The Semiotic Analysis of Silence in Class Management

پژوهش نامه مبانی تعلیم و تربیت

Article 4, Volume 9, Issue 2 - Serial Number 18, March 2020, Pages 67-84   

Document Type: پژوهشی

DOI: 10.22067/fedu.v9i2.79854

Authors

zohreh meshkibaf moghadam^{* 1}; Moslem Cherabin¹; Ahmad Akbari²; Alireza Davoodi¹

¹Islamic Azad University of Neyshabur

²Islamic Azad University، Bardaskanr، Iran

Abstract

The Main purpose of this paper is to analyze one of the components of classroom management, The sign of “Silence”. Saussure's semiotic analysis qualitative method was used to perceive the explicit message and analyze the latent meanings. The data validated based on the intertextual method is based on the text itself and the interpretations derived from the text. The theoretical results of this research led to the design of a binary model of "self-imposed/imposed" and "positive/negative" of silence. In the practical section, based on classroom biography, semantic codes of silence were extracted and decoded. The predicate and the referent were studied, recognized, internalized, and interpreted. As a result, the binary model of "affirmative-privative" and "incompetence -stubborn" was designed. The results of this paper indicate that the most frequent silence in the class was ‘inappropriate or empty silence’, which indicates the loud cry of the bitter reality of many wasted hours in classes that had no educational or educative consequence. Authorities, scholars, and teachers can receive the message of silence through theoretical study, educational action research and reflection, and by increasing teaching and transfer of meaning, and the predictability of classroom management. Another category of silence with "unknown" goals was also identified.

Keywords

silence; Semiotic; Predictability; Classroom Management; internship

References

Adnyani, l. s., Piska, l. k., & Marhaeni, A. i. (2019). The effect of solent reading. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa.

Aghasaleh, R., & Pierre, E. A. (2014). A readers ruide to post-qualitative inquiry proposal.

Ahmadi, A. (2017). Practical Guide to Internship Program at Farhangian University with Teachers Fellwship Approch. Tehran: Tehran University Publication(in persian).

Akbari, A. (2014). Teaching Children Thinking(Integral approach to p4c). kashmar: kashmer(In Persian).

Baghere Noparast, K. (2014). Teaching "to" and learning from ":. Research Foundations of Education, 3(2), 5-16(In Persian).

Behnam far, r. (2014). Modern Reticence. Iranian Journal Of Medical Education, 829-830 (In Persian).

Behnamfar, R., Zameni, F., & Enayati, t. (2015). Scholary Bimonthy of Educations Strategies in Medical Siences, 146-149 (In Persian).

Bohlooli Faskhoodi, M., & Zarghami hamrah, S. (2018). Tacit Knowledge Implications for Implicit Learning and Teaching with an Emphasis on the View of Michael Polanyi. Research Foundations of Education, 8(1), 5-20 (In Persian).

Dehnavi, M., & Purkarmi Haveshki, M. (2018). Philosophizing and Its Effects on Teaching. Research Foundations of Education, 8(1), 43-66(In persian).

Ebrahimi dinani, G. (2019). What dose Silence Mean in Philosophy? Tehtan: School of philosophy.

Farasat khah, m. (2017). Qualitative Research Method in Social Sience wuth the Emphesis on Grounded Theory Method. Tehran: AGAH (In Persian).

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: basic books.

Greene, J. D. (2019). Walk till you disappear. Kar-ben publishing.

Hillsotrom, l. c. (2019). Scholl shooting and the never again novment. www.afb.org/helenkllerarchive.clio.

Ikps, n., & Marhaeni, A. (2019). The effect of sustaind silent reading on students reading comperehension of eight graading students at amp negeri. EJurnal.undiksha.ac.id.

Khanifar, H., & Moslemi, N. (2019). Fundamentals QUALITIVE RESEARCH METHODS (vol 1). Tehran: Negah danesh (In Persian).

Khanjarkhani, m., Safaei Moghadam, M., & Pakseresht, M. (2017). Philosophical Hermeneutics and its Implications for Self-Understanding, Otherness- Understanding and Together – Understanding, in Education. Journal of Foundation of Education, 6(2), 5-20 (In Persian).

Koleini, M. (1987). Alkaffi. qom : Daralhadis(In Persian).

Liu, J. (2002). Negotiating dilence in american classrooms; therchinese case. Language and interculcgeral communication, 37-54.

Lu, M. Z. (1987). From Silence to Words:Writing. college English, 437-448.

Majlesi, M. (1983). Bahar Al Anvar. tehran (In Persian): Daralkotob Aleslamieh.

Mehrmohamadi, M., & Colleagues. (2014). Curriculum Theories, Approaches and Perspectives. Mashhad: Behnashr(In Persian).

Mirlohi, S. (2015). m. Mehrmohamadi در, Curriculum, Theories,Approach and Perspective (p. 415-434). Mashhad: Astanqods(In Persian).

Mirnezami, s. (2018). letter by Helen Keller, blind and deaf author to the New York SymphonyOrchestra. www.chok.ir (In Persian).

Mohammadpur, A. (2013). Qualitative Research Method Counter Method 2 (vol 2). Tehran: Jameshenasan(In Pesrsian).

Poplau, R., & w. (2018). A living classroom: ideas for student creativity and community service. Roman &littlefield.

Raoof, A. (1993). Teacher Training and Practice Teaching. Tehran: Fatemi(In Persian).

Raoof, a. (2011). Practice Teaching in Teacher Training Workshop. Tehran: Aiij(In Paisian).

Shabani, H. (2013). Educational Skills,Methods and Techniques of Teaching. Tehran: Samt(In Persian).

Tsui, A. B. (1996). Reticence and anaxiety in secend language learning. voices from the language classroom, 145-167.

Weinstein, C. s., & Hoy, W. A. (2006). Student and teacher perspectives on classroom management. Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice and contemporary issues, 181-222.

Zoofan, s., & Lotfipour, k. (2000). Instructional Media for the Classroom. tehran: Tarbiat moalem(In persian).