.X., Wang, L., Shanyu, x., Zhou, L., Yue, J.F., and Dongyun, H. 2006. Polyethylene glycol fraction improved detection of low-abundant proteins by two-dimensional electrophoresis analysis of plant proteome. Phytochemistry 67: 2341-2348.
25. Kakaei, M., Zebarjadi, A.R., and Mostafaie, A. 2009. Comparison of genetic and morpho-physiological distance via SDS-PAGE marker in some Rapeseed genotypes. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology 1(2): 1-15. (In Persian).
26. Kakaei, M., Zebarjadi, A.R., Mostafaie, A., and Rezaiezad, A. 2009. Determination of drought tolerant genotypes in Brassica napus L. based on drought tolerance indices. Journal of Electronic Plant Production 3(4): 107-124. (In Persian).
27. Laemmli, U.K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680-685.
28. Lawerence, G.J., Moos, H.J., Shepherd, K.W., and Wrigley, C.W. 1987. Dough quality of biotypes of eleven Australian wheat cultivars that differ in HMW glutenin subunits composition. Journal Cereal Science 6: 99-101.
29. Mohammadi, A., Ahmadi, J., and Habibi, D. 2005. Selection indices for drought tolerance in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum). Iranian Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breeding 1: 47-62. (In Persian).
30. Mukhlesur, R.M.D., and Hirata, Y. 2004. Genetic diversity in Brassica species using SDS-PAGE Analysis. Journal of Biological 4(2): 234-238.
31. Raeesilelri, F., Keshavarzi, M., and Ghadam, P. 2015. Prosopis species of dark bean seed proteins investigated in Iran. Journal of Applied Biology, University of Al-Zahra 28 (1): 79-88. (In Persian).
32. Rosielle, A.A., and Hamblin, J. 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environments. Crop Science 21: 943-946.
33. Sadia, M., Malik, S.A., Rabbani, M.A., and Pearce, S.R. 2009. Electrophoresis characterization and the relationship between some Brassica species. Electronically of Journal Biology 5(1): 1-4.
34. SalehiShanjani, P., Jafari, A.A., Kolagari, M., and Esmaeili, M. 2013. Genetic diversity and geographic relationship between the 18 wild populations of Agropyrondesertorum by proteins. Plant Journal (Journal of Biology Iran) 27(2): 243-255. (In Persian).
35. Shobeiri, S., Ghassemi-Golezani, K., Golechin, A. and Saba, J. 2007. Effect of water limitation on growth and yield of three chickpea cultivars in Zanjan. Journal of Agricultural Science and Natural Resources 14: 32-43.
36. Sneath P.H.A., and Sokal, R.R. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. W.H: Freeman and CO, Sanfrancisco, U.S.A.
37. Valizadeh, M., Shareati, F., Alyari, H., and Moharamneghad, S. 2011. Evaluation of relationship some of in main economical traits with storage protein in Phaseolus vulgaris L. Iran Agricultural Research Magazine 43(1): 163-173. (In Persian).