تأملی در باب شأن الگو در قلمرو طراحی برنامه درسی

پژوهش نامه مبانی تعلیم و تربیت

مقاله 3، دوره 5، شماره 2، بهمن 1394، صفحه 153-172   

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/fe.v5i2.37686

نویسندگان

رحیم شالیان¹؛ محمود سعیدی رضوانی^{* 2}؛ سیدامیر امین یزدی²؛ حسین کارشکی²؛ سیدمحسن اصغری نکاح²

¹فردوسی مشهد. دانشکده علوم تربیتی

²دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد

چکیده

هدف اصلی این پژوهش پاسخ به این سؤال است که تا چه حد عنوان‌ها و ارزش گذاری ارائه شده برای الگوهای برنامه درسی در مقاله «واکاوی الگوی مفهومی در حوزه برنامه درسی: نقدی بر پژوهش های انجام شده با رویکرد طراحی الگو در برنامه درسی»، با ماهیت موضوع‌های حوزه معرفتی برنامه درسی منطبق می-باشد؟ و آنگاه با توجه به منابع موجود، امکان تعیین ملاکی برای وجه تمایز الگو در حوزه طراحی رشته برنامه درسی، بررسی شد. برای دستیابی به این هدف از روش پژوهش تحلیلی- اسنادی بهره گرفته شد. نتایج حاصل از این پژوهش حاکی از آن است که الگوها در حوزه طراحی برنامه درسی، از دو منظر ساختار و موضوع دارای دسته بندی های متفاوتی می‌باشند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

طراحی الگو؛ برنامه درسی

مراجع

Akker, J. v. d., Fasoglio, D., and Mulder, H. (2010). A curriculum perspective on plurilingual education. SLO (Netherlands institute for curriculum development). The Council of Europe Press.

Beyer, E., Michael, W., and Apple, W. (1998). The Curriculum: Problems, Politics, and Possibilities. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Birnbaum, R. (2003). How colleges work: the cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. (H. Arasteh, Trans). Tehran: Institute for Research and planning in Higher Education. (In Persian)

Corbin, J., and Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons and Evaluative Criteria. Qualitative sociology, 19(6), 418-427.

Dehghani, M. (2012). Designing optimal (alternative) model for social education curriculum of middle school in Iran. (Doctoral Dissertation, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad). (In Persian)

Dehghani, M., Amin Khandaghi, M., jafari Suny, H., and Noghani Dokht Bahmani, M. (2011). Analysis of the Conceptual Model in Curriculum Filed: Critical review of researchers done with model design approach curriculum. Journal of Foundations of Education, 1(1), 99-126.

Eisner, E. W. (1994). The Educational Imagination On the Design and Evaluation of School Programs. New York: Macmillan.

Fathi vajargah, K. (2007). Curriculum Toward New Identities, (Vol. 1, pp. 1-342). Tehran: Aeeyg. (In Persian)

Levin, B. (2010). Curriculum Governance and Planning. In International Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 379-383). Oxford: Elsevier.

Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., and Gall, J. P. (2008). Educational Research: An Introduction. 6 Th Ed. (A. R. Nasr, H. R. Orizy, M. abolghasemi, K. Bagheri, M. H. Alamatsaz, M. J. Pakseresht, et al., Trans). Tehran: SAMT. (In Persian)

Gardner Howard, A. (2011). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. 10 Th Ed. Basic Books Press

Gooler, D. D., and Grotelueschen, A. (1970). Process Accountability in Curriculum Development. Center for Instructional Research and Curriculum Evaluation. Urbana: University of Illinois.

Goodlad, J. (1994). Curriculum as a field of study. In The international encyclopedia of education, Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Maleki, H. (2003). Integrated approach to curriculum. Tehran: PTO. (In Persian)

Marsh, C. J. (2009). Key Concepts for Understanding Curriculum, 4 th Ed. Taylor and Francis Routledge Press.

McKernan, J. (2008). Curriculum and imagination: process theory, pedagogy and action. USA and Canada: Routledge.

McCutcheon, G. (1982). What in the World is curriculum theory? Theory into practice, 11(1), 18-22.

Mellers, B. A., and Baron, J. (2008). Psychological perspectives on justice: theory and applications. Digitally printed version.

Miller, J. P. (2007). The Educational Spectrum: Orientation to Curriculum. (M. Mehrmohammadi, Trans). Tehran: SAMT. (In Persian)

Mehrmohammadi, M. (2009). Key Consideration the Policy Making for Interdisciplinary Sciences in Higher Education from the Standpoint of Development Process. Journal Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 1(3), 1-18. (In Persian)

Mehrmohammadi, M. (2013). A Reflection on Curriculum Development with an emphasis on Eisner view: An outdated or an up to date mission. Jornal new educational approaches, 1(17), 1-20. (In Persian)

Mehrmohammadi, M. (2010). Curriculum Theories, Approaches and Perspectives. 2th Ed. Tehran: SAMT. (In Persian)

Mehrmohammadi, M. and Amin Khandaghi, M. (2009). The Comparison of Eisner's With Miller's Curriculum Ideologies: Another View. Journal of Foundations of Education, 10(1), 27-45. (In Persian)

Ornstein, A. C., and Hunkins, F. P. (2009). Curriculum: foundations, principles, and issues. (G. Ahgar, Trans). Islamic Azad University Press. (In Persian)

Portelli, J. P. (1987). On defining curriculum. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 2(4), 354–367.

Short, E. C. (2008). Forms of curriculum inquiry. (M. Mehrmohammadi, Trans). Tehran: SAMT. (In Persian).

Short, E. C. (1991). Forms of curriculum inquiry. State University or New York Press.

Stangvic, G. (1998). Conflicting perspectives on learning disabilities. In: C. Clark, A. Dyson and A. Millward, Theorising special Education, New York, Routledge Press.

Stenhouse, L. (1975). An Introduction to Curriculum, Research and Development. London: Heinemann.

Thijs, A., and Akker J. (2009). Curriculum development. Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO).

Thornton, S. (2010). Curriculum Design. In Encyclopedia of curriculum Studies. Sage.

Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. The University of Chicago Press.

Walker, D. F. (1982). Curriculum Theory is many things to many people, Theory into practice, 11(1), 62-65.

Walker, D. F. (2003). Fundamentals of curriculum: passion and professionalism. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Press.