Study on the Effect of Combined Application of Manure and Chemical Fertilizers on Some Properties of Thompson Novel Orange Juice

علوم باغبانی

Article 15, Volume 29, Issue 2, April 2015, Pages 314-321   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jhorts4.v0i0.43644

Authors

Shahin Shahsavani^{* 1}; Mojtaba Mahmoodi²; Shahrokh Garangic¹; Sedigheh Gran Malik³

¹Shahrood University

²Sari research center

³Shahrood university

Abstract

Introduction: Citrus are one of the important orchard fruit production that after banana is second in production at the world level and every year, Chemical fertilizers having most important role in increasing crops productions, but in long application of fertilizers cause soil destructions and polluting underground water. Also soils of dry regions are very poor in organic matter level. Nowadays in most countries, climatically condition and poor management cause poor organic matter content of soils. In Iran more than 60 percent of cultivated lands having less than 0.5 up to 1 percent organic matter. This may be due to intensive cultivation and poor managements For this reason if we have combine applications of manure and chemical fertilizers, the results would be much better. The aim of this research was to evaluate suitable ratio of manure and chemical fertilizer in order to reduce the chemical fertilizer use in citrus orchard in north of Iran.
Materials and Methods: This experiment was conducted in one of the orchard at Sari district with low organic C. This research carried out on five years old citrus threes. This experiment carried out as factorial experiment on the base of complete randomized block design with 9 treatments and three replications. Treatments included three manure levels (0, 6 and 12 kg per tree) and three levels of macro fertilizer including potassium sulphate, ammonium sulphate and super phosphate triple (o, 30 and 60 percent on the bases of soil test). Total treatment were 27 plots, (each plots were includes two threes).all treatments were applied at March. All analysis was done with standard methods. This experiment was done as factorial on the bases of complete randomized block design with 9 treatments and three replications. The treatments were as follows:
T1: Zero percent chemical fertilizer and zero kg manure
T2: 30 percent chemical fertilizer (potassium sulphate 50 kgha-1, ammonium sulphate 30 kg ha-1 and super phosphate triple 45 kg ha-1) and zero kg manure.
T3: 60 percent chemical fertilizer (potassium sulphate 100 kgha-1, ammonium sulphate 60 kg ha-1 and super phosphate triple 90 kg ha-1) and zero kg manure.
T4: Zero percent chemical fertilizer and 6 kg manure
T5: 30 percent chemical fertilizer (potassium sulphate 50 kgha-1, ammonium sulphate 30 kg ha-1 and super phosphate triple 45 kg ha-1) and 6 kg manure.
T6: 60 percent chemical fertilizer (potassium sulphate 100 kgha-1, ammonium sulphate 60 kg ha-1 and super phosphate triple 90 kg ha-1) and 6 kg manure.
T7: Zero percent chemical fertilizer and 12 kg manure
T8: 30 percent chemical fertilizer (potassium sulphate 50 kgha-1, ammonium sulphate 30 kg ha-1 and super phosphate triple 45 kg ha-1) and 12 kg manure.
T9: 60 percent chemical fertilizer (potassium sulphate 100 kgha-1, ammonium sulphate 60 kg ha-1 and super phosphate triple 90 kg ha-1) and 12 kg manure.
All data analysis was done with MSTATC software and mean data comparison done with Duncan test levels at 1 or 5 percent levels.
Results and Discussion: The results of analysis of variance showed that simple effect of manure and fertilizers and their interactions had no significant effect on TSS, but simple effect of fertilizer and their interactions between them had significant effect. The simple effect of chemical fertilizer and its interaction with manure were significant at 1 percent level on titration able pH of fruit juice and the simple effect of manure effect on fruit juice pH were significant at 5 percent level. The simple chemical fertilizer effect on C vitamin was not significant but simple effect of manure and its interaction effect with chemical fertilizer were significant at 5 percent level. The analysis of variance showed that simple effect of chemical fertilizer on fruit juice potassium were not significant, but simple effect of manure and its interaction with chemical fertilizer were significant at 5 percent level. Analysis of variance showed that simple effect of manure and fertilizer on the fruit juice calcium was significant at 1 percent level but their interactions were significant at 5 percent level. Simple effect of manure and fertilizer and their interactions on the fruit magnesium, iron manganese, zinc and copper were significant at 1 percent level. Analysis of variance showed that simple effect of manure and fertilizer and their interactions on the fruit juice magnesium, manganese, iron and copper was significant at 1 percent level, but simple effect of manure on fruit juice zinc were significant at 5 percent level.
Conclusion: In this study the treatment with combined application of 30 percent and 12 kg manure had highest Ca, Mg , Fe, Mn and zinc concentration in fruit, also combined application of 60 percent fertilizer and 12 kg manure had effect on pH and potassium of fruit juice.

Keywords

Chemical fertilizer; Citrus; Fruit quality manure

References

Ebrahimi Y. 1981. Citrus growth in Iran. Number one report of Seed and plant breeding institute of Iran, Karaj.

2- Eghball B. 2002. Soil Properties as influenced by phosphorus- and nitrogen-based manure and compost applications. Agronomy & Horticulture. Faculty Publications Paper. 16. (in Persian with English abstract)

3- Farzad M.A. 2011. Citrus orchard production. Agriculture education and extension 394.

4- Fotohi Ghazvini R.V. and Fatahi Moghadam J. 2011. Citrus production in Iran. Geilan University publication. 305. (in Persian with English abstract).

5- Gandomkar A. 1999. Recognition plane of male nutrition of citrus in north of Khozestan and practical remedy. Application for yield and quality. Safiabad research center final report,Dezful, Khozestan, Iran.

6- Ghorbani M., Yazdani S., Zare Mirakabad H. 2011. Introduction to sustainable agriculture. Ferdousei University publication.

7- Jones J. 2001. Laboratory guide for conducting soil tests and plant analysis. Journal of Botany. 41(3): 1373-1384.

8- Kochakei A., Hossainei M., Hashemi Dezfoli A. 2001. Sustainable Agriculture. Mashhad Jahad University. 164. (in Persian with English abstract)

9- Koo R.C.J., and Reese R.L. 1972. A comparison of potash sources and rates for citrus. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society, 85: 1-5.

10- Lester J.N., and Birkett J.W. 1999. Microbiology and chemistry for environmental scientic and engineers, 2nd ed. London and New York, 386 p.

11- Liang Y., Nicolic J., Si M., peng Y., Chen W., and Jiang Y. 2005. Organic manure stimulates biological activity and barley growth in soil subject to secondary salinization. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 37: 1185-1195.

12- Malakoti M.J. Sustainable agriculture with best use of fertilizer and increasing yield in Iran. Agriculture education . 973, 17.

13- Nomura N., Matsuzaki Y., Yanagisawa A. 1989. Influence of farmyard manure and nitrogen application on sugar yield and quality of sugar beet. Field Crop Abstract. 42(11):8993.

14- Olson S.R., and Sommers L.E. 1990. Phosph0rous. In: page a. l. Method of soil analysis. Part 2. 2nd Agron Monoger. ASA, Madison, WI. 403-431.

15- Omidi H., Naghdi abadi H.A., Golzad A., Torabi H., and Potokian M.H. 2010. Effect of chemical and biological fertilizers on zafran yield quantity and quality. Seasonal report of medical plant 8 (2) 81-90.

16- Pedra F., Polo A., Ribero A., and Domingues H., 2006. Effect of municipal solid waste compost and sewage sludge on minerlization of soil organic matter. Journal of Soil Biology and Biochemistry 29: 1375-1382

17- Prasad R.N., and Maili P.C. 2003. Effect of different levels of nitrogen on quality characters of pomegranate fruit cv. Jalore Seedless. Scientific Horticulture. 8: 35-39.

18- Ramadass K., and Palaniyandi S. 2007. Effect of enriched municipal solid waste compost application on soil available macronutrient in the rice field. Archiv. Agron. Soil Science. 53: 497-506.

19- Rodriguez V.A., Martinez G.C., and Ferrero A.R. 2000. Zninc and potasium incidence in fruit sizes of Valencia orange with CVC symptoms. International Society of Citriculture Congress. Disney’s coronado springs Resort, lake Buena Vista, Florida, USA.

20- Rulkens W.H., and Ten Have P.J.W. 1994. Single and combined effect of bio-organic and inorganic fertilizers on yield of sunflower and soil properties under rain feed condition. Advance Plant Science. 5: 161-167.

21- Saini E.S., Sharma K.D., Dhankhar O.P., and Kaushik R. A 2001. Laboratory manual of analytical techniques in Horticultural. Agrobios, Publisher India, 135p.

22- Sharples R.O.1967. A note on the occurrence of watercore breakdown in apple during 1966. Plant path.16:119-120.

23 Silspour M. 2002. Possibilities of using municipal waste in wheat cultivation and it replacement with chemical fertilizer. Exploration of renewable sources in agriculture. Islamic Azad University publication. Khoresgan unit. 54-66 (in Persian with English abstract).

24- Sujatha M.G., Lingaraju B.S., Palled Y.B., and Ashalatha K.V. 2008. Importance of integrated nutrient management practices in maize under rain fed condition. Karnataka Journal Agricultura Science. 21: 334-338.

25- Szewczuk A., Komosa A., and Gudarowska E. 2008. Effect of soil potassium levels and different potassium fertilizer forms on yield and storability of 'Golden Delicious' apples. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum - Hortorum Cultus, 7(2): 53-59.

26- Wei Y., and Liu Y. 2005. Effect of sewage sludge compost application on crops and cropland in a 3 years field study . chemosphere. 50:1257-1263.