Identification and Prevalence of Potato VirusM and PotatoVirus Sin Some Provinces of Iran

پژوهش های حفاظت گیاهان ایران

Article 8, Volume 29, Issue 3 - Serial Number 32, September 2015, Pages 412-418   

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: 10.22067/jpp.v29i3.35917

Authors

F. Tabasinezhad^* ; B. Jafarpour; H. Rouhani; M. Zakiaghl; M. Mehrvar

Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad

Abstract

Introduction: Potato virus M (PVM) and Potato virus S (PVS) are members of the genus Carlavirus in the family Betaflexiviridae. They have worldwide distribution and potato is a major host of the viruses. They have flexuous filamentous virions with a linear, single-stranded, positive-sense RNA genome of about 8.5 kb. The RNA genome contains a 5´- cap structure, six open reading frames (ORFs), and a poly-A tail at the 3´-terminus. Potato virus M was first isolated from Solanum tuberosum in 1923 in the United States by Schulz et al. It has since been found in all potato production areas worldwide, alone or in mixed infection with PVS. Despite evolutionary adaptation to broad geographical niches, PVM and PVS have a narrow host range limited to solanaceous species. In naturally infected plants, PVM causes mottling, mosaic, crinkling, leaflet deformation and stunting of shoots. The symptoms of PVM on potato vary from latency to severe and are similar to those caused by some other potato-infecting viruses, including potato virus S (PVS, Carlavirus), potato virus X (PVX, Potexvirus) and the common strain of potato virus Y (PVY-O, Potyvirus). PVS has a severe symptom of mosaic and yellowing on potato plants. Most carlaviruses, including PVM and PVS, are naturally transmitted by aphids in a non-persistent manner. PVM and PVS are also transmissible experimentally by mechanical inoculation, however, the common route for the spread of PVM and PVS within the crop is through activities such as seed cutting operations and machinery movements. All of the potato plants grown in a field may become infected, depending on the potato cultivar and environmental conditions.
Materials and Methods: In the present study the prevalence of PVM and PVS were surveyed in potato fields from different fields of major potato producing area in Hamedan, Northern Khorasan, Khorasanrazavi, Esfahan, Kerman provinces of Iran. Specific antibody against PVM and PVS (DSMZ, Germany) were used to detect the viruses in fresh leaf crude extracts by DAS-ELISA. Antigen samples were prepared by grinding 500 milligrams of leaf tissue in 200 mMTris-HCl, pH 8.2, 140 mMNaCl, 2 % polyvinylpyrrolidone 40, and 0.05 % Tween 20. Leaf samples from healthy potatoes were also included as negative controls. DAS-ELISA was performed as described by Clark and Adams, according to the instructions of the antibody supplier. The rate of substrate hydrolysis was measured at 405 nm using a microplate reader. A number of samples were also tested by mechanical inoculation on test plants Solanum tuberosum, Lycopersicum escolentum and Nicotiana glutinosa by using 0.1M sodium phosphate buffer. The presence of infection was confirmed about two weeks later by the symptoms and DAS-ELISA results. Total RNA was extracted from fresh young leaf tissue by Accuzol, total RNA extraction kit (Bioneer). Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) was carried out using specific primers, corresponding to a complete coat protein gene of PVM and PVS. Amplified fragments were ligated in pTZ57R/T plasmid and cloned in DH5α isolate of Escherichia coli using InsT/A clone PCR product cloning kit (Fermentas) as manufacturer’s protocol. Recombinant plasmids extracted using Prime prep Plasmid DNA isolation Kit (Genetbio) then sequenced bidirectional using pUC-M13 universal primers with an ABI PRISM system (Bioneer company, Korea). Consensus sequences were compared with those deposited in the GenBank using BLAST program from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).
Results and Discussion: Results showed that 10.5% and17.1% of the total 970 samples were infected with the PVM and PVS, respectively. The highest abundance of infection was among Kerman and then Esfahan samples. PVS prevalence as greater than PVM; however, most of the samples had mixed infection. The PVM-inoculated test plants developed mottling and leaf deformation symptoms, whereas mosaic, leaf necrosis and leaf malformation were the characteristic symptoms induced by PVS. Mechanical inoculation of PVS on Lycopersicum escolentum resulted no symptoms but in PVM produced mosaic and yellowing. However, a number of symptomless samples were found to be infected by the viruses. The symptoms on test plants and the results of their ELISA confirmed the previous ELISA results. RT-PCR was amplified a 915 and 1118 bp DNA fragment from the ELISA positive samples of PVM and PVS, respectively. However rarely amplification was carried out in ELISA negative samples, indicated DAS-ELISA has low sensitivity to identify PVM infection in the samples. Blast search showed that 915 and 1118 bp fragments amplified by RT-PCR were corresponding to full length sequence of coat protein gene of PVM and PVS, respectively. The coat protein gene of PVM and PVS isolates analyzed in this study had 73.3-100 and 70-96 percent nucleotide identity with the corresponding sequences in GenBank, respectively.

Keywords

Potato virus M; Potato virus S; ELISA; PCR; identity

References

1- Adams M.J., and Antoniw J.F. 2004. The new plant virus family Flexiviridae and assessment of molecular criteria for species demarcation. Archive of Virology, 149:1045–1060.

2- Brunt A.A., Crabtree K., Dallwitz M.J., Gibbs A.J., Watson L., and Zurcher, E.J. 1996. `Plant Viruses Online: Descriptions and Lists from the VIDE Database.

3- Cavileer T.D., Clarke R.C., Corsini D.L., and Berger P.H. 1998. A new strain of potato carlavirus M. Plant Disease, 82:98-102.

4- Clark M.F., and Adams A.N. 1977. Characteristics of the microplate method of enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of plant viruses. Journal of General Virology, 34:475-483.

5- Cox B.A., and Jones R.A.C. 2010. Genetic variability in the coat protein gene of Potato virus S isolates and distinguishing its biologically distinct strains. Archive of Virology, 155:1163–1169.

6- Flatken S., Ungewickell V., Menzel W., and Maiss, E. 2008. Construction of an infectious full-length cDNA clone of potato virus M. Archive of Virology, 153:1385–1389.

7- Foster G.D., and Mills P.R. 1992. The 3´-nucleotide sequence of an ordinary strain of potato virus S. Virus Genes, 6:213–220.

8- Ge B.B., He Z., Jiang D.M., Zhang Z.X., Liu G.J., and Wang H.Q. 2012. Characterization and complete nucleotide sequence of potato virus M isolated from tomato in China. Acta Virology, 56(3):261-263.

9- Gramstat A., Courtpozanis A., and Rohde W. 1990. The 12-kDa protein of potato virus M displays properties of a nucleic acid-binding regulatory protein. FEBS Letters, 276:34-38.

10- Jafarpour B. 1989. Identification of Potato Virus S and Potato Virus X in Mashhad. P. 166. Proceedings of the 9th Iranian Plant Protection Congress.

11- Mahy B.W.J., and Van Regenmortel M.H.V. 2010. Desk Encyclopedia of Plant and Fungal Virology. Elsevier Academic Press, 4.

12- Martelli G.P., Adams M.J., Kreuze J.F., and Dolja, V.V. 2007. Family flexiviridae: a case study in virion and genome plasticity. Phytopathology, 45:73-100.

13- Matousek J., Schubert J., Dedic P., and Pta´cek, J. 2000. A broad variability of potato virus S (PVS) revealed by analysis of virus sequences amplified by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 22:29–37.

14- Matousek J., Schubert J., Pta´cek J., Kozlova´ P., and Dedic, P. 2005. Complete nucleotide sequence and molecular probing of potato virus S genome. Acta Virology, 49:195–205.

15- Naghibzade M., Jafarpour B., and Falahati rastegar M. 2008. Identification and Distribution of Potato Virus A in Razavi and Northern Provinces of Iran. P. 520. Proceedings of the 18th Iranian Plant Protection Congress.

16- Pourrahim R., Farzadfar Sh., Golnaraghi A.R. and Ahoonmanesh A. 2007. Incidence and distribution of important viral pathogens in some Iranian potato fields. Plant Disease, 91:609-615.

17- Rupasov V.V., Morozov S.YU., Kanyuka K.V., and Zavriev, S.K. 1989. Partial nucleotide sequence of potato virus M RNA shows similarities to potexviruses in gene arrangement and the encoded amino acid sequences. Journal of General Virology, 10:1861-1869.

18- Salari Kh., Massumi H., Heydarnejad J., Hosseini pour A. and Varsani, A. 2011. Analysis of Iranian Potato virus S isolates. Virus Genes, 43:281–288.

19- Schultz E.S., and Folsom D. 1923. Transmission, variation, and control of certain degeneration diseases of Irish potatoes. Journal of Agricultural Research, 25:43-147.

20- Senshu H., Yamaji Y., Minato N., Shiraishi T., and Maejima K. 2011. A dual strategy for the suppression of host antiviral silencing: two distinct suppressors for viral replication and viral movement encoded by potato virus M. Journal of Virology, 85:10269-10278.

21- Xu H., D'Aubin J., and Nie, J. 2010. Genomic variability in Potato virus M and the development of RT-PCR and RFLP procedures for the detection of this virus in seed potatoes. Virology journal, 7(1):25.