Effect of Salinity on Growth and Physiological Parameters of Four Olive (OleaeuropaeaL.) Cultivars underGreenhouse Conditions

علوم باغبانی

Article 5, Volume 30, Issue 1, February 2016, Pages 1-10   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jhorts4.v30i1.22931

Authors

Farzaneh Olyaei; Bahram Baninasab^* ; Cyrus Ghobadi

Isfahan University of Technology

Abstract

Introduction: Salinity is a common abiotic stress that seriously affects crop production around the world, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions.The deleterious effects of salinity on plant growth are associated with low osmotic potential of soil solution (water stress), nutritional imbalance, specific ion effect (salt stress), or a combination of these factors. Olive is one of the most important fruit crops in Iran and the world. Despite olive has been classified as moderately salt tolerant plant, poor quality of irrigation water in association with salt build-up soils has reduced the yields, especially in arid and semi-arid regions of Iran. The tolerance of the olive to salt is to a great extent depends on the cultivar. Selecting salinity-resistant cultivars is one of the most important strategies used for mitigating salinity effects on olive. Therefore, this study was performed to assess the salt tolerance of four olive cultivars under greenhouse condition.
Materials and Methods: For this purpose, one-year-old rooted cuttings of Iranian olive cultivars (‘Dakal’, ‘Shiraz’, ‘Zard’) and non-Iranian cultivar ‘Amigdal’ were grown in the research greenhouse of Agricultural College, Isfahan University of Technology of Iran. Plants were grown in plastic pots. The pots were 180 mm in diameter and 20 mm in depth with volume of 7 L. The minimum and maximum temperatures during the experiment period were 19 and 35˚C, respectively. After sticking the cuttings, the pots with uniform plants were subjected to the treatment with 0 (control), 100, 150 or 200 mMNaCl. The electrical conductivities of these solutions were 0.003, 10.52, 15.43 and 19.55 dS m-1, respectively. To avoid osmotic shock, the NaCl concentration was gradually increased. The layout was a 4×4 factorial experiment based oncompletely randomized design, with four replications. The experimental measurements were carried out three months after beginning the salt treatments.
Results and Discussion:The results showed that salt stress and cultivar hadsignificant effects on all of vegetative and physiological parameters. Injury rating valueof plants wasfound to increase significantly as the salt concentration was raised. Among the cultivars, the highest injury rating value (2.75) belonged to Amigdal cultivar, while the lowest means (2.00) was related to Dakal cultivar. By increasing the salinity level, stem heightincreasing ratesignificantly decreased. The lowest means (18.17%) belonged to 200 mMNaCl treatment, showing 81.83% decrease compared with control. Among the cultivars, Zard showed the highest means of increase in stem height (71.75%). Leaf area influenced significantly by salinity, sothat the lowest means of leaf area (35.05%) was recorded for200 mMNaCl treatment, showing a 69.91% decrease compared with the control. The highest leaf area belonged to Shiraz cultivar, which had a significant difference with Zard and Amigdal cultivars. Compared with the control, salinity caused 50.83% and 54.36% decreases in shoot fresh and dry weight in 200 mMNaCl, respectively. The highest shoot fresh and dry weightswere recorded forZard cultivar. The lowest shoot fresh and dry weights were observed forAmigdal cultivar.Increment of salinity concentration significantly declined root fresh and dry weight. Among the cultivars, the highest means of root fresh weightbelonged to Amigdal cultivar, whereas the lowest was related to Shiraz cultivar. The highest and lowest root dry weightswere observed forDakal and Amigdal cultivars, respectively.Salinity significantly decreased relative water content.The lowest leaf relative water content (66.04%) was recorded in 200 mMNaCl treatment, showing a 23.43% decrease compared with the control.Zard cultivar showed the highestleafrelative water content. Salinity stress decreased chlorophyll fluorescence in leaves of salt-treated olive plants. At 200 mMNaCl, leaf chlorophyll fluorescence was minimal as compared to control and other salt levels. The highest leaf chlorophyll fluorescence ratio (0.74) was recorded forZard cultivar. However, Amigdal cultivar showed the lowest means for this index (0.60).Salinity significantly decreasedleaf chlorophyll content.The lowest leaf chlorophyll content (69.39%) was recorded in 200 mMNaCl, showing a 66.80% decrease compared with the control.Among the cultivars, Zard showed the highest leaf chlorophyll content (170.33). In the present study, the increase in proline content in the NaCl-treated plants was noted, with the highest level being attained with 200 mMNaCl. The highest proline content (1.03 µmol.g-1 F.W.)was observed in Zard cultivar. Salinity stress increased malondialdehyde content in the leaves of salt-treated plants. The highest malondialdehyde content was obtained from leaves of plants treated with 200 mMNaCl. The highest malondialdehyde content was recorded in Amigdal cultivar.Shirazl cultivar showed the lowest malondialdehyde content. In this study, the correlation betweenvegetative and physiological parameters of olive plants subjected to salt stress was analysed. These correlations suggested that salt injury symptoms was negatively correlated with relative water content, leaf chlorophyll fluorescence and leaf chlorophyll content, but positively correlated with proline content and malondialdehyde content.
Conclusion: In overall, this investigation revealed that salt stress had aninhibitory effect on the vegetative growth of olive plants.The responses of olive cultivars to salt stress suggested that Zard and Shiraz cultivars were more tolerant and ‘Amygdal’ was the most sensitive to changes in the salt levels.

Keywords

Chlorophyll fluorescence; Environmental stresses; Proline

References

1- Ashraf M. 1989. The effect of NaCl on water relations, chlorophyll, protein and proline contents of two cultivars of blackgram (Vigna mungo L.). Plant and Soil, 119: 205-210.

2- Ashraf M., and Foolad M.R. 2005. Pre-sowing seed treatment: A shotgun approach to improve germination, plant growth, and crop yield under saline and non-saline conditions. Advances in Agronomy, 88: 223-271.

3- Bates L.S., Waldren, R.P., and Teare I.D. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant and Soil, 39: 205-207.

4- Bolat I., Kaya C., Almaca A., and Timucin S. 2006. Calcium sulfate improve salinity tolerance in rootstock of plum. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 29: 553-564.

5- Bongi F., and Loreto F. 1989. Gas-exchange properties of salt-stressed olive (Olea europaea L.) leaves. Plant Physiology, 90: 1408-1416.

6- Bybordi A., Tabatabaei S.J., and Ahmadev A. 2010. Effect of salinity on the growth and peroxidase and IAA oxidase activities in canola. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 8: 109-112.

7- Chartzoulakis K.S. 2005. Salinity and olive: Growth, salt tolerance, photosynthesis and yield. Agricultural Water Management, 78: 108-121.

8- Debez A., Saadaui D., Ramani B., Ouerghi Z., Koyro H.W., Huchzermeyer B., and Abdelly C. 2006. Leaf H+-ATPase activey and photosynthetic capacity of Cakile martima under increasing salinity. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 57: 285-295.

9- El-Hariri D.M., Sadak M.S., and El-Bassiouny H.M.S. 2010. Response of flax cultivars to ascorbic acid and - tocopherol under salinity stress conditions. International Journal of Academic Research, 6: 101-109.

10- Esfandiari E., Shekari F., and Esfandiari M. 2007. The effect of salt stress on antioxidant enzymes activity and lipid peroxidation on the wheat seedling. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 35: 48-56.

11- Fisarakis I., Chartzoulakis K., and Stavrakas D. 2001. Response of sultana vines (V. vinifera L.) on six rootstock to NaCl salinity exposure and recovery. Agricultureal Water Management, 51: 13-27.

12- Goreta S., Bucevic-Popovic V., Pavela-Vranic M., and Perica S. 2007. Salinity induced changes in growth, superoxide dismutase activity, and ion content of two olive cultivars. Journal of Plant Nurtrition and Soil Science, 170: 398-403.

13- Greenway H., and Munns R. 1980. Mechanisms of salt tolerance in nonhalophytes. Annual of Plant Physiology, 31: 149-190.

14- Gucci, R., and Tattini M. 1997. Salinity tolerance in olive. Horticultural Review, 21: 177-214.

15- Ketchum R.E.B., Warren R.C., Klima L.J., Lopez-Gutierrez F., and Nabors M.W. 1991. The mechanism and regulation of proline accumulation in suspension cultures of halophytic grass Distichlis spicata L. Journal of Plant Physiology, 137: 368-374.

16- Lawlor D.W., and Cornic G. 2002. Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants. Plant, Cell and Environmental, 25: 275- 294.

17- Lu K.X., Cao B.H., Feng X.P., He Y., and Jiang D.A. 2009. Photosynthetic response of salt-tolerant and sensitive soybean varieties. Photosynthetica, 47: 381-387.

18- Mansour M.M.F. 2000. Nitrogen containing compounds and adaptation of plants to salinity stress. Biologia Plantarum, 43: 491-500.

19- Melgar J.C., Guidi L., Remorini D., Agati G., Degl’Innocenti E., Castelli S., Camillabaratto M., Faraloniand C., and Tattini M. 2009. Antioxidant defenses and oxidative damage in salt-treated olive plants under contrasting sunlight irradiance. Tree Physiology, 29: 1187–1198.

20- Mingyang F., Chao L., and Fengwang M. 2013. Physiological responses and tolerance to NaCl stress in different biotypes of Malus prunifolia. Euphytica, 189: 101-109.

21- Munns R. and James R.A. 2003. Screening method for salinity tolerance: a case study with tetraploid wheat. Plant and Soil, 253: 201-218.

Oraei M., Tabatabaei S.J., Fallahi E., and Imani A. 2009. The effect of salinity and rootstock on the growth, photosyntheteic rate, nutrient and sodium concentrations of almond (Prunus dulcis Mill.). Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 23: 131-140. (in Persian with English abstract)

23- Ramzi B., and Morales F. 1994. Chlorophyll flourescende as a possible tool for salinity tolerance screening in barley. Plant Physiology, 104: 667-673.

24- Pezeshki S.R., and chambers J.L. 1986. Effect of soil salinity on stomatal conductance and photosynthesis of green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marsh.) seedling. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 16: 569-573.

25- Qasim M., Ashraf M., Ashraf M.Y., Rehman S.U., and Rha E.S. 2003. Salt-induced changes in two canola cultivars differing in salt tolerance. Biologia Plantarum, 46: 692-632.

26- Quiles M.J., and Lopez N.I. 2004. Photoinhibition of photosystems I and II induced by exposure to high light intensity during oat plant grown effects on the chloroplastic NADH dehydrogenase complex. Plant Science, 166: 815-823.

27- Scandalios J.G. 1993. Oxygen stress and superoxide dismutase. Plant Physiology, 101: 712-726.

28- Shahba Z., Baghizadeh A., Vakili S., Mohamad A., Yazdanpanah A., and Yosefi M. 2010. The salisilic acid effect on the tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.) sugar, protein and proline contents under salinity stress NaCl. Journal of Biophysics and Structural Biology, 2: 35-41.

29- Shannon M.C. 1997. Adaptation of plants to salinity. Advances Agronomy, 60: 75-120.

30- Sheokand S., Bhankar V., and Sawhney V. 2010. Ameliorative effect of exogenous nitric oxide on oxidative metabolism in NaCl treated chickpea plants. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, 22: 81-90.

31- Sivritepe N., Sivritepe H.O., Celik H., and Katkat A.V. 2010. Salinity responses of grafted grapevines: Effects of scion and rootstock genotypes. Notulae Botanici Horti Agrobotanici Cloj-Napoca, 38: 193-201.

32- Tattini M., Bertoni P., and Caselli S. 1992. Genotypic responses of olive plants to sodium chloride. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 15: 1467-1485.

33- Vitagliano C., and Sebastiani L. 2002. Physiological and biochemical remarks on environmental stress in olive (Olea europaea L.). Acta Horticulturae, 586: 435-441.

34- Wang F., Zeng B., Sun Z., and Zhu C. 2009. Relationship between proline and Hg2+-induced oxidative stress in tolerant rice mutant. Archive of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 56: 723-731.

35- Yin R., Tuanhui B., Fengwang M., Xinjuan W., Yonghong L. and Zhiyong Y. 2010. Physiological responses and relative tolerance by chinese apple rootstocks to NaCl stress. Scientia Horticulturae, 126: 247-252.

36- Younis M.E., El-Shahaby O.A., Abo-Hamed S.A., and Ibrahim A.H. 2000. Effects of water stress on growth, pigments and 14CO2 assimilation in three sorghum cultivars. Agronomy and Crop Science, 185: 73-82.

37- Zheng Q., Liu Z., Chen G., Gao Y., Li Q., and Wang J. 2010. Comparison of osmotic regulation in dehydration and salinity-stressed sunflower seedlings. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 33: 966-981.