تأثیر سطوح مختلف نیتروکسین و اسید هیومیک بر برخی ویژگی‌های کمی و اسانس گیاه دارویی زنیان (Carum copticum (L .)C .B . Clarke)

علوم باغبانی

مقاله 2، دوره 29، شماره 3، آذر 1394، صفحه 321-341   

نوع مقاله: مقالات پژوهشی

شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22067/jhorts4.v0i0.22523

نویسندگان

کاظم برغمدی^* ؛ شهلا نجفی

دانشگاه زابل

چکیده

به منظور بررسی تاثیر سطوح مختلف نیتروکسین و اسید هیومیک بر خصوصیات کمی و کیفی گیاه دارویی زنیان، آزمایشی به صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در مزرعه پژوهشی دانشگاه زابل انجام گردید. تیمارهای کودی شامل: استفاده از کود زیستی نیتروکسین به صورت تلقیح با بذر در چهار سطح شامل N1=صفر (شاهد)، N2= 5/0، N3= 1 و N4= 5/1 لیتر در هکتار و استفاده از کود آلی اسید هیومیک به صورت محلول در آب آبیاری و در مرحله 4 برگی در چهار سطح شامل H1= صفر (شاهد)، H2= 1، H3= 2 و H4= 3 کیلوگرم در هکتار بود. نتایج آزمایش نشان داد که تأثیر اسید هیومیک بر وزن هزار دانه، تعداد چتر، تعداد شاخه جانبی، درصد اسانس و عملکرد اسانس معنی دار بود. نتایج مقایسه میانگین نشان داد که بیشترین درصد و عملکرد اسانس به ترتیب با 17/4 درصد و 75/64 کیلوگرم در هکتار از تیمار H4 به دست آمد. هم‌چنین اثر نیتروکسین بر تمام صفات فوق به جز درصد اسانس معنی‌دار بود. برهمکنش تیمارهای اسید هیومیک و نیتروکسین بر عملکرد بیولوژیک و عملکرد دانه، معنی دار شد. بیشترین عملکرد دانه (33/1758 کیلوگرم در هکتار) از تیمار N4H3 به دست آمد. با توجه به نتایج این پژوهش به نظر می رسد استفاده از 5/1 لیتر نیتروکسین و سه کیلوگرم اسید هیومیک در هکتار بهترین تیمار در تولید درصد و عملکرد اسانس زنیان باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

صفات مورفولوژیکی؛ عملکرد اسانس؛ کود زیستی

مراجع

1- Atiyeh R.M., Subler S., Edwards C.A., Bachman G., Metzger J.D., and Shuster W. 2000. Effects of vermicomposts and compost on plant growth in horticultural container media and soil. Pedobiologia, 44: 579–590.

2- Ayuso M., Hernandez T., Garcia C., and Pascual J.A. 1996. A comparative study of the effect on barley growthof humic substances extracted from municipal wastes and from traditional organic materials, 24: 493 – 500.

3- Badran F.S., and Safwat M.S. 2004. Response of fennel plants to organic manure and biofertilizers in replacementof chemical fertilization. Egyptian Journal of Agriculture Research, 82: 247-256.

4- Darzi M.T., Ghalavand A., Sefidkon F., Rejali F. 2007.The effects of mycorrhiza, vermicompost and phosphatic biofertilizer application on quantity and quality of essential oil in Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, 24(4): 396 -413. (in Persian with English abstract)

5- Darzi M.T., Ghalavand A., Rejali F., and Sefidkon,F. 2006. Effects of biofertilizers application onyield and yield components in Fennel (Foeniculumvulgare Mill.). Iranian Journal of Medicinal andAromatic Plants, 22(4): 276-292. (in Persian with English abstract)

6- David p.p., Nelson p.v. and Sanders c.d. 1994. A humic acid improves growth of tomato seedling in solution culture. Journal of plant nutrition, 17: 173- 184.

7- Delfine S., Tognetti R., Desiderio E., and Alvino A. 2005. Effect of foliar application of N and humic acids ongrowth and yield of durum wheat. Agronomy for Sustainable development, 25: 183-191.

8- El-Ghadban E.A.E., Shalan M.N. and Abdel-Latif T.A.T. 2006. Influence of biofertilizers on growth, volatile oilyield and constituents of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.). Egyptian Journal of Agriculture Research, 84: 977-992.

9- EL-Ghadban E. A., Ghallab A. M., and AbdelwahabA. F. 2002. Effect of organic fertilizer (Biogreen)and biofertilization on growth, yield and chemicalcomposition of Marjoram plants growth under newlyreclaimed soil conditions. 2nd Congress of RecentTechnologies in Agriculture, 2: 334-361.

10- Emami A. 1996. Methods of Plant Analysis. Soil and Water Research Institute, 982 (1): 128 p.

11- Fallahi J., Kochaki A.R., Rezvani Moghaddam P. 2010. Effects of biological fertilizers on yield and quality of German chamomile. (Matricariia chamomilla) Journal of agricultural research, 7 (1): 135-137. (in Persian with English abstract)

12- Gupta A.K and Samnotra R.K. 2004. Effect of biofertilizers and nitrogen on growth, quality and yield of cabbage (Brassica napus L.). Environment Ecology, 22: 551-553.

13- Harper S.M., kerven G.L., Edwards D.G. and ostatek boczyski Z. 2000. Characterizyion on fulvic and humic acids from leavesof eucalyptus comaldulensis and from decomposed hey. Soil Biochemistry, 32: 1331-1336.

14- Hazarika D.K., Taluk Dar N.C., Phookan A.K.,Saikia U.N., Das B.C., and Deka P.C., 2002.Influence of Vesicular arbascular mycorrhizal fungiand phosphate solubilizing bacteria on nurseryestablishment and growth of tea seedlings in Assam.A paper presented in the 17th WCSS, 14-21.

15- Iswaran V. and Chonkar P.K. 1971. Action of sodium humate and dry matter accumulation of soybean in saline alkali sail. In B. Novak ct al. Humus et Planta:613-615.

16- Kader M.A., Mian M.H., and Hoque M.S. 2002.Effects of Azotobacter inoculant on the yield andnitrogen uptake by wheat. Journal of BiologicalSciences, 2(4): 259-261.

17- Kapoor R., Giri B., and Mukerji, K.G. 2004. Improved growth and essential oil yield andquality in Foeniculum vulgare mill on mycorrhizal inoculation supplemented with Pfertilizer.Bioresearch Technology, 93:307-311.

18- Khalilian Ekrami H. 1385. Effects of sulfur oxidizers bacteria (Thiobacillus), nitrogen fixation (Zvsprlyvm and Azotobacter) on corn yield, the .S. C 704 MS Thesis Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch. (in Persian with English abstract)

19- Khoram Del S., Koochaki A., Nassiri Mahalati M., Ghorbani R. 2007. Application effects of biofertilizers on the growth indices of black cumin (Nigella sativa L). Journal of Iranian Field Crop Research, 2(6):285-294. (in Persian with English abstract)

20- Kochaki A.R., Tabrizi L., Gorbani R. 2009. Evaluation of the effect of biofertilizers on growth characteristics, yield and quality of the medicinal herb hyssop. CROP Research, 6 (1): 137- 127. (in Persian with English abstract)

21- Leithy S., El-Meseiry T.A., and Abdallah E.F. 2006. Effect of biofertilizer, cell stabilizer and irrigation regime onRosemary herbage oil quality. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 2: 773-779.

22- Mackowiak C.L., Grossl P.R., and Bugbee B.G. 2001. Beneficial effects of humic acid on micronutrientavailability to wheat. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 65: 1744–1750.

23- Mahfouz S.A., and Sharaf-Eldin M.A. 2007. Effect of mineral vs. biofertilizer on growth, yield, and essential oilcontent of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.). International-Agrophysics, 21: 361-366.

24- Malakoti M.J., Nafisi M. 1989. Fertilizer use in irrigated and rainfed lands, rinting, center, Tarbiat Modarres University Press, 267 p. (in Persian with English abstract)

25- Manaffee W.F., and Kloepper J.W. 1994. Application of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in sustainable agriculture. In: “Soil biota management in sustainable farming systems”. Eds. By C.E. Paankburst, B.M. Doube, V.V.S.R. Gupta, and P.R. Grace. p. 23-31. CSIRO, Pub. East Melbourne, Australia

26- Michael K. 2001. Oxidized lignites and extracts from oxidizwd lignites in agriculture. Soil Science,1-23.

27- Niakan M., Khavarinejad R., Rezaei M.B. 2005. Effect of three ratios of fertilizer N, P, K on fresh weight, dry weight, leaf area and the essential oil of peppermint. (Mentha piperita L.) of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research, 21 (2): 148-131. (in Persian with English abstract)

28- Ojaglo F.2006. Effect of inoculation with biofertilizers (Azotobacter and phosphorus fertilization) on growth, yield, and safflower. MS Thesis Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University of Tabriz. (in Persian with English abstract)

29- Ram M., and Kumar S. 1997. Yield improvement inthe regenerated and transplanted mint menthearvensis by recycling the organic wastes andmanures. Bioresource Technology, 59: 141-149.

30- Saleh Rastin N.1999. Biological fertilizers. Journal of Soil and Water Special Publication Research Institute, Agricultural Extension and Education, 12 (3): 17-26. (in Persian with English abstract)

31- Samavat S., Malakoti M. 2006. Necessitates the use of organic acids (humic and Fvlvyk) to increase the quantity and quality of agricultural products. Technical Bulletin No. 463. Senate publications. Tehran. Iran. (in Persian with English abstract)

32- Sanches Govin E., Rodrigues Gonzales H., and C. Carballo Guerra. 2005. Ifluencia de los abonos organicos y biofertilizantes en la calidad de las especies medicinales calendula officinalis l.y Matricaria recutita L. Revista Cubana de Plantas Medicinales, 10(1):1.

33- Sebahattin A., and Necdet C. 2005. Effects of different levels and application times of humic acid on root and leaf yield and yield components of forage Turnip (Brassica rapa L.). Agronomy. Journal, 4: 130-133.

34- Shariff M., 2002. Effect of lignitic coal derived HA on growth and yield of wheat and maize in alkaline soil. Ph.DThesis, NWFP Agric Univ Peshawar, Pakistan.

35- Sharma A.K. 2002. Biofertilizers for Sustainable Agriculture. Agro-bios Indian publication. P. 300.

36- Sidari M., Ronzello G., Vecchio G., and Muscolo A. 2008. Influence of slope aspects on soil chemical and biochemical properties in a Pinus laricio forest ecosystem of Aspromonte (Southern Italy). European Journal of Soil Biology, 44(4): 364-372.

37- Singh S., and Kapoor K.K. 1998. Effects of inoculation of phosphatesolubilizingmicroorganisms and an arbuscularmycorrhizal fungus on mungbean grown under natural soil conditions.

38- Tehlan S.K., Thakral K.K., and Nandal J.K. 2004. Effect of Azotobacter on plant growth and seed yield of fennel(Foeniculum vulgare Mill.). Haryana Journal of Horticultural Science, 33(3/4): 287-288.

39- Tilak K. V. B. R., Ranganayaki N., Pal K.K., De R., Saxena A.K., Shekhar Nautiyal C., Tripathi A.K., and Johri B. N. 2005. Diversity of plant growth and soil health supporting bacteria. Current Science, 89: 136-150.

40- Wolf D.W., Henderson D.W., Hsiao T. C., and Alvino A. 1988. Interactive water and nitrogen effects onsenescence of maize. I. Leaf area duration nitrogen distribution and yield. Agronomy Journal, 80: 859-864.

41- Young C.C., and Chen L.F.. 1997. Polyamines in humic acid and their effect on radical growth of lettuce seedling. Plant and Soil, 195: 143-149.